Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Moderator: James Robinson
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:50 pm
Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
R2: SMUTTIER (I think it was round 2 - whichever round it was that DC got DETRITUS)
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I found James's conundrum attempt absolutely hillarious, i think there must be somethign wrong with me.
Im not sure if these topics are the place to discuss the contestants, but James eems to represent all the things i hate about countdown. Does anyone else feel the same?
Im not sure if these topics are the place to discuss the contestants, but James eems to represent all the things i hate about countdown. Does anyone else feel the same?
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:15 pm
- Location: Wiltshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I feel the same, but that's because he beat me
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Totally opposite for me Jack, I think he represents the best of what Countdown brings to people.JackHurst wrote:Im not sure if these topics are the place to discuss the contestants, but James eems to represent all the things i hate about countdown. Does anyone else feel the same?
Let's not beat about the bush, he's clearly, for want of a better word, a geek. We're all geeky to some extent here but you know what I mean.
But Countdown (and his ability at the game) seems to have given him a confidence, a warm personality, and a social ability that are rarely enjoyed by 'geeks'.
So I think it's great, he seems really likeable to me. Compare him to other contestants in the geek mould that we've had on recently - can't think of names but there have been a couple that have come across as cringeworthily uncomfortable while Jeff talks to them about some obscure hobby or other.
I'd much rather spend an hour with James than with Richard Brittain, put it that way.
I got it in 3 seconds. Worth mentioning as that's fucking rare for me. But yes, there's probably something wrong with you.JackHurst wrote:I found James's conundrum attempt absolutely hillarious, i think there must be somethign wrong with me.
EDIT: Just noticed James is on the forum. I hate calling people 'geeks' as it sounds so derogatory, but it wasn't meant that way (I was literally wanting for a better word). However, I'm not editing my post as I think it's complimentary enough to warrant using just one negatively perceived word. Plus James spoiled the result of his run in his very first post on this forum, and that pisses me off. The geek.
Last edited by Matt Morrison on Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Darren Carter
- What a lot of bling
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
- Location: Shrewsbury
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Same, 'genuine' stook out like a sore thumb and then there was only an 'l' and a 'y' left.Matt Morrison wrote: I got it in 3 seconds. Worth mentioning as that's fucking rare for me. But yes, there's probably something wrong with you.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
That succinctly sums up how shit I am at Countdown - I see LY and then start looking for the rest of it!Darren Carter wrote:Same, 'genuine' stook out like a sore thumb and then there was only an 'l' and a 'y' left.Matt Morrison wrote: I got it in 3 seconds. Worth mentioning as that's fucking rare for me. But yes, there's probably something wrong with you.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
That's normalMatt Morrison wrote:That succinctly sums up how shit I am at Countdown - I see LY and then start looking for the rest of it!Darren Carter wrote:Same, 'genuine' stook out like a sore thumb and then there was only an 'l' and a 'y' left.Matt Morrison wrote: I got it in 3 seconds. Worth mentioning as that's fucking rare for me. But yes, there's probably something wrong with you.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
That's OK, Matt, I don't mind being called a geek. It's better than being called that popular rhyming slang for a merchant banker! Having watched the show now, I'm slightly disappointed, as I normally find GENUINE when it's in a letters game. Interestingly I also got the first numbers game after a couple of seconds, not bad since I didn't get it on the show!
P.S. At least you didn't see the bit cut out at the end of the conundrum!
P.S. At least you didn't see the bit cut out at the end of the conundrum!
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Hey James - glad you took it the right way!James Robinson wrote:That's OK, Matt, I don't mind being called a geek. It's better than being called that popular rhyming slang for a merchant banker! Having watched the show now, I'm slightly disappointed, as I normally find GENUINE when it's in a letters game. Interestingly I also got the first numbers game after a couple of seconds, not bad since I didn't get it on the show!
P.S. At least you didn't see the bit cut out at the end of the conundrum!
What happened at the end of the conundrum?
Oh, and you mentioned being a Bond fan on the show - have a go at this.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Well, soon as the time ran out, Jeff said "You GENUINELY didn't get it, did you?" and I immediately replied by saying "No", followed immediately by the audience groaning and me putting my head in my hands in shame!
Stupid me falling for that old sausage!
P.S. Thanks for that Bond link, Matt!
Stupid me falling for that old sausage!
P.S. Thanks for that Bond link, Matt!
Last edited by James Robinson on Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Brian Moore
- Devotee
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
- Location: Exeter
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
They were deceptive letters today, I thought - they looked like they should yield higher scores than they did - I kept on thinking that I must be missing bigger words, but they weren't there. Maybe I'm confused by thinking that Tim Vine is really Peter Davison.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Haha brilliant. No joke, when I was watching it I fully expected Jeff to say that, and was really confused when he didn't!James Robinson wrote:Well, soon as the time ran out, Jeff said "You GENUINELY didn't get it, did you?" and I immediately replied by saying "No", followed immediately by the audience groaning and me putting my head in my hands in shame!
I wonder why it was cut out, surely the production team aren't getting sick of Jeff's cheesy puns?
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I'm with Jack on this one I think.
Tim Vine is a super-awesome DC guest.
Louise Bambury is VERY lovely, gutted she (you) lost
James is a bit of an arrogant nob, who I still haven't forgiven for spoiling about a dozen shows with his first fucking post about a month ago.
Tim Vine is a super-awesome DC guest.
Louise Bambury is VERY lovely, gutted she (you) lost
James is a bit of an arrogant nob, who I still haven't forgiven for spoiling about a dozen shows with his first fucking post about a month ago.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Louise was very good. Could have been an octochamp.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I didn't like the fists in the air thing after beating Karyn yesterday either. But that might just be me. I'm drawn towards modesty and humility, I find it endearing.JackHurst wrote:I found James's conundrum attempt absolutely hillarious, i think there must be somethign wrong with me.
Im not sure if these topics are the place to discuss the contestants, but James eems to represent all the things i hate about countdown. Does anyone else feel the same?
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Jon Corby wrote:I'm with Jack on this one I think.
Oh dear, I'm finding myself agreeing with everything Jon posts lately. Should I be worried?? This isn't like when you buy the Daily Mail just to get the free DVD and find yourself finding everything Amanda Platell writes abhorrent, but then as the weeks go by you seem to start agreeing with her is it?Jon Corby wrote:I didn't like the fists in the air thing after beating Karyn yesterday either. But that might just be me. I'm drawn towards modesty and humility, I find it endearing.
Not that I'm suggesting Jon was ever like any Daily Mail columnists . . . I just mean the persuasive effect.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I sometimes watch most the countdown episodes round my granparents house (How cool am I?!), and they hate Tim Vine so much. There must be a generational divide. I also didnt know that his brother was the part time egg heads presenter.Jon Corby wrote: Tim Vine is a super-awesome DC guest.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I'm worse than that. What stood out for me was the -ING, so I spent the first 15 seconds looking for a word with that suffix. Then I spent the next 10 seconds looking for a word with an -ILY suffix. Then I spent the last 5 seconds panicking. What I'd be like if I actually got on the show Kirk only knows.Matt Morrison wrote:That succinctly sums up how shit I am at Countdown - I see LY and then start looking for the rest of it!Darren Carter wrote:'genuine' stook out like a sore thumb and then there was only an 'l' and a 'y' left.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Almost identical with me, PhilPhil Reynolds wrote:I'm worse than that. What stood out for me was the -ING, so I spent the first 15 seconds looking for a word with that suffix. Then I spent the next 10 seconds looking for a word with an -ILY suffix. Then I spent the last 5 seconds panicking. What I'd be like if I actually got on the show Kirk only knows.
- Davy Affleck
- Acolyte
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:24 am
- Location: Lesmahagow
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
[quote="Jon Corby
I didn't like the fists in the air thing after beating Karyn yesterday either. But that might just be me. I'm drawn towards modesty and humility, I find it endearing.[/quote]
I thought he was a bad loser and an even worse winner.
It seemed that when he got a reasonable solution fairly quickly he then fidgeted, drummed his pen or fingers, drank water excessively, etc to distract his opponent. During the last numbers game he banged his glass down and rifted while Pat was still counting.
I thought he was the worst mannered and ungracious contestants for a long while.
I didn't like the fists in the air thing after beating Karyn yesterday either. But that might just be me. I'm drawn towards modesty and humility, I find it endearing.[/quote]
I thought he was a bad loser and an even worse winner.
It seemed that when he got a reasonable solution fairly quickly he then fidgeted, drummed his pen or fingers, drank water excessively, etc to distract his opponent. During the last numbers game he banged his glass down and rifted while Pat was still counting.
I thought he was the worst mannered and ungracious contestants for a long while.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I'd guess from James's speech patterns that he's slightly autistic, which would excuse some of the faux pas that made people dislike him. I'm surprised no one commented on this before, given the highly-tuned aut-dar possessed by some of our number.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Well done for recognising that Charlie. I actually have Asperger's syndrome, to be completely official. I believe that's what Jeffrey Hansford (or whatever his name was) from Series 57 had as well. Interestingly, I actually share the same birthday as Mr Asperger, after whom the syndrome was named.
- Brian Moore
- Devotee
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
- Location: Exeter
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I'd been thinking exactly the same, but had refrained from commenting, as it does raise the question of what is appropriate to post about what is perceived as unusual behaviour. (Do you not mention the behaviour, note it without labelling it, or try to explain it by giving it a label?)Charlie Reams wrote:I'd guess from James's speech patterns that he's slightly autistic, which would excuse some of the faux pas that made people dislike him. I'm surprised no one commented on this before, given the highly-tuned aut-dar possessed by some of our number.
I also wonder if some of the symptoms of autism and Aspergers might actually be linked in with the ability to spot patterns in numbers and letters - there is, in my experience, an uncanny ability of some musicians with Aspergers to excel at music, where dealing with thousands of varying patterns is a vital skill.
- Rosemary Roberts
- Devotee
- Posts: 555
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I agree. I wonder whether this is one of the rare cases where the PC term "differently skilled" is actually appropriate: people on the "autism spectrum" do often have very "different" skills that so-called "normal" people can only dream of.Brian Moore wrote:I'd been thinking exactly the same, but had refrained from commenting, as it does raise the question of what is appropriate to post about what is perceived as unusual behaviour. (Do you not mention the behaviour, note it without labelling it, or try to explain it by giving it a label?)Charlie Reams wrote:I'd guess from James's speech patterns that he's slightly autistic, which would excuse some of the faux pas that made people dislike him. I'm surprised no one commented on this before, given the highly-tuned aut-dar possessed by some of our number.
I also wonder if some of the symptoms of autism and Aspergers might actually be linked in with the ability to spot patterns in numbers and letters - there is, in my experience, an uncanny ability of some musicians with Aspergers to excel at music, where dealing with thousands of varying patterns is a vital skill.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Ah, that makes sense. I think you came across better than Jeffrey, in the sense that it was immediately obvious that he was in some way unusual, whereas you just seemed rather confident.James Robinson wrote:Well done for recognising that Charlie. I actually have Asperger's syndrome, to be completely official. I believe that's what Jeffrey Hansford (or whatever his name was) from Series 57 had as well. Interestingly, I actually share the same birthday as Mr Asperger, after whom the syndrome was named.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Does anyone not have an alternative to the 1st numbers game
I've got 3 here.
10 + 4 = 14
14 x 6 = 84
84 - 1 = 83
3 x 3 = 9
9 x 83 = 747
No.2:
10 x 4 = 40
40 + 1 = 41
41 x 6 = 246
246 + 3 = 249
249 x 3 = 747
No.3:
10 x 3 = 30
30 + 1 = 31
6 x 4 = 24
31 x 24 = 744
744 + 3 = 747
I've got 3 here.
10 + 4 = 14
14 x 6 = 84
84 - 1 = 83
3 x 3 = 9
9 x 83 = 747
No.2:
10 x 4 = 40
40 + 1 = 41
41 x 6 = 246
246 + 3 = 249
249 x 3 = 747
No.3:
10 x 3 = 30
30 + 1 = 31
6 x 4 = 24
31 x 24 = 744
744 + 3 = 747
- Davy Affleck
- Acolyte
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:24 am
- Location: Lesmahagow
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Impressive - and all in only 6 months.Jon Corby wrote:Does anyone not have an alternative to the 1st numbers game
I've got 3 here.
10 + 4 = 14
14 x 6 = 84
84 - 1 = 83
3 x 3 = 9
9 x 83 = 747
No.2:
10 x 4 = 40
40 + 1 = 41
41 x 6 = 246
246 + 3 = 249
249 x 3 = 747
No.3:
10 x 3 = 30
30 + 1 = 31
6 x 4 = 24
31 x 24 = 744
744 + 3 = 747
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
No, I did them all in the 30 seconds. I just forgot to post them.Davy Affleck wrote:Impressive - and all in only 6 months.Jon Corby wrote:Does anyone not have an alternative to the 1st numbers game
I've got 3 here.
10 + 4 = 14
14 x 6 = 84
84 - 1 = 83
3 x 3 = 9
9 x 83 = 747
No.2:
10 x 4 = 40
40 + 1 = 41
41 x 6 = 246
246 + 3 = 249
249 x 3 = 747
No.3:
10 x 3 = 30
30 + 1 = 31
6 x 4 = 24
31 x 24 = 744
744 + 3 = 747
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Dear me, you're just an annoying little c**t, aren't you, Corby?Jon Corby wrote:No, I did them all in the 30 seconds. I just forgot to post them.
Why don't you just go back to making trouser presses or whatever it is you do.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
James, please don't say "cunt" on the forum.James Robinson wrote:Dear me, you're just an annoying little c**t, aren't you, Corby?Jon Corby wrote:No, I did them all in the 30 seconds. I just forgot to post them.
Why don't you just go back to making trouser presses or whatever it is you do.
Thanks,
The Moderator
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6379
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Oops, sorry Charlie.Charlie Reams wrote:James, please don't say "cunt" on the forum.James Robinson wrote: Dear me, you're just an annoying little c**t, aren't you, Corby?
Why don't you just go back to making trouser presses or whatever it is you do.
Thanks,
The Moderator
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I don't get it.James Robinson wrote:Dear me, you're just an annoying little c**t, aren't you, Corby?Jon Corby wrote:No, I did them all in the 30 seconds. I just forgot to post them.
Why don't you just go back to making trouser presses or whatever it is you do.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Have you never heard of a Corby trouser pressJon Corby wrote:I don't get it.James Robinson wrote: Dear me, you're just an annoying little c**t, aren't you, Corby?
Why don't you just go back to making trouser presses or whatever it is you do.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Erm... dunno really. Sort of rings a bell I suppose. What is it?James Robinson wrote:Have you never heard of a Corby trouser pressJon Corby wrote:I don't get it.James Robinson wrote: Dear me, you're just an annoying little c**t, aren't you, Corby?
Why don't you just go back to making trouser presses or whatever it is you do.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
It's a press for steaming trousers, so that there are less wrinkles on it.Jon Corby wrote:Erm... dunno really. Sort of rings a bell I suppose. What is it?
It was developed by a John Corby from Windsor in 1930, hence the reference to you.
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Shouldn't you be putting golliwogs on the side of marmalade jars?James Robinson wrote:It's a press for steaming trousers, so that there are less wrinkles on it.Jon Corby wrote:Erm... dunno really. Sort of rings a bell I suppose. What is it?
It was developed by a John Corby from Windsor in 1930, hence the reference to you.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
He can't, Kirk's had them all deportedBen Hunter wrote:Shouldn't you be putting golliwogs on the side of marmalade jars?James Robinson wrote:It's a press for steaming trousers, so that there are less wrinkles on it.Jon Corby wrote:Erm... dunno really. Sort of rings a bell I suppose. What is it?
It was developed by a John Corby from Windsor in 1930, hence the reference to you.
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
More jobs for Kirk. I can't wait to start seeing his face on the side of marmalade jars.Jon Corby wrote:He can't, Kirk's had them all deportedBen Hunter wrote:Shouldn't you be putting golliwogs on the side of marmalade jars?
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I think you'll find that was ROBERTSON'S jam, not ROBINSON'S jam.Ben Hunter wrote:More jobs for Kirk. I can't wait to start seeing his face on the side of marmalade jars.Jon Corby wrote:He can't, Kirk's had them all deportedBen Hunter wrote:Shouldn't you be putting golliwogs on the side of marmalade jars?
I'll stick to my fruit squash, thank you.
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Told. Though maybe I wasn't so much implying you had the same name as marmalade jars as I was suggesting you're a massive racist.James Robinson wrote:I think you'll find that was ROBERTSON'S jam, not ROBINSON'S jam.
I'll stick to my fruit squash, thank you.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Well, luckily I'm not a jam maker or a racist.Ben Hunter wrote:Told. Though maybe I wasn't so much implying you had the same name as marmalade jars as I was suggesting you're a massive racist.James Robinson wrote:I think you'll find that was ROBERTSON'S jam, not ROBINSON'S jam.
I'll stick to my fruit squash, thank you.
Although I'm definitely more of a Nick Griffin hater after his performance on Question Time last night.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
What have you got against jam makers? Actually we had one on the show recently and he was married to a Thai lady, so you're well off the mark labelling all jam makers as racists James.James Robinson wrote:Well, luckily I'm not a jam maker or a racist.Ben Hunter wrote:Told. Though maybe I wasn't so much implying you had the same name as marmalade jars as I was suggesting you're a massive racist.James Robinson wrote:I think you'll find that was ROBERTSON'S jam, not ROBINSON'S jam.
I'll stick to my fruit squash, thank you.
Although I'm definitely more of a Nick Griffin hater after his performance on Question Time last night.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I never said that jam makers were racists, Jon.Jon Corby wrote:What have you got against jam makers? Actually we had one on the show recently and he was married to a Thai lady, so you're well off the mark labelling all jam makers as racists James.James Robinson wrote:Well, luckily I'm not a jam maker or a racist.
Although I'm definitely more of a Nick Griffin hater after his performance on Question Time last night.
I've got nothing against them whatsoever, apart from the jam they make. I'm more of a Marmite person myself.
I have nothing against David Kurdynowski (who you were referring to) and I have nothing more to say on this matter.
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
I made this one far more hilarious than it apparently was by thinking you were referring to KR rather than David K.Jon Corby wrote:What have you got against jam makers? Actually we had one on the show recently and he was married to a Thai lady, so you're well off the mark labelling all jam makers as racists James.
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
James Robinson wrote:Dear me, you're just an annoying little c**t, aren't you, Corby?
I disagree, he's not little at all.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
"Clot" is considered an offensive word by some people, James.James Robinson wrote:Dear me, you're just an annoying little c**t, aren't you, Corby?
- Davy Affleck
- Acolyte
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:24 am
- Location: Lesmahagow
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
[quote="James Robinson and I have nothing more to say on this matter.[/quote]
I bet you have more.
I bet you have more.
- Alec Rivers
- Devotee
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Jon Corby wrote:Erm... dunno really. Sort of rings a bell I suppose. What is it?James Robinson wrote:Have you never heard of a Corby trouser press
Edit - changed picture host.
Last edited by Alec Rivers on Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Matthew Green
- Devotee
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:28 pm
Re: Spoilers for Wednesday 22nd April
Jason?James Robinson wrote:I never said that jam makers were racists, Jon.
If I suddenly have a squirming baby on my lap it probably means that I should start paying it some attention and stop wasting my time messing around on a Countdown forum