...and that's ZoomDown
Moderators: JackHurst, Lesley Hines
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
David Hilton
Seed: 7
Wins: 3
Points: 333 (83.3 per game)
Total Max: 29/60 (48.3%)
Letters Maxes: 17/40 (42.5%)
ZD Medals: N/A
Numbers Maxes: 11/16 (68.8%)
6S: 1/4 (25%)
1L: 9/11 (81.8%)
2L: 1/1 (100%)
3L: N/A
4L: 0/1
Conundrums: 1/4 (25%)
1 Solved, 0 Lost, 3 Unsolved
Seed: 7
Wins: 3
Points: 333 (83.3 per game)
Total Max: 29/60 (48.3%)
Letters Maxes: 17/40 (42.5%)
ZD Medals: N/A
Numbers Maxes: 11/16 (68.8%)
6S: 1/4 (25%)
1L: 9/11 (81.8%)
2L: 1/1 (100%)
3L: N/A
4L: 0/1
Conundrums: 1/4 (25%)
1 Solved, 0 Lost, 3 Unsolved
Last edited by Tom S on Tue Dec 08, 2020 4:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Tom Stevenson
Seed: 8
Wins: 2
Points: 349 (116.3 per game)
Total Max: 35 /45 (77.8%)
Letters Maxes: 24/30 (80%)
ZD Medals: Anaemic, Defeatism (Joint accolade alongside opponent) Adorement, Romanzes
Numbers Maxes: 11/12 (91.7%)
6S: 3/3 (100%)
1L: 2/2 (100%)
2L: 1/1 (1005)
3L: 4/5 (80%)
4L: 1/1 (100%)
Conundrums: 0/3
0 Won. 3 Lost, 0 Unsolved
Seed: 8
Wins: 2
Points: 349 (116.3 per game)
Total Max: 35 /45 (77.8%)
Letters Maxes: 24/30 (80%)
ZD Medals: Anaemic, Defeatism (Joint accolade alongside opponent) Adorement, Romanzes
Numbers Maxes: 11/12 (91.7%)
6S: 3/3 (100%)
1L: 2/2 (100%)
2L: 1/1 (1005)
3L: 4/5 (80%)
4L: 1/1 (100%)
Conundrums: 0/3
0 Won. 3 Lost, 0 Unsolved
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
All results + rankings on 1 post.
Rob Foster:
Seed: 1
Wins: 4
Points: 530 (132.5 per game)
Total Max: 55/60 (91.7%)
Letters Maxes: 38/40 (95%)
ZD Medals (7+ maxes never played by a contestant or suggested by DC on either Countdown or Zoomdown): Alodiary, Alienors, Outwept, Pleasurer (joint accolade alongside opponent), Inositol, Augitites, Neuraxial, Tentoria, Emulous, Labarias, Semitonal, Ocreate, Echiurid, Mesghal, Dewaxes, Teeting, Webinars, Priorite.
Numbers Maxes: 13/16 (81.3%)
6S: 1/3 (33.3%)
1L: 8/9 (88.9%)
2L: N/A
3L: N/A
4L: 4/4 (100%)
Conundrums: 4/4 (100%)
Callum Todd:
Seed: 2
Wins: 4
Points: 480 (120 per game)
Total Max: 52/60 (86.7%)
Letters Maxes: 33/40 (82.5%)
ZD Medals: Defeatism (Joint accolade alongside opponent), Ipomoeas, Similor, Goafstead, Mesozoa, Upturned, Bonanza, Maniera
Numbers Maxes: 15/16 (93.4%)
6S: 3/3 (100%)
1L: 3/4 (75%)
2L: 1/1 (100%)
3L: 2/2 (100%)
4L: 6/6 (100%)
Conundrums: 4/4 (100%)
Jack Worsley:
Seed: 3
Wins: 4
Points: 469 (117.3 per game)
Total Max: 46/60 (76.7%)
Letters Maxes: 30/40 (75%)
ZD Medals: Supernova, Paesanos, Candirus (Joint accolades alongside opponents) Agatizes, Homevid, Rotaliid, Powernets, Rheadins, Eulogia, Langues, Jetboats
Numbers Maxes: 13/16 (81.3%)
6S: 1/1 (100%)
1L: 6/6 (100%)
2L: 0/1
3L: 1/1 (100%)
4L: 5/7 (71.4%)
Conundrums: 3/4 (75%)
3 Solved, 0 Lost, 1 Unsolved
Harry Savage:
Seed: 4
Wins: 3
Points: 436 (104 per game)
Total Max: 43/60 (71.7%)
Letters Maxes: 28/40 (70%)
ZD Medals: Dogmatize, Tweezer (Joint accolades alongside opponents) Alumite, Achroite, Aurorae
Numbers Maxes: 12/16 (75%)
6S; 0/2
1L: 11/12 (91.7%)
2L: N/A
3L: N/A
4L: 1/2 (50%)
Conundrums: 3/4 (75%)
3 Solved, 1 Lost, 0 Unsolved
Noel McIlvenny
Seed: 5
Wins: 3
Points: 396 (99 per game)
Total Max: 36 /60 (60%)
Letters Maxes: 20/40 (50%)
ZD Medals: Swiping, Scummier, Dogmatize (Joint accolades alongside opponents)
Numbers Maxes: 13/16 (81.25%)
6S: 1/1 (100%)
1L: 4/4 (100%)
2L: 1/4 (25%)
3L: N/A
4L: 7/7 (100%)
Conundrums: 3/4 (75%)
3 Solved, 1 Lost, 0 Unsolved
Ben Wilson
Seed: 6
Wins: 3
Points: 395 (98.8 per game)
Total Max:37/60 (61.7%)
Letters Maxes: 26/40 (65%)
ZD Medals: Enviro, Baronetcy
Numbers Maxes: 10/16 (62.5%)
6S: 1/3 (33.3%)
1L: 7/8 (87.5%)
2L: 1/3 (33.3%)
3L: N/A
4L: 1/2 (50%)
Conundrums: 1/4 (25%)
1 Solved, 3 Lost, 0 Unsolved
David Hilton
Seed: 7
Wins: 3
Points: 333 (83.3 per game)
Total Max: 29/60 (48.3%)
Letters Maxes: 17/40 (42.5%)
ZD Medals: N/A
Numbers Maxes: 11/16 (68.8%)
6S: 1/4 (25%)
1L: 9/11 (81.8%)
2L: 1/1 (100%)
3L: N/A
4L: 0/1
Conundrums: 1/4 (25%)
1 Solved, 0 Lost, 3 Unsolved
Tom Stevenson
Seed: 8
Wins: 2
Points: 349 (116.3 per game)
Total Max: 35 /45 (77.8%)
Letters Maxes: 24/30 (80%)
ZD Medals: Anaemic, Defeatism (Joint accolade alongside opponent) Adorement, Romanzes
Numbers Maxes: 11/12 (91.7%)
6S: 3/3 (100%)
1L: 2/2 (100%)
2L: 1/1 (100%)
3L: 4/5 (80%)
4L: 1/1 (100%)
Conundrums: 0/3
0 Won. 3 Lost, 0 Unsolved
Letters Maxes (Based on %)
1. 95%- Rob Foster
2. 93.4%- Callum Todd
3. 80%- Tom Stevenson
4. 75%- Jack Worsley
5. 70%- Harry Savage
6. 65%- Ben Wilson
7. 50%- Noel McIlvenny
8. 42.5%- David Hilton
Numbers Maxes (Based on %)
1. 93.4%- Callum Todd
2. 91.7%- Tom Stevenson
=3. 81.3%- Rob Foster
=3. " Jack Worsley
=3. "- Noel McIlvenny
4. 75%-Harry Savage
5. 68.8%- David Hilton
6. 62.5%- Ben WIlson
Conundrums Maxes (Based on %)
=1. 100%- Rob Foster
=1. "- Callum Todd
=2. 75%- Jack Worsley
=2. "- Harry Savage
=2. "- Noel McIlvenny
=3. 25%- Ben Wilson
=3. "- David Hilton
4. 0%- Tom Stevenson
Combined Max %
1. 90%- Rob Foster
2. 86.7%- Callum Todd
3. 77.8%- Tom Stevenson
4. 76.7%- Jack Worsley
5. 71.7%- Harry Savage
6. 61.7%- Ben Wilson
7. 60%- Noel McIlvenny
8. 48.3%- David Hilton
With all of these stats combined, the results would all go to seeding if it was based on percentages only. We'll have to wait and see to find out what happens!
Rob Foster:
Seed: 1
Wins: 4
Points: 530 (132.5 per game)
Total Max: 55/60 (91.7%)
Letters Maxes: 38/40 (95%)
ZD Medals (7+ maxes never played by a contestant or suggested by DC on either Countdown or Zoomdown): Alodiary, Alienors, Outwept, Pleasurer (joint accolade alongside opponent), Inositol, Augitites, Neuraxial, Tentoria, Emulous, Labarias, Semitonal, Ocreate, Echiurid, Mesghal, Dewaxes, Teeting, Webinars, Priorite.
Numbers Maxes: 13/16 (81.3%)
6S: 1/3 (33.3%)
1L: 8/9 (88.9%)
2L: N/A
3L: N/A
4L: 4/4 (100%)
Conundrums: 4/4 (100%)
Callum Todd:
Seed: 2
Wins: 4
Points: 480 (120 per game)
Total Max: 52/60 (86.7%)
Letters Maxes: 33/40 (82.5%)
ZD Medals: Defeatism (Joint accolade alongside opponent), Ipomoeas, Similor, Goafstead, Mesozoa, Upturned, Bonanza, Maniera
Numbers Maxes: 15/16 (93.4%)
6S: 3/3 (100%)
1L: 3/4 (75%)
2L: 1/1 (100%)
3L: 2/2 (100%)
4L: 6/6 (100%)
Conundrums: 4/4 (100%)
Jack Worsley:
Seed: 3
Wins: 4
Points: 469 (117.3 per game)
Total Max: 46/60 (76.7%)
Letters Maxes: 30/40 (75%)
ZD Medals: Supernova, Paesanos, Candirus (Joint accolades alongside opponents) Agatizes, Homevid, Rotaliid, Powernets, Rheadins, Eulogia, Langues, Jetboats
Numbers Maxes: 13/16 (81.3%)
6S: 1/1 (100%)
1L: 6/6 (100%)
2L: 0/1
3L: 1/1 (100%)
4L: 5/7 (71.4%)
Conundrums: 3/4 (75%)
3 Solved, 0 Lost, 1 Unsolved
Harry Savage:
Seed: 4
Wins: 3
Points: 436 (104 per game)
Total Max: 43/60 (71.7%)
Letters Maxes: 28/40 (70%)
ZD Medals: Dogmatize, Tweezer (Joint accolades alongside opponents) Alumite, Achroite, Aurorae
Numbers Maxes: 12/16 (75%)
6S; 0/2
1L: 11/12 (91.7%)
2L: N/A
3L: N/A
4L: 1/2 (50%)
Conundrums: 3/4 (75%)
3 Solved, 1 Lost, 0 Unsolved
Noel McIlvenny
Seed: 5
Wins: 3
Points: 396 (99 per game)
Total Max: 36 /60 (60%)
Letters Maxes: 20/40 (50%)
ZD Medals: Swiping, Scummier, Dogmatize (Joint accolades alongside opponents)
Numbers Maxes: 13/16 (81.25%)
6S: 1/1 (100%)
1L: 4/4 (100%)
2L: 1/4 (25%)
3L: N/A
4L: 7/7 (100%)
Conundrums: 3/4 (75%)
3 Solved, 1 Lost, 0 Unsolved
Ben Wilson
Seed: 6
Wins: 3
Points: 395 (98.8 per game)
Total Max:37/60 (61.7%)
Letters Maxes: 26/40 (65%)
ZD Medals: Enviro, Baronetcy
Numbers Maxes: 10/16 (62.5%)
6S: 1/3 (33.3%)
1L: 7/8 (87.5%)
2L: 1/3 (33.3%)
3L: N/A
4L: 1/2 (50%)
Conundrums: 1/4 (25%)
1 Solved, 3 Lost, 0 Unsolved
David Hilton
Seed: 7
Wins: 3
Points: 333 (83.3 per game)
Total Max: 29/60 (48.3%)
Letters Maxes: 17/40 (42.5%)
ZD Medals: N/A
Numbers Maxes: 11/16 (68.8%)
6S: 1/4 (25%)
1L: 9/11 (81.8%)
2L: 1/1 (100%)
3L: N/A
4L: 0/1
Conundrums: 1/4 (25%)
1 Solved, 0 Lost, 3 Unsolved
Tom Stevenson
Seed: 8
Wins: 2
Points: 349 (116.3 per game)
Total Max: 35 /45 (77.8%)
Letters Maxes: 24/30 (80%)
ZD Medals: Anaemic, Defeatism (Joint accolade alongside opponent) Adorement, Romanzes
Numbers Maxes: 11/12 (91.7%)
6S: 3/3 (100%)
1L: 2/2 (100%)
2L: 1/1 (100%)
3L: 4/5 (80%)
4L: 1/1 (100%)
Conundrums: 0/3
0 Won. 3 Lost, 0 Unsolved
Letters Maxes (Based on %)
1. 95%- Rob Foster
2. 93.4%- Callum Todd
3. 80%- Tom Stevenson
4. 75%- Jack Worsley
5. 70%- Harry Savage
6. 65%- Ben Wilson
7. 50%- Noel McIlvenny
8. 42.5%- David Hilton
Numbers Maxes (Based on %)
1. 93.4%- Callum Todd
2. 91.7%- Tom Stevenson
=3. 81.3%- Rob Foster
=3. " Jack Worsley
=3. "- Noel McIlvenny
4. 75%-Harry Savage
5. 68.8%- David Hilton
6. 62.5%- Ben WIlson
Conundrums Maxes (Based on %)
=1. 100%- Rob Foster
=1. "- Callum Todd
=2. 75%- Jack Worsley
=2. "- Harry Savage
=2. "- Noel McIlvenny
=3. 25%- Ben Wilson
=3. "- David Hilton
4. 0%- Tom Stevenson
Combined Max %
1. 90%- Rob Foster
2. 86.7%- Callum Todd
3. 77.8%- Tom Stevenson
4. 76.7%- Jack Worsley
5. 71.7%- Harry Savage
6. 61.7%- Ben Wilson
7. 60%- Noel McIlvenny
8. 48.3%- David Hilton
With all of these stats combined, the results would all go to seeding if it was based on percentages only. We'll have to wait and see to find out what happens!
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Throwback to Scott Gillies on the show.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Great idea, Graeme. You should ticket it.Graeme Cole wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:57 am You may be interested to hear there is precedent for using the apterous ticket system to request recap writer features.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Woohoo! Quarterfinals time
Best of luck to all our players tonight
Best of luck to all our players tonight
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Thanks! I'll need it!Paul Anderson wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 5:27 pm Woohoo! Quarterfinals time
Best of luck to all our players tonight
-
- Series 72 Champion
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:42 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Your last series finals before you jet off to the big time on Channel 4?Paul Anderson wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 5:27 pm Woohoo! Quarterfinals time
Best of luck to all our players tonight
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Ha, sure one can only dream eh Tom!
Just chatted to Susie, all good for the final.....just need two players now! Who will they be?
Just chatted to Susie, all good for the final.....just need two players now! Who will they be?
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Sorry I'm late to this, but yes, all of this for me too. I too saw PACKIES first and was relieved to spot COOKIES to avoid the awkwardness. I thought it was a sensible decision on Fred's part not to read out PACKIES but would have been equally fine with him reading it out. Seems a non-issue to me, and something Fred shouldn't have had to defend himself over.Callum Todd wrote: ↑Sat Dec 05, 2020 5:14 pm I saw that word first and didn't declare it because of how it sounds so I'm fully behind the decision (if it was a decision and not just an oversight) of DC to not mention it. It's hardly a big deal; there's no reason for DC to reel off all the boring maxes anyway. I know they normally do, but I'm not gonna worry about them not doing so in this case, especially considering the word in question.
As for the offence point, most Countdown people I think hear the syllables of CUNTIER being read out and think of it as an amusing word. The cat's arse thing was funny/charming. Hearing the syllables of PACKIES being read out isn't associated with much fun or frivolity to me and I predict the same is true for most people.
- L'oisleatch McGraw
- Devotee
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:46 am
- Location: Waterford
- Contact:
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Had the decision been to include this particular non-racist word among the maxes, it would be a non-issue.
That it was omitted, makes it an issue, and raises more interesting questions.
(The lengthy discussion that ensued -and that you just contributed to- kind of proves that point.)
S:778-ochamp
- L'oisleatch McGraw
- Devotee
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:46 am
- Location: Waterford
- Contact:
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Callum v Jack would be a great game, but one which would only be possible in an SF this series given that they are seed's 2 and 3
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
My guess: Rob vs Callum
- L'oisleatch McGraw
- Devotee
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:46 am
- Location: Waterford
- Contact:
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Oh yeah, d'oh!Tom S wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 11:24 pmCallum v Jack would be a great game, but one which would only be possible in an SF this series given that they are seed's 2 and 3
Well, I suppose I'd better try again.
I'll go Rob vs Jack then...
...though the standard is so high, it may as well be the toss of a coin.
Prepare for a few rapid-fire crucial conundrum shootouts in the next three episodes.
S:778-ochamp
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
We're finally here!
What a final we have in store. 2 brilliant players to round off the series in style. Bring it on!
What a final we have in store. 2 brilliant players to round off the series in style. Bring it on!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Susie to tweet the link sometime over le weekend
- L'oisleatch McGraw
- Devotee
- Posts: 930
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 2:46 am
- Location: Waterford
- Contact:
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Did anyone else find the Zoomdown Semi-Finals that little bit more entertaining than the S82 semis on telly?!
Well played all!
Well played all!
S:778-ochamp
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
I wouldn't like to compare, but we've been treated to a whole lot of great CD and are in for a whole lot more
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Should be a great final.
200+ scores please!
Is Susie lexing, Paul? (And does that mean I’ll have to listen out more carefully for the maxes she mentions and * the ones she doesn’t)
200+ scores please!
Is Susie lexing, Paul? (And does that mean I’ll have to listen out more carefully for the maxes she mentions and * the ones she doesn’t)
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
She sure is! Ok, I guess I should make a rough plan for the chats
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Is she lexing using Apterous or as she does on the show?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Yeah using TCC’s tool, which uses Apto for the maxes, but has links to Premium
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Didn't disappoint...
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Yeah, great game. And a celebrity lexicographer!
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Glad you enjoyed it guys - great game, great guest - perfect for that pre-Christmas lift that we all need.
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Boo to Channel 4 for scheduling Catsdown against it!
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 8:10 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
I mean that was probably scheduled long before ZoomDown existed looking at when it was filmed.Rhys Benjamin wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 11:06 pm Boo to Channel 4 for scheduling Catsdown against it!
Shame the shout-out for it was mentioned in real countdown in today's episode, rather than yesterday before the final though.
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Great stuff last night. Susie was excellent as were both the players. Big congrats to the winner! (Won't name here in case spoilers?)
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Well I’m sure we can name him now.
Ladies and gents, I give you our ZoomDown Series 2 champion, Rob Foster! A very worthy winner indeed.
Cracking year’s CD against the odds lads, so Merry Christmas to all of ye and bring on 2021!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Happy New Year fellow Countdownites
The draw for ZD Numberists S2:
Mon 4th January 2021:
Thomas Cappleman vs Sam Cappleman-Lynes (The Cappleman-Off)
Bradley Horrocks vs Antoinette Ryan
Peter Clarke vs Matthew Tassier
Elizabeth Beer vs Tim Down
Mon 11th January 2021:
Noel McIlvenny vs Jon O'Neill (Ulster Final)
Elliott Mellor vs Vincent Barcet
Eoin Monaghan vs Chris Butler
Stephen Read vs Trevor Birenbaum
These two "groups" constitute halves of the draw, so the final will be the winner of the 4th Jan half vs the winner of the 11th Jan half
Some tasty ones
The draw for ZD Numberists S2:
Mon 4th January 2021:
Thomas Cappleman vs Sam Cappleman-Lynes (The Cappleman-Off)
Bradley Horrocks vs Antoinette Ryan
Peter Clarke vs Matthew Tassier
Elizabeth Beer vs Tim Down
Mon 11th January 2021:
Noel McIlvenny vs Jon O'Neill (Ulster Final)
Elliott Mellor vs Vincent Barcet
Eoin Monaghan vs Chris Butler
Stephen Read vs Trevor Birenbaum
These two "groups" constitute halves of the draw, so the final will be the winner of the 4th Jan half vs the winner of the 11th Jan half
Some tasty ones
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
https://wiki.apterous.org/ZoomDown_spec ... mberists_2 for a nice chart showing just that.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:02 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Bonjour,
I watched some of this on Monday after discovering it after searching for 'Countdown Episodes' on YouTube.
I would love to have a crack at it but as i am in Canada it is during the day and i work Mon-Fri in a supermarket from 9am to 6pm (Canadian Time) so i won't be able to be available all times, i do have a holiday in February but i may not be able to carry on if i win (unlikely) so i won't risk messing it up.
I look forward to seeing more. I did watch the final with Susie Dent on catch-up as well
Jonathan.
I watched some of this on Monday after discovering it after searching for 'Countdown Episodes' on YouTube.
I would love to have a crack at it but as i am in Canada it is during the day and i work Mon-Fri in a supermarket from 9am to 6pm (Canadian Time) so i won't be able to be available all times, i do have a holiday in February but i may not be able to carry on if i win (unlikely) so i won't risk messing it up.
I look forward to seeing more. I did watch the final with Susie Dent on catch-up as well
Jonathan.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
https://extra.ie/2021/01/24/entertainme ... senter-gig
Well? What do ye make? I feared it would be way fluffier, but I'm happy with it
Well? What do ye make? I feared it would be way fluffier, but I'm happy with it
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:02 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Looks good. Is it published in any newspapers? Did they speak to you for this?Paul Anderson wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:51 pm https://extra.ie/2021/01/24/entertainme ... senter-gig
Well? What do ye make? I feared it would be way fluffier, but I'm happy with it
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Yeah a phone interview, just an Irish online paper, hopefully it gets picked up by a UK one. Have an Irish radio interview for a breakfast show this week too
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:02 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
What day, time and station? I would be interested in listening in!Paul Anderson wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 4:43 pm Yeah a phone interview, just an Irish online paper, hopefully it gets picked up by a UK one. Have an Irish radio interview for a breakfast show this week too
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:02 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
When is the next ZoomDown?
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:30 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Today, at 8pm UTC!
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:02 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Who is playing? Where is the link?
- Callum Todd
- Series 69 Champion
- Posts: 1128
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:38 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0Dxmw2Pg_4
If you subscribe to that YouTube channel Jonathan, the video links are normally put up a day or two in advance so you'll see them ahead of time. Or if you use twitter, there is a twitter account @LiveZoomDown. Failing that, Mondays and Thursdays at 8pm UK time is generally when they're on.
If you subscribe to that YouTube channel Jonathan, the video links are normally put up a day or two in advance so you'll see them ahead of time. Or if you use twitter, there is a twitter account @LiveZoomDown. Failing that, Mondays and Thursdays at 8pm UK time is generally when they're on.
Mark Deeks wrote:Callum Todd looks like a young Ted Bundy.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 6:02 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Will do! Is it just numbers tonight?Callum Todd wrote: ↑Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:15 pm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0Dxmw2Pg_4
If you subscribe to that YouTube channel Jonathan, the video links are normally put up a day or two in advance so you'll see them ahead of time. Or if you use twitter, there is a twitter account @LiveZoomDown. Failing that, Mondays and Thursdays at 8pm UK time is generally when they're on.
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Congrats to Elliott, our numberists winner, and Callum our goat winner who even managed a bit of beardown! Great games, and thanks to all who entered those contests - the standard was jaw-dropping!
You might like this puzzle posed by one of our viewers on the youtube chat -
"There are only 761 words which can be used as a goatdown conundrum with ANY one of their nine letters being the hidden letter. Can you name one?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJTiRT-DDek (Reply there so he sees it!)
We'll be back on the 15th February with the regular series - Zubair will be aiming for tetrachampdom and will be playing our own Paul Anderson!
You might like this puzzle posed by one of our viewers on the youtube chat -
"There are only 761 words which can be used as a goatdown conundrum with ANY one of their nine letters being the hidden letter. Can you name one?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJTiRT-DDek (Reply there so he sees it!)
We'll be back on the 15th February with the regular series - Zubair will be aiming for tetrachampdom and will be playing our own Paul Anderson!
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Just to say, every time I read the title of this thread - every time, from the first post to now - I always expect it to be a "and that's all folks" thing.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Well, you get your wish Matt.Matt Morrison wrote: ↑Sun Jan 31, 2021 12:24 am Just to say, every time I read the title of this thread - every time, from the first post to now - I always expect it to be a "and that's all folks" thing.
And that's all folks....
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Huh? What wish? I was talking about the title, it reminded me of the end of Looney Tunes cartoons.
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Haven't had a good 1/20th of a pint for a while.
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Can I suggest some sort of anonymous online feedback form for Zoomdown?
That would allow the viewers to express the things that we particularly like or think could be improved and could maybe be taken on board to make Zoomdown even better.
That would allow the viewers to express the things that we particularly like or think could be improved and could maybe be taken on board to make Zoomdown even better.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Well, I'd kinda hoped folk would be able to say it all here
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
I'm happy to provide feedback here, though I do think there are benefits to anonymising feedback, e.g. people can say what they feel without having to worry about being mean/harsh (which I'm a little concerned about coming across as here! I don't like offending people!) and also you can collect a small sample of data to see if different people have the same thoughts without them influencing each other on a thread.
Anyway, here is a bit of feedback from me:
- I love the community vibe. I enjoy the interactions with chat and wouldn't want to see it become too 'professional'.
- I like it when a contestant is on and they are able to talk about themselves. However I sometimes think it comes across as if you take up a lot of this time talking about your own experiences and anecdotes. I don't think the interjections are an issue in themselves, but sometimes I feel like the contestants might have more to say but aren't able to direct the conversation where they want it to go. (Of course, sometimes a contestant might be less talkative and may need a bit of prompting.)
- Also, I don't have any interest at all in what you happened to have got in a particular round (sorry Paul). I appreciate the enjoyment of joining in with the game but I think as host, the objective is to facilitate the game between two players - they are the people whose declarations I care about. Sometimes it might be a different word of equivalent length that personally I feel doesn't add to the content. Other times, I also think it could be quite frustrating/disheartening for the players if the host announces that they've beaten them. However, I do think there is interest if you come up with a word that is particularly interesting, or a pretty numbers solve.
I do feel the above could come across as a bit harsh, which I don't intend it to be. I really appreciate what you're doing for the community, I think you're a charismatic and enterntaining host and I really love Zoomdown. These are just a couple of ways I think it could be improved. I'd also be interested to hear what other people thought about these points.
Anyway, here is a bit of feedback from me:
- I love the community vibe. I enjoy the interactions with chat and wouldn't want to see it become too 'professional'.
- I like it when a contestant is on and they are able to talk about themselves. However I sometimes think it comes across as if you take up a lot of this time talking about your own experiences and anecdotes. I don't think the interjections are an issue in themselves, but sometimes I feel like the contestants might have more to say but aren't able to direct the conversation where they want it to go. (Of course, sometimes a contestant might be less talkative and may need a bit of prompting.)
- Also, I don't have any interest at all in what you happened to have got in a particular round (sorry Paul). I appreciate the enjoyment of joining in with the game but I think as host, the objective is to facilitate the game between two players - they are the people whose declarations I care about. Sometimes it might be a different word of equivalent length that personally I feel doesn't add to the content. Other times, I also think it could be quite frustrating/disheartening for the players if the host announces that they've beaten them. However, I do think there is interest if you come up with a word that is particularly interesting, or a pretty numbers solve.
I do feel the above could come across as a bit harsh, which I don't intend it to be. I really appreciate what you're doing for the community, I think you're a charismatic and enterntaining host and I really love Zoomdown. These are just a couple of ways I think it could be improved. I'd also be interested to hear what other people thought about these points.
-
- Series 72 Champion
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:42 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
I'd second everything Dan said, including a similar concern about bringing it up, particularly when it relates so much to your personal style. You really are a great host of the show, and the only criticisms are of things that come from your clear enthusiasm for it - it just may help to tweak the result of that enthusiasm in that small way.
If I were to pick one of Dan's points to particularly change, it'd be not announcing what you've got when it's better than the contestants. It does give a different and slightly off impression when the host does that (especially if you win a round when distracted by other things), compared to Rachel/Susie doing so with that as their key role. I think leaving it to the computer to just determine what the best options are, when you know that's always going to be the best, seems better. Though even this depends on the contestants - if you beat Rob on a letters round, or Elliott on anything, then feel free to go ahead and revel in your victory!
If I were to pick one of Dan's points to particularly change, it'd be not announcing what you've got when it's better than the contestants. It does give a different and slightly off impression when the host does that (especially if you win a round when distracted by other things), compared to Rachel/Susie doing so with that as their key role. I think leaving it to the computer to just determine what the best options are, when you know that's always going to be the best, seems better. Though even this depends on the contestants - if you beat Rob on a letters round, or Elliott on anything, then feel free to go ahead and revel in your victory!
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
I take your points, not sure where/when I've misdirected the convo tho. I try to get the players to chat, period. Sometimes this is easy, sometimes not. I'm looking forward to dealing with complete strangers this series, as it's the bit I enjoy most.
The other point I feel applies to CD much more than ZD, where we've had a very high calibre of player, better than me on average. I'd wager most times they were a Rob eg
The other point I feel applies to CD much more than ZD, where we've had a very high calibre of player, better than me on average. I'd wager most times they were a Rob eg
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
But thanks for your honesty.
You're correct Tom, it does depend on the level of player and I will naturally tone it down for new players.
You're correct Tom, it does depend on the level of player and I will naturally tone it down for new players.
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
I definitely could have worded things better here. I actually don't believe there has been much misdirection. On reflection, I'm thinking it's just down to word count. As in, when it comes to the section where the contestant gets to introduce a bit about themselves, I'd like as many of the words said in that section to to be said by the contestant, if that makes sense. Of course, this is very dependent on how talkative the person is.
But again want to reiterate that I appreciate what you're doing, and this is a nitpick, and is also something very difficult to do! Thank you being happy to take on board the comments!
See you in series 3!
-
- Series 72 Champion
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:42 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Thanks for the responses Paul. These things are all on a scale and subject to preference, so don't want you to start second guessing yourself. Maybe as an actionable point (I'm in work mode, sorry), you could quickly check before the episode starts whether there's anything the contestants would particularly like to talk about. I know in my second appearance there was something (can't even remember what), but we ended up talking about music because of the keyboard behind me, which I wasn't actually that bothered about talking about.
No idea how many people will actually have something, but if they do that'll probably help them show what they're passionate about - like Elliott with his longevity facts.
And amazing work with the documentary, really well edited. Wasn't sure how you were going to fill 80 minutes worth, but it sped by.
No idea how many people will actually have something, but if they do that'll probably help them show what they're passionate about - like Elliott with his longevity facts.
And amazing work with the documentary, really well edited. Wasn't sure how you were going to fill 80 minutes worth, but it sped by.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
Yeah I expect this series to be very different, with me or any of us probably not familiar with half of the players. ZD has had a very community feel til now, with all the liberties that go with that.
Cheers on the docu, yeah I’m most pleased I got it to a watchable length, from well over 2.5 hours
Cheers on the docu, yeah I’m most pleased I got it to a watchable length, from well over 2.5 hours
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
The documentary was great, even if I did come across as a bit of a tit.
The camera really does add 10lb...
The camera really does add 10lb...
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
I take it there's a documentary.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:18 pm
Re: ...and that's ZoomDown
You were great, and got the last wordRhys Benjamin wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 11:14 pm The documentary was great, even if I did come across as a bit of a tit.