Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 1:50 pm
by Thomas Carey
stu

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 5:31 pm
by Philip A
Stu has a wicked sense of humour.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:52 pm
by L'oisleatch McGraw
Stu is playing a blinder, and I'd say the response to his demeanour and personality has probably been v. positive.
Though, on the negative side, he is fast earning a reputation as a crusher of children's hopes and dreams! :o :oops: :lol: :twisted:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2021 12:39 pm
by Howie Myers
r2 alt: OUTGAIN
r3 alt: (6+1)*(50+2)+10= 374
r6 alt: ((7+(8*9)*10)+4 = 794

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2021 11:34 pm
by Toby McDonald
DESCRIER in R4
RHATANIES in R11

R14 Alt.: (9*6-4)*(6+2)+1 = 401

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:28 pm
by Philip Wilson
Scareder in R4 - if scared is one syllable as it's not specified?

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2021 10:56 pm
by Philip A
Philip Wilson wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:28 pm Scareder in R4 - if scared is one syllable as it's not specified?
Not valid. There is a dubious exemption to the mono-syllable adjective rule to entries ending in -ED, like PAINED, BORED, HORNED, DAMNED among others. I think for an adjective with one syllable ending with -ED, the -EDER and -EDEST entries would have to be specified. DEADEST has been allowed multiple times but ends in -AD rather than -ED.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2021 11:31 pm
by Philip Wilson
Philip A wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 10:56 pm
Philip Wilson wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:28 pm Scareder in R4 - if scared is one syllable as it's not specified?
Not valid. There is a dubious exemption to the mono-syllable adjective rule to entries ending in -ED, like PAINED, BORED, HORNED, DAMNED among others. I think for an adjective with one syllable ending with -ED, the -EDER and -EDEST entries would have to be specified. DEADEST has been allowed multiple times but ends in -AD rather than -ED.
Ah. Thanks for clarifying. I do agree with the exemption in the adjectives you list which have an N before the ED, they do sound wrong with ER added. But in the case of BORED, (and SCARED), the R in that position instead makes them sound less clumsy, at least to me. If that's the rule though!

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:59 am
by Gavin Chipper
Not sure it's a rule. Apterous tends to disallow -EDER and -EDEST words but I've not ever seen any evidence from the show as far as I'm aware.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2021 10:11 am
by Philip A
Gavin Chipper wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:59 am Not sure it's a rule. Apterous tends to disallow -EDER and -EDEST words but I've not ever seen any evidence from the show as far as I'm aware.
Hence “dubious”. You’ve also good GOOD which is BETTER and BEST rather than gooder x and goodest x, and NTH is an adjective but nther x and nthest x (used to be Apto valid) are illogical too.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:07 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Philip A wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 10:11 am
Gavin Chipper wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:59 am Not sure it's a rule. Apterous tends to disallow -EDER and -EDEST words but I've not ever seen any evidence from the show as far as I'm aware.
Hence “dubious”. You’ve also good GOOD which is BETTER and BEST rather than gooder x and goodest x, and NTH is an adjective but nther x and nthest x (used to be Apto valid) are illogical too.
Good explicitly states that the comparative is better so gooder doesn't require any subjectivity to disallow.
Nther, like feinter (which I think gets disallowed now) don't actually make any sense, whereas benter, paineder and mainer all actually mean something.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:43 pm
by Philip A
Jon O'Neill wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:07 pm
Philip A wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 10:11 am
Gavin Chipper wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:59 am Not sure it's a rule. Apterous tends to disallow -EDER and -EDEST words but I've not ever seen any evidence from the show as far as I'm aware.
Hence “dubious”. You’ve also good GOOD which is BETTER and BEST rather than gooder x and goodest x, and NTH is an adjective but nther x and nthest x (used to be Apto valid) are illogical too.
Good explicitly states that the comparative is better so gooder doesn't require any subjectivity to disallow.
Nther, like feinter (which I think gets disallowed now) don't actually make any sense, whereas benter, paineder and mainer all actually mean something.
Paineder x is a non sequitur.

https://www.apterous.org/ticket_view.ph ... 143#p46809

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 25th November 2021 (Series 84, Prelim 108)

Posted: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:58 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Philip A wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:43 pm
Jon O'Neill wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 12:07 pm
Philip A wrote: Thu Dec 23, 2021 10:11 am

Hence “dubious”. You’ve also good GOOD which is BETTER and BEST rather than gooder x and goodest x, and NTH is an adjective but nther x and nthest x (used to be Apto valid) are illogical too.
Good explicitly states that the comparative is better so gooder doesn't require any subjectivity to disallow.
Nther, like feinter (which I think gets disallowed now) don't actually make any sense, whereas benter, paineder and mainer all actually mean something.
Paineder x is a non sequitur.

https://www.apterous.org/ticket_view.ph ... 143#p46809
A pained expression crossed my face reading this, and a paineder one crossed my face having to reply.