c4countdown

James Richards game four.

DC got one of two possible 9s today (I was happy with MARDIEST in the MIDWATERS round), and at least one more
round with beaters.

I got MIDWATERS, but probably wouldn't have risked it in a game.
Also got the conundrum, though its a good thing Vera Lynn wasn't in the audience.

Was this spoilers thread started after broadcast?

Anyhow, I've seen bits and pieces of James's games so far, and just wanted to remark that he seems very strong on the letters. He has a good chance of octochamping.

Adam Gillard wrote:Anyhow, I've seen bits and pieces of James's games so far, and just wanted to remark that he seems very strong on the letters. He has a good chance of octochamping.

He does indeed, but I'm confused as to why you would remark specifically on his letters, I'd say his numbers were equally as strong as his letters.

I've been very impressed with James. Doesn't miss much.

EXTROPIAN

Jon Corby wrote:

Adam Gillard wrote:Anyhow, I've seen bits and pieces of James's games so far, and just wanted to remark that he seems very strong on the letters. He has a good chance of octochamping.

He does indeed, but I'm confused as to why you would remark specifically on his letters, I'd say his numbers were equally as strong as his letters.

I'd say his letters are stronger.

Gavin Chipper wrote:

Jon Corby wrote:

Adam Gillard wrote:Anyhow, I've seen bits and pieces of James's games so far, and just wanted to remark that he seems very strong on the letters. He has a good chance of octochamping.

He does indeed, but I'm confused as to why you would remark specifically on his letters, I'd say his numbers were equally as strong as his letters.

I'd say his letters are stronger.

I wouldn't.