![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
You'll note I haven't included their Sunday counterparts. If you only get a paper on a Sunday or read it online please submit the corresponding daily. Similarly, if you don't read the paper with breakfast, use your imagination. You get the gist
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Moderator: Jon O'Neill
Actually The Observer is a Sunday paper. It is in place of The Guardian, which does not have a Sunday issue. Also The People is Sunday only, although similar to The Sunday Mirror.Lesley Hines wrote:You'll note I haven't included their Sunday counterparts. If you only get a paper on a Sunday or read it online please submit the corresponding daily. Similarly, if you don't read the paper with breakfast, use your imagination. You get the gist
Damn. Something else you never mentioned at the finals!Lesley Hines wrote:Your wish is my command
No. Newspapers normally are very biased and follow the viewpoint of whoever is in charge, whereas on here you get a wide variety of different opinions. Also, if you can't get on here at work, breakfast time is as good a time as any.Karen Pearson wrote:I usually read this forum! Is that sad?
CHARLIE IS AWESOME.Derek Hazell wrote:No. Newspapers normally are very biased and follow the viewpoint of whoever is in charge, whereas on here you get a wide variety of different opinions.
Similarly for me, except I don't go to work now & hardly ever bother to get a newspaper - certainly not before breakfastDerek Hazell wrote:No. Newspapers normally are very biased and follow the viewpoint of whoever is in charge, whereas on here you get a wide variety of different opinions. Also, if you can't get on here at work, breakfast time is as good a time as any.Karen Pearson wrote:I usually read this forum! Is that sad?
No daily paper for me but it does take me all week to read The Sunday Times! I'm with you Howard, I can always murder a bowl of Weetabix in the mornings................Howard Somerset wrote: I always eat Weetabix, not Cornflakes.
Difficult to eat cornflakes and read Metro at the same time on a crowded bus, though. (Unless you eat them dry, from the box)Derek Hazell wrote:As a former professional newsagent (ooh get him etc.), I approve of this poll.
Going against what I just said though, as it not available in newsagents, can you please add Metro, as many people read it on the bus/train to work.
.
Lol, good point, which strangely passed me by when I wrote all that!Liam Tiernan wrote:Difficult to eat cornflakes and read Metro at the same time on a crowded bus, though. (Unless you eat them dry, from the box)Derek Hazell wrote:Going against what I just said though, as it not available in newsagents, can you please add Metro, as many people read it on the bus/train to work.
Only if people actually pay for it. More likely people who like getting their news for free will just read something else, like BBC News, which will never charge for content.Brian Moore wrote:Reading online also saves me about £400 a year, I guess, which probably gives some unintended evidence in support of Rupert Murdoch's plan to charge for online readers. Discuss.