Countdown Manifesto
Moderator: Jon O'Neill
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Countdown Manifesto
If you were running for Parliament, then obviously Countdown would be one of your primary policy areas. So what would go in your Countdown Manifesto? Would you ban certain guests from DC? Demand gender equality by employing a male numbers-girl for 2 and a half shows a week? Cut the number of rounds to help the country out of the recession?
I'm not really sure where I'm going with this, so hopefully you lot will provide.
I'm not really sure where I'm going with this, so hopefully you lot will provide.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
(AMNIOTES + F)
Compulsory recognition of US spellings on equal footing to UK spelling in all areas of life, reflecting the rich flavo(u)r of global English.
Compulsory recognition of US spellings on equal footing to UK spelling in all areas of life, reflecting the rich flavo(u)r of global English.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
To balance the crazy tea party-ish suggestion above, I'd propose a return to olde English spelyng, although this legislation is currently in draught form only.Charlie Reams wrote:(AMNIOTES + F)
Compulsory recognition of US spellings on equal footing to UK spelling in all areas of life, reflecting the rich flavo(u)r of global English.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:47 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Quite simply, that Countdown has a place on the airwaves for all the good things that it stands for. Before you started campaigning however, you would have to address the limited educational value of the maths bit - given that the co-presenter is still using the equals sign inappropriately after almost two years - but you can comfortably point to Countdown as a very good example of broadening vocabulary and language skills, delivering entertainment, and championing people who use their brain.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Jeff Clayton wrote:given that the co-presenter is still using the equals sign inappropriately after almost two years
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Writing things like:Michael Wallace wrote:Jeff Clayton wrote:given that the co-presenter is still using the equals sign inappropriately after almost two years
6 x 75 = 450 + 4 = 454
I'm sure Carol used to do the same thing.
It's very common nowadays, and I'm sure many schools use that method. Though I've yet to see it in a text book.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Under my administration, Countdown will
Reinforce cultural stereotypes. Middle-aged men are bumbling idiots, young women like shopping.
Denigrate hard work. Anyone prepared to put time and effort into improving their play shall be treated as slightly odd.
Mislead the public. By feeding celebrities words and applauding them for reading aloud.
Exercise subtle mind control. By persuading people that anagrams are actually conundrums.
Cut expenditure. Savagely, in the case of at least one employee.
I predict a landslide.
Reinforce cultural stereotypes. Middle-aged men are bumbling idiots, young women like shopping.
Denigrate hard work. Anyone prepared to put time and effort into improving their play shall be treated as slightly odd.
Mislead the public. By feeding celebrities words and applauding them for reading aloud.
Exercise subtle mind control. By persuading people that anagrams are actually conundrums.
Cut expenditure. Savagely, in the case of at least one employee.
I predict a landslide.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
I'd think of it more as a social justice issue, reducing the wage disparity between the highest- and lowest-earners.David Williams wrote:Cut expenditure. Savagely, in the case of at least one employee.
- Ben Wilson
- Legend
- Posts: 4549
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
- Location: North Hykeham
Re: Countdown Manifesto
At the moment, under your username it says 'Enthusiast' and that might just be the most ironic thing I've seen all year.David Williams wrote:Under my administration, Countdown will
Reinforce cultural stereotypes. Middle-aged men are bumbling idiots, young women like shopping.
Denigrate hard work. Anyone prepared to put time and effort into improving their play shall be treated as slightly odd.
Mislead the public. By feeding celebrities words and applauding them for reading aloud.
Exercise subtle mind control. By persuading people that anagrams are actually conundrums.
Cut expenditure. Savagely, in the case of at least one employee.
I predict a landslide.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
But I've still got your vote, right? You do support these policies?Ben Wilson wrote:At the moment, under your username it says 'Enthusiast' and that might just be the most ironic thing I've seen all year.David Williams wrote:Under my administration, Countdown will
Reinforce cultural stereotypes. Middle-aged men are bumbling idiots, young women like shopping.
Denigrate hard work. Anyone prepared to put time and effort into improving their play shall be treated as slightly odd.
Mislead the public. By feeding celebrities words and applauding them for reading aloud.
Exercise subtle mind control. By persuading people that anagrams are actually conundrums.
Cut expenditure. Savagely, in the case of at least one employee.
I predict a landslide.
Just between ourselves I'm planning a bit of Kosovo-style social cleansing in this forum after I'm elected, but no need to mention that just yet.
- Jon O'Neill
- Ginger Ninja
- Posts: 4551
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Countdown Manifesto
This offends me, too. Carol used to at least write on a new line when she was using a previous number so it would be laid out like this:Howard Somerset wrote:Writing things like:Michael Wallace wrote:Jeff Clayton wrote:given that the co-presenter is still using the equals sign inappropriately after almost two years
6 x 75 = 450 + 4 = 454
I'm sure Carol used to do the same thing.
It's very common nowadays, and I'm sure many schools use that method. Though I've yet to see it in a text book.
Code: Select all
6*75 = 450
+ 4
-----
454
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Countdown Manifesto
So she did, Jono. Marginally more acceptable.
But pretty well every kid I know now writes such strings. I used to challenge it, but they all say that's how their teachers do it.
But pretty well every kid I know now writes such strings. I used to challenge it, but they all say that's how their teachers do it.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Haha, I like how you were so transparently disappointed that no one took the bait of your original post. Keep trying dude!David Williams wrote:But I've still got your vote, right? You do support these policies?
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Thanks for noticing.Charlie Reams wrote:Haha, I like how you were so transparently disappointed that no one took the bait of your original post. Keep trying dude!David Williams wrote:But I've still got your vote, right? You do support these policies?
- Martin Bishop
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:29 pm
- Location: Tadworth, Surrey
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Move Countdown later in the afternoon.
Ban Deal or No Deal.
Ban Deal or No Deal.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:47 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Howard Somerset wrote:Writing things like:Michael Wallace wrote:Jeff Clayton wrote:given that the co-presenter is still using the equals sign inappropriately after almost two years
6 x 75 = 450 + 4 = 454
I'm sure Carol used to do the same thing.
You're quite right - she did, and for longer than the first two years. So this isn't about "I hate Rachel / bring Carol back", this is "do your job properly and you will earn your money" - perfectly in tune with the current political mood.
If this program has educational value and a reputation for making learning fun, then it's misleading its pilgrims at the moment.
Surely that's worth undoing on election day.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
CHANGE IS GOOD!
Remember the good old days of Countdown? Where lexicographers rotated and it was 9 rounds? Well you can forget the FEAR of sleeping during 15-round Countdown! The answer IS here!
P.S. I hope Damian Reads this topic
Remember the good old days of Countdown? Where lexicographers rotated and it was 9 rounds? Well you can forget the FEAR of sleeping during 15-round Countdown! The answer IS here!
P.S. I hope Damian Reads this topic
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Maybe I don't know much about maths, but why is it such a big deal?Jeff Clayton wrote:If this program has educational value and a reputation for making learning fun, then it's misleading its pilgrims at the moment.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13317
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Yeah, I don't think people will actually think that 6 * 75 = 450 + 4. Is it any worse than "times by"?Michael Wallace wrote:Maybe I don't know much about maths, but why is it such a big deal?Jeff Clayton wrote:If this program has educational value and a reputation for making learning fun, then it's misleading its pilgrims at the moment.
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Countdown Manifesto
She'll earn her money because she's doing a brilliant job as both an arithmetician and a TV personality. You'd have to be a moron to not pay her because god forbid she writes out the solutions to reflect what the contestant is saying to her.Jeff Clayton wrote:You're quite right - she did, and for longer than the first two years. So this isn't about "I hate Rachel / bring Carol back", this is "do your job properly and you will earn your money" - perfectly in tune with the current political mood.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Jeff Clayton wrote:"do your job properly and you will earn your money"
-
- Series 62 Champion
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
The way I view this (and other things in life) is by asking myself 'Is it obvious what she means from what is there despite it not following the correct protocol?' I'm sure you'd agree that in this case the answer is yes, as in many cases where people take issue with 'mistakes' such as this. I would also extend this to incorrect speling; punctuation or grammer. where pepole can make themselves understod despit not followin strict rules on such mattaz. INNITJeff Clayton wrote:given that the co-presenter is still using the equals sign inappropriately after almost two years
- Mike Brown
- Legend
- Posts: 1413
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm
- Location: King's Lynn
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Sorry no, I can't remember Susie Dent ever spinning round and round in her chair, must have slipped my mind. Sounds like fun, though, although it might get boring after one or two programmes.Rhys Benjamin wrote:Remember the good old days of Countdown? Where lexicographers rotated and it was 9 rounds?
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Countdown Manifesto
My kids in my top set year 9 queried this in one lesson and asked "doesn't it annoy you, Sir, that Rachel Riley writes several equals line on one line when what's on the left hand side doesn't equal the right hand side." I replied "not really. Yes it's mathematically incorrect but, say you have two 7s in your selection and if you start doing: 3+4=7. 7x25=175, 175+7=182...it may become confusing as it may appear to some people that you've used three 7s. This way is more clear." and some seemed happier after that.
Howard, you have to remember that a lot of teachers love kids more than their subject so won't always write correctly on the board and stuff. Teachers will say 7x9 = 56 and random shit too. Just because a teacher at school does/says it doesn't make it right.
Howard, you have to remember that a lot of teachers love kids more than their subject so won't always write correctly on the board and stuff. Teachers will say 7x9 = 56 and random shit too. Just because a teacher at school does/says it doesn't make it right.
-
- Series 62 Champion
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
LikeKirk Bevins wrote:My kids in my top set year 9 queried this in one lesson and asked "doesn't it annoy you, Sir, that Rachel Riley writes several equals line on one line when what's on the left hand side doesn't equal the right hand side." I replied "not really. Yes it's mathematically incorrect but, say you have two 7s in your selection and if you start doing: 3+4=7. 7x25=175, 175+7=182...it may become confusing as it may appear to some people that you've used three 7s. This way is more clear." and some seemed happier after that.
Howard, you have to remember that a lot of teachers love kids more than their subject so won't always write correctly on the board and stuff. Teachers will say 7x9 = 56 and random shit too. Just because a teacher at school does/says it doesn't make it right.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Countdown Manifesto
I'm delighted to hear that your top year 9 set queried the style, Kirk. It shows they're thinking, and understanding what's happening.
I certainly accept that styles change over the years, and now never query a student when he/she uses this particular method of demonstrating calculations. What does concern me though, is that when they look back through their notes when revising, it could well confuse them when they see two things on either side of an equals sign which are clealy not equal to each other.
I'm quite sure I'll start adopting the style myself at some time in the future, rather like I now find myself saying "times by", having heard it said so many times.
I'll be interested to see when text books start introducing it, though. I think I'll probably die first, but won't bet on it.
I certainly accept that styles change over the years, and now never query a student when he/she uses this particular method of demonstrating calculations. What does concern me though, is that when they look back through their notes when revising, it could well confuse them when they see two things on either side of an equals sign which are clealy not equal to each other.
I'm quite sure I'll start adopting the style myself at some time in the future, rather like I now find myself saying "times by", having heard it said so many times.
I'll be interested to see when text books start introducing it, though. I think I'll probably die first, but won't bet on it.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
You should have put "by other people" on the end of that sentenceHoward Somerset wrote:I now find myself saying "times by", having heard it said so many times.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:47 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
We had the "times them together" discussion previously and agreed it was valid because it's in the ODE2r. Whether we think it's sloppy or not doesn't really matter.
The "equals" debate, however, is turning out rather different - no-one here knows of "1+1=2+1=3" in any textbook, and doing that flouts a basic arithmetic rule (did someone say maths degree?).
I'm neither a teacher nor a parent but I would be concerned if a child started copying that method "because that's how the lady on the television does it". I distinctly remember one of my early year 7 maths classes, introducing us to fractions, and being pleased when the teacher suggested we should use a horizontal line rather than a diagonal line to separate the numbers because that was how it was done on Countdown.
So let's take Oliver's question, "Is it obvious what she means from what is there despite it not following the correct protocol?" and apply it to someone taking an exam. It could be maths and any discipline you want where you would have to show your working. If a question carries several marks and asks you to show your working, and the process you write out is not quite correct, then you should expect the marker not to award the full points. Dropping the odd mark like that is careless and can make the difference between grades. I wouldn't want my child on the wrong end of that.
The "equals" debate, however, is turning out rather different - no-one here knows of "1+1=2+1=3" in any textbook, and doing that flouts a basic arithmetic rule (did someone say maths degree?).
I'm neither a teacher nor a parent but I would be concerned if a child started copying that method "because that's how the lady on the television does it". I distinctly remember one of my early year 7 maths classes, introducing us to fractions, and being pleased when the teacher suggested we should use a horizontal line rather than a diagonal line to separate the numbers because that was how it was done on Countdown.
So let's take Oliver's question, "Is it obvious what she means from what is there despite it not following the correct protocol?" and apply it to someone taking an exam. It could be maths and any discipline you want where you would have to show your working. If a question carries several marks and asks you to show your working, and the process you write out is not quite correct, then you should expect the marker not to award the full points. Dropping the odd mark like that is careless and can make the difference between grades. I wouldn't want my child on the wrong end of that.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Maybe Countdown should come with an 18 rating to prevent such tragedies.
-
- Series 62 Champion
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Point taken, but in a maths exam, it is explicit in the mark scheme that correct protocol when doing a method matters and thus, carries marks. That is the rule and it is clearly in the best interest of the student to follow these guidelines. However, Rachel is not in an exam and, as she has limited time and space to write down her's/contestants solutions, she has to do it as quickly, efficiently and clearly as possible and, as Kirk said, doing it the 'proper' method can easily lead to ambiguity. And the argument 'kids may learn bad habits' can only really be used if Countdown is shown at a time that kids are home from school. I live fairly close to mine and I only see the last third if I'm lucky.Jeff Clayton wrote:We had the "times them together" discussion previously and agreed it was valid because it's in the ODE2r. Whether we think it's sloppy or not doesn't really matter.
The "equals" debate, however, is turning out rather different - no-one here knows of "1+1=2+1=3" in any textbook, and doing that flouts a basic arithmetic rule (did someone say maths degree?).
I'm neither a teacher nor a parent but I would be concerned if a child started copying that method "because that's how the lady on the television does it". I distinctly remember one of my early year 7 maths classes, introducing us to fractions, and being pleased when the teacher suggested we should use a horizontal line rather than a diagonal line to separate the numbers because that was how it was done on Countdown.
So let's take Oliver's question, "Is it obvious what she means from what is there despite it not following the correct protocol?" and apply it to someone taking an exam. It could be maths and any discipline you want where you would have to show your working. If a question carries several marks and asks you to show your working, and the process you write out is not quite correct, then you should expect the marker not to award the full points. Dropping the odd mark like that is careless and can make the difference between grades. I wouldn't want my child on the wrong end of that.
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Your profile picture is the cabin of a bus.Jeff Clayton wrote:We had the "times them together" discussion previously and agreed it was valid because it's in the ODE2r. Whether we think it's sloppy or not doesn't really matter.
The "equals" debate, however, is turning out rather different - no-one here knows of "1+1=2+1=3" in any textbook, and doing that flouts a basic arithmetic rule (did someone say maths degree?).
I'm neither a teacher nor a parent but I would be concerned if a child started copying that method "because that's how the lady on the television does it". I distinctly remember one of my early year 7 maths classes, introducing us to fractions, and being pleased when the teacher suggested we should use a horizontal line rather than a diagonal line to separate the numbers because that was how it was done on Countdown.
So let's take Oliver's question, "Is it obvious what she means from what is there despite it not following the correct protocol?" and apply it to someone taking an exam. It could be maths and any discipline you want where you would have to show your working. If a question carries several marks and asks you to show your working, and the process you write out is not quite correct, then you should expect the marker not to award the full points. Dropping the odd mark like that is careless and can make the difference between grades. I wouldn't want my child on the wrong end of that.
Re: Countdown Manifesto
FFS, Rachel (or Carol previously) isn't writing a formula that can be re-used, or studied again. She's writing what the contestants tell her, the point being to be able to check that what they've done adds up, and that they haven't re-used any numbers. If she didn't need to write anything down, she wouldn't, but It's too difficult to follow and check without writing something down. Are you suggesting she should start a new line in each case, and rewrite the previous results of operations? Yeah, that'll help the flow. Or maybe she should just start in the middle of the board, so she can add brackets around things as appropriate, so that what's left is a perfect equation.
What a pathetic thing to complain about.
What a pathetic thing to complain about.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Countdown Manifesto
This has turned into the lamest thread ever. Whoever started it should be banned.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:47 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
My apologies that it's come to be hijacked over one issue.
We forumites are all capable of working out where a contestant's calculation is going one or two moves in, even if we hadn't got it ourselves in the first place, but this forum does not represent the wider viewing audience and the not-so-inclined viewer isn't as sharp. Jon seems to have really misinterpreted this discussion on quality and standards for something about why the numbers board should come with a pad and a marker pen, but I certainly appreciate where Oly is coming from about conditions, though I don't accept it should be difficult for a professional to apply some foresight in their presentation skills and anticipate what a player is going to say.
There is a horrible irony in being shown "how it's done" when that's really not how it should be done. Look again and consider whether there really isn't a better way of doing it.
/soapbox
Jeff
We forumites are all capable of working out where a contestant's calculation is going one or two moves in, even if we hadn't got it ourselves in the first place, but this forum does not represent the wider viewing audience and the not-so-inclined viewer isn't as sharp. Jon seems to have really misinterpreted this discussion on quality and standards for something about why the numbers board should come with a pad and a marker pen, but I certainly appreciate where Oly is coming from about conditions, though I don't accept it should be difficult for a professional to apply some foresight in their presentation skills and anticipate what a player is going to say.
There is a horrible irony in being shown "how it's done" when that's really not how it should be done. Look again and consider whether there really isn't a better way of doing it.
/soapbox
Jeff
-
- Series 58 Champion
- Posts: 2010
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: Cardiff
Re: Countdown Manifesto
All Countdown fans should be shot or at the very least stabbed.Jeff Clayton wrote:My apologies that it's come to be hijacked over one issue.
We forumites are all capable of working out where a contestant's calculation is going one or two moves in, even if we hadn't got it ourselves in the first place, but this forum does not represent the wider viewing audience and the not-so-inclined viewer isn't as sharp. Jon seems to have really misinterpreted this discussion on quality and standards for something about why the numbers board should come with a pad and a marker pen, but I certainly appreciate where Oly is coming from about conditions, though I don't accept it should be difficult for a professional to apply some foresight in their presentation skills and anticipate what a player is going to say.
There is a horrible irony in being shown "how it's done" when that's really not how it should be done. Look again and consider whether there really isn't a better way of doing it.
/soapbox
Jeff
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Can I go for a slash?David O'Donnell wrote:
All Countdown fans should be shot or at the very least stabbed.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
Re: Countdown Manifesto
It sounds like conundrums are shit at CoLei.Jeff Clayton wrote:My apologies that it's come to be hijacked over one issue.
We forumites are all capable of working out where a contestant's calculation is going one or two moves in, even if we hadn't got it ourselves in the first place, but this forum does not represent the wider viewing audience and the not-so-inclined viewer isn't as sharp. Jon seems to have really misinterpreted this discussion on quality and standards for something about why the numbers board should come with a pad and a marker pen, but I certainly appreciate where Oly is coming from about conditions, though I don't accept it should be difficult for a professional to apply some foresight in their presentation skills and anticipate what a player is going to say.
There is a horrible irony in being shown "how it's done" when that's really not how it should be done. Look again and consider whether there really isn't a better way of doing it.
/soapbox
Jeff
Look again and consider whether there really isn't a better way of doing it.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:47 pm
Re: Countdown Manifesto
Feel free to organise yer own event!