c4countdownA group for contestants and lovers of the Channel 4 game show 'Countdown'.
|
|
|
|
It is currently Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:40 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:20 am |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1740 Location: Alsager, UK
|
Bugger. I should've got in first and started it yesterday evening with the title CofC tomorrow 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:20 am |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
Everyone has predicted a Mubeen victory, but can Warren pull something out of the hat? Hmm, there must be some kind of rabbit pun in there.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Phil Reynolds
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:46 am |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm Posts: 2502 Location: Leamington Spa, UK
|
Charlie Reams wrote: can Warren pull something out of the hat? Hmm, there must be some kind of rabbit pun in there. Charlie, you're a bunny guy!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kai Laddiman
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:43 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm Posts: 1995 Location: My bedroom
|
That was a brilliant joke by Andrew (but we had been told not to mention it  ).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Phil Reynolds
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:45 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm Posts: 2502 Location: Leamington Spa, UK
|
|
I beat the contestants with DEIFIED in round 2. Which is much more interesting than DC's EDIFIED, being a palindrome.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Chris Davies
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:48 pm |
| Series 61 Champion |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:50 pm Posts: 301
|
I saw RESONATE  And BEDTIME! Well done Jeff.
Last edited by Chris Davies on Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Phil Reynolds
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:57 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm Posts: 2502 Location: Leamington Spa, UK
|
|
Simpler method for round 10: (100+50)x(9-5)-7x3
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Martin Gardner
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:57 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm Posts: 1436 Location: Leeds, UK
|
|
Cuter numbers solution for round 10:
100 + 50 = 150 9 - 5 = 4 4 * 150 = 600 7 * 3 = 21 600 - 21 = 579
Voilà
_________________ If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Katherine Birkett
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:02 pm |
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:06 am Posts: 80 Location: Lincolnshire
|
LAST SEGMENT OF SHOW: I just got 'Bedtime'! Next round - one letter short of 'galoshes'!  Next round - Got 'parried' Numbers - achieved a 900 but time ran out for me to 'minus off' what needed to be 'minused off' 900 to get whatever it was! Conundrum - didn't get it.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Martin Gardner
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:18 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm Posts: 1436 Location: Leeds, UK
|
|
Re: Octochamps scores, that's two games now that the Octochamp with the highest average score has won. Let's see if this continues through the week.
_________________ If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Dinos Sfyris
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:43 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am Posts: 2440 Location: Sheffield
|
Phil Reynolds wrote: Charlie, you're a bunny guy! Andrew Sachs wrote: But this is Countdown not the Russell Brand Show! Well done to Junaid on todays victory, although I think SEIGNEUR was spot of the day. Nice one Tony  I lost 77-73 to Junaid having risked DEFIXED in round 2 and MORALES in round 12, both of which are bogus, and beat Tony 77-60, albeit as an armchair hero! Rachel seems more comfortable already but I wish Carol was there to go check on the ghastly triple vowels!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Malcolm James
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:23 pm |
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:59 pm Posts: 70
|
|
R5 10,9,8,6,5,4 Target 921
((6+5) x 10 +4) x 8 + 9 = 921
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Junaid Mubeen
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 5:25 pm |
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:26 pm Posts: 564
|
|
I'd like to assure you all that this was, by far, the worst game in CofC. Thank goodness. SEIGNEUR was a terrific spot by Tony though.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
tonywarren
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:03 pm |
| Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:33 am Posts: 70 Location: somerton, somerset
|
[quote="Junaid Mubeen"]I'd like to assure you all that this was, by far, the worst game in CofC. Thank goodness. SEIGNEUR was a terrific spot by Tony though.[/quote My cat Tigger outscored me today. But then he's not in the studio with one opponent and 14 CofC contestants looking on with Damocles clock behind him. And I'm not sure that some of Tigger's words were any more likely than prandize. Thanks to Junaid for not rubbing my nose in it. Definitely the better player won! 
_________________ Who says Morris dancing ain't cool...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ian Dent
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:05 pm |
| Enthusiast |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:12 pm Posts: 480
|
|
Well done Junaid. Enjoyed the nervous game. Tony played very well.
Was a bit surprised to see you both though. Was I the only one expecting Steve Briers vs Debbi Flack?!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:17 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
Ian Dent wrote: Well done Junaid. Enjoyed the nervous game. Tony played very well.
Was a bit surprised to see you both though. Was I the only one expecting Steve Briers vs Debbi Flack?! The games are not played in the order suggested by the draw. That's why I did a separate diagram showing the draw.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lesley Jeavons
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 7:33 pm |
| Enthusiast |
 |
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:05 pm Posts: 315 Location: Brighton, UK
|
|
Round 10 numbers, ((9-5)x50-7)x3=579
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Eoin Monaghan
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:07 pm |
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm Posts: 876 Location: Norn Iron
|
|
i beat junaid but forgot by what and can't be bothered to check.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jon O'Neill
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:11 pm |
| Ginger Ninja |
 |
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am Posts: 1766 Location: London, UK
|
Eoin.V.Monaghan wrote: i beat junaid but forgot by what and can't be bothered to check. And nobody cares.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kirk Bevins
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:12 pm |
| God |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm Posts: 4260 Location: York, UK
|
Jon O'Neill wrote: Eoin.V.Monaghan wrote: i beat junaid but forgot by what and can't be bothered to check. And nobody cares. That's a bit harsh. Junaid's a quality player and if people feel good about beating him from home, let them come somewhere (and where other than a Countdown forum) to brag about it.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Eoin Monaghan
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:21 pm |
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm Posts: 876 Location: Norn Iron
|
Kirk Bevins wrote: Jon O'Neill wrote: Eoin.V.Monaghan wrote: i beat junaid but forgot by what and can't be bothered to check. And nobody cares. That's a bit harsh. Junaid's a quality player and if people feel good about beating him from home, let them come somewhere (and where other than a Countdown forum) to brag about it. I'm trying not to boast i'm just saying, because Dinos said how he got on, that I thought I'd join in. I don't mind if nobody cares. Thanks Kirk for backing me up anyway.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kathleen Batlle
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:36 pm |
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 9:59 pm Posts: 143
|
|
I enjoyed the show today and Rachel seemed a bit more relaxed than yesterday, except when she dropped the number! Congratulations to Junaid, he played very well, but so did Tony. The selection of letters hasn't been very good at all. I wonder if something has changed there. Loved your Clarice Cliff tie Tony. I did manage a 6 when Junaid only got a 5, but didn't do very well anywhere else.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Martin Bishop
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:41 pm |
| Acolyte |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:29 pm Posts: 226 Location: Tadworth, Surrey
|
Eoin.V.Monaghan wrote: I'm trying not to boast i'm just saying, because Dinos said how he got on, that I thought I'd join in. I don't mind if nobody cares. Thanks Kirk for backing me up anyway. Well, I'm here to boast. I beat Junaid 76-67. I've got to address my searing bitterness at losing my semi final somehow.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Junaid Mubeen
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:19 pm |
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:26 pm Posts: 564
|
Kirk Bevins wrote: Jon O'Neill wrote: Eoin.V.Monaghan wrote: i beat junaid but forgot by what and can't be bothered to check. And nobody cares. That's a bit harsh. Junaid's a quality player and if people feel good about beating him from home, let them come somewhere (and where other than a Countdown forum) to brag about it. Not too bothered either way to be honest, although you have to be cautious when comparing against contetants on the show. For example, I chose not to risk BEDTIME in one round since Tony had 5. You would score me as having a 6, but if you declared >5 I'd no doubt have gone for the 7. In other words, the playing safe option isn't taken into account and this often changes the whole complexion of a game. That said, I thrashed myself today so am feeling sky high 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Dan Vanniasingham
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:56 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:38 am Posts: 290 Location: Enfield, Middlesex
|
Phil Reynolds wrote: Charlie, you're a bunny guy! Brilliant Jon O'Neill wrote: Eoin.V.Monaghan wrote: i beat junaid but forgot by what and can't be bothered to check. And nobody cares. Brilliant Junaid Mubeen wrote: Not too bothered either way to be honest, although you have to be cautious when comparing against contetants on the show. For example, I chose not to risk BEDTIME in one round since Tony had 5. You would score me as having a 6, but if you declared >5 I'd no doubt have gone for the 7. In other words, the playing safe option isn't taken into account and this often changes the whole complexion of a game. Precisely! The whole "I beat you/lost to you/would've gone to a tie-break conundrum against you and then beaten you on it because it would've been scrambled as TURROTING and I know what that is straight away" stuff is very tiresome. I can see why scoring against someone from home is a useful way of tracking your progress and ability, but to use that as anything more than a guide is laughable (Martin's excused though as his post was almost worthy of a "brilliant" too). Anyway, well done to a seemingly nervous Junaid, and also to Tony - you did better than you think (unless your cat is a future series champion). Those two difficult numbers games played into Junaid's hands, and your made-up R13 word was a tactical gamble worth going for (what with beating Junaid on the final numbers rather improbable). SEIGNEUR was quality too! Good effort mate. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
tonywarren
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:57 pm |
| Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:33 am Posts: 70 Location: somerton, somerset
|
Dan Vanniasingham wrote: Anyway, well done to a seemingly nervous Junaid, and also to Tony - you did better than you think (unless your cat is a future series champion). Those two difficult numbers games played into Junaid's hands, and your made-up R13 word was a tactical gamble worth going for (what with beating Junaid on the final numbers rather improbable). SEIGNEUR was quality too! Good effort mate.  Cheers. When you're sitting up front with the Clock of Damocles behind and the time ticking away it's amazing how much of the obvious passes you by. There really was a great camaraderie between the contestants so that everyone new that the whole thing was going to be won by a member of the home team so losing a game didn't hurt. Too much 
_________________ Who says Morris dancing ain't cool...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Spoilers for Tuesday 13th Jan 2009 Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:53 am |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1740 Location: Alsager, UK
|
Ian Dent wrote: Was I the only one expecting Steve Briers vs Debbi Flack?! This page contains two tables. The top one shows who plays whom, and the bottom one shows who plays when. But don't go to that page if you're not up to date with games, as it shows all results so far.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|