Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Moderator: James Robinson
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
So, new week, new month, new contestants, and new DC guest. Quite a lot to cram in today
As you might've seen, Tracey has become the 2nd octochamp of the series, following her win over Wendy Cooke on Friday, which I'm sure Wendy will be delighted is being remembered more for Tracey's achievement, rather than anything else.........
So, we have 2 new players today, and also a new DC guest in former Chelsea, Southampton, Blackburn Rovers and England left-back turned pundit, Graeme Le Saux.
Join Andy for the recap later.
As you might've seen, Tracey has become the 2nd octochamp of the series, following her win over Wendy Cooke on Friday, which I'm sure Wendy will be delighted is being remembered more for Tracey's achievement, rather than anything else.........
So, we have 2 new players today, and also a new DC guest in former Chelsea, Southampton, Blackburn Rovers and England left-back turned pundit, Graeme Le Saux.
Join Andy for the recap later.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:45 pm
- Location: West Bridgford
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Also (sadly) new time, seeing as C4 are pushing Countdown even earlier in the schedules
Definitely not Jamie McNeill or Schrodinger's Cat....
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:07 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
I know it's highly unlikely to ever happen, but wouldn't it be great if Susie was able to solve a numbers game Rachel failed to get!
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Surprised Graeme missed the GOALIE in round 7
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Alt second numbers (75+(10/5))x9+3. Also beaters in R1 and R8 - I'll leave JR to tell those.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
- Mark Kudlowski
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
1st numbers alt:
(50-1) x (25-((9+6)/3))
(50-1) x (25-((9+6)/3))
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:07 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Graeme also missed what fans of other clubs call Rachel's team in R8.........MANURE!
- Tony Atkins
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Reading
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Rachel is so polite when they make 31 from 1 5 and 6 and not 36. I did it the way she showed.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
- Mark Kudlowski
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
4th numbers: (75+3)x(6+5+1)
- Tracey Anne Mills
- Devotee
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:30 pm
- Location: The Series 72 Runner Up, The Crazy Cat Lady that lives with her two cats Freddie and Callie
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Round 8 MAUNERSVE there was an 8 available that both DC and the contestants missed USERNAME
Tracey 'Old Enough To Be My Mum' Mills aka Crazy Cat Lady and Cat Lover
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Could have had MANEUVERS for 9 without the American spelling rule.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
BOURNE (ironically after Rod's BORNE) in round 1, and USERNAME as Tracey said in R8.Tony Atkins wrote:Alt second numbers (75+(10/5))x9+3. Also beaters in R1 and R8 - I'll leave JR to tell those.
2nd Numbers Alt.: (75 x 10) - 50 - 9 + 5 = 696
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Mark Kudlowski
1st numbers alt: (50-1) x (25-((9+6)/3))
Mark Kudlowski
4th numbers: (75+3)x(6+5+1)
James Robinson
2nd Numbers Alt.: (75 x 10) - 50 - 9 + 5 = 696
Damn!! All my methods! I will really have to start trying to be here when the programme's actually on
1st numbers alt: (50-1) x (25-((9+6)/3))
Mark Kudlowski
4th numbers: (75+3)x(6+5+1)
James Robinson
2nd Numbers Alt.: (75 x 10) - 50 - 9 + 5 = 696
Damn!! All my methods! I will really have to start trying to be here when the programme's actually on
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Hmmm, sorry Tony but I just find that really annoying when she doesn't do that. Who would actually be offended if she did?Tony Atkins wrote:Rachel is so polite when they make 31 from 1 5 and 6 and not 36. I did it the way she showed.
From the post above, I didn't do it that way (with 6 squared anyway), but would still have mentioned it if I'd been RR - which I'm not, ha ha
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
TBF it may be that she doesn't see it because she's not sitting there comfortably analysing it all like we are. She's writing up their method, checking calculations, checking they haven't used all the numbers, while chatting and presenting to camera as well. It just may be that if she hasn't gone that way herself, she's not going to spot it because she's got too much else going on.
Or, it may not, I have no idea, she may actually just not want to draw attention to their misses. But I think people shouldn't underestimate the effort in presenting.
Or, it may not, I have no idea, she may actually just not want to draw attention to their misses. But I think people shouldn't underestimate the effort in presenting.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Spoilers For Monday February 2nd 2015
Point proven on Thursday 5th when she said she didn't see an easy solution involving a 75 x (7 + 3). I won't be annoyed anymore thenJon Corby wrote:TBF it may be that she doesn't see it because she's not sitting there comfortably analysing it all like we are. She's writing up their method, checking calculations, checking they haven't used all the numbers, while chatting and presenting to camera as well. It just may be that if she hasn't gone that way herself, she's not going to spot it because she's got too much else going on.
Or, it may not, I have no idea, she may actually just not want to draw attention to their misses. But I think people shouldn't underestimate the effort in presenting.