In my experience women are no better or worse than men.
Men are more likely to speed however
I have a problem with octogenarians and older drivers
They should only be allowed to drive in daylight
Moderator: Jon O'Neill
In my experience women are no better or worse than men.
Heh well quite. But nothing is as pervasive as anecdotal evidence.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
Is this an example of prejudicial affirmation the kids of today talk about?Mark Deeks wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 9:42 pmHeh well quite. But nothing is as pervasive as anecdotal evidence.
Are you suggesting you can't be Trans and Gay?Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 6:45 pm Being trans is not really related to being gay, except in a superficial sense, and the concept of an LGBT (plus some extra letters maybe) "community" is somewhat bizarre.
No.Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:39 pmAre you suggesting you can't be Trans and Gay?Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 6:45 pm Being trans is not really related to being gay, except in a superficial sense, and the concept of an LGBT (plus some extra letters maybe) "community" is somewhat bizarre.
I basically feel this way too, except I realise I don't know very much about this so it's very possible I'm missing something that would change my mind. At the very least I think it can be unhelpful both to trans people and to non-heterosexual people to lump the T in with the other three letters that specifically refer to sexuality.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 6:45 pm Being trans is not really related to being gay, except in a superficial sense, and the concept of an LGBT (plus some extra letters maybe) "community" is somewhat bizarre.
Mark Deeks wrote:Callum Todd looks like a young Ted Bundy.
Totally agree, I've been saying this for ages, the T and the rest of the letters need to be dropped. The Trans lobby have been taking advantage of the LGB situation for their own benefit alone!Callum Todd wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 9:49 pmI basically feel this way too, except I realise I don't know very much about this so it's very possible I'm missing something that would change my mind. At the very least I think it can be unhelpful both to trans people and to non-heterosexual people to lump the T in with the other three letters that specifically refer to sexuality.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 6:45 pm Being trans is not really related to being gay, except in a superficial sense, and the concept of an LGBT (plus some extra letters maybe) "community" is somewhat bizarre.
Just to clarify, I do understand the wider community of the "rainbow flag(s)" you refer to, which includes all sorts of other things. The confusion I have is why, of all the dozen+ letters that form up that group, the T is more readily grouped together with LGB (the three that have more intuitive shared characteristics). As Marc alluded to above, even something like LGBAQ+ would seem to make more sense than LGBTQ+.Ian Volante wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 6:14 pm You all (recent commenters) seem to be putting the cart before the horse. Persons under the rainbow flag(s) all deviate from societal norms of fitting with binary gender roles, which is much wider than who/what someone is attracted to. Anyone in these groups has endured, and continue to endure, attacks of various kinds, and only by banding together have they managed to advance their cause as far as has happened in the last fifty years or so.
Callum Todd wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 9:49 pm I realise I don't know very much about this so it's very possible I'm missing something that would change my mind.
Mark Deeks wrote:Callum Todd looks like a young Ted Bundy.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
Theresa May, possibly but BJ was a disaster.Rhys Benjamin wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:07 pm We would be better off as a country if we had kept Boris Johnson as PM.
I suspect it's habit to an extent; these letters are the first listed because they're the first recognised, most common or most obvious characteristics. It would probably be much easier to have an overarching term that isn't derived from an insult (or, like queer for example), and is accepted by most people under the banner. There's always going to be someone that feels the need to set themselves apart though, which I think will mean we'll continue to evolve more letters as well as moving towards umbrella terms.Callum Todd wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 12:43 pmJust to clarify, I do understand the wider community of the "rainbow flag(s)" you refer to, which includes all sorts of other things. The confusion I have is why, of all the dozen+ letters that form up that group, the T is more readily grouped together with LGB (the three that have more intuitive shared characteristics). As Marc alluded to above, even something like LGBAQ+ would seem to make more sense than LGBTQ+.Ian Volante wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 6:14 pm You all (recent commenters) seem to be putting the cart before the horse. Persons under the rainbow flag(s) all deviate from societal norms of fitting with binary gender roles, which is much wider than who/what someone is attracted to. Anyone in these groups has endured, and continue to endure, attacks of various kinds, and only by banding together have they managed to advance their cause as far as has happened in the last fifty years or so.
And again:
Callum Todd wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 9:49 pm I realise I don't know very much about this so it's very possible I'm missing something that would change my mind.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
Yes it's bold.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 2:14 pm That's quite a claim, considering they want to do so in the relatively near future. Well September 2026 at the earliest.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
If you see Sid, tell him.
And that itself is a problem. Essential services like this should not be privatised.
You will have to speak up, they can't hear you from back the 1980s .Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 3:33 pmAnd that itself is a problem. Essential services like this should not be privatised.
You seem to parrot this as though you're being paid to do so. Have you not yet thought of a more original nickname for him than the tabloids have?Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 3:59 pm
But seriously, I could never understand how Tony B Liar did not try and reverse the privatised industries back to being nationalised
Fwiw, I came up with his anagram before the tabloids but probably not firstElliott Mellor wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 5:38 pmYou seem to parrot this as though you're being paid to do so. Have you not yet thought of a more original nickname for him than the tabloids have?Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 3:59 pm
But seriously, I could never understand how Tony B Liar did not try and reverse the privatised industries back to being nationalised
How about we talk about politics without pretending to be in a playground at the same time?Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 6:02 pmFwiw, I came up with his anagram before the tabloids but probably not firstElliott Mellor wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 5:38 pmYou seem to parrot this as though you're being paid to do so. Have you not yet thought of a more original nickname for him than the tabloids have?Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 3:59 pm
But seriously, I could never understand how Tony B Liar did not try and reverse the privatised industries back to being nationalised
There's a good one for Margaret Thatcher too
Baroness Thatcher The Iron Lady becomes
That sad Tony Blair Cheers her on
But if you want another nickname how about the father of Tory lite or the killer of socialist Labour
Grown up talk is for the politics thread.Ian Volante wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:47 pmHow about we talk about politics without pretending to be in a playground at the same time?Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 6:02 pmFwiw, I came up with his anagram before the tabloids but probably not firstElliott Mellor wrote: ↑Wed Jan 24, 2024 5:38 pm
You seem to parrot this as though you're being paid to do so. Have you not yet thought of a more original nickname for him than the tabloids have?
There's a good one for Margaret Thatcher too
Baroness Thatcher The Iron Lady becomes
That sad Tony Blair Cheers her on
But if you want another nickname how about the father of Tory lite or the killer of socialist Labour
You can apply this reductive logic to all life, including humans. Obviously not just about manipulating humans to get food, but more generally manipulating the world (including other life in the world) to be able to get food, survive and reproduce.Mark James wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:04 pm Cats and dogs are the same. People think cats are cold and heartless and dogs show love. Bullshit. They've both learned to manipulate humans to get food.
This is a good one. I find it odd when people paint dogs as being "they love you unconditionally and will protect you at all costs". If you didn't feed them, they wouldn't love you. If an intruder brought dog treats with them, I reckon there'd be a fair percentage of dogs that would be easily bribed. It's true that a large dog will do more damage than a cat if they attacked an intruder (and there are breeds that would instinctively), but it's nowhere near the binary "dogs will love and protect you at all costs, cats just want food" that people think it is.Mark James wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:04 pm Cats and dogs are the same. People think cats are cold and heartless and dogs show love. Bullshit. They've both learned to manipulate humans to get food.
The main difference is cats have more opportunity to be disloyal and go where the best food is.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:39 pmThis is a good one. I find it odd when people paint dogs as being "they love you unconditionally and will protect you at all costs". If you didn't feed them, they wouldn't love you. If an intruder brought dog treats with them, I reckon there'd be a fair percentage of dogs that would be easily bribed. It's true that a large dog will do more damage than a cat if they attacked an intruder (and there are breeds that would instinctively), but it's nowhere near the binary "dogs will love and protect you at all costs, cats just want food" that people think it is.Mark James wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:04 pm Cats and dogs are the same. People think cats are cold and heartless and dogs show love. Bullshit. They've both learned to manipulate humans to get food.
I debunked it. Unless you accept the conclusion that all life is the same.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:39 pmThis is a good one.Mark James wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:04 pm Cats and dogs are the same. People think cats are cold and heartless and dogs show love. Bullshit. They've both learned to manipulate humans to get food.
No you haven't.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:38 pmI debunked it.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:39 pmThis is a good one.Mark James wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:04 pm Cats and dogs are the same. People think cats are cold and heartless and dogs show love. Bullshit. They've both learned to manipulate humans to get food.
Yes, I suppose you can.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:38 pmYou can apply this reductive logic to all life, including humans. Obviously not just about manipulating humans to get food, but more generally manipulating the world (including other life in the world) to be able to get food, survive and reproduce.Mark James wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:04 pm Cats and dogs are the same. People think cats are cold and heartless and dogs show love. Bullshit. They've both learned to manipulate humans to get food.
I remember when I was little having to stay in the car with a can of tizer and a bag of crisp whilst my dad had a drink in the oubMatt Rutherford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 6:07 pm If you are with kids at a football match (be it your own or others) and you drink alcohol in any quantity, that is irresponsible and shitty.
In addition, pubs should not serve booze to any group of people with kids regardless of how much. Be a proper parent and leave the booze for fucks sake
(Posted at Preston station having just been on a train from Blackburn with boozed-up knobheads, hence my slight annoyance)
The other thing is that while you can draw this conclusion, it doesn't mean all life (including humans) is consciously acting in this way. When e.g. someone shows love towards their children, then you can take a step back and say this is just a way to make sure their genes survive into the future rather than a genuine act of love.Mark James wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:00 amYes, I suppose you can.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 7:38 pmYou can apply this reductive logic to all life, including humans. Obviously not just about manipulating humans to get food, but more generally manipulating the world (including other life in the world) to be able to get food, survive and reproduce.Mark James wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:04 pm Cats and dogs are the same. People think cats are cold and heartless and dogs show love. Bullshit. They've both learned to manipulate humans to get food.
Remember I added "Unless you accept the conclusion that all life is the same."Mark James wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 2:59 amNo you haven't.
You didn't, you just posted a bunch of tangential philosophy that didn't really address the point at all. If anything, you proved the point further.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:38 pmI debunked it. Unless you accept the conclusion that all life is the same.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:39 pmThis is a good one.Mark James wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:04 pm Cats and dogs are the same. People think cats are cold and heartless and dogs show love. Bullshit. They've both learned to manipulate humans to get food.
OK, so humans and fungus are the same.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:05 amYou didn't, you just posted a bunch of tangential philosophy that didn't really address the point at all. If anything, you proved the point further.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:38 pmI debunked it. Unless you accept the conclusion that all life is the same.
I'm not sure how anything you're saying is really related to the original point that cats and dogs are equally as food oriented/loyal.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:54 pmOK, so humans and fungus are the same.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:05 amYou didn't, you just posted a bunch of tangential philosophy that didn't really address the point at all. If anything, you proved the point further.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:38 pm
I debunked it. Unless you accept the conclusion that all life is the same.
That wasn't the original point. It was that they are the same. And essentially that any perceived differences are "cosmetic" and are just different strategies to achieve the same aim.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 2:35 pmI'm not sure how anything you're saying is really related to the original point that cats and dogs are equally as food oriented/loyal.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 1:54 pmOK, so humans and fungus are the same.Elliott Mellor wrote: ↑Sun Feb 11, 2024 10:05 am
You didn't, you just posted a bunch of tangential philosophy that didn't really address the point at all. If anything, you proved the point further.
I'll get over it.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
After getting humiliated at the only time I went to one when I was 18 (but looked 12) I have no desire to ever going back.Mark Deeks wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 1:15 am Probably not that unpopular within the unrepresentative population sample that is the C4C community, but in the eider world, it seems to be: I, a straight and reasonably normally libidoed man even with the sertraline, have absolutely no desire to go to a strip club
Of course you can. Leering is eternal. It's not the leering that is illogical. It's the very being there. You're paying for what, exactly? Like Other Mark says.Marc Meakin wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 5:18 am Plus I can't fathom a group of men wanting to leeri at naked women in the 21st Century
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
Maybe we can refer to Marc James as MJ.
Well you could carry poo bags and pick the shit up tooGavin Chipper wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 6:31 pm People walking their dogs should have poo bags on them anyway and are part of the wider dog walking community, so if they see some dog poo that didn't come from their own dog, they should pick it up anyway and not be all "Well it's nothing to do with me" about it. Especially on that bridge on my run route that always has fucking dog shit on it.