Lexplorer

Official forum of apterous.org, the website which allows you to play against other people over the Internet.
Post Reply
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Lexplorer

Post by Charlie Reams »

At last, you can explore the dictionary through one shiny unified interface, with the Apterous Lexplorer! It's pretty cool! It's pretty fast! It's pretty untested and probably has bugs so please report them here! Also other feedback is appreciated.
Simon Myers
Enthusiast
Posts: 295
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 12:41 am
Location: Stamford, Connecticut

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Simon Myers »

Very nice.

Perhaps some way of noting when the word was a max (when found by a player) or a darren max (when found by a player or noted by DC) would be interesting.

I see that non-words (e.g. WANKIEST^) are displayed in the word search in the same way as real words. Should this be the case?
As an aside, I wonder what the top 5 most disallowed non-words are.

A final thought - should the identity prefixes/suffixes be suppressed? What I mean by that is if you search for, say, NOTARISE, you get NOTARISE as both a prefix and suffix. While this is technically true, it's not very useful or interesting. I'd argue that it should still appear in the anagrams section, just to leave no doubt as to whether a word is actually in the dictionary (cf WANKIEST^ example above).
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Charlie Reams »

Simon Myers wrote:Perhaps some way of noting when the word was a max (when found by a player) or a darren max (when found by a player or noted by DC) would be interesting.
Nice idea.
I see that non-words (e.g. WANKIEST^) are displayed in the word search in the same way as real words. Should this be the case?
Probably not.
As an aside, I wonder what the top 5 most disallowed non-words are.
Here's a top 10. This would make a good page for the site.
  • OUTLAID [37]
  • LEGATED [35]
  • PATTIE [34]
  • GAUZES [26]
  • AUDIOS [25]
  • GAITED [25]
  • COMPENSE [23]
  • MOANIEST [22]
  • OUTLIES [22]
  • WASPIER [22]
A final thought - should the identity prefixes/suffixes be suppressed? What I mean by that is if you search for, say, NOTARISE, you get NOTARISE as both a prefix and suffix. While this is technically true, it's not very useful or interesting. I'd argue that it should still appear in the anagrams section, just to leave no doubt as to whether a word is actually in the dictionary (cf WANKIEST^ example above).
I wondered about that. The thing is, you might easily have only the prefix or suffix tabs open, and then you wouldn't know whether it was actually a word. Maybe there should just be something at the top of the page saying "X is a word" or "X is not a word", which would solve the problem.
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Conor »

Very neat. It's a testament to my immaturity (or suppressed urges, if you want to be mean) that my virgin Lexploring was "penis".
User avatar
Ben Wilson
Legend
Posts: 4546
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
Location: North Hykeham

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Ben Wilson »

My first was 'sorry' and my second was 'Kai'.

But on another note, my third was KAIKAWAKA^- an absolute bitch of a goatundrum I had once during a csw game (and nearly got too, only transposing two letters)- could a csw version be added or is it too much effort for not enough demand, especially given I'm the only csw player and I haven't done a csw game in ages?
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Matt Morrison »

Charlie Reams wrote:The thing is, you might easily have only the prefix or suffix tabs open, and then you wouldn't know whether it was actually a word. Maybe there should just be something at the top of the page saying "X is a word" or "X is not a word", which would solve the problem.
The universal green tick / red cross would work a treat. Great stuff Charlie.
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Lexplorer

Post by JimBentley »

I just played a game in which I inadvisedly offered the non-word BUMHOLE (I didn't really think it would be in, but I'd never have forgiven myself if I'd stuck with a safe 6). Naturally, my first thought was "I wonder if anyone else has offered BUMHOLE before?" and now thanks to the power of Lexplorer, I am happy to know that I was the first.

What I'm saying, I suppose, is that Lexplorer is a really awesome thing. Thanks Charlie!
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Charlie Reams »

It's also (fairly) painless for me to add new sections, so if there's other stuff will people think might be interesting then I'm happy to add that.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Kai Laddiman »

I think it would be handy if you had links to all of these on the homepage (eg. Podcasts, Lexplorer).
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Charlie Reams »

Kai Laddiman wrote:I think it would be handy if you had links to all of these on the homepage (eg. Podcasts, Lexplorer).
The podcasts aren't really anything to do with apterous but I host them there because it's convenient. The Lexplorer will obviously get a link, but not til it's been tested properly.
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Howard Somerset »

Looks very good. An excellent addition.
Conor wrote:Very neat. It's a testament to my immaturity (or suppressed urges, if you want to be mean) that my virgin Lexploring was "penis".
And as a testament to my senility (or ... er, what were those urges I've completely forgotten about?), my first attempt was a word which was far more inappropriate that Conor's

I wonder if Charlie's got a log of all use made of the facility. :oops:
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Charlie Reams »

Howard Somerset wrote:I wonder if Charlie's got a log of all use made of the facility. :oops:
I thought about it, for some kind of "other people are searching for..." thing, but I'll warn you in advance if I start logging things like that.
User avatar
Ian Volante
Postmaster General
Posts: 3967
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Ian Volante »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Howard Somerset wrote:I wonder if Charlie's got a log of all use made of the facility. :oops:
I thought about it, for some kind of "other people are searching for..." thing, but I'll warn you in advance if I start logging things like that.
I hope not, or my search for PISSFLAPS will be quite early in my list.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Paul Howe »

Sweet.
User avatar
Adam Dexter
Enthusiast
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Kidderminster

Re: Lexplorer

Post by Adam Dexter »

Erm one possible problem I have found is that it comes up with words from Daily Duels... I'm not sure if it would come up with that day's duels, and I know that it's unlikely that you'll search a word that happens to be from today, but I think it may jeopardise the use of Lexplorer ever so slightly!
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon :)
Post Reply