Spoilers for 1st December 2009
Moderator: James Robinson
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
ACETATE - Round 6
COWPIES - Round 12
COWPIES - Round 12
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:59 pm
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
I know this is not necessarily a spoiler, although what is contained within the link contains some spoilerific information, but I found it quite amusing and thought that this was the most appropriate place to share it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Coote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Coote
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
COWPIES not valid, sorry.James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
Only in The Dandy.Kirk Bevins wrote:COWPIES not valid, sorry.James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
How odd. Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't! This dictionary needs checking and refining sharpish.Marc Meakin wrote:Only in The Dandy.Kirk Bevins wrote:COWPIES not valid, sorry.James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
You'll find the ODE2r is full of stuff like that. e.g. SEPARATE is valid, but SEPERATE isn't for some reason. What a rubbish dictionary.James Robinson wrote:How odd. Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't! This dictionary needs checking and refining sharpish.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
Maybe you're being humorous, but "unless I'm not mistaken" is (still) the opposite of what you probably meant.James Robinson wrote:Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't!
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
ffs how childish is this thread? Nobody died from someone posting a solver-aided beater. FWIW while I mostly find beater-posting to be an exercise in stroking one's ego, it's nice to be informed if a bizarre looking selection yields a juicy unexpected max eg HOUBARAS yesterday. Normally if playing along I'd find a 5 or a 6 from those letters and give up. But if someone tells me there's an interesting 8 or 9 in the selection it makes you that more determined to try and find it. Like when DC say "We have a 9" and you try and spot it in the few seconds before the reveal.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
I agree, but I guess I was wrong to post the solution, albeit in small print.Dinos Sfyris wrote:ffs how childish is this thread? Nobody died from someone posting a solver-aided beater. FWIW while I mostly find beater-posting to be an exercise in stroking one's ego, it's nice to be informed if a bizarre looking selection yields a juicy unexpected max eg HOUBARAS yesterday. Normally if playing along I'd find a 5 or a 6 from those letters and give up. But if someone tells me there's an interesting 8 or 9 in the selection it makes you that more determined to try and find it. Like when DC say "We have a 9" and you try and spot it in the few seconds before the reveal.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
This. I've done it once or twice when I've said "I've used a solver and there were actually two nines...I won't say what they are unless someone else actually spotted them" (or at best make sure I say I've used a solver but leave it till after a few minutes for people who got it in the time to post it). Think it was the game with SMORZANDO in.Marc Meakin wrote: I agree, but I guess I was wrong to post the solution, albeit in small print.
- Ian Fitzpatrick
- Devotee
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
- Location: Wimborne, Dorset
Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009
Picture size was ok but the background kept flashing. I'm surprised no one else has mentioned it, I wonder if my equipment is starting to fail - although it hasn't been apparent on anything else, maybe Damian needs to make sure the meter is fully stocked with 50ps.Mike Brown wrote:Did anyone else here have to watch today's show with the edges of the picture missing, or was it just a regional thing? Damn difficult to do the conundrum as quickly as the contestant, and it made Rachel look a bit wide (until I forced my TV into 4/3 mode). Hope it's better for tomorrow!
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum