c4countdown

In France, a player declared 2 when he didn't type his word fast enough into the computer. A bit harsh that. In France only the person with the longest word gets to declare, so I don't know what the word was.

I often declare 2.

I often declare that I am aged 2

How about "j'ai une lettre"?

The below is a 9min extract from a late night talk show on France 2 called "On n'est pas couché", presented here by Laurent Ruquier (left) and Jean-Luc Lemoine (doing the talking). The segment is an open mic session inviting questions from the public on how different programs are made.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=LmS8z-KPGVM

A question for Chiffres & Lettres comes in at 5'10 with an elderly gentleman and his strong southern accent. He's asking for some elaboration on the revamp from autumn 2005. It's not taken seriously.

The presenters explain how a hardcore DJ was hired to remix the music used in the rounds to give it a proper techno effect. The lady player cannot concentrate in her game and therefore ends up declaring just one.

--

In France only the person with the longest word gets to declare, so I don't know what the word was.

Le?

Longer of two, longest of three


Jeff

Dinos Sfyris wrote:I often declare that I am aged 2

But only to Corby?

Jeff Clayton wrote:The presenters explain how a hardcore DJ was hired to remix the music used in the rounds to give it a proper techno effect. The lady player cannot concentrate in her game and therefore ends up declaring just one.

Gyles Brandreth: I got FRANC for 5 and I wasn't even trying.

It seems quite common for new contestants to have difficulty with the interface, particularly for the numbers game. Does nobody bother to explain it to them?

Type it? I thought they wrote it!

Jason Larsen wrote:Type it? I thought they wrote it!

They're a bit more high tech in France, Jason!
I prefer the low tech Countdown method.

I figured that!

I don't know why, though.

In the upcoming series of British Countdown though, the new set looks a lot more futuristic. Although the only thing different about the new set than the old set that hasn't been mentioned already is the "revolver" that Rachel mentioned in her interview on ITV's morning show.

Other than that, it's still the same!

Jason Larsen wrote:I figured that!

I don't know why, though.

In the upcoming series of British Countdown though, the new set looks a lot more futuristic. Although the only thing different about the new set than the old set that hasn't been mentioned already is the "revolver" that Rachel mentioned in her interview on ITV's morning show.

Other than that, it's still the same!

Not strictly true. The contestants sit further away from DC or Jeff and so when their words/solutions are the same they have to pass their piece of paper to each other to check.

So, that's not a really big change in the upcoming Countdown set!

Jason Larsen wrote:So, that's not a really big change in the upcoming Countdown set!

I think it's a big change because for years you've had to pass your paper to 'an official' as it were. A change to the set causing contestant rules to change has to be a big change in my eyes.

Personally, I think it's a bit more fair if they do it the old way because who knows if another contestant's opponent thinks their own word is acceptable?

Jason Larsen wrote:Personally, I think it's a bit more fair if they do it the old way because who knows if another contestant's opponent thinks their own word is acceptable?

The passing of a contestant's paper to someone else in the studio is not done to judge whether a word is acceptable - it is only done for confirmation when the second player declares the same word as the first. In any case, I'm sure the rules allow for DC to arbitrate if there is any disagreement between the players about what is on the paper.

The situation might be slightly more complex in the numbers rounds, when the second player to declare has a solution that is essentially similar, though not identical, to the first, and the first player has to make a judgment about whether his opponent's working is sufficiently like his own to not need calling out. But again, the rules presumably allow for arbitration in the event of a dispute.

I do wonder how many instances there'll be of players not being sure their opponent does actually have what they say they have, but don't want to cause a fuss by questioning it.

Michael Wallace wrote:I do wonder how many instances there'll be of players not being sure their opponent does actually have what they say they have, but don't want to cause a fuss by questioning it.

Good point. But then I regularly used to wonder that when watching Des O supposedly "confirming" that a numbers solution was correct.

Thank you!

I didn't know that, Phil!

Just to get back to DCeDL... I did notice the standard was a lot lower this time when I was there, including a player offering a 4 when the maximum was an 8. Perhaps on my last trip to France, I just happened to run into some really good players, and the overall standard is not as high as that. I'm not too far away from my year in France (which is really 7 months, I might add) so by the end of that year, I should know what I'm potientially up against.

A slight improvement could have been a moving background ala University Challenge, letters, numbers, words and maths problems flying around, but I think it is a good try !

I'm not too far away from my year in France (which is really 7 months, I might add) so by the end of that year, I should know what I'm potientially up against.

I did ten months, three years ago, and still can't crack it!

Don't let that put you off though. Enjoy being able to watch the program up to six nights a week - and you might like to get involved with the club circuit aswell.

Whereabouts in France are you going to?


Jeff

Tours is the most likely place. I might join a club, yes. One of the reasons I picked Tours is that they have a big Scrabble tournament (300 people) during the summer, and I've already been to the venue where is takes place.