Spoilers for Wednesday 20th April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
Thomas Carey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1480
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:17 pm
Location: North-West of Bradford
Contact:

Spoilers for Wednesday 20th April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Post by Thomas Carey »

lmao
cheers maus
samir pilica
Acolyte
Posts: 199
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:30 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 20 April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Post by samir pilica »

Not taking anything away from Matt's brilliance, but these one-sided matches are rather painful to watch. Wonder if anyone at the auditions ever mentions Apterous or similar for practice purposes?
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 20 April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Surprised Matt only saw 6 in the final letters. Had he got 7 though I wouldn't have been surprised to see a target of something like 200 in the numbers.
User avatar
Callum Todd
Series 69 Champion
Posts: 1126
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:38 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 20 April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Post by Callum Todd »

I've not seen any episodes but looking at the wiki it seems Matts first opponent must have been pretty good to score 77 against him given his next 3 opponents have only scored against him in 4 rounds out of 45.

What's the record for aggregate points conceded over an octorun?
Mark Deeks wrote:Callum Todd looks like a young Ted Bundy.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 20 April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Matt's first opponent even led after 12 rounds but conceded 38 in the final 3 to lose by 36. He was very good and looked like octoing until Matt came along.

A few octochamps have had quite a few near walkovers - Elliott Mellor being one I think.
Fiona T
Kiloposter
Posts: 1461
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:54 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 20 April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Post by Fiona T »

Gavin Chipper wrote: Wed Apr 20, 2022 2:06 pm Matt's first opponent even led after 12 rounds but conceded 38 in the final 3 to lose by 36. He was very good and looked like octoing until Matt came along.

A few octochamps have had quite a few near walkovers - Elliott Mellor being one I think.
These players all seem like lovely people, but would in all probability lose badly against most average opponents, so in some ways it's good that better opponents who could reasonably expect a teapot aren't facing Matt! I'm bewildered at how they pass the audition (as someone who, as a reasonably competent armchair player, failed mine!) unless they really do suffer disproportionately from studio pressure.
Toby McDonald
Kiloposter
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 4:23 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 20 April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Post by Toby McDonald »

SILICONE in R1
MAGESHIP in R8
OVISACS in R11

R6 LNAFP: (9*8+1)*2 = 146
David Williams
Kiloposter
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 20 April 2022 (Series 85, Prelim 78)

Post by David Williams »

I'm sure there must be plenty of people like me who couldn't live with Matt, but got a seven in round 13 and would have whitewashed the challenger. Low scores aren't particularly related to whether the winner is faultless, it's much more to do with the ability of the loser. If you get a maximum in any round you score points no matter how good your opponent is. If you score zero, or could have scored zero, you didn't get a single maximum all game.
Post Reply