Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:22 am
ACETATE - Round 6
COWPIES - Round 12
COWPIES - Round 12
A group for contestants and lovers of the Channel 4 game show 'Countdown'.
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/
COWPIES not valid, sorry.James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
Only in The Dandy.Kirk Bevins wrote:COWPIES not valid, sorry.James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
How odd. Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't! This dictionary needs checking and refining sharpish.Marc Meakin wrote:Only in The Dandy.Kirk Bevins wrote:COWPIES not valid, sorry.James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
You'll find the ODE2r is full of stuff like that. e.g. SEPARATE is valid, but SEPERATE isn't for some reason. What a rubbish dictionary.James Robinson wrote:How odd. Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't! This dictionary needs checking and refining sharpish.
Maybe you're being humorous, but "unless I'm not mistaken" is (still) the opposite of what you probably meant.James Robinson wrote:Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't!
I agree, but I guess I was wrong to post the solution, albeit in small print.Dinos Sfyris wrote:ffs how childish is this thread? Nobody died from someone posting a solver-aided beater. FWIW while I mostly find beater-posting to be an exercise in stroking one's ego, it's nice to be informed if a bizarre looking selection yields a juicy unexpected max eg HOUBARAS yesterday. Normally if playing along I'd find a 5 or a 6 from those letters and give up. But if someone tells me there's an interesting 8 or 9 in the selection it makes you that more determined to try and find it. Like when DC say "We have a 9" and you try and spot it in the few seconds before the reveal.
This. I've done it once or twice when I've said "I've used a solver and there were actually two nines...I won't say what they are unless someone else actually spotted them" (or at best make sure I say I've used a solver but leave it till after a few minutes for people who got it in the time to post it). Think it was the game with SMORZANDO in.Marc Meakin wrote: I agree, but I guess I was wrong to post the solution, albeit in small print.
Picture size was ok but the background kept flashing. I'm surprised no one else has mentioned it, I wonder if my equipment is starting to failMike Brown wrote:Did anyone else here have to watch today's show with the edges of the picture missing, or was it just a regional thing? Damn difficult to do the conundrum as quickly as the contestant, and it made Rachel look a bit wide (until I forced my TV into 4/3 mode). Hope it's better for tomorrow!