Spoilers For Monday 6th August 2018
Moderator: James Robinson
Spoilers For Monday 6th August 2018
Sturdier as a rather common r2 beater.
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Bit surprised that Asocials is not allowed.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:32 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
The conundrum setters fail once again, if only Bob had offered RELUCTING...
- Mark Kudlowski
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
1st numbers alt: ((75 + 50) x 5 ) + 25 +7
2nd numbers alt: 50 x 7 x (8 / 4) - 5 - 3
2nd numbers alt: 50 x 7 x (8 / 4) - 5 - 3
- Johnny Canuck
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
- Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Five large? That's a new one on me. I guess this graph by Graeme is going to need a new line!
1st Numbers Alt.: (25 + 75 + 5 - 4) * 7 - 50
1st Numbers Alt.: (25 + 75 + 5 - 4) * 7 - 50
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Another player that looks good briefly and then falls away. I wonder what today's winner will go on to achieve.
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
I wonder what would have been done though if someone did declare Relucting, as I spotted.
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
I kind of had a gut feeling that Matthew was not going to go far, even though he put in a very good debut. Bar the blip on the last numbers, Eddie put in a solidly consistent performance and I hope he will do well because he seems like a genuine, nice chapGavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:12 pm Another player that looks good briefly and then falls away. I wonder what today's winner will go on to achieve.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Tom S wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:23 pmI kind of had a gut feeling that Matthew was not going to go far, even though he put in a very good debut. Bar the blip on the last numbers, Eddie put in a solidly consistent performance and I hope he will do well because he seems like a genuine, nice chapGavin Chipper wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:12 pm Another player that looks good briefly and then falls away. I wonder what today's winner will go on to achieve.
Guess Matt's just an afternoon person, not a morning one (assuming he ended one day and started another).
- Bradley Horrocks
- Acolyte
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:53 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
I think this was filmed on a Monday, which would have meant the first filming was afternoon too. Maybe he just prefers being nearer to Nick.Philip Wilson wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:56 pm
Guess Matt's just an afternoon person, not a morning one (assuming he ended one day and started another).
"And PANTIES, thank you for that, that cheers us up enormously" - NH
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:42 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Cannot help but feel the challenger was very similar to James Kennedy
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
I've checked the filming schedules, this was recorded on Wednesday, 25 April 2018 at 10am, the previous recording was on Tuesday, 24 April 2018 which ended at 6pm, so Philip is right in a sense...Bradley Horrocks wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 6:23 pmI think this was filmed on a Monday, which would have meant the first filming was afternoon too. Maybe he just prefers being nearer to Nick.Philip Wilson wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:56 pm
Guess Matt's just an afternoon person, not a morning one (assuming he ended one day and started another).
On the other hand, IMO Matthew's win on Friday can be attributed to just pure luck with his risky words since he genuinely did not know whether it was in or not...but seriously, someone please end the Octochamp drought, we should have had two by now and we have none!
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Interesting Ryan. Also Bob would have been tired on 'Friday', which may have helped Matthew.Ryan Lam wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 12:46 amI've checked the filming schedules, this was recorded on Wednesday, 25 April 2018 at 10am, the previous recording was on Tuesday, 24 April 2018 which ended at 6pm, so Philip is right in a sense...Bradley Horrocks wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 6:23 pmI think this was filmed on a Monday, which would have meant the first filming was afternoon too. Maybe he just prefers being nearer to Nick.Philip Wilson wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:56 pm
Guess Matt's just an afternoon person, not a morning one (assuming he ended one day and started another).
On the other hand, IMO Matthew's win on Friday can be attributed to just pure luck with his risky words since he genuinely did not know whether it was in or not...but seriously, someone please end the Octochamp drought, we should have had two by now and we have none!
On the octochamps subject, as far as I can see there is still time for 8 in this series, so it was strange that Nick and Rachel both suggested Bob was already In the finals. Am I missing something?
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:13 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Once again? Please do submit the other errors and we'll update our database accordingly.Ray Wilding wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:55 pm The conundrum setters fail once again, if only Bob had offered RELUCTING...
- Mark Deeks
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:15 am
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Also, it's hardly a fail. If someone out there is willing and able to say RELUCTING, they deserve their ten points.
Eoin Monaghan wrote:
He may not be liked on here, but you have to give some credit to Mark
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Ryan Lam wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 12:46 amI don't think Matthew's win is attributed to just pure luck, perhaps luck in the sense that Bob was not on form, but that's as far as it goes because he deservedly won on Friday and his performance was one of the better ones we've seen this series. He is a good player, but was not with it on that occasion and lost fair and square to the better player. There will be a few octochamps at least imo...Bradley Horrocks wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 6:23 pmPhilip Wilson wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:56 pm
Guess Matt's just an afternoon person, not a morning one (assuming he ended one day and started another).
On the other hand, IMO Matthew's win on Friday can be attributed to just pure luck with his risky words since he genuinely did not know whether it was in or not...but seriously, someone please end the Octochamp drought, we should have had two by now and we have none!
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Maybe it would be re-filmed and a new one would be put in place, but agree with your point, nevertheless, Mark.Mark Deeks wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:34 am Also, it's hardly a fail. If someone out there is willing and able to say RELUCTING, they deserve their ten points.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
I don't think so at all. He spotted well, so it's not just about whether his words were in. Bob didn't have his best game, but Matthew played at a higher standard than Bob did throughout his run.Ryan Lam wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 12:46 am On the other hand, IMO Matthew's win on Friday can be attributed to just pure luck with his risky words since he genuinely did not know whether it was in or not...but seriously, someone please end the Octochamp drought, we should have had two by now and we have none!
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
I personally think Bob was the better player overall as his numbers seemed a little more accurate than Matthew's, I think if it wasn't for the last recording, the score would be closer.Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:09 amI don't think so at all. He spotted well, so it's not just about whether his words were in. Bob didn't have his best game, but Matthew played at a higher standard than Bob did throughout his run.Ryan Lam wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 12:46 am On the other hand, IMO Matthew's win on Friday can be attributed to just pure luck with his risky words since he genuinely did not know whether it was in or not...but seriously, someone please end the Octochamp drought, we should have had two by now and we have none!
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:32 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
LIMBERING/RELIMBING http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_6738 was the one I was thinking of.Countdown Team wrote: ↑Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:15 amOnce again? Please do submit the other errors and we'll update our database accordingly.Ray Wilding wrote: ↑Mon Aug 06, 2018 1:55 pm The conundrum setters fail once again, if only Bob had offered RELUCTING...
INSTILLED/TELLINIDS http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_6873 , though since conundrums won't be plurals I guess that's moot.
NOTIFYING/TONIFYING http://wiki.apterous.org/Episode_6574 going back a bit further.
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:13 pm
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
Thanks for these.
- Johnny Canuck
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
- Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃
Re: Spoilers for 6th August 2018
There's a "database"? I figured you guys just fiddled with Lexplorer to get 'em.
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.