Spinning Around
Moderator: Michael Wallace
Spinning Around
Here's a puzzle that's not very difficult, but most people find the solution surprising. It comes in two parts:
i) Everyone knows there are 365 days in a year. Well, actually it's more like 365 1/4 days which is why we need leap years, but to make things simpler we'll assume that a year is exactly 365 days. How many times does the Earth rotate around its own axis in a year? To answer this, you'll need to know that the Earth rotates around its own axis in the same direction as the Earth orbits the sun.
ii) Now assume that the Earth rotates around its own axis the same number of times as in part (i), but in the opposite direction. How many days are there in a year now?
Please no googling, no answering if you've seen it before, and include an explanation with your answer!
i) Everyone knows there are 365 days in a year. Well, actually it's more like 365 1/4 days which is why we need leap years, but to make things simpler we'll assume that a year is exactly 365 days. How many times does the Earth rotate around its own axis in a year? To answer this, you'll need to know that the Earth rotates around its own axis in the same direction as the Earth orbits the sun.
ii) Now assume that the Earth rotates around its own axis the same number of times as in part (i), but in the opposite direction. How many days are there in a year now?
Please no googling, no answering if you've seen it before, and include an explanation with your answer!
Last edited by Paul Howe on Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Spinning Around
I thought there were 365 days in a year regardless.
What has this turned into? An analytical section of the forum?
What has this turned into? An analytical section of the forum?
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
- Craig Beevers
- Series 57 Champion
- Posts: 653
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Spinning Around
This is just for i)
364 times?
If you imagine the earth in 2 dimensions at 3 o'clock to the sun, then at 6 o'clock to the sun. At 3 o'clock the left side of the earth faces the sun, at 6 o'clock it's the top side. So you've effectively gained an extra 1/4 of a rotation there (as the moving around the sun and the earth spinning is the same direction). So throughout a year you'll get an extra full rotation, so that leaves another 364 to make up the full 365.
I hope.
364 times?
If you imagine the earth in 2 dimensions at 3 o'clock to the sun, then at 6 o'clock to the sun. At 3 o'clock the left side of the earth faces the sun, at 6 o'clock it's the top side. So you've effectively gained an extra 1/4 of a rotation there (as the moving around the sun and the earth spinning is the same direction). So throughout a year you'll get an extra full rotation, so that leaves another 364 to make up the full 365.
I hope.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Spinning Around
Oh.
I forgot about leap years.
I forgot about leap years.
Re: Spinning Around
Craig, it's not 364, but you're reasoning along the right lines.
Jason, this has nothing to do with leap years, they're just a human timekeeping device, not an astronomical phenomenon. I've edited the original post to make this clearer.
Jason, this has nothing to do with leap years, they're just a human timekeeping device, not an astronomical phenomenon. I've edited the original post to make this clearer.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Spinning Around
Thank you
You all must have very interesting imaginations.
You all must have very interesting imaginations.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spinning Around
I'm not sure that word means what you think it means...Richard Brittain wrote:it is a mere technical quango
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Spinning Around
And this has nothing to do with leap years!
Amazing!
Amazing!
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:37 pm
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Spinning Around
I'm not sure what this section of the forum is turning into.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13276
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spinning Around
If there Earth didn't rotate at all around it's axis then it would be like having one day. Rotating clockwise has the effect of reducing the number of days (try it with one hand going round the other - assuming you have an above average number of hands). So to get 365 days, it would have to rotate 366 times, so I agree with you.Richard_Brittain wrote:OK, well according to Craig's logic the answer is probably 366. But I still wouldn't count the Earth's orbit around the Sun as an extra rotation. Pedantically speaking, yes, but surely it has no actual relation to reality. Also, the question asked, 'How many times does the Earth rotate around its own axis in a year?' which confuses things further. The normal 365 rotations of the Earth are about its axis, but is this extra one? For all practical intents and purposes, this extra 'rotation' is completely meaningless, it is a mere technical quango. I will, however, admit that it makes for a good puzzle to confuse people. Good one.
Then if it spun the other way, it must be increasing the number of days by one, so 366 rotations gives you 367 days.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Spinning Around
We're all still here. That's a good thing. If we weren't, there would be no Countdown.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spinning Around
It's 366.
The earth rotates on its axis once every 23 hours and approx 56 minutes. It needs the extra 4 minutes to continue rotating so that the Sun is in approximately the same place relative to it's apparent position on the previous day. All of those 4 minute chunks add up to an extra 24 hours, so we rotate one more time in a year than there are days in a year.
The 23 hours and approx 56 minutes is the Sidereal Day, a term which came up in Countdown only a few days ago.
The earth rotates on its axis once every 23 hours and approx 56 minutes. It needs the extra 4 minutes to continue rotating so that the Sun is in approximately the same place relative to it's apparent position on the previous day. All of those 4 minute chunks add up to an extra 24 hours, so we rotate one more time in a year than there are days in a year.
The 23 hours and approx 56 minutes is the Sidereal Day, a term which came up in Countdown only a few days ago.
Re: Spinning Around
Yes, the answer is 366, but no I'm not counting the Earth's orbit around the sun as an extra orbit. I'm not sure you've understood what Craig was saying at all.Richard_Brittain wrote:OK, well according to Craig's logic the answer is probably 366. But I
still wouldn't count the Earth's orbit around the Sun as an extra
rotation. Pedantically speaking, yes, but surely it has no actual
relation to reality. Also, the question asked, 'How many times does the
Earth rotate around its own axis in a year?' which confuses
things further. The normal 365 rotations of the Earth are about its
axis, but is this extra one? For all practical intents and purposes,
this extra 'rotation' is completely meaningless, it is a mere technical
quango. I will, however, admit that it makes for a good puzzle to
confuse people. Good one.
Right on both counts, and pretty well explained too. I've drawn a rather nice diagram to illustrate all this, but typically my scanner's packed in. Another good way to think of it is what if the Earth had no days at all? It would have to rotate once during a year to keep the same bit of the Earth facing the sun. I think it's kind of cool that if someone were to set the Earth spinning at the same rate but in the opposite direction, our year would be two days longer!Gevin-Gavin wrote:
If there
Earth didn't rotate at all around it's axis then it would be like
having one day. Rotating clockwise has the effect of reducing the
number of days (try it with one hand going round the other - assuming
you have an above average number of hands). So to get 365 days, it
would have to rotate 366 times, so I agree with you.
Then if it spun the other way, it must be increasing the number of days by one, so 366 rotations gives you 367 days.
Yes, that about sums it up, although methinks you may have seen this beforeHoward Somerset wrote:It's 366.
The earth rotates on its axis once every 23 hours and
approx 56 minutes. It needs the extra 4 minutes to continue rotating so
that the Sun is in approximately the same place relative to it's
apparent position on the previous day. All of those 4 minute chunks add
up to an extra 24 hours, so we rotate one more time in a year than
there are days in a year.
The 23 hours and approx 56 minutes is the Sidereal Day, a term which came up in Countdown only a few days ago.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spinning Around
Well, it's one of the many things that have interested me ever since I came across a young Patrick Moore, some years before he started his Sky at Night TV prog.Paul Howe wrote:Yes, that about sums it up, although methinks you may have seen this before
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Spinning Around
Haha, I was just going to post that Jono. Also, if Patrick Moore can get to Mars on his rocket powered xylophone, just landing on the moon seems a pretty simple thing in comparison.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13276
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spinning Around
He's been doing that for 50 years! When was this?! Presumably when he was solely the Gamesmaster.Howard Somerset wrote:Well, it's one of the many things that have interested me ever since I came across a young Patrick Moore, some years before he started his Sky at Night TV prog.Paul Howe wrote:Yes, that about sums it up, although methinks you may have seen this before
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
That's just weird.Ginger Jono wrote:http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons/patrick+moore/
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Spinning Around
Who came up with this philosophy?
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spinning Around
It was in the early 1950s. The first book I ever borrowed from my school library was one of Patrick Moore's first books. It concerned the subject which he still says interests him the most - the moon. I was then interested to learn that he was starting his series Sky At Night, but was unable to see it for a few years because our family didn't get tv until some years later.Gevin-Gavin wrote:He's been doing that for 50 years! When was this?! Presumably when he was solely the Gamesmaster.![]()
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spinning Around
I just had to quote Gevin-Gavin and correct him - you mean "its" not "it's" don't you! And why "there" and not "the"?Gevin-Gavin wrote:
If there Earth didn't rotate at all around it's axis then
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
- M. George Quinn
- Acolyte
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:43 pm
- Location: Belfast
- Contact:
Re: Spinning Around
"It's"
That one confuses me. If your cat is neutered can you say "it's tail"?
That one confuses me. If your cat is neutered can you say "it's tail"?
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13276
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spinning Around
"there" instead of "the" is less embarrassing than the other one, because no-one would ever think that you would not know the difference. But I can assure you that it was just carelessness and not lack of knowledge.Kirk Bevins wrote:I just had to quote Gevin-Gavin and correct him - you mean "its" not "it's" don't you! And why "there" and not "the"?Gevin-Gavin wrote:
If there Earth didn't rotate at all around it's axis then
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13276
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spinning Around
Only if it is tail. Is it?M. George Quinn wrote:"It's"
That one confuses me. If your cat is neutered can you say "it's tail"?
- M. George Quinn
- Acolyte
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:43 pm
- Location: Belfast
- Contact:
Re: Spinning Around
No, but it's an it.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13276
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spinning Around
And the tail of it would be its tail (unlike the way I described the Earth's axis). But then if you named it "it"...M. George Quinn wrote:No, but it's an it.
- M. George Quinn
- Acolyte
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:43 pm
- Location: Belfast
- Contact:
Re: Spinning Around
Wahey, we got there eventually.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Spinning Around
Basically yeah, 'its' is an exception to the rule, stupidly.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spinning Around
No, all pronouns work that way. You don't write "hi's" or "her's" so "its" behaves consistently.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4546
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Spinning Around
Pronouns are an exception to the rule, stupidly.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spinning Around
hahaGinger Jono wrote:Pronouns are an exception to the rule, stupidly.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13276
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spinning Around
A follow-up was made to this.