Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Round-by-round summaries of every game in recent series; for every series in the last 5 years, try cdb, the Countdown database. Obviously this forum contains spoilers!

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Anthony Endsor
Enthusiast
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:55 pm

Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Anthony Endsor »

Well hello again :) and once more I find myself doing the Thursday slot as James is busy with a quiz this evening, though not a televised one I believe this time. As such, he will therefore be stepping in to my Friday slot this week. This is in fact the last week for 3 weeks that either James or myself will be doing recaps, as we have decided we can't be bothered doing these anymore :roll: no really in fact the real reason this is our last time for 3 weeks is because Countdown is only on for 2 days a week for the next 3 weeks as horseracing yet again commandeers.
So on to today, and Neil Green returns for the 5th time, as he heads towards Octochampdom. He has done rather well in the last 4 games and is proving a real handful. Will he get his 5th win today? Standing in his way is Gary Warland. Enjoy.

Countdown recap for Thursday 1 May 2014.

C1: Champion Neil Green (4 wins, 351 points.) A scrabbler and comedy writer from Cardiff.
C2: Challenger Gary Warland. A financial controller from Bicester. A gamesmaker at the 2012 Paralympics.
DC: Susie Dent and Tony Jacklin.
RR: Rachel Riley.
OT: Other words or solutions.

R01: G L N S U I A B S
R02: R V D O E A R N U
R03: 1, 7, 5, 1, 3, 75. Target: 788.
TTT: MYAMIGOS - "It's about never saying I do and always saying I won't."
R04: G S M K I E O P R
R05: C T Z S I E U F A
R06: 8, 9, 10, 1, 6, 100. Target: 893.
R07: G T F N E I A R T
R08: O E I N T P L S O
R09: 1, 1, 9, 4, 4, 50. Target: 711.
TTT: GOFINDUS - "Let's go find us some lovely wild mushrooms."
R10: V N R E O I M T D
R11: S M S D A E O N I
R12: S P Q E O A T S P
R13: R H R L E O E H T
R14: 5, 2, 3, 2, 10, 100. Target: 513.
R15: M E E T C O R G I (conundrum)


And now a brief interlude before our main feature:

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

Enjoy the show.

Round 1: G L N S U I A B S

Neil: BUSSING (7)
Gary: SLINGS (6)
DC: ABUSING (7)
OT: ISABGUL (7) SIGNALS (7)
Score: 7–0 (max 7)

Gary SLINGS his hook in the very first round, as Neil gets 7 points by BUSSING his way here.

Round 2: R V D O E A R N U

Neil: ROUNDER (7)
Gary: ORDER (5)
DC: OVERRAN (7) DEVOUR (6)
OT: ADORNER (7) OVERRUN (7) RONDEAU (7)
Score: 14–0 (max 14)

Neil was the ROUNDER figure here, as Gary takes an ORDER, so it's a 14 point head start for Neil.

Round 3: 1, 7, 5, 1, 3, 75. Target: 788.

Neil: 780. (75+5 - 1-1) x 10 (5)
Gary: -
RR: 788. ((1+1) x 75 + 7) x 5 + 3 (10)
Score: 19–0 (max 24)

Gary doesn't get near the numbers. Neither does Neil really, but 8 away is enough for 5 points. Rachel gets 788 spot on though.

Teatime teaser: MYAMIGOS -> MISOGAMY

Round 4: G S M K I E O P R

Neil: PROMISE (7)
Gary: PROMISE (7)
DC: PORKIES (7) SMOKIER (7)
OT: IRKSOME (7) PORGIES (7)
Score: 26–7 (max 31)

Both players on a PROMISE here, and Gary off the mark at last.

Round 5: C T Z S I E U F A

Neil: FUTZES (6)
Gary: FIESTA (6)
DC: FAUCETS (7)
Score: 32–13 (max 38)

Six points each here. FUTZES and FIESTA the words here.

Round 6: 8, 9, 10, 1, 6, 100. Target: 893.

Neil: 893. (100x9) - (6+1) (10)
Gary: 893. (100x9) -8 +1 (10)
Score: 42–23 (max 48)

Both players get 10 points with 893.

Tony Jacklin talks about when he was teaching someone to play golf in Brunei and was shown a massive expensive car collection.

Round 7: G T F N E I A R T

Neil: TREATING (8)
Gary: TANGIER (7)
DC: TEARING (7) GRANITE (7) FAINTER (7)
OT: FRETTING (8)
Score: 50–23 (max 56)

Gary gets the TANGIER word, but Neil is TREATING himself to 8 points.

Round 8: O E I N T P L S O

Neil: LOOPIEST (8)
Gary: linpets
DC: OILSTONE (8)
OT: LOONIEST (8) PELOTONS (8) POLONIES (8)
Score: 58–23 (max 64)

Gary is in bits over 'linpets' as his word is disallowed. Neil gets LOOPIEST for another 8.

Round 9: 1, 1, 9, 4, 4, 50. Target: 711.

Neil: 710. (9+1+4) x (50+1) -4 (7)
Gary: 705.
RR: 711. ((50+9) x 4 + 1) x (4-1) (10)
Score: 65–23 (max 74)

Neither player spot on but Neil gets 1 away. Rachel again gets it spot on.

Teatime teaser: GOFINDUS -> FUNGOIDS

Round 10: V N R E O I M T D

Neil: VOMITED (7)
Gary: REMIND (6)
DC: DRIVEN (6)
OT: MINORED (7) MORDENT (7) VOMITER (7)
Score: 72–23 (max 81)

No need to REMIND Gary of his situation here. Neil VOMITED in this round for another 7 points.

Round 11: S M S D A E O N I

Neil: DAMSONS (7)
Gary: MASSED (6)
DC: SESAMOID (8)
OT: ANODISES (8) DOMAINES (8) MADISONS (8) SIDESMAN (8)
Score: 79–23 (max 89)

Neil gets DAMSONS for another 7, as Neil MASSED only 6.

Susie talks about the origin of the word 'pull'.

Round 12: S P Q E O A T S P

Neil: APPOSES (7)
Gary: SPATES (6)
Score: 86–23 (max 96)

Neil APPOSES another 7, as Gary has SPATES of bad luck again.

Round 13: R H R L E O E H T

Neil: HOTEL (5)
Gary: OTHER (5)
DC: HETERO (6) HERETO (6)
OT: RHETOR (6)
Score: 91–28 (max 102)

Neil goes back to the HOTEL as Gary goes the OTHER way.

Round 14: 5, 2, 3, 2, 10, 100. Target: 513.

Neil: 513. (5x100) + 10 + 3 (10)
Gary: 513. (5x100) + 10 + 3 (10)
Score: 101–38 (max 112)

Both players get a rather easy 513 target for 10 points.

Round 15: M E E T C O R G I

Neil buzzes on 3 seconds to say GEOMETRIC which is correct.
Final Score: 111–38 (max 122)

Neil managed to meet the corgi of this round by finding GEOMETRIC in just 3 seconds. Neil has been superb at conundrums during his reign and they have played a big part in his run. Another century and now 5 wins. Is there any stopping him? Find out if he can make it 6 wins tomorrow as James Robinson steps in to my usual slot. I'll be back in a few weeks time, once the horseracing is over. I believe it will be approximately 30th May, though I may be wrong. In the meantime, enjoy the racing, and don't forget Countdown is on Monday and Tuesday, so Andy McGurn and Callum Todd will guide you through those days. Thank you very much for reading, and goodbye. :)


Further summaries are at:
http://cdb.apterous.org/series.php?series=70

This website is not endorsed by or affiliated with Channel 4, the makers of Countdown, or any person associated with the aforementioned in any way whatsoever at all, never has been, never will be, and moreover is proud not to be. Yep.

Page design and all good stuff copyright © Charles Reams 2008. Thanks for Mike Brown for collecting the data for so many years.
Last edited by Anthony Endsor on Fri May 02, 2014 6:53 pm, edited 4 times in total.
James Laverty
Enthusiast
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 2:45 pm
Location: West Bridgford

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by James Laverty »

Round 3: 1, 7, 5, 1, 3, 75. Target: 788.

Neil: 780. (75+5) - 1-1 x 10 (5)
Gary: -
RR: 788. (1+1) x 75 + 7 x 5 + 3 (10)
Score: 19–0 (max 24)

Gary doesn't get near the numbers. Neither does Neil really, but 7 away is enough for 5 points. Rachel gets 788 spot on though.
might want to check something Anthony
Definitely not Jamie McNeill or Schrodinger's Cat....
Conor
Series 54 Champion
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Luton - UK

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Conor »

Anthony Endsor wrote: Round 3: 1, 7, 5, 1, 3, 75. Target: 788.

Neil: 780. (75+5) - 1-1 x 10 (5)
Gary: -
RR: 788. (1+1) x 75 + 7 x 5 + 3 (10)
Score: 19–0 (max 24)

Round 9: 1, 1, 9, 4, 4, 50. Target: 711.

Neil: 710. (9+1+4) x (50+1) -4 (7)
Gary: 705.
RR: 711. (50+9) x 4 + 1 x (4-1) (10)
Score: 65–23 (max 74)
There are a few 'order of operations' errors here, as the three emboldened expressions evaluate to 69, 188 and 239 respectively - the unbracketed multiplications in each are performed before additions and subtractions. My suggested ways for writing them:
(75+5-1-1) x 10
((1+1) x 75 + 7) x 5 + 3
((50+9) x 4 + 1) x (4 - 1)
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Jon Corby »

Why have you left spaces around some of the operators but not others Conor?

My suggested ways for writing them:

(75 + 5 - 1 - 1) x 10
((1 + 1) x 75 + 7) x 5 + 3
((50 + 9) x 4 + 1) x (4 - 1)
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Kiloposter
Posts: 1650
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Johnny Canuck »

Jon Corby wrote:Why have you left spaces around some of the operators but not others Conor?

My suggested ways for writing them:

(75 + 5 - 1 - 1) x 10
((1 + 1) x 75 + 7) x 5 + 3
((50 + 9) x 4 + 1) x (4 - 1)
What's "x"? This isn't algebra. Use "*".
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Jon Corby »

Johnny Canuck wrote:What's "x"? This isn't algebra.
Sounds a lot like algebra to me :?
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13276
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

I've noticed some people use more brackets than they need to. That's a pretty bad crime as well. So I'm going to start calling people up on it.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Jon Corby »

Gavin Chipper wrote:I've noticed some people use more brackets than they need to. That's a pretty bad crime as well. So I'm going to start calling people up on it.
You do that (and I'll be right behind you).
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by JimBentley »

Gavin Chipper wrote:I've noticed some people use more brackets than they need to. That's a pretty bad crime as well. So I'm going to start calling people up on it.
I disagree. I think the use of extra brackets is often helpful for clarity.
Anthony Endsor
Enthusiast
Posts: 328
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:55 pm

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Anthony Endsor »

I have made the changes I felt were right.
I'm not getting involved in a brackets debate, to me either way will do but for this time I've added the extra ones suggested.
I have corrected one other minor error and that's it. The x's are staying and always will. Everyone knows x is a times symbol just as much as * and either option will do. Other people also use it. Nobody else has complained during my 9 months of doing these recaps.

Peace be with you all and have a lovely weekend. :P
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13276
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Thursday 1st May 2014 (Series 70, Prelim 77)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

JimBentley wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:I've noticed some people use more brackets than they need to. That's a pretty bad crime as well. So I'm going to start calling people up on it.
I disagree. I think the use of extra brackets is often helpful for clarity.
I think it can make it more confusing because it makes it less tidy, especially solutions starting with three open bracketses.
Post Reply