Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by James Robinson »

ACETATE - Round 6
COWPIES - Round 12
Josh Hurst
Enthusiast
Posts: 327
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 4:59 pm

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Josh Hurst »

I know this is not necessarily a spoiler, although what is contained within the link contains some spoilerific information, but I found it quite amusing and thought that this was the most appropriate place to share it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Coote
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
COWPIES not valid, sorry.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Marc Meakin »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
COWPIES not valid, sorry.
Only in The Dandy.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by James Robinson »

Marc Meakin wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:
James Robinson wrote:COWPIES - Round 12
COWPIES not valid, sorry.
Only in The Dandy.
How odd. Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't! This dictionary needs checking and refining sharpish.
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Phil Reynolds »

James Robinson wrote:How odd. Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't! This dictionary needs checking and refining sharpish.
You'll find the ODE2r is full of stuff like that. e.g. SEPARATE is valid, but SEPERATE isn't for some reason. What a rubbish dictionary.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

James Robinson wrote:Unless I'm not mistaken, COWPEAS are allowed, but COWPIES aren't!
Maybe you're being humorous, but "unless I'm not mistaken" is (still) the opposite of what you probably meant.
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

ffs how childish is this thread? Nobody died from someone posting a solver-aided beater. FWIW while I mostly find beater-posting to be an exercise in stroking one's ego, it's nice to be informed if a bizarre looking selection yields a juicy unexpected max eg HOUBARAS yesterday. Normally if playing along I'd find a 5 or a 6 from those letters and give up. But if someone tells me there's an interesting 8 or 9 in the selection it makes you that more determined to try and find it. Like when DC say "We have a 9" and you try and spot it in the few seconds before the reveal.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Marc Meakin »

Dinos Sfyris wrote:ffs how childish is this thread? Nobody died from someone posting a solver-aided beater. FWIW while I mostly find beater-posting to be an exercise in stroking one's ego, it's nice to be informed if a bizarre looking selection yields a juicy unexpected max eg HOUBARAS yesterday. Normally if playing along I'd find a 5 or a 6 from those letters and give up. But if someone tells me there's an interesting 8 or 9 in the selection it makes you that more determined to try and find it. Like when DC say "We have a 9" and you try and spot it in the few seconds before the reveal.
I agree, but I guess I was wrong to post the solution, albeit in small print.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Marc Meakin wrote: I agree, but I guess I was wrong to post the solution, albeit in small print.
This. I've done it once or twice when I've said "I've used a solver and there were actually two nines...I won't say what they are unless someone else actually spotted them" (or at best make sure I say I've used a solver but leave it till after a few minutes for people who got it in the time to post it). Think it was the game with SMORZANDO in.
User avatar
Ian Fitzpatrick
Devotee
Posts: 621
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
Location: Wimborne, Dorset

Re: Spoilers for 1st December 2009

Post by Ian Fitzpatrick »

Mike Brown wrote:Did anyone else here have to watch today's show with the edges of the picture missing, or was it just a regional thing? Damn difficult to do the conundrum as quickly as the contestant, and it made Rachel look a bit wide (until I forced my TV into 4/3 mode). Hope it's better for tomorrow!
Picture size was ok but the background kept flashing. I'm surprised no one else has mentioned it, I wonder if my equipment is starting to fail :cry: - although it hasn't been apparent on anything else, maybe Damian needs to make sure the meter is fully stocked with 50ps.
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum
Post Reply