Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
Moderator: James Robinson
Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
Stephen Briggs has has 6 strong wins so far. If he gets a 7th today, he will be the new number 1 seed. Can he do it?
Join Tracey for the recap later.
Join Tracey for the recap later.
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
MAPEPIRE in round 5
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
3rd numbers: 75 x 2 + 9 x 9 + 10 + 7 = 248
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
Like Jack I beat Rachel on 3rd numbers but didn't see the West Indian snake.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
SENSORIA in round 11
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
Different ways of doing 2 numbers rounds:
(8x75)/(7+5-9)-1 = 199
(9+9+7)x10-2 = 248
(8x75)/(7+5-9)-1 = 199
(9+9+7)x10-2 = 248
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
TOWAI in round 1, UNLADE in round 2, OUTRACE in round 8, MOOLI in round 12 and DEPILATE in round 13.
- Adam Dexter
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 4:41 pm
- Location: Kidderminster
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
Did anyone think it odd in R5 when Stephen said "risky 7", challenger went with 6, obv declared first, then Stephen says "Oh it wasn't risky, PRIMATE".
Made me wonder if it was a dummy. Like he said "risky" to ward challenger off declaring 7, to stop challenger getting points.
Tactical play? Within sportsmanlike boundaries?
Made me wonder if it was a dummy. Like he said "risky" to ward challenger off declaring 7, to stop challenger getting points.
Tactical play? Within sportsmanlike boundaries?
ADAM DEXTER: MAXED DATER
We're off to button moon
We're off to button moon
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
Yeah, it did come across a bit weird. I'm torn between him just having a moment where you see the word differently (as some kind of adjectival sense of PRIME or something), and simply having something like PEATIER in mind when declaring, and spotting it in the interim.Adam Dexter wrote:Did anyone think it odd in R5 when Stephen said "risky 7", challenger went with 6, obv declared first, then Stephen says "Oh it wasn't risky, PRIMATE".
Made me wonder if it was a dummy. Like he said "risky" to ward challenger off declaring 7, to stop challenger getting points.
Tactical play? Within sportsmanlike boundaries?
Or sometimes we just say daft stuff. Either way, he doesn't seem the sort to try it on in any kind of underhand tactical way IMO.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
Also thought it was a bit weird but the scores weren't that close so no real need to try to gain an advantage.
Also if I was Stephen's challenger on his 7th game I'd be quite confident that even a risky word from him would be ok so it wouldn't affect my declaration.
Also if I was Stephen's challenger on his 7th game I'd be quite confident that even a risky word from him would be ok so it wouldn't affect my declaration.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
And what if he did have PEATIER and spotted it in the interim?Jon Corby wrote:Yeah, it did come across a bit weird. I'm torn between him just having a moment where you see the word differently (as some kind of adjectival sense of PRIME or something), and simply having something like PEATIER in mind when declaring, and spotting it in the interim.Adam Dexter wrote:Did anyone think it odd in R5 when Stephen said "risky 7", challenger went with 6, obv declared first, then Stephen says "Oh it wasn't risky, PRIMATE".
Made me wonder if it was a dummy. Like he said "risky" to ward challenger off declaring 7, to stop challenger getting points.
Tactical play? Within sportsmanlike boundaries?
Or sometimes we just say daft stuff. Either way, he doesn't seem the sort to try it on in any kind of underhand tactical way IMO.
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
I'm not sure there's really an advantage to declaring your word as "risky" when it isn't. It would only have the potential to affect your opponent's offering if the opponent also has a seven and a six written down, and is uncertain enough about the seven that they won't go for it unless you confidently declare seven. As a "tactical play" it doesn't seem very reliable to me.
I thought of the possibility that he'd actually seen a risky 7, like TAPPIER^ or something like that, then after declaring a "risky 7", spotted the safer PRIMATE so decided to go for that. However, I'm hesitant to actually call shenanigans. Sometimes you can doubt common words because you read them wrong. On apterous I've ignored COUNTY, because my thought process has been "COUNTY? An adjective meaning 'a bit like a count'? Nah, that won't be in."
Also, I've read somewhere on here that a contestant once offered DOING in an onomatopoeic sense, rhyming it with BOING, and Susie spent ages trying to find it in the dictionary before remembering the verb DO. In general we should believe a cock-up before a conspiracy.
I thought of the possibility that he'd actually seen a risky 7, like TAPPIER^ or something like that, then after declaring a "risky 7", spotted the safer PRIMATE so decided to go for that. However, I'm hesitant to actually call shenanigans. Sometimes you can doubt common words because you read them wrong. On apterous I've ignored COUNTY, because my thought process has been "COUNTY? An adjective meaning 'a bit like a count'? Nah, that won't be in."
Also, I've read somewhere on here that a contestant once offered DOING in an onomatopoeic sense, rhyming it with BOING, and Susie spent ages trying to find it in the dictionary before remembering the verb DO. In general we should believe a cock-up before a conspiracy.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13318
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
And there was also Paul Gallen getting SUNDRIES (as in sun-dries).Graeme Cole wrote:Also, I've read somewhere on here that a contestant once offered DOING in an onomatopoeic sense, rhyming it with BOING, and Susie spent ages trying to find it in the dictionary before remembering the verb DO. In general we should believe a cock-up before a conspiracy.
- Johnny Canuck
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
- Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
In this clip, around the 5-minute mark, Robert Teuton pronounces SWINGED incorrectly, as if it were the past tense of SWING instead of SWINGE, and still gets the points.Gavin Chipper wrote:And there was also Paul Gallen getting SUNDRIES (as in sun-dries).Graeme Cole wrote:Also, I've read somewhere on here that a contestant once offered DOING in an onomatopoeic sense, rhyming it with BOING, and Susie spent ages trying to find it in the dictionary before remembering the verb DO. In general we should believe a cock-up before a conspiracy.
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
- Adam Gillard
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:42 pm
- Location: About 45 minutes south-east of Thibodaux, Louisiana
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
I done did the numbers and Rachel done didn't
Oh now she's done it but had AGES in the ad break to think about it. Same method as me, she must have copied me...
Oh now she's done it but had AGES in the ad break to think about it. Same method as me, she must have copied me...
Mike Brown: "Round 12: T N R S A E I G U
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
C1: SIGNATURE (18) ["9; not written down"]
C2: SEATING (7)
Score: 108–16 (max 113)
Another niner for Adam and yet another century. Well done, that man."
Re: Spoilers for Thursday August 6th 2015 (S73 P29)
PEATIER is also fine (it was my word) so it doesn't matter too much I would declare "peatier" as dodgy on the show even though I know it's in, just because it's not a word you use everyday, and to declare it forthright makes you sound like you've read the dictionary, and ain't nobody got time for that.Gavin Chipper wrote:And what if he did have PEATIER and spotted it in the interim?
But yeah, if he's changed to PRIMATE because he spotted it out of time then that's not great at all. Can't remember who declared first but this is a case that is unlikely to be caught unless you make everyone show their words at all times.