Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Derek Hazell »

Today has a French connection, so will Andrew triumph again on Bastille day, or will REDTOPVAN Paris match him all the way?
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Andy Wilson
Kiloposter
Posts: 1181
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Andy Wilson »

Extrinsic... beautiful.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

Yes, word of the series for me (so far). I was quite pleased with 7.
User avatar
Andy Wilson
Kiloposter
Posts: 1181
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Andy Wilson »

2 cretins in DC, and Jeff, and me. All we need are two more and we've sixcretin.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Derek Hazell »

Is it ironic that a Davina McCall advert just came on?
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Andy Wilson
Kiloposter
Posts: 1181
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Andy Wilson »

Derek Hazell wrote:Is it ironic that a Davina McCall advert just came on?
I don't follow...
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Derek Hazell »

Andy Wilson wrote:I don't follow...
We've had discussions on here before about the definition of the word "ironic", so I asked if it was ironic that that advert should come on, right after Ian Hyland spoke of his relationship with Davina, and made an allusion to her adverts.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Andy Wilson
Kiloposter
Posts: 1181
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Andy Wilson »

My buddy Dave Knox reckons alimental for 9?
User avatar
Andy Wilson
Kiloposter
Posts: 1181
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Andy Wilson »

Derek Hazell wrote:
Andy Wilson wrote:I don't follow...
We've had discussions on here before about the definition of the word "ironic", so I asked if it was ironic that that advert should come on, right after Ian Hyland spoke of his relationship with Davina, and made an allusion to her adverts.
Ah, missed his bit...
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

Andy Wilson wrote:My buddy Dave Knox reckons alimental for 9?
No.
User avatar
Andy Wilson
Kiloposter
Posts: 1181
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Andy Wilson »

Apologies, would have looked it up first but connection here is dodge and can't load apterous properly at moment. He's not happy. He's got his Collins dictionary and he aint happy!

Anyway, super show Andrew... great score against a half decent opponent.
Rufus Frog
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Rufus Frog »

I also have the Collins and was self-congratulating on ALIMENTAL (pooh). Yesterday it had SWATTER - it never ceases to amaze me how two similarly sized dictionaries can diverge so much.
Interestingly OxRef Online has ALIMENTAL in its Australian and New Zealand dictionaries.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

Rufus Frog wrote:it never ceases to amaze me how two similarly sized dictionaries can diverge so much.
It's almost like a lot of the decisions are based on arbitrary editorializing rather than any real statistics...
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

EXTRINSIC is spot of the series (i had INCITERS for 8) so far, well done mate. I went from being 14 up to 4 down just like that!
GOOSANDER is DCs spot of the series too - that's two nines I missed this episode.

By my calculations, to beat 925 you need to average 112 in the last 4 shows. That's very doable and I'm starting to quake. Here's hoping you have some shit letters and no more nines. :twisted:
User avatar
Neil Zussman
Enthusiast
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:41 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Neil Zussman »

It's not often I beat so many top players, so I'm just posting to say that I was shouting 'Consonant, Pick a Consonant, be a C, a C!!!' before the last letter came up. And he did, it was, and I had a nine. Quality spot Andrew. :D
You're slipping on the conundrums though, there was time for a light to come on on the clock :o
Rufus Frog
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Rufus Frog »

In 1 round I thought I had a belter with SHADOUF - but it's only in the full OED as a variant spelling :cry:
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Michael Wallace »

I keep getting nervous whenever the challengers do their numbers selections - I'm worried they're going to say "fuck it, 6 small" and screw up your chances of setting a new high score record.
Keith Bevins
Rookie
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:14 pm

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Keith Bevins »

I was absolutely hammered by Andrew today, well played sir. EXTRINSIC was amazing.

Just an alternative numbers R5
(50-10-4+1)*(9-6)=111
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by James Robinson »

Keith Bevins wrote:I was absolutely hammered by Andrew today, well played sir. EXTRINSIC was amazing.

Just an alternative numbers R5
(50-10-4+1)*(9-6)=111
I just managed to beat Andrew yesterday, but I was completely out of hus league today, although I did get PITHEAD and he didn't, so a little bit of joy there.

Two more alternatives to the first numbers game:

9 + 6 = 15

15 - 4 = 11

11 x 10 = 110

110 + 1 = 111

and

50 x 4 = 200

9 x 10 = 90

200 - 90 = 110

110 + 1 = 111
Kirk Bevins wrote:By my calculations, to beat 925 you need to average 112 in the last 4 shows. That's very doable and I'm starting to quake. Here's hoping you have some shit letters and no more nines.
Nah, Andrew already has an average of 119.75, so his chances must be good. Looks like that's one of your records going, Kirk. Having said that, do you have any other records apart from first perfect game and the 925 points :?:
Andrew Hulme
Acolyte
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Andrew Hulme »

Neil Zussman wrote:It's not often I beat so many top players, so I'm just posting to say that I was shouting 'Consonant, Pick a Consonant, be a C, a C!!!' before the last letter came up. And he did, it was, and I had a nine. Quality spot Andrew. :D
You're slipping on the conundrums though, there was time for a light to come on on the clock :o
Without blowing my own trumpet the conundrum was re-shot and there was no light with the original ;)
Michael Wallace wrote:I keep getting nervous whenever the challengers do their numbers selections - I'm worried they're going to say "fuck it, 6 small" and screw up your chances of setting a new high score record.
Ha ha. Watch closely tomorrow. Some idiot picks 6 small.
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Michael Wallace »

Andrew Hulme wrote:Ha ha. Watch closely tomorrow. Some idiot picks 6 small.
OMG SPOILERSSSSSSSS!!!
Andrew Hulme
Acolyte
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Andrew Hulme »

Lol, not really a massive spoiler I guess. Anyone who's that offended by knowing that 6 small numbers are picked at some point is pretty pernickity (sp?); besides I might just have been lying.

Also wanted to add that I was dead happy with EXTRINSIC, as it was a "pure" spot, i.e. nothing to do with any apterous training.

Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Michael Wallace »

Clearly my three exclamation marks wasn't sufficient to convey the fact I was joking :(
User avatar
Ben Hunter
Kiloposter
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
Location: S Yorks

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Ben Hunter »

Michael Wallace wrote:Clearly my three exclamation marks wasn't sufficient to convey the fact I was joking :(
There weren't enough 'S'es.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

Andrew Hulme wrote: Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
It seemed to be some blend of amorphous, aphesis, amphoras and aqueous at least.
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Brian Moore »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Andrew Hulme wrote: Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
It seemed to be some blend of amorphous, aphesis, amphoras and aqueous at least.
I'd say aphasia too, except I'm finding it difficult.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Is aphorous in? Maybe it was aphorise you mistook? Or nacreous?
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Charlie Reams »

Andrew Hulme wrote:Ha ha. Watch closely tomorrow. Some idiot picks 6 small.
You wag!
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009

Post by Kai Laddiman »

Andrew Hulme wrote:Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
Hmmm, well...
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Post Reply