Page 2 of 2

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:22 am
by James Robinson
ACETATE - Round 6
COWPIES - Round 12

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:33 am
by Josh Hurst
I know this is not necessarily a spoiler, although what is contained within the link contains some spoilerific information, but I found it quite amusing and thought that this was the most appropriate place to share it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Coote

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:38 am
by Kirk Bevins
James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
COWPIES not valid, sorry.

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:45 am
by Marc Meakin
Kirk Bevins wrote:
James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
COWPIES not valid, sorry.
Only in The Dandy.

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:58 am
by James Robinson
Marc Meakin wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:
James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
COWPIES not valid, sorry.
Only in The Dandy.
How odd. Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't! This dictionary needs checking and refining sharpish.

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:09 am
by Phil Reynolds
James Robinson wrote:How odd. Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't! This dictionary needs checking and refining sharpish.
You'll find the ODE2r is full of stuff like that. e.g. SEPARATE is valid, but SEPERATE isn't for some reason. What a rubbish dictionary.

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:27 am
by Charlie Reams
James Robinson wrote:Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't!
Maybe you're being humorous, but "unless I'm not mistaken" is (still) the opposite of what you probably meant.

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:14 pm
by Dinos Sfyris
ffs how childish is this thread? Nobody died from someone posting a solver-aided beater. FWIW while I mostly find beater-posting to be an exercise in stroking one's ego, it's nice to be informed if a bizarre looking selection yields a juicy unexpected max eg HOUBARAS yesterday. Normally if playing along I'd find a 5 or a 6 from those letters and give up. But if someone tells me there's an interesting 8 or 9 in the selection it makes you that more determined to try and find it. Like when DC say "We have a 9" and you try and spot it in the few seconds before the reveal.

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:18 pm
by Marc Meakin
Dinos Sfyris wrote:ffs how childish is this thread? Nobody died from someone posting a solver-aided beater. FWIW while I mostly find beater-posting to be an exercise in stroking one's ego, it's nice to be informed if a bizarre looking selection yields a juicy unexpected max eg HOUBARAS yesterday. Normally if playing along I'd find a 5 or a 6 from those letters and give up. But if someone tells me there's an interesting 8 or 9 in the selection it makes you that more determined to try and find it. Like when DC say "We have a 9" and you try and spot it in the few seconds before the reveal.
I agree, but I guess I was wrong to post the solution, albeit in small print.

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:15 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Marc Meakin wrote: I agree, but I guess I was wrong to post the solution, albeit in small print.
This. I've done it once or twice when I've said "I've used a solver and there were actually two nines...I won't say what they are unless someone else actually spotted them" (or at best make sure I say I've used a solver but leave it till after a few minutes for people who got it in the time to post it). Think it was the game with SMORZANDO in.

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 10:54 am
by Ian Fitzpatrick
Mike Brown wrote:Did anyone else here have to watch today's show with the edges of the picture missing, or was it just a regional thing? Damn difficult to do the conundrum as quickly as the contestant, and it made Rachel look a bit wide (until I forced my TV into 4/3 mode). Hope it's better for tomorrow!
Picture size was ok but the background kept flashing. I'm surprised no one else has mentioned it, I wonder if my equipment is starting to fail :cry: - although it hasn't been apparent on anything else, maybe Damian needs to make sure the meter is fully stocked with 50ps.