Page 1 of 2

Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:14 pm
by Ben Hunter
It's Kirk's second game in the champion's seat, and I'm sure he's very EXEATed at the prospect of seeing EXEAT come up for the third game in a row, but he shouldn't get a HEDARIM self.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:29 pm
by Mike Brailsford
Beating the Liverpool fan a must !

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:30 pm
by Charlie Reams
Ben Hunter wrote:It's Kirk's second game in the champion's seat, and I'm sure he's very EXEATed at the prospect of seeing EXEAT come up for the third game in a row, but he shouldn't get a HEDARIM self.
You're getting good at these. I grant you a 300% pay rise.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:31 pm
by Martin Gardner
I like Rachel's outfit.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:36 pm
by Martin Gardner
I noticed that Kirk always goes for four vowels, when you've got less useful consonants the like H and X, I always prefer three vowels. The next consonant would have been the C for INARCHES.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:39 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Kirk talking to himself - lej :mrgreen:

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:40 pm
by John Douglas
R4: CURATORS also for 8.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:42 pm
by Kai Laddiman
I bet Kirk would be telling Demi to pEE Off after the recurrence of the letters in the first round.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:48 pm
by John Douglas
R6: NUCLEAR or UNCLEAR also for 7.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:50 pm
by Martin Gardner
I bet he doesn't miss this.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:50 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Come on Kirk! Get it!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:51 pm
by Ben Wilson
Yes, this is the Bevatron we know and love! :D

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:51 pm
by Ben Hunter
Thought I was clever to have spotted GODETIAS straight away, now I feel daft.

Pretty sure Kirk is on a max game right now?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:54 pm
by Matt Morrison
R9: When Charlie proves you wrong, you've been REAMSED.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:55 pm
by Charlie Reams
Ben Hunter wrote:Thought I was clever to have spotted GODETIAS straight away, now I feel daft.

Pretty sure Kirk is on a max game right now?
This round amused me, I spotted the nine straight away and was pretty confident that Kirk would have it too. But he kept his head down and concentrated for almost the entire time, and his acting was so good that I started to worry he'd missed it. Then just after the time ended, he looked up to me in the audience and gave me his sexy wink, and I knew what was coming...

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:55 pm
by Ben Wilson
141 = R10 target
141 = Kirk's highest perfect game on apterous

It's a sign, I tells thee...

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:56 pm
by Martin Gardner
Jeff seemed to pronounce that LEZSPOOR or something?!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:57 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Much cooler way for Rd 10: (100+1-7)x(9-6)/2

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:01 pm
by Martin Gardner
It does seem to be a max game (up to round 11). It's a bit like watching a snooker 147 attempt on TV, I always get nervous!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:04 pm
by Ian Volante
My first viewing of Kirk. I'm feeling sorry for the poor sod who's playing against him.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:04 pm
by Kai Laddiman
NOOO!!! He's blown it! TOPAZES!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:05 pm
by Martin Gardner
Kai Laddiman wrote:NOOO!!! He's blown it! TOPAZES!
Don't you need a Z for that?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:05 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Martin Gardner wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:NOOO!!! He's blown it! TOPAZES!
Don't you need a Z for that?
Possibly.

By induction, I've proved that Q = Z.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:06 pm
by Ben Hunter
Oh god, if he gets the conundrum I think he's got a perfect game...

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:06 pm
by Martin Gardner
Kai Laddiman wrote:
Martin Gardner wrote:
Kai Laddiman wrote:NOOO!!! He's blown it! TOPAZES!
Don't you need a Z for that?
Possibly.
I think it was AEEOOPQST

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:07 pm
by Martin Gardner
YESSSSSSSS

Edit: Hard conundrum, shame it wasn't EXPANDING or something.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:07 pm
by Ben Hunter
Can anyone in the know confirm if this is a perfect game?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:08 pm
by Simon Myers
Yes, barring any glaring omissions in Jimdic, that was a max game.

EDIT: A bit of background info on that. As Charlie and I were sat in the studios we were aware that since Charlie nor DC had beaten Kirk on any rounds during the game, he might be on for a max. I checked all the selections with a2zwordfinder on my phone and it didn't offer up anything better, but it wasn't till we got back to the hotel (drinks & Box Pizza later) that I was able to run all the selections through CountMax on my laptop. I remember Charlie jumping up and punching the air when I fed in the last selection (the PESETA round actually - my sheets of paper were a mess) and the max came up as a 6. He seemed more excited about it than Kirk did actually.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:09 pm
by Martin Gardner
Ben Hunter wrote:Can anyone in the know confirm if this is a perfect game?
I suppose CountMax isn't perfect, so there's always a chance that someone will find a word that we don't know about yet, but we think so, yes!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:10 pm
by tomrowell
that. was. awesome.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:10 pm
by Charlie Reams
So there you have it. The max game. And it only took 27 years. Fucking beautiful.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:11 pm
by Paul Howe
Simon Myers wrote:Yes, barring any glaring omissions in Jimdic, that was a max game.
Awesome.

I'm going to refrain from posting how I got on against Kirk today as well :?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:11 pm
by Jimmy Gough
That was quite good, well done.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:12 pm
by Ben Hunter
Charlie Reams wrote:So there you have it. The max game. And it only took 27 years. Fucking beautiful.
I shed a tear.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:12 pm
by Charlie Reams
As soon as we got back to the hotel that evening, Sid ran all the rounds through his solver to confirm the max. When the results for Round 13 came up, I jumped into the air and shouted quite a lot. Apologies to anyone in adjacent rooms.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:13 pm
by PhillT
Took 27 years for a max game, and I got 27 points against Kirk... that's got to be a sign =P

-Phill.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:13 pm
by Ben Wilson
Simply amazing. Here's hoping it ain't the only one!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:14 pm
by Jojo Apollo
:lol: Great stuff Kirk, a MAX game. :D

Keep up the good work.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:15 pm
by Martin Gardner
Paul Howe wrote:
Simon Myers wrote:Yes, barring any glaring omissions in Jimdic, that was a max game.
Awesome.

I'm going to refrain from posting how I got on against Kirk today as well :?
In fairness towards the end I stopped playing against him and just admired his work!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:16 pm
by Kai Laddiman
Martin Gardner wrote:
Paul Howe wrote:
Simon Myers wrote:Yes, barring any glaring omissions in Jimdic, that was a max game.
Awesome.

I'm going to refrain from posting how I got on against Kirk today as well :?
In fairness towards the end I stopped playing against him and just admired his work!
I didn't bother in the first place. :shock: :o :shock: :o :!: :idea: ;) :D

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:21 pm
by Junaid Mubeen
Man, I wish I was in the studio to witness that. Absolutely stunning. A tough conundrum as well. I hope this gets the mention it deserves on tomorrow's show. It is rare for something to be hyped up so much and live up to it, but boy oh boy that was special!

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:32 pm
by Lesley Jeavons
Well done Kirk! :D

(Shame we only had Ben for one show though, you genius! He's quite my type. :oops: )

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:03 pm
by Oliver Garner
That was amazing although I was pleased with 78 against Apterous Rex though

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:17 pm
by Matt Coates
Amazing Kirk, well done

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:26 pm
by DaveC
Congratulations Kirk on your 15/15. A fantastic achievement.

I'm sure I recall some of the big guns of the game saying it would never come.... they miskirkulated obviously.

Bring on tomorrow.

Dave C

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:30 pm
by Jojo Apollo
WOW! Is this really the first ever MAX game on the TV show??? :o

Even more kudos to Kirk if it is then.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:43 pm
by Martin Gardner
Jojo Apollo wrote:WOW! Is this really the first ever MAX game on the TV show??? :o

Even more kudos to Kirk if it is then.
For 15 rounds, almost certainly. For 9 rounds or even 15 we don't have nearly enough data. There's a Tim Morrissey game on the Countdown Wiki where gets 73 out of 74 with BECLOUD listed as a DC beater. But unless we find the dictionary that they used in Series 33, we will never know if it was allowed back then! This waas 13 years ago after all.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:44 pm
by Martin Gardner
DaveC wrote:Congratulations Kirk on your 15/15. A fantastic achievement.

I'm sure I recall some of the big guns of the game saying it would never come.... they miskirkulated obviously.

Bring on tomorrow.

Dave C
I don't think he scored in round 14 yesterday, so right now he's got 16 maxes in a row. That's one more than Paul Gallen did in the CofC semi and final.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:51 pm
by Allan Harmer
Great max game Kirk - Truly awesome and sheer class.

Well done mate.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:54 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Brilliant. I think I'm almost enjoying this more than CoC XIII. Well done Kirk. Two records in three games - not bad going.

I was gobsmacked when Ben had "courters" disallowed. What are people who go out courting called then? Dylan Thomas uses it in the first sentence of Under Milk Wood, for heaven's sake - one of the most famous opening lines in 20th century literature. God, Oxford are crap.

On a brighter note, I'm pretty sure from the look on Rachel's face when she was drawing the letters for the DOGMATISE round that she was expecting an R for ORGASMED.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:57 pm
by Martin Gardner
Phil Reynolds wrote:Brilliant. I think I'm almost enjoying this more than CoC XIII. Well done Kirk. Two records in three games - not bad going.

I was gobsmacked when Ben had "courters" disallowed. What are people who go out courting called then? Dylan Thomas uses it in the first sentence of Under Milk Wood, for heaven's sake - one of the most famous opening lines in 20th century literature. God, Oxford are crap.

On a brighter note, I'm pretty sure from the look on Rachel's face when she was drawing the letters for the DOGMATISE round that she was expecting an R for ORGASMED.
Yeah I thought COURTERS was very very probable as well. Just complete the eights, nobody's mentioned CREATORS yet, have they?

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:09 pm
by Steve Durney
Phil Reynolds wrote:Brilliant. I think I'm almost enjoying this more than CoC XIII. Well done Kirk. Two records in three games - not bad going.

I was gobsmacked when Ben had "courters" disallowed. What are people who go out courting called then? Dylan Thomas uses it in the first sentence of Under Milk Wood, for heaven's sake - one of the most famous opening lines in 20th century literature. God, Oxford are crap.

On a brighter note, I'm pretty sure from the look on Rachel's face when she was drawing the letters for the DOGMATISE round that she was expecting an R for ORGASMED.
I had COURTERS too and didn't think there'd be any problem with that.

Was also waiting for the R in the DOGMATISE round! :D

Amazing game Kirk.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:16 pm
by Julie T
Charlie Reams wrote:So there you have it. The max game. And it only took 27 years. Fucking beautiful.
Absolutely bloody marvellous, Kirk! I'm still grinning like a Cheshire cat! :mrgreen:

Can I have your child while I still have time, Kirk?
Turkey baster method obviously, in case this conjures up horrific images! LOL! :lol:

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:17 pm
by Jon Corby
Simon Myers wrote:I remember Charlie jumping up and punching the air when I fed in the last selection (the PESETA round actually - my sheets of paper were a mess) and the max came up as a 6. He seemed more excited about it than Kirk did actually.
Maybe Kirk was feeling a little deflated about losing either Thursday's or Friday's show which would have been filmed before this moment took place?

Congratulations on the max game Kirky! :D See, now NAIANT, and giving the definition, that was clever ;)

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:31 pm
by JimBentley
Brilliant stuff, Kirk. When you didn't get the conundrum within five seconds and started writing stuff down, I feared you were going to fall at the final hurdle, but I should've known better than to doubt the power of the Kirkulator. Fearsome.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:32 pm
by Lesley Jeavons
Julie T wrote:Can I have your child while I still have time, Kirk?
Turkey baster method obviously, in case this conjures up horrific images! LOL! :lol:
:lol: The turkey baster method is surely less visually pleasing. :o ;) I mean, I've never googled for porn, but I guess there's more of a market for 'traditional' sex than basting... :mrgreen:

BTW and off topic, what's your avatar from? I saw it in a shop window and recognised it as being yours.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:39 pm
by Julie T
Lesley Jeavons wrote:
Julie T wrote:Can I have your child while I still have time, Kirk?
Turkey baster method obviously, in case this conjures up horrific images! LOL! :lol:
:lol: The turkey baster method is surely less visually pleasing. :o ;) I mean, I've never googled for porn, but I guess there's more of a market for 'traditional' sex than basting... :mrgreen:

BTW and off topic, what's your avatar from? I saw it in a shop window and recognised it as being yours.
I meant that Kirk has met me at CoLin, so knows that I'm a lot older than him, etc, so that he's unlikely to desire the traditional method! :(

The avatar is a motivational poster from WW2:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7869458.stm

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:46 pm
by Lesley Jeavons
Julie T wrote:I meant that Kirk has met me at CoLin, so knows that I'm a lot older than him, etc, so that he's unlikely to desire the traditional method! :(

The avatar is a motivational poster from WW2:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7869458.stm
Ah I see, and I hope you're not too disappointed and can live with that. ;)

Thanks for the link - interesting. :) I think your avatar could be having an affect on Charlie's attitude these days too. ;)

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:53 pm
by Michael Wallace
Posting in a legendary thread.

Re: Spoilers for Wed 04/03/2009

Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:06 pm
by Richard Priest
Great stuff Kirk.Well done.