c4countdown

Posted: **Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:59 pm**

Great response.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:57 am**

Ian Dent wrote:Great response.

Yeah, do you suppose people maybe feel that the numbers game is more of a level playing field than the letters?

Oh and, er, I'm in.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:21 am**

Phil Reynolds wrote:
Ian Dent wrote:Great response.
Yeah, do you suppose people maybe feel that the numbers game is more of a level playing field than the letters?

Nah man, it's clearly because I'm very, very sexy.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:33 am**

Charlie Reams wrote:Nah man, it's clearly because I'm very, very sexy.

We each have our cross to bear.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:50 am**

I knew something would make me join Apterous eventually.

It may be a disaster but I'd like to enter anyway.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:03 pm**

Clive Brooker wrote:I knew something would make me join Apterous eventually.

It may be a disaster but I'd like to enter anyway.

Welcome. I'll have to give you a dummy rating of zero at this point, which I suspect may be a bit low.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:34 pm**

Charlie Reams wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Ian Dent wrote:Great response.
Yeah, do you suppose people maybe feel that the numbers game is more of a level playing field than the letters?
Nah man, it's clearly because I'm very, very sexy.

And how is that panning out for you, Charles?

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:26 pm**

Charlie Reams wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Ian Dent wrote:Great response.
Yeah, do you suppose people maybe feel that the numbers game is more of a level playing field than the letters?
Nah man, it's clearly because I'm very, very sexy.

I'd like to point out that this was the sole reason for me signing up.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:43 pm**

Charlie Reams wrote:
Clive Brooker wrote:I knew something would make me join Apterous eventually.

It may be a disaster but I'd like to enter anyway.
Welcome. I'll have to give you a dummy rating of zero at this point, which I suspect may be a bit low.

Well, presumably a rating of zero does make you a dummy.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:43 pm**

I will give it a bash if possible.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:46 pm**

Gavin Chipper wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:
Clive Brooker wrote:I knew something would make me join Apterous eventually.

It may be a disaster but I'd like to enter anyway.
Welcome. I'll have to give you a dummy rating of zero at this point, which I suspect may be a bit low.
Well, presumably a rating of zero does make you a dummy.

WINWINWIN

You are officially receiving 1 point.
Recipient: Gavin Chipper
Points giver: Kieran Child
Reason: Exceedingly high quality of post.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:17 pm**

I may as well have a crack too.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:43 pm**

Euphemism Central, this thread.

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:16 pm**

I will throw my hat into the ring (or into <generic forum participant>, whichever seems easier).

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:20 pm**

Andrew Feist wrote:I will throw my hat into the ring (or into <generic forum participant>, whichever seems easier).

Posted: **Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:26 pm**

Over 50 people! Apterous has really grown. Sounds awesome. I'm in (please).

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2009 7:01 am**

I'm in. Cheers.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:56 am**

Yes please, Charlie.

But I won't be available to play first round before 2nd October.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:34 am**

Important notice:

Please check that your name is on the list above if you expect to be playing, and that your rating is (approximately) correct.

No corrections will be accepted after the closing deadline.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:31 pm**

A question mark should be put by my name, as my participation may well be dependent on me bypassing the college proxy somehow. Bypassing could be the wrong word, but basically it won't let me get on apterous.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:06 pm**

Shaun Hegarty wrote:A question mark should be put by my name, as my participation may well be dependent on me bypassing the college proxy somehow. Bypassing could be the wrong word, but basically it won't let me get on apterous.

Let me know for definite by the deadline or I'll assume you're not playing. With this many people to organise I can't afford to have people dropping out.

Posted: **Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:18 pm**

Although I'm away from Monday to Friday of next week, if my opponent can't do the weekend, I might still be able to find time to get on the internet during the week, so don't count my post as maybe not playing.

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 3:23 pm**

Count me in please!

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 3:26 pm**

Lloyd Pettet wrote:Count me in please!

Good first post pal.

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:04 pm**

Count me in!

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:14 pm**

Chris Maudsley wrote:Count me in!

Terrible first post.

Posted: **Fri Sep 25, 2009 6:25 pm**

Finally you join

Posted: **Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:15 pm**

I should be able to get playing at weekends, or jump on some rather slow and annoying internet in a worst case scenario.

Posted: **Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:46 pm**

Shaun Hegarty wrote:I should be able to get playing at weekends, or jump on some rather slow and annoying internet in a worst case scenario.

Yey

Posted: **Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:01 pm**

So entry closes at 11pm Sunday, or when we get to 64 entrants.

To confirm, there will be two divisions, based on ratings, and each player will play 5 games. I'll play iff we have an odd number of entrants. Oh and it'll be fun.

Posted: **Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:30 pm**

I will throw my proverbial hat into the ring for this, in an attempt to improve my woefully poor numbers play.

Posted: **Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:31 pm**

Excellent the newest member of the Octochamp family throws his hat into the ring.

I hope we're paired together, Jeffrey.

Posted: **Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:37 pm**

James Robinson wrote:I hope we're paired together, Jeffrey.

You'll have to fight Ralph for him.

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:26 am**

Charlie Reams wrote:
James Robinson wrote:I hope we're paired together, Jeffrey.
You'll have to fight Ralph for him.

Oh dear, is it so obvious?

(My intentions are almost entirely honourable.)

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:50 am**

Charlie Reams wrote: You'll have to fight Ralph for him.

I can fight off Ralph's amorous advances on my own thanks, I don't need James as a bodyguard.

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:43 am**

James Robinson wrote:Excellent the newest member of the Octochamp family throws his hat into the ring.

ZOMGSPOILERZ

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:09 am**

Last orders, ding ding.

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:43 am**

Yes please. And mine's a pint of ale.

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:36 pm**

If we haven't yet reached the 64-person limit, I'm in too!

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:00 pm**

Going by yesterday's duel, mine's going to be a pint of fail.

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:48 pm**

Sign me up please!

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:20 pm**

I hope im in time will be my first tourny

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:51 pm**

Someone called Reuben Kay was saying they want to play.

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:11 pm**

Derek Hazell wrote:Someone called Reuben Kay was saying they want to play.

Is this an entry or not?

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:24 pm**

Charlie Reams wrote:
Derek Hazell wrote:Someone called Reuben Kay was saying they want to play.
Is this an entry or not?

Yep, he didn't want to use the forum. Not sure why I helped him - he's a fool to himself really, but it seemed a shame to see him panic

Posted: **Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:32 pm**

I'd like to enter if possible please.

Posted: **Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:56 pm**

Derek Hazell wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:
Derek Hazell wrote:Someone called Reuben Kay was saying they want to play.
Is this an entry or not?
Yep, he didn't want to use the forum. Not sure why I helped him - he's a fool to himself really, but it seemed a shame to see him panic

Is there any way I can get in contact with him about ourgame other than jus hoping were on apterous at the same time?

Posted: **Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:07 pm**

Andrew Hulme wrote:
Derek Hazell wrote:
Derek Hazell wrote:Someone called Reuben Kay was saying they want to play.
Yep, he didn't want to use the forum. Not sure why I helped him - he's a fool to himself really, but it seemed a shame to see him panic
Is there any way I can get in contact with him about ourgame other than jus hoping were on apterous at the same time?

Not sure Andrew, I don't know him personally. But I (or Richard Brittain considering his first name) will certainly ask him if I happen to be on the same time as him again.

c4countdown

apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack

Re: apterous tournament - Numbers Attack