Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Moderator: James Robinson
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Today has a French connection, so will Andrew triumph again on Bastille day, or will REDTOPVAN Paris match him all the way?
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Extrinsic... beautiful.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Yes, word of the series for me (so far). I was quite pleased with 7.
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
2 cretins in DC, and Jeff, and me. All we need are two more and we've sixcretin.
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Is it ironic that a Davina McCall advert just came on?
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
I don't follow...Derek Hazell wrote:Is it ironic that a Davina McCall advert just came on?
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
We've had discussions on here before about the definition of the word "ironic", so I asked if it was ironic that that advert should come on, right after Ian Hyland spoke of his relationship with Davina, and made an allusion to her adverts.Andy Wilson wrote:I don't follow...
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
My buddy Dave Knox reckons alimental for 9?
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Ah, missed his bit...Derek Hazell wrote:We've had discussions on here before about the definition of the word "ironic", so I asked if it was ironic that that advert should come on, right after Ian Hyland spoke of his relationship with Davina, and made an allusion to her adverts.Andy Wilson wrote:I don't follow...
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
No.Andy Wilson wrote:My buddy Dave Knox reckons alimental for 9?
- Andy Wilson
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1181
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Apologies, would have looked it up first but connection here is dodge and can't load apterous properly at moment. He's not happy. He's got his Collins dictionary and he aint happy!
Anyway, super show Andrew... great score against a half decent opponent.
Anyway, super show Andrew... great score against a half decent opponent.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
I also have the Collins and was self-congratulating on ALIMENTAL (pooh). Yesterday it had SWATTER - it never ceases to amaze me how two similarly sized dictionaries can diverge so much.
Interestingly OxRef Online has ALIMENTAL in its Australian and New Zealand dictionaries.
Interestingly OxRef Online has ALIMENTAL in its Australian and New Zealand dictionaries.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
It's almost like a lot of the decisions are based on arbitrary editorializing rather than any real statistics...Rufus Frog wrote:it never ceases to amaze me how two similarly sized dictionaries can diverge so much.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
EXTRINSIC is spot of the series (i had INCITERS for 8) so far, well done mate. I went from being 14 up to 4 down just like that!
GOOSANDER is DCs spot of the series too - that's two nines I missed this episode.
By my calculations, to beat 925 you need to average 112 in the last 4 shows. That's very doable and I'm starting to quake. Here's hoping you have some shit letters and no more nines.
GOOSANDER is DCs spot of the series too - that's two nines I missed this episode.
By my calculations, to beat 925 you need to average 112 in the last 4 shows. That's very doable and I'm starting to quake. Here's hoping you have some shit letters and no more nines.
- Neil Zussman
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
It's not often I beat so many top players, so I'm just posting to say that I was shouting 'Consonant, Pick a Consonant, be a C, a C!!!' before the last letter came up. And he did, it was, and I had a nine. Quality spot Andrew.
You're slipping on the conundrums though, there was time for a light to come on on the clock
You're slipping on the conundrums though, there was time for a light to come on on the clock
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
In 1 round I thought I had a belter with SHADOUF - but it's only in the full OED as a variant spelling
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
I keep getting nervous whenever the challengers do their numbers selections - I'm worried they're going to say "fuck it, 6 small" and screw up your chances of setting a new high score record.
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:14 pm
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
I was absolutely hammered by Andrew today, well played sir. EXTRINSIC was amazing.
Just an alternative numbers R5
(50-10-4+1)*(9-6)=111
Just an alternative numbers R5
(50-10-4+1)*(9-6)=111
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
I just managed to beat Andrew yesterday, but I was completely out of hus league today, although I did get PITHEAD and he didn't, so a little bit of joy there.Keith Bevins wrote:I was absolutely hammered by Andrew today, well played sir. EXTRINSIC was amazing.
Just an alternative numbers R5
(50-10-4+1)*(9-6)=111
Two more alternatives to the first numbers game:
9 + 6 = 15
15 - 4 = 11
11 x 10 = 110
110 + 1 = 111
and
50 x 4 = 200
9 x 10 = 90
200 - 90 = 110
110 + 1 = 111
Nah, Andrew already has an average of 119.75, so his chances must be good. Looks like that's one of your records going, Kirk. Having said that, do you have any other records apart from first perfect game and the 925 pointsKirk Bevins wrote:By my calculations, to beat 925 you need to average 112 in the last 4 shows. That's very doable and I'm starting to quake. Here's hoping you have some shit letters and no more nines.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Without blowing my own trumpet the conundrum was re-shot and there was no light with the originalNeil Zussman wrote:It's not often I beat so many top players, so I'm just posting to say that I was shouting 'Consonant, Pick a Consonant, be a C, a C!!!' before the last letter came up. And he did, it was, and I had a nine. Quality spot Andrew.
You're slipping on the conundrums though, there was time for a light to come on on the clock
Ha ha. Watch closely tomorrow. Some idiot picks 6 small.Michael Wallace wrote:I keep getting nervous whenever the challengers do their numbers selections - I'm worried they're going to say "fuck it, 6 small" and screw up your chances of setting a new high score record.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
OMG SPOILERSSSSSSSS!!!Andrew Hulme wrote:Ha ha. Watch closely tomorrow. Some idiot picks 6 small.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Lol, not really a massive spoiler I guess. Anyone who's that offended by knowing that 6 small numbers are picked at some point is pretty pernickity (sp?); besides I might just have been lying.
Also wanted to add that I was dead happy with EXTRINSIC, as it was a "pure" spot, i.e. nothing to do with any apterous training.
Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
Also wanted to add that I was dead happy with EXTRINSIC, as it was a "pure" spot, i.e. nothing to do with any apterous training.
Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Clearly my three exclamation marks wasn't sufficient to convey the fact I was joking
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
There weren't enough 'S'es.Michael Wallace wrote:Clearly my three exclamation marks wasn't sufficient to convey the fact I was joking
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
It seemed to be some blend of amorphous, aphesis, amphoras and aqueous at least.Andrew Hulme wrote: Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
- Brian Moore
- Devotee
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
- Location: Exeter
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
I'd say aphasia too, except I'm finding it difficult.Charlie Reams wrote:It seemed to be some blend of amorphous, aphesis, amphoras and aqueous at least.Andrew Hulme wrote: Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Is aphorous in? Maybe it was aphorise you mistook? Or nacreous?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
You wag!Andrew Hulme wrote:Ha ha. Watch closely tomorrow. Some idiot picks 6 small.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 14th July 2009
Hmmm, well...Andrew Hulme wrote:Only thing that I think apterous helped that much with today was apheous??! Anyone got any ideas where the chuff I got that from?!
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.