Would anyone else have been tempted by the invalid ‘opacities’ in Round 1? https://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_8210
R9 alt: (100+5*6-7)*(9-1)=984
R14 alt: (50*3+10/2)*5=755
Spoilers for Friday 16th February 2024 (Series 89, Heat 34)
Moderator: James Robinson
Spoilers for Friday 16th February 2024 (Series 89, Heat 34)
Series 78 Runner-up
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2019 6:05 am
Re: Spoilers for Friday 16th February 2024 (Series 89, Heat 34)
r9 alt: 6*((9*7)+1+100)=984
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13317
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Friday 16th February 2024 (Series 89, Heat 34)
I thought about opacities after Susie got OPACITES. I think it would be better if she was more explicit about the obvious extensions being invalid in general. Maybe she didn't notice this but quite often the viewer is left thinking "Can't we add an S?"Philip A wrote: ↑Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:53 pm Would anyone else have been tempted by the invalid ‘opacities’ in Round 1? https://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_8210
R9 alt: (100+5*6-7)*(9-1)=984
R14 alt: (50*3+10/2)*5=755