One or two large?

Official forum of apterous.org, the website which allows you to play against other people over the Internet.
Post Reply
Oliver Garner
Series 62 Champion
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm

One or two large?

Post by Oliver Garner »

It doesn't seem to show it now but when I last looked at the relevant statland page, it showed that 2 large is most likely to be possible, and for a while I always chose 2 large. However, I did a numbers attack recently against Prune, choosing almost entirely 1 large and got 190, making a error in calculation on the other one. Therefore, I started going one large again and have found these games easier. Does anyone have any thoughts?
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: One or two large?

Post by Michael Wallace »

Oliver Garner wrote:It doesn't seem to show it now but when I last looked at the relevant statland page, it showed that 2 large is most likely to be possible, and for a while I always chose 2 large. However, I did a numbers attack recently against Prune, choosing almost entirely 1 large and got 190, making a error in calculation on the other one. Therefore, I started going one large again and have found these games easier. Does anyone have any thoughts?
I think the generally accepted opinion is that whilst 2 large gives you a higher chance of it being solvable, 1 large tends to be 'easier'.
Oliver Garner
Series 62 Champion
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:13 pm

Re: One or two large?

Post by Oliver Garner »

Michael Wallace wrote:
Oliver Garner wrote:It doesn't seem to show it now but when I last looked at the relevant statland page, it showed that 2 large is most likely to be possible, and for a while I always chose 2 large. However, I did a numbers attack recently against Prune, choosing almost entirely 1 large and got 190, making a error in calculation on the other one. Therefore, I started going one large again and have found these games easier. Does anyone have any thoughts?
I think the generally accepted opinion is that whilst 2 large gives you a higher chance of it being solvable, 1 large tends to be 'easier'.
Yeah, I have also noticed that in hyper numbers, 5 large has the highest chance of being solvable even the solutions for 2 large look more doable
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: One or two large?

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Michael Wallace wrote:
I think the generally accepted opinion is that whilst 2 large gives you a higher chance of it being solvable, 1 large tends to be 'easier'.
Exactly this. 1 large is easier as it is more intuitive to solve and less (sensible) routes to check but as a computer can solve any, a computer should pick 2 large and a human should pick 1 large. In theory.
Post Reply