Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Douglas Wilson
Enthusiast
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:54 pm

Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Douglas Wilson »

Well the climax of Series 62 will be recorded today and tomorrow and a select group of lucky people are in Manchester watching it unfold.

The rest of us will have to make do with the latest prelim edition of Series 62 which features 3 time winner Nicki who may or may not be back recording today. She'll definitely need to win today and tomorrow to stand any chance and the long awaited second octochamp party of the series could be next Monday.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6305
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Marc Meakin »

:oops:
Last edited by Marc Meakin on Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
Andrew Hulme
Acolyte
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Andrew Hulme »

TOURACO Rd 2
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6305
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Marc Meakin »

UNAVOWED was there for 8.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Kirk Bevins »

FOSSAE for 6 in round 7.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Matt Morrison »

Marc Meakin wrote::oops:
This is way more annoying than leaving whatever was there intact. Probably. I wouldn't know cos I didn't get to see it obviously, but I'm annoyed now gard damnit.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Kirk Bevins »

RORTIEST for 8 in round 8 for a beater.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6305
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Marc Meakin »

Matt Morrison wrote:
Marc Meakin wrote::oops:
This is way more annoying than leaving whatever was there intact. Probably. I wouldn't know cos I didn't get to see it obviously, but I'm annoyed now gard damnit.
Wanted to delete the post but couldn't.
To put you out of your misery, I put down MOLERAT but it is only a CSW word.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Matt Morrison »

Marc Meakin wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:
Marc Meakin wrote::oops:
This is way more annoying than leaving whatever was there intact. Probably. I wouldn't know cos I didn't get to see it obviously, but I'm annoyed now gard damnit.
Wanted to delete the post but couldn't.
To put you out of your misery, I put down MOLERAT but it is only a CSW word.
Thanks Marc! Be a love and leave it next time :-) I'm sure I've seen you doing plenty of "would have been XXXXXX there but it's CSW only" posts before, so dunno why this one got culled.
John Brackstone
Rookie
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:44 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by John Brackstone »

opencast for a dc-equaller
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6305
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Marc Meakin »

Fantastic contest today.
Well done Nikki for acheiving your half octochampdom.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Ray Folwell
Acolyte
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:46 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Ray Folwell »

Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon :D
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Ray Folwell wrote:Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon :D
The contestants virtually did this. They said, essentially, 25x6x4+10 for their 2 away. They wanted to do 25x6x4+8 which is 25x6x4+2x4, which is (25x6+2)x4, which is what Rachel did. Job done.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Matt Morrison »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Ray Folwell wrote:Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon :D
The contestants virtually did this. They said, essentially, 25x6x4+10 for their 2 away. They wanted to do 25x6x4+8 which is 25x6x4+2x4, which is (25x6+2)x4, which is what Rachel did. Job done.
Sometimes I get frustrated when Rachel's method is very very similar to the contestants and just involves splitmultiplicationising it, yet she presents it in a totally different-looking way.
I think usually the contestants don't see the link at all and it's a shame Rachel doesn't get another 10 seconds just to explain how they could have developed their method just slightly to get it right.
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Ben Hunter »

Marc Meakin wrote:Well done Nikki for acheiving your half octochampdom.
Can Huddersfield win tonight?
Peter Mabey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Harlow

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Peter Mabey »

Ray Folwell wrote:Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon :D
I did it quite differently: (25+6X6)X10-2 :)
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13276
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Peter Mabey wrote:
Ray Folwell wrote:Slightly simpler version of the 3rd numbers : (6x25+2) x (10-6)
I do hope Rachel gets well soon :D
I did it quite differently: (25+6X6)X10-2 :)
Mabey I did it like that too. In fact I definitely did.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Jon Corby »

I did (6*5-6)*25+10-2.

Well done Nicki!
Ryan Taylor
Postmaster General
Posts: 3661
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by Ryan Taylor »

Nice one Nikki! Great steal on the conundrum woohoo!!
David Williams
Kiloposter
Posts: 1266
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: Spoilers For Tuesday 27th April 2010

Post by David Williams »

Matt Morrison wrote:Sometimes I get frustrated when Rachel's method is very very similar to the contestants and just involves splitmultiplicationising it, yet she presents it in a totally different-looking way.
I think usually the contestants don't see the link at all and it's a shame Rachel doesn't get another 10 seconds just to explain how they could have developed their method just slightly to get it right.
Agreed. I can appreciate that Rachel's got a few things to think about at the same time, while not forgetting her own solution. I can also see it could look like trying to make contestants look foolish, but Susie often does something similar ("You'll kick yourself") without upsetting anyone. It would be good to illustrate the tricks of the trade for viewers at home in this way.
Post Reply