February's Daily Duels
February's Daily Duels
Decided in yesterday's Blind Duel to use Dan's tip of typing in a gobbledygook word first of the letters I could remember.
So I did much better than I usually do in a Blind Duel. Unfortunately not many people attempted it, so not many points.
C'est la vie!
So I did much better than I usually do in a Blind Duel. Unfortunately not many people attempted it, so not many points.
C'est la vie!
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
I don't think it's really in the spirit of the game to write the letters down, even in an order of your own creation.
Re: February's Daily Duels
Ah, this was mentioned on the cheating thread, and you didn't say there was anything wrong with it.Charlie Reams wrote:I don't think it's really in the spirit of the game to write the letters down, even in an order of your own creation.
Unless you're misunderstanding what I meant.
What I did was: after all the letters had come out and disappeared, I entered what I could remember as a 'word'.
Or is it OK for Dan, but not for me?
Dan Vanniasingham wrote: I freely admit to being someone who looks to form a word or two from the letters as they appear, and then jot down the other letters in the declaration box after. Sometimes I'll have CATSBONEH, sometimes DOGFMUZLI, and sometimes I'll still note a letter wrong anyway.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
I didn't read that. I think it's pretty obvious that writing down anything except your answer is not really the idea.Julie T wrote:Ah, this was mentioned on the cheating thread, and you didn't say there was anything wrong with it.Charlie Reams wrote:I don't think it's really in the spirit of the game to write the letters down, even in an order of your own creation.
Unless you're misunderstanding what I meant.
What I did was: after all the letters had come out and disappeared, I entered what I could remember as a 'word'.
Or is it OK for Dan, but not for me?
Dan Vanniasingham wrote: I freely admit to being someone who looks to form a word or two from the letters as they appear, and then jot down the other letters in the declaration box after. Sometimes I'll have CATSBONEH, sometimes DOGFMUZLI, and sometimes I'll still note a letter wrong anyway.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:38 am
- Location: Enfield, Middlesex
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
Wherever my quote came from, I also explained my thoughts on how unworkable the blind variant is online. I can't be bothered doing that again, but if my method isn't deemed acceptable (and I can see why it wouldn't be) then I'd suggest not using the blind variant at all in duels. If the words "horse" and "duck" appear in the selection, and I note them both - I'm not going to shut my eyes for 30 seconds, and I don't see why I should avoid typing them into the box either.
Re: February's Daily Duels
There are a couple of solutions I can think of, neither of which are even close to ideal.
1) Disable the entry field for the first half (or however long is deemed necessary) of the clock
2) Require length of word to be declared in the round time, then the word typed after time is up kind of like the numbers solutions.
I can totally see why Charlie wouldn't want to think about programming either, just to make it slightly less convenient to "cheat". After all, if people want to write down the letters that badly they'll just use pen and paper.
1) Disable the entry field for the first half (or however long is deemed necessary) of the clock
2) Require length of word to be declared in the round time, then the word typed after time is up kind of like the numbers solutions.
I can totally see why Charlie wouldn't want to think about programming either, just to make it slightly less convenient to "cheat". After all, if people want to write down the letters that badly they'll just use pen and paper.
Re: February's Daily Duels
It is a minefield. Sorry I dragged you into it.Dan Vanniasingham wrote:Wherever my quote came from, I also explained my thoughts on how unworkable the blind variant is online. I can't be bothered doing that again, but if my method isn't deemed acceptable (and I can see why it wouldn't be) then I'd suggest not using the blind variant at all in duels. If the words "horse" and "duck" appear in the selection, and I note them both - I'm not going to shut my eyes for 30 seconds, and I don't see why I should avoid typing them into the box either.
I often avoid playing the blind duels, but they seem to come up quite often.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
Congrats to James on winning a tough duel outright with 11 maxes from 12 rounds.
Congratulations also to Bob Shadwick for winning the "rollover" duel with this excellent performance. Bob has never got a conundrum in under 5 seconds in over 100 attempts but nevertheless managed to get 18 of these tricky ones within the time, including such spots as CHALKIEST (21 seconds) and SMOOCHING (20 seconds). I leave you to draw your own conclusions.
Congratulations also to Bob Shadwick for winning the "rollover" duel with this excellent performance. Bob has never got a conundrum in under 5 seconds in over 100 attempts but nevertheless managed to get 18 of these tricky ones within the time, including such spots as CHALKIEST (21 seconds) and SMOOCHING (20 seconds). I leave you to draw your own conclusions.
Re: February's Daily Duels
I was annoyed at myself for offering MOOCHINGS instead of SMOOCHING and UNLEASING instead of UNSEALING.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Lee Simmonds
- Acolyte
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:37 pm
Re: February's Daily Duels
But surely the best spots were subphylum and biosensor?Charlie Reams wrote:
Congratulations also to Bob Shadwick for winning the "rollover" duel with this excellent performance. Bob has never got a conundrum in under 5 seconds in over 100 attempts but nevertheless managed to get 18 of these tricky ones within the time, including such spots as CHALKIEST (21 seconds) and SMOOCHING (20 seconds). I leave you to draw your own conclusions.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: February's Daily Duels
We seemed to do very similarly, Julie. Both got three, two of which were the same conundrums. And both offered MOOCHINGS.Julie T wrote:I was annoyed at myself for offering MOOCHINGS instead of SMOOCHING and UNLEASING instead of UNSEALING.
Looks as if I missed out on today's duel. Was I alone in not being able to get in this evening?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
I was out from about 2 til after midnight so I didn't know the server was dead.
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: February's Daily Duels
No worries. I've probably only lost one point for February with missing Sunday's.Charlie Reams wrote:I was out from about 2 til after midnight so I didn't know the server was dead.
Re: February's Daily Duels
I missed it too. I was unlucky in that I first tried just at the time the last game was played at 2:55pm. I checked in quite often but it didn't come up again.Howard Somerset wrote:We seemed to do very similarly, Julie. Both got three, two of which were the same conundrums. And both offered MOOCHINGS.Julie T wrote:I was annoyed at myself for offering MOOCHINGS instead of SMOOCHING and UNLEASING instead of UNSEALING.
Looks as if I missed out on today's duel. Was I alone in not being able to get in this evening?
C'est la vie. Can't expect Charlie to devote his whole life to apterous.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
You seem to have a unique insight here, maybe you could publicise it more widely.Julie T wrote:C'est la vie. Can't expect Charlie to devote his whole life to apterous.
- Callum Laddiman
- Rookie
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere in East Sussex
Re: February's Daily Duels
I even offered schooming!
Oh, don't you just love pets..... Ahhhhhhh......
Re: February's Daily Duels
Is there a rollover of yesterday's duel? I didn't notice apterous being down, or maybe I was lucky when I logged on.
The daily duel score table listed is Tuesday's one.
The daily duel score table listed is Tuesday's one.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3966
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
It dropped in the evening. I assume there is a rollover.Julie T wrote:Is there a rollover of yesterday's duel? I didn't notice apterous being down, or maybe I was lucky when I logged on.
The daily duel score table listed is Tuesday's one.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
- Kai Laddiman
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
- Location: My bedroom
Re: February's Daily Duels
3 of us went for a word on Wednesday which will almost certainly be in the next dictionary - ECOMANIAC^.
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
Re: February's Daily Duels
Are Friday's results lost because apterous was down all Saturday?
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: February's Daily Duels
What factors determine whether or not a Duel rolls over and which players get the chance to play a Duel on a subsequent day?
I managed to log in to Apterous yesterday afternoon (Sunday) after it had been down since teatime on Friday, and was hoping to have an opportunity to play both Friday and Saturday's Duels - but no. I queried Charlie about this in the chat room and he said that Friday's Duel had closed but that I would be able to play Saturday's. I logged back in a few more times after that but it didn't appear so I gave up.
However, I notice that the results for Saturday's Duel have now been posted and that 19 people did in fact get to play it - meaning that it must have rolled over for them (stop sniggering at the back) as the server was down all day Saturday. Why didn't it roll over for me? As one of the more mediocre players, my only chance of even getting in the top 10 for the month is if I can play every Duel and add at least a point or two each day.
On a related note: why do the rankings show that a certain Kai Laddiman has played 17 Duels this month when it's only the 16th - and he has yet to play today's Duel?
Sorry if all you can hear while reading this post is a sort of constant high-pitched whine.
I managed to log in to Apterous yesterday afternoon (Sunday) after it had been down since teatime on Friday, and was hoping to have an opportunity to play both Friday and Saturday's Duels - but no. I queried Charlie about this in the chat room and he said that Friday's Duel had closed but that I would be able to play Saturday's. I logged back in a few more times after that but it didn't appear so I gave up.
However, I notice that the results for Saturday's Duel have now been posted and that 19 people did in fact get to play it - meaning that it must have rolled over for them (stop sniggering at the back) as the server was down all day Saturday. Why didn't it roll over for me? As one of the more mediocre players, my only chance of even getting in the top 10 for the month is if I can play every Duel and add at least a point or two each day.
On a related note: why do the rankings show that a certain Kai Laddiman has played 17 Duels this month when it's only the 16th - and he has yet to play today's Duel?
Sorry if all you can hear while reading this post is a sort of constant high-pitched whine.
Re: February's Daily Duels
Saturday's duel didn't appear for me either, Phil. I'd assumed there wasn't one since it'd been down the whole day.
Re number of duels played, mine says 2 more than I've actually played this month too. Maybe they're all fecked up.
Re number of duels played, mine says 2 more than I've actually played this month too. Maybe they're all fecked up.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
Generally the Duel rolls over if there is more than a few hours of downtime. However Saturday's Duel was not really a rollover; it actually closed on Saturday as normal, it's just the no one could play it, so I reopened it yesterday. It sounds like you logged in before I reopened it. The scores for this month are a bit screwy and will be corrected at some point.Phil Reynolds wrote:What factors determine whether or not a Duel rolls over and which players get the chance to play a Duel on a subsequent day?
I managed to log in to Apterous yesterday afternoon (Sunday) after it had been down since teatime on Friday, and was hoping to have an opportunity to play both Friday and Saturday's Duels - but no. I queried Charlie about this in the chat room and he said that Friday's Duel had closed but that I would be able to play Saturday's. I logged back in a few more times after that but it didn't appear so I gave up.
However, I notice that the results for Saturday's Duel have now been posted and that 19 people did in fact get to play it - meaning that it must have rolled over for them (stop sniggering at the back) as the server was down all day Saturday. Why didn't it roll over for me? As one of the more mediocre players, my only chance of even getting in the top 10 for the month is if I can play every Duel and add at least a point or two each day.
On a related note: why do the rankings show that a certain Kai Laddiman has played 17 Duels this month when it's only the 16th - and he has yet to play today's Duel?
Sorry if all you can hear while reading this post is a sort of constant high-pitched whine.
- Lee Simmonds
- Acolyte
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:37 pm
Re: February's Daily Duels
Just checked the results for Sunday's duel and gutted as I could have won! I risked tunafish in rd 5 when I had a safe 6 and that subsequently put me off risking routined and oversite in later rounds. Those 9 points would have given me a total of 116.
- Lee Simmonds
- Acolyte
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:37 pm
Re: February's Daily Duels
Any chance that today's duel will roll over? Looks like apterous is down atm.
- Ben Hunter
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1770
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm
- Location: S Yorks
Re: February's Daily Duels
He's little so Charlie gave him a head start.Phil Reynolds wrote:On a related note: why do the rankings show that a certain Kai Laddiman has played 17 Duels this month when it's only the 16th - and he has yet to play today's Duel?
Re: February's Daily Duels
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
Re: February's Daily Duels
It does seem harsh that we get 4 points fewer than Kirk. It's not like he did that much better than the rest of us.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: February's Daily Duels
Oi. I got a 3 second blind conundrum in 2 seconds. You didn't. I got a perfect game. You didn't. I need all the points I can get.Jon Corby wrote:It does seem harsh that we get 4 points fewer than Kirk. It's not like he did that much better than the rest of us.
Re: February's Daily Duels
Cocking bunch of cocking 'H' key not cocking working cock.
Re: February's Daily Duels
Aaaarrrgghh! We've all been victims of some sort of mistyping at some time or another, though. Still bloody annoying.Gary Male wrote:Cocking bunch of cocking 'H' key not cocking working cock.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
Re: February's Daily Duels
I appear to be joint 18th with the great Jon Corby in the February standings!
The fact that he's done half the number of duels that I have, has absolutely no relevance whatsoever!
The fact that he's done half the number of duels that I have, has absolutely no relevance whatsoever!
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
Re: February's Daily Duels
apterous crashed while I was on the duel today.
I wrote down the conundrums I got, so that when it came back up, I could be honest and put in what I'd got first time round.
Unfortunately I forgot that, since I got the 3 I'd written down after the last letter came up, my score should be 28 and not 37.
As I'm sure that this is a pretty rubbish score, I hope no-one is bothered. Sorry!
It made for a rather stupid looking game!
http://apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=28381
I wrote down the conundrums I got, so that when it came back up, I could be honest and put in what I'd got first time round.
Unfortunately I forgot that, since I got the 3 I'd written down after the last letter came up, my score should be 28 and not 37.
As I'm sure that this is a pretty rubbish score, I hope no-one is bothered. Sorry!
It made for a rather stupid looking game!
http://apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=28381
Last edited by Julie T on Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3966
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
Started mine, it crashed, couldn't resume, even though it was in view. Bah.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
Re: February's Daily Duels
Bit late now, but if it happens again, did you try logging out and in again?Ian Volante wrote:Started mine, it crashed, couldn't resume, even though it was in view. Bah.
Nice to have a standardish game for the duel today.
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3966
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
Aye! I swore at it too.Julie T wrote:Bit late now, but if it happens again, did you try logging out and in again?Ian Volante wrote:Started mine, it crashed, couldn't resume, even though it was in view. Bah.
Nice to have a standardish game for the duel today.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
If the Duel crashes on you, let me know by email or PM. A message in some obscure thread at 11.20 is unlikely to attract my attention in time.
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3966
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: February's Daily Duels
I wasn't too bothered, just fancied a whingeCharlie Reams wrote:If the Duel crashes on you, let me know by email or PM. A message in some obscure thread at 11.20 is unlikely to attract my attention in time.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles