Y'know...
Moderator: Jon O'Neill
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Y'know...
So, when did people start saying 'y'know' all the time whilst they speak? I'm pretty certain it's not always been like this, but now it seems almost ubiquitous. Hopefully at least some of you know what I'm talking about - people who throw 'y'know' into sentences whereas before they might've just said 'er'. It's not just me suddenly noticing this, right?
Or has this been thoroughly documented somewhere already, and I've just missed it?
Or has this been thoroughly documented somewhere already, and I've just missed it?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: South Yorkshire
Re: Y'know...
Some people suggest this sort of thing is a delaying tactic to give the speaker time to think.
I doubt that.
I think it is a habit.
Others would be "reallyreally", "basically", "right?"
I find the more widely they are used the more annoying they become.
I doubt that.
I think it is a habit.
Others would be "reallyreally", "basically", "right?"
I find the more widely they are used the more annoying they become.
Re: Y'know...
D-Becks used to be shocking for this, but is now a lot more accomplished at public speaking. My bird always adds "do you know what I mean?" to the end of utterly unambiguous sentences, which annoys me no end.
- Derek Hazell
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1535
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
- Location: Swindon
- Contact:
Re: Y'know...
See Patsy Kensit's 5 March 2005 interview with Michael Parkinson.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Y'know...
I rather think it is. I've been aware of it since the 1960s, and I don't think it was new then.Michael Wallace wrote:It's not just me suddenly noticing this, right?
My pet hates include the utterly unnecessary use of the phrase "on a regular basis" to mean "regularly", and people who prefix every other sentence with "I'm not being funny" when the likelihood of them saying something amusing is so remote as to be rendered invisible by the curvature of the earth.
Re: Y'know...
Ooh yeah my missus does that one tooPhil Reynolds wrote:and people who prefix every other sentence with "I'm not being funny"
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Y'know...
Hmm ok. Both I and the other half have only really noticed this in the last couple of years (I suppose it might just be that I haven't been exposed to enough commoners, or something).Phil Reynolds wrote:I rather think it is. I've been aware of it since the 1960s, and I don't think it was new then.Michael Wallace wrote:It's not just me suddenly noticing this, right?
Re: Y'know...
Maybe. Phil regularly exposes himself to commoners, so I believe.Michael Wallace wrote:Hmm ok. Both I and the other half have only really noticed this in the last couple of years (I suppose it might just be that I haven't been exposed to enough commoners, or something).
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Y'know...
How very dare you. I haven't been on the common for ages.Jon Corby wrote:Phil regularly exposes himself to commoners, so I believe.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:08 am
Re: Y'know...
Phil is right - it goes back a long time. I recall a BBC interviewer, wearing a suit and speaking in a plummy accent, talking to a young person, who said "y'know" or "y'know what I mean" at least once a (short) sentence. The BBC man even said "yes" a couple of times.
It predates "At the end of the day" etc. If you want modern crap sayings, try, "We have been working very hard", "there are clear procedures in place", "unfortunately, there is no CCTV footage of the incident."
Kevin
It predates "At the end of the day" etc. If you want modern crap sayings, try, "We have been working very hard", "there are clear procedures in place", "unfortunately, there is no CCTV footage of the incident."
Kevin
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Y'know...
You forgot "We are investigating the matter"Kevin Thurlow wrote:If you want modern crap sayings, try, "We have been working very hard", "there are clear procedures in place", "unfortunately, there is no CCTV footage of the incident."
Kevin
- Les Butterworth
- Rookie
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Cheshire
- Contact:
Re: Y'know...
An ex MD who I worked for had the annoying habit of starting his replies to you with "IN ACTUAL FACT".
You knew he was going to disagree with you and no one would ever come back with the correct "ACTUALLY".
Though if he was actually listening to you and if he actually took any notice of your opinion was actually doubtful.
You knew he was going to disagree with you and no one would ever come back with the correct "ACTUALLY".
Though if he was actually listening to you and if he actually took any notice of your opinion was actually doubtful.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
- Location: Harlow
Re: Y'know...
Nowadays he'd have said "absolutely"Kevin Thurlow wrote:Phil is right - it goes back a long time. ...
The BBC man even said "yes" a couple of times.