Page 2 of 3

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:08 am
by Phil Reynolds
Jason Larsen wrote:Why would one post justify the existence of my recap thread?
Because it took a thread that was going nowhere in particular and rescued it with a witty pun.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:12 am
by Derek Hazell
Two really clever/funny Matthew Green ideas:

http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 204#p57204

http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic.php?p=991#p991 (I know this one's ancient, but the fact that I still remember it with a smile proves its eligibility)

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:07 pm
by Jason Larsen
Thank you, Phil.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:59 pm
by Jeffrey Burgin
This one made me laugh for ages, another Matthew Green one.

http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 055#p56055

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:33 pm
by Jason Larsen
Jeff, have you ever seen St. Elsewhere?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:37 am
by Ben Wilson

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:44 am
by Jon Corby
Lol, I'd forgotten I'd even posted that, and so followed the link excitedly. And then decided to add an edit because it could be misread as being quite insulting!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:46 am
by Ben Hunter

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:56 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Ben Hunter wrote:Nearly died laughing at this http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 913#p59913
Yes! Makes it all worthwhile. Still I think I let somebody else do most of the work for that.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:30 pm
by Charlie Reams
Perceptivity, parsimony, profanity: this post has it all.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:12 pm
by Charlie Reams
After some consideration I have settled on my favourite RB post ever.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:25 pm
by Charlie Reams
The number of classic Jim posts is probably greater than any integer, but this has got to be among the finest.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:24 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Sorry Phil but this was pretty good.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 10:19 am
by Phil Reynolds
This made me laugh till the tears ran down my legs.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:29 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Charlie Reams wrote:After some consideration I have settled on my favourite RB post ever.
I think you spoke too soon. (Don't worry - it's not Jews(dard)).

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 11:45 pm
by Phil Reynolds
Posts of this standard make me more jealous than the human mind can comfortably conceive.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:05 pm
by Jon Corby
This made me chortle.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:58 pm
by Derek Hazell
Superb (but don't click on it for a week in case you notice any of the spoilers that surround it although the post itself is not a spoiler, thanks Jon *kisses*)

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:07 pm
by Jon Corby
Derek Hazell wrote:Superb.
!!!ZOMG SPOILER THREAD LINK WITHOUT WARNING!!!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:31 am
by Jon Corby
This is the first post in a spoiler thread, but doesn't actually spoil anything.

But so funny :)

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:30 pm
by Michael Wallace
SERIES 61 FINAL SPOILER THREAD
SERIES 61 FINAL SPOILER THREAD
SERIES 61 FINAL SPOILER THREAD

I thought this SERIES 61 FINAL SPOILER THREAD was pretty funny.

SERIES 61 FINAL SPOILER THREAD!!!!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:32 pm
by Charlie Reams
[nb spoilers]
This, this, this and this. Four posts from four posters (like a bed), good for four reasons. What a day!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:36 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday April 14th 2010
Kirk Bevins wrote:Missed round 10 as some woman knocked on the door and just stared at me for 5 seconds before introducing her name and talking slowly. I thought "ffs hurry up, Countdown's on, if this is some religious thing I'll be super pissed off" and she said she used to live here in 1952 and she wanted to come in. She went into all our bedrooms and stormed about the house and stood dead still in the living room trying to cry. She then started shouting at me, ranting about why I wasn't teaching. She kept saying her name and shaking her hand.

The weirdest experience ever and the weirdest lady I've ever come across.
This is one of the weirdest posts I've ever come across. I think the fact that it's in spoilers is what makes it so great, not because it fits anywhere else, but because that just amuses me for some reason.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 5:07 pm
by Ben Hunter
Second that, I've never laughed so hard at anything on c4c.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 7:09 pm
by Jason Larsen
What kind of person was that lady?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:11 pm
by Ben Hunter
Jason Larsen wrote:What kind of person was that lady?
The weirdest Kirk had ever met.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:22 pm
by Jason Larsen
I was wondering if she could have been a Jehovah's Witness

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:16 pm
by Matt Morrison

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:18 pm
by Jason Larsen
Seriously, you have to work really hard to get those people to stop talking

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:09 am
by Dinos Sfyris
Jon O'Neill wrote:MASSIVE SPOILERZ!!!
You cock-muncher! I've been avoiding the spoilers thread all week as I've not yet seen this week's episode of "Through The Kirkhole" but now I know who Kirk's house guest is so you've spoilt it.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:45 am
by Jon O'Neill
Dinos Sfyris wrote:
Jon O'Neill wrote:MASSIVE SPOILERZ!!!
You cock-muncher! I've been avoiding the spoilers thread all week as I've not yet seen this week's episode of "Through The Kirkhole" but now I know who Kirk's house guest is so you've spoilt it.
Haha, "Through the Kirkhole".

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:29 pm
by Jason Larsen
Do you think that lady will ever show up at Kirk's door again?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 11:19 am
by Ben Hunter
Jason Larsen wrote:Do you think that lady will ever show up at Kirk's door again?
Yes, and next time with a knife.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:47 pm
by Jason Larsen
Ben, we want him to stay alive!

After all, why did we call him God?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:51 pm
by Charlie Reams
Jason Larsen wrote:Ben, we want him to stay alive!

After all, why did we call him God?
If Kirk did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 4:28 pm
by Liam Tiernan
Charlie Reams wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:Ben, we want him to stay alive!

After all, why did we call him God?
If Kirk did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him.
That's all very well in theory, but then how do you account for Jason?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:03 pm
by Jason Larsen
I don't think so!

Everyone is special, Charlie!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 6:02 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Jason Larsen wrote:I don't think so!

Everyone is special, Charlie!
But some more special than others.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:36 pm
by Jason Larsen
Once again, thank you, Gavin

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 10:34 pm
by Jon O'Neill
Re: Word Soup
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:it's now been cancelled in very mysterious circumstances.
Since you aren't coming, I can say "more details please" without worrying about future awkward silences.
It's not that exciting really, so I'll include some irrelevant background detail.

So my friend's wedding was due to be on 22nd May and his "gift list" was with John Lewis.

Meanwhile, I'd noticed that dried apricots often have maggots in. I noticed this with Tesco's ones first but we sometimes get stuff delivered from Okado (basically Waitrose online) and found that the Waitrose brand apricots were the same. I imagine that they have the same supplier, rather than supermarket chains manufacturing all their own fruit. So I e-mailed Waitrose about this problem with their apricots and made it clear that this was more about having maggot-free apricots than getting some sort of compensation. So they sent me £14 of John Lewis vouchers.

It didn't take me long to twig that I could use these towards a wedding present from the "gift list". I was on the cusp of choosing something when another friend texted to say that the wedding is definitely off because she'd returned the ring. Then the friend whose wedding it was texted the next day to say that the wedding was off because she's had some sort of breakdown.

Luckily I hadn't spent the £14 of John Lewis vouchers.
Pointless, but amusing.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 10:55 pm
by Ian Volante
Jon O'Neill wrote:Re: Word Soup
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote: Since you aren't coming, I can say "more details please" without worrying about future awkward silences.
It's not that exciting really, so I'll include some irrelevant background detail.

So my friend's wedding was due to be on 22nd May and his "gift list" was with John Lewis.

Meanwhile, I'd noticed that dried apricots often have maggots in. I noticed this with Tesco's ones first but we sometimes get stuff delivered from Okado (basically Waitrose online) and found that the Waitrose brand apricots were the same. I imagine that they have the same supplier, rather than supermarket chains manufacturing all their own fruit. So I e-mailed Waitrose about this problem with their apricots and made it clear that this was more about having maggot-free apricots than getting some sort of compensation. So they sent me £14 of John Lewis vouchers.

It didn't take me long to twig that I could use these towards a wedding present from the "gift list". I was on the cusp of choosing something when another friend texted to say that the wedding is definitely off because she'd returned the ring. Then the friend whose wedding it was texted the next day to say that the wedding was off because she's had some sort of breakdown.

Luckily I hadn't spent the £14 of John Lewis vouchers.
Pointless, but amusing.
I still can't work out how that thread got to that point.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:35 pm
by Jon O'Neill
http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... 806#p86731
Kirk Bevins wrote:I don't want to watch people running around passing a ball and then having a shot on target and missing by miles. How much do they get paid? You don't get the best darter in the world going for double 8 and missing by 2 foot do you. Ridiculous.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:38 pm
by Jason Larsen
That is the wrong wy to play darts!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:13 pm
by Kirk Bevins
Jason Larsen wrote:That is the wrong wy to play darts!
Haha. Oh I love Jason's logic.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:51 pm
by Jason Larsen
I meant to channel Chris Tarrant thee by the way.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:18 am
by Jon Corby
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:That is the wrong wy to play darts!
Haha. Oh I love Jason's logic.
You're running him very close in that vuvuzela thread.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:21 am
by Michael Wallace
Jon Corby wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:
Jason Larsen wrote:That is the wrong wy to play darts!
Haha. Oh I love Jason's logic.
You're running him very close in that vuvuzela thread.
Haha, glad it's not just me thinking that.

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:23 am
by Charlie Reams
LTICUMB (Lolled til I coughed up my breakfast).

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 3:45 pm
by Jason Larsen
Wow

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:52 am
by Dinos Sfyris
Posts 2 and 4 in this spoilers thread :lol:

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:31 pm
by Eoin Monaghan

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:58 pm
by Matt Morrison

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:26 pm
by Lesley Hines
SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I know it's only just gone up, but this is superb!

Edited cos I'm SUCH a muppet :oops:

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:56 pm
by Matt Morrison
Lesley Hines wrote:I know it's only just gone up, but this is superb!
I'm really, really, really fucking pleased that I spotted the title of that before I read any spoilers. You're walking a thin line there Lesley, been looking forward to watching it all day!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:01 pm
by Lesley Hines
Matt Morrison wrote:
Lesley Hines wrote:I know it's only just gone up, but this is superb!
I'm really, really, really fucking pleased that I spotted the title of that before I read any spoilers. You're walking a thin line there Lesley, been looking forward to watching it all day!
Oh the shame. :oops:

Really sorry Matt (et al.) Duly changed.

It's still bloooooooooooooooody funny tho :lol:

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:04 pm
by Matt Morrison
Lesley Hines wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:
Lesley Hines wrote:I know it's only just gone up, but this is superb!
I'm really, really, really fucking pleased that I spotted the title of that before I read any spoilers. You're walking a thin line there Lesley, been looking forward to watching it all day!
Oh the shame. :oops:

Really sorry Matt (et al.) Duly changed.

It's still bloooooooooooooooody funny tho :lol:
Tee hee, cheers. All good though - the link is now safe, nothing got spoilered for me, I now know to read Ryan's recap, and Badcock hasn't dumped me which she definitely would have if it'd been spoiled. Everyone's a winner, or at least not a loser :) Will be watching at silly o'clock tonight... let's hope you win! :)

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:24 am
by Dmitry Goretsky
I can't post new topics! What to do?!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:50 am
by Brian Moore
Dmitry Goretsky wrote:I can't post new topics! What to do?!
?

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:11 am
by Charlie Reams
Dmitry Goretsky wrote:I can't post new topics!
Oh but you can!

Re: Classic posts

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 1:36 am
by Andrew Feist
Charlie Reams wrote:
Dmitry Goretsky wrote:I can't post new topics!
Oh but you can!
I knew you weren't a fan of the dearly departed, but have you no shame sir?