Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Moderator: Jon O'Neill
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Petersfield (Hants)
Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
My family have spent a lot of time doing their maths homework this week and and completed it bar the following equation which has baffled both my son who is good at maths + my wife who is also quite a good mathematician.
((x+1/2x-1) + (3x-2/2x+1)) -2 = 0
They have both tried various ways of solving it but to no avail.
Have any of you maths whizzes got any tips as to how to tackle it please?
Many thanks
Al
((x+1/2x-1) + (3x-2/2x+1)) -2 = 0
They have both tried various ways of solving it but to no avail.
Have any of you maths whizzes got any tips as to how to tackle it please?
Many thanks
Al
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Assuming I've interpreted it correctly (your brackets are very dodgy), the question is
You need to get rid of the fractions, so first multiply through by (2x-1) to get
(x+1) + (3x-2)(2x-1)/(2x+1) - 2(2x-1) = 0
and then multiply again by (2x+1) to get
(x+1)(2x+1) + (3x-2)(2x+1) - 2(2x+1)(2x-1) = 0
This is now a normal quadratic; multiply out the brackets and gather the x^2's, x's and numbers. The x^2's cancel and you get left with 5 - 4x = 0, which obviously has the solution x=1.25.
Incidentally how old is your son?
Code: Select all
x+1 3x-2
---- + ---- - 2 = 0
2x-1 2x+1
(x+1) + (3x-2)(2x-1)/(2x+1) - 2(2x-1) = 0
and then multiply again by (2x+1) to get
(x+1)(2x+1) + (3x-2)(2x+1) - 2(2x+1)(2x-1) = 0
This is now a normal quadratic; multiply out the brackets and gather the x^2's, x's and numbers. The x^2's cancel and you get left with 5 - 4x = 0, which obviously has the solution x=1.25.
Incidentally how old is your son?
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
What Charlie said
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Makes sense now, I didn't interpret the question like that.Charlie Reams wrote:Assuming I've interpreted it correctly (your brackets are very dodgy), the question isCode: Select all
x+1 3x-2 ---- + ---- - 2 = 0 2x-1 2x+1
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Yeah, the bracketing implies that the question is
x + 1/(2x) - 1 + 3x - 2/(2x) + 1 = 0
but that's such a weird way to write the equation that I assumed it must be something else.
x + 1/(2x) - 1 + 3x - 2/(2x) + 1 = 0
but that's such a weird way to write the equation that I assumed it must be something else.
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Funny, I leapt to completely the wrong interpretation, which we're all assuming is correct. It was only when you said about the bracketing being dodgy that I realised!
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
So are you saying you think the question means something else?Jon Corby wrote:Funny, I leapt to completely the wrong interpretation, which we're all assuming is correct. It was only when you said about the bracketing being dodgy that I realised!
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
No! I agree with what you wrote. But that is, of course, not exactly what that specific question is asking, but what we assume the original question is asking, and the bracketing errors have arisen from Allan's attempt to type it here.Charlie Reams wrote:So are you saying you think the question means something else?Jon Corby wrote:Funny, I leapt to completely the wrong interpretation, which we're all assuming is correct. It was only when you said about the bracketing being dodgy that I realised!
Clear?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I see I see.Jon Corby wrote:No! I agree with what you wrote. But that is, of course, not exactly what that specific question is asking, but what we assume the original question is asking, and the bracketing errors have arisen from Allan's attempt to type it here.Charlie Reams wrote:So are you saying you think the question means something else?Jon Corby wrote:Funny, I leapt to completely the wrong interpretation, which we're all assuming is correct. It was only when you said about the bracketing being dodgy that I realised!
Clear?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Petersfield (Hants)
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Thanks very much Charlie - This is very kind of you - Mike is 16 and on track for A* in his GCSE maths.Charlie Reams wrote:Assuming I've interpreted it correctly (your brackets are very dodgy), the question isYou need to get rid of the fractions, so first multiply through by (2x-1) to getCode: Select all
x+1 3x-2 ---- + ---- - 2 = 0 2x-1 2x+1
(x+1) + (3x-2)(2x-1)/(2x+1) - 2(2x-1) = 0
and then multiply again by (2x+1) to get
(x+1)(2x+1) + (3x-2)(2x+1) - 2(2x+1)(2x-1) = 0
This is now a normal quadratic; multiply out the brackets and gather the x^2's, x's and numbers. The x^2's cancel and you get left with 5 - 4x = 0, which obviously has the solution x=1.25.
Incidentally how old is your son?
We now know where he went wrong when he was multiplying through and got positive x instead of -7x to add back the 3x and get -4x.
Thanks again
Al
ps sorry for setting it out so badly - I should have used separate lines like you did
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Or you could simply have bracketed it correctly:Allan Harmer wrote:ps sorry for setting it out so badly - I should have used separate lines like you did
(x+1)/(2x-1) + (3x-2)/(2x+1) - 2 = 0
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
A rectangular brick has a volume of 72 cubic inches and one edge twice the length of one of the others. What is its minimum surface area?
GCE O-Level 1964
GCE O-Level 1964
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I make it 106 square inches.David Williams wrote:A rectangular brick has a volume of 72 cubic inches and one edge twice the length of one of the others. What is its minimum surface area?
GCE O-Level 1964
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Adam Dexter
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
- Location: Kidderminster
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Sure you don't mean 108? Or have you found a way of slicing two off?Kai Laddiman wrote:I make it 106 square inches.David Williams wrote:A rectangular brick has a volume of 72 cubic inches and one edge twice the length of one of the others. What is its minimum surface area?
GCE O-Level 1964
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon
We're off to button moon
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I make it 108 square inches. I did it the good old fashioned way (no calculator) so chances are that it's wrong.David Williams wrote:A rectangular brick has a volume of 72 cubic inches and one edge twice the length of one of the others. What is its minimum surface area?
GCE O-Level 1964
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
It would make me T_T if anyone thought they needed a calculator for this...Charlie Reams wrote:I make it 108 square inches. I did it the good old fashioned way (no calculator) so chances are that it's wrong.David Williams wrote:A rectangular brick has a volume of 72 cubic inches and one edge twice the length of one of the others. What is its minimum surface area?
GCE O-Level 1964
- Adam Dexter
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
- Location: Kidderminster
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Well not so much a calculator, as a simple thing on tinternet where I put height, width and breadth and it pops out the answer And I have an A level in maths... oh dear!Michael Wallace wrote:It would make me T_T if anyone thought they needed a calculator for this...
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon
We're off to button moon
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I wonder how you were supposed to do this at the time - I just differentiated my expression for the surface area once I'd used the other information to simplify it, but it occurs to me that maybe you're meant to presume that the dimensions are all integers and so you're limited to only 3 options, and then just check both to see which yields the smaller area.
Is there a nice way to do it without calculus without presuming the dimensions are integers?
Is there a nice way to do it without calculus without presuming the dimensions are integers?
Last edited by Michael Wallace on Fri Feb 20, 2009 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Adam Dexter
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
- Location: Kidderminster
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Ah yes! I forgot about the other possible dimensions... assumed there was only one possibility.
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon
We're off to button moon
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Yeah I just used calculus (which they probably had to do back in those days).
I got the lengths as 3, 4 and 6. This meant a surface area of 36+24+48=108, as already answered.
I got the lengths as 3, 4 and 6. This meant a surface area of 36+24+48=108, as already answered.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Elementary calculus was GCSE material at the time so it's possible that that's what was expected.
For anyone interested, the solution goes like this. Call the lengths of the sides a, b and c then:
One side is double the length of another, so a = 2b (it doesn't matter which pair we pick, but let's say we do it this way.)
We know the volume of the cube, so abc = 72.
The surface area S is 2(ab+bc+ac). Rearranging the above two equations allows you to eliminate first a and then c to get S = 4b^2 + 216/b.
Then differentiate S with respect to b to get dS/db = 8b - 216/b^2.
To find the minimum, set dS/db equal to 0 and solve, to give b = 3.
Then plug this value of b into the formula for S to get 108.
Would be interested to see if Harmer Jnr can do this question.
For anyone interested, the solution goes like this. Call the lengths of the sides a, b and c then:
One side is double the length of another, so a = 2b (it doesn't matter which pair we pick, but let's say we do it this way.)
We know the volume of the cube, so abc = 72.
The surface area S is 2(ab+bc+ac). Rearranging the above two equations allows you to eliminate first a and then c to get S = 4b^2 + 216/b.
Then differentiate S with respect to b to get dS/db = 8b - 216/b^2.
To find the minimum, set dS/db equal to 0 and solve, to give b = 3.
Then plug this value of b into the formula for S to get 108.
Would be interested to see if Harmer Jnr can do this question.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
What I meant.Kirk Bevins wrote:Yeah I just used calculus (which they probably had to do back in those days).
I got the lengths as 3, 4 and 6. This meant a surface area of 36+24+48=108, as already answered.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I just remember this as a neat little problem that illustrates the power of calculus.
Log tables are provided. (What's a calculator?)
Log tables are provided. (What's a calculator?)
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Petersfield (Hants)
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I'll get him working on it and report back.Charlie Reams wrote:Elementary calculus was GCSE material at the time so it's possible that that's what was expected.
Would be interested to see if Harmer Jnr can do this question.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I did it by finding the prime factors of 72 (2, 2, 2, 3, 3), finding the sets that fit the condition a=2b (2, 4, 9 and 3, 4, 6) and seeing which 2(ab + ac + bc) gives the lowest value. Nothing complicated or anything.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
You've assumed the dimensions are integers, though, which is why I was wondering if there was a neater way than calculus that didn't make this assumption (oh, and you missed 1, 6 and 12).Kai Laddiman wrote:I did it by finding the prime factors of 72 (2, 2, 2, 3, 3), finding the sets that fit the condition a=2b (2, 4, 9 and 3, 4, 6) and seeing which 2(ab + ac + bc) gives the lowest value. Nothing complicated or anything.
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
But it worked, OK?Michael Wallace wrote:You've assumed the dimensions are integers, though, which is why I was wondering if there was a neater way than calculus that didn't make this assumption (oh, and you missed 1, 6 and 12).Kai Laddiman wrote:I did it by finding the prime factors of 72 (2, 2, 2, 3, 3), finding the sets that fit the condition a=2b (2, 4, 9 and 3, 4, 6) and seeing which 2(ab + ac + bc) gives the lowest value. Nothing complicated or anything.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Petersfield (Hants)
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
He got it right by using trial and error - He hasn't done Calculus yet, but is doing differentiation and integration, which I guess is leading up to Calaculus, which is on his syllabus for the next 1/2 term.Allan Harmer wrote:I'll get him working on it and report back.Charlie Reams wrote:Elementary calculus was GCSE material at the time so it's possible that that's what was expected.
Would be interested to see if Harmer Jnr can do this question.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Clearly you are not a mathematicianKai Laddiman wrote:But it worked, OK?
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
And 36. My first trial and error stab was to assume the brick was 1 inch, 2 inches wide and 36 inches long...Michael Wallace wrote:You've assumed the dimensions are integers, though, which is why I was wondering if there was a neater way than calculus that didn't make this assumption (oh, and you missed 1, 6 and 12).Kai Laddiman wrote:I did it by finding the prime factors of 72 (2, 2, 2, 3, 3), finding the sets that fit the condition a=2b (2, 4, 9 and 3, 4, 6) and seeing which 2(ab + ac + bc) gives the lowest value. Nothing complicated or anything.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Ha, good point. All this just goes to show how sexy calculus is. (I tried to use this to demonstrate to CF how sexy calculus is, I'm not sure if he was convinced...)Phil Reynolds wrote:And 36. My first trial and error stab was to assume the brick was 1 inch, 2 inches wide and 36 inches long...Michael Wallace wrote:You've assumed the dimensions are integers, though, which is why I was wondering if there was a neater way than calculus that didn't make this assumption (oh, and you missed 1, 6 and 12).Kai Laddiman wrote:I did it by finding the prime factors of 72 (2, 2, 2, 3, 3), finding the sets that fit the condition a=2b (2, 4, 9 and 3, 4, 6) and seeing which 2(ab + ac + bc) gives the lowest value. Nothing complicated or anything.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
CFMichael Wallace wrote:I tried to use this to demonstrate to CF how sexy calculus is, I'm not sure if he was convinced...
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
based on his classwork or the homework that you do for him?Allan Harmer wrote:Mike is 16 and on track for A* in his GCSE maths.
- Ian Fitzpatrick
- Devotee
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:23 pm
- Location: Wimborne, Dorset
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
ooooh, RoxanneRoxanne wrote:based on his classwork or the homework that you do for him?Allan Harmer wrote:Mike is 16 and on track for A* in his GCSE maths.
I thought I was good at Countdown until I joined this forum
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Petersfield (Hants)
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Based on the results of the modules he has already passed at A* Cheeky twat! Sorry Kai.Roxanne wrote:based on his classwork or the homework that you do for him?Allan Harmer wrote:Mike is 16 and on track for A* in his GCSE maths.
Last edited by Allan Harmer on Fri Feb 20, 2009 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
GCSEs are modular these days?Allan Harmer wrote:Based on the results of the modules he has already passed at A* Cheeky twat!
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
- Location: Eastbourne
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Haha, the idea of my dad calling somebody named Roxanne a twat on an online forum.Allan Harmer wrote:Based on the results of the modules he has already passed at A* Cheeky twat!Roxanne wrote:based on his classwork or the homework that you do for him?Allan Harmer wrote:Mike is 16 and on track for A* in his GCSE maths.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Petersfield (Hants)
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I know Michael - not like in our day when you had to cram for the exam at the end of the course!Michael Wallace wrote:GCSEs are modular these days?Allan Harmer wrote:Based on the results of the modules he has already passed at A* Cheeky twat!
They have 3 modules to sit - He has passed the two taken so far at A* and has the third to take in April/May + the Additional Maths he has been put in for.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
I'm not sure what distinction you're drawing here, since calculus basically is differentiation and integration (at least until you get into the heavy stuff at degree level) but in any case differentiation is all that's needed here.Allan Harmer wrote:He hasn't done Calculus yet, but is doing differentiation and integration, which I guess is leading up to Calaculus, which is on his syllabus for the next 1/2 term.
Incidentally I did Additional Maths back in the day, I'm surprised it's still going given the existence of AS levels, and the fact that no one recognised it as a qualification.
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Yeah, come on, there's no need to use that sort of language when talking to an 18 year old girl. For shame.Jimmy Gough wrote:Haha, the idea of my dad calling somebody named Roxanne a twat on an online forum.Allan Harmer wrote:Based on the results of the modules he has already passed at A* Cheeky twat!Roxanne wrote:based on his classwork or the homework that you do for him?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Petersfield (Hants)
Re: Maths Homework - Dodgy equation
Jon Corby
Yeah, come on, there's no need to use that sort of language when talking to an 18 year old girl. For shame.
Yeah, come on, there's no need to use that sort of language when talking to an 18 year old girl. For shame.