Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Hey fellow Countdowners, I'm new to the forum so go easy on me as I pose my first question regarding the now infamous "Numbers Game." Sitting here on the nightshift, watching re-runs of some of the classic Countdown episodes from years gone by on my shiny new mp4 player, as you do, and forgive me if this has been asked before but if, after choosing your six numbers and Carol presses her magic button, the random number lands on one of the selected numbers. Would it be fair to assume that one could therefore solve the sum with one number?
The mind boggles, oh well only another 6.5hrs to go
Kind Regardz,
Gavin
The mind boggles, oh well only another 6.5hrs to go
Kind Regardz,
Gavin
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:38 am
- Location: Enfield, Middlesex
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
The target generated is in the region of 100-999, so yes, it's possible for the target to be 100 with a 100 in the selection.
Unless it's actually 101-999 and my mind is playing tricks on me...
Unless it's actually 101-999 and my mind is playing tricks on me...
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Welcome to the forum Gavin.Gav Grant wrote:Forgive me if this has been asked before but if, after choosing your six numbers and Carol presses her magic button, the random number lands on one of the selected numbers. Would it be fair to assume that one could therefore solve the sum with one number?
I think in the earlier years, you could've had 100 as a target, but I do believe that CECIL can now only generate numbers from 101-999.
The last time 101 actually came out in a numbers round was on the 4th September and there was a 100 and a 1 there, so I think you will find that the answer to your question is that a numbers game can only be solved with a minimum of two numbers, never one.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
CECIL hasn't set 100 as the target in any of the 2061 numbers games available on the wiki, so statistically we can be about 90% sure that 100 is no longer a valid target.
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
100 has definitely been used before, in a Tony Vick game available on the Countdown Page, so it definitely was possible at one point.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Cecil.........(pronounced SeeSill), is programmed to select ANY 3-figure number, so 100 is legitimate.
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I have had a look on the Coundown page but I can't find this game. Have you got a link to this game please?Martin Gardner wrote:100 has definitely been used before, in a Tony Vick game available on the Countdown Page, so it definitely was possible at one point.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I can't find it either, the nearest I could find was this: http://www.thecountdownpage.com/gotw-001001.htmJoseph Bolas wrote:I have had a look on the Coundown page but I can't find this game. Have you got a link to this game please?
- Joseph Bolas
- Fanatic
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
If you go back to the older days of Calendar Countdown, when they used HENRY, the first wheel had a '0' on it and therefore I believe that you could've had '010', '025', '050', '075' and '100' etc as targets too.
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
If a target of 101 was unattainable and there was a 100 in the selection the 100 could count as a single number "solution". Whether such a numbers game exists is unclear, I just spent a few minutes trying to make one and was unsuccessful.
Edit: have just read the thread and realised 100 is a legitimate target. I think the numbers generator on Countgen only does 101-999 unless Charlie changed it, to me that seems like a better target range.
Edit: have just read the thread and realised 100 is a legitimate target. I think the numbers generator on Countgen only does 101-999 unless Charlie changed it, to me that seems like a better target range.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Yep, CountGen does 101-999 only, although as you rightly say, it's still potentially worthwhile to declare anything as low as 91.
I have to say I think someone has changed CECIL without informing Damian, because 100 has not come up in any of the last 2484 numbers games, which makes it 93.7% likely that CECIL can't generate it. (Perhaps one of our resident statonerds can confirm my back-of-the-envelope calculation.)
I have to say I think someone has changed CECIL without informing Damian, because 100 has not come up in any of the last 2484 numbers games, which makes it 93.7% likely that CECIL can't generate it. (Perhaps one of our resident statonerds can confirm my back-of-the-envelope calculation.)
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Charlie, i think the idea is, you change the programming on Apterous to incorporate the possibility of a 100 target, then i come out a week or two later and say it was a mistake and that 101 is actually the lowest. It's called messing you about.
Seriously, i do think that 100 is the lowest, but if its not been 'chosen' by Cecil in 2484 numbers games, it doesn't mean that much. If you were to list all the targets from 100 -999 that HAVE come out in that time, there must be dozens that have not been picked surely?
Why don't we have a small compeitition?
Pick a random number from 100 (or 101) to 999, and see who's comes out first, starting from tomorrow's show. I'll donate a good Countdown prize to the winner.
I'll take a guess at 774.
Seriously, i do think that 100 is the lowest, but if its not been 'chosen' by Cecil in 2484 numbers games, it doesn't mean that much. If you were to list all the targets from 100 -999 that HAVE come out in that time, there must be dozens that have not been picked surely?
Why don't we have a small compeitition?
Pick a random number from 100 (or 101) to 999, and see who's comes out first, starting from tomorrow's show. I'll donate a good Countdown prize to the winner.
I'll take a guess at 774.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Haha.Damian E wrote:
Why don't we have a small compeitition?
Pick a random number from 100 (or 101) to 999, and see who's comes out first, starting from tomorrow's show. I'll donate a good Countdown prize to the winner.
I'll take a guess at 774.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Well if we have a 100 in the selection and 101 to be impossible, we need the 5 small numbers to not be consecutive (since if you have say 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, then you can do 7-6 to make the 1). This means the only two plausible selections are: 100, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 100, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9. Taking the first, it's clear 1 can be made by 6/(4+2) and taking the second it's clear that the 1 can be made by just, well, using the 1. So in a 1 large selection, it will be always possible to get 101 if there was a 100 in the selection sadly.Paul Howe wrote:If a target of 101 was unattainable and there was a 100 in the selection the 100 could count as a single number "solution". Whether such a numbers game exists is unclear, I just spent a few minutes trying to make one and was unsuccessful.
For four large, you will have 100, 50, 75, 25 and so 101 will always be possible too (100 + (50+25)/75).
For 2 large and 3 large, it's a bit trickier. An imaginary prize for anybody who can give me a selection with a 100 in with a target of 101 which is impossible to obtain.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
You're right, there are a handful of other targets that haven't come up (including 999) but it does seem odd that 100 is one of them.Damian E wrote:Seriously, i do think that 100 is the lowest, but if its not been 'chosen' by Cecil in 2484 numbers games, it doesn't mean that much. If you were to list all the targets from 100 -999 that HAVE come out in that time, there must be dozens that have not been picked surely?
I'll go for 774. Gut feeling.Damian E wrote:Why don't we have a small compeitition?
Pick a random number from 100 (or 101) to 999, and see who's comes out first, starting from tomorrow's show. I'll donate a good Countdown prize to the winner.
I'll take a guess at 774.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I'm confused. http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... =999#p7025Charlie Reams wrote:
You're right, there are a handful of other targets that haven't come up (including 999) but it does seem odd that 100 is one of them.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I only considered games which are on the wiki. That one isn't.Kirk Bevins wrote:I'm confused. http://www.c4countdown.co.uk/viewtopic. ... =999#p7025Charlie Reams wrote:
You're right, there are a handful of other targets that haven't come up (including 999) but it does seem odd that 100 is one of them.
There are none. Do I still get a prize?Kirk Bevins wrote: For 2 large and 3 large, it's a bit trickier. An imaginary prize for anybody who can give me a selection with a 100 in with a target of 101 which is impossible to obtain.
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
No. Prove it.Charlie Reams wrote:There are none. Do I still get a prize?Kirk Bevins wrote: For 2 large and 3 large, it's a bit trickier. An imaginary prize for anybody who can give me a selection with a 100 in with a target of 101 which is impossible to obtain.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Okay, proof for 2 large:Kirk Bevins wrote:No. Prove it.
Say the selection is 100, N, a, b, c, d, where N is the other large number and a, b, c and d are the 4 small numbers. Rearrange the selection so that the small numbers are in ascending order, so we can assume that a is the smallest and d the largest. Clearly a must be at least 2 or we can do 100+1 regardless of the other numbers. As you said, the numbers can't be the equal or consecutive as that would give us the 1 trivially, so b must be at least 4. Likewise c must be at least 6 and d at least 8. Working the other way, d can't be more than 10 (it's a small number), so c can't be more than 8, b can't be more than 6 and a can't be more than 4. So we now have quite a reduced set of cases to consider:
Assume a = 2. b must be one of 4, 5 or 6, but in each of these cases then any of the three values of c (6, 7 or 8) allow us to easily generate the 1 without even considering d and N. So a can't be 2.
Assume a = 3. b can't be 4, and if b is 5 or 6 then again we can easily get the 1 just using a, b and c. So a can't be 3.
Assume a = 4. b can't be 4 or 5, so it must be 6, hence c can't be 6 or 7 so it must be 8, and hence d can't be 8 or 9 so it must be 10. So we have the selection 100, N, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 100+(4+6)/10 gives us the 101. So a can't be 4.
But we already said a would have to be no greater than 4, so that's all the cases, and it's impossible to find a selection where 101 can't be made.
It's interesting that we never have to consider cases for N.
The argument for 3 large is left as an exercise for the reader (it's the same but more tedious.)
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I can't remember how I found it but I did, if Mike Brown could read this I'm sure he could find it in a flash.Charlie Reams wrote:I can't find it either, the nearest I could find was this: http://www.thecountdownpage.com/gotw-001001.htmJoseph Bolas wrote:I have had a look on the Coundown page but I can't find this game. Have you got a link to this game please?
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
- Martin Gardner
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
- Location: Leeds, UK
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Ok found it, this seems to settle the argument: Link
The final numbers game, pity he didn't go for 4 large.
The final numbers game, pity he didn't go for 4 large.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Martin Gardner wrote:Ok found it, this seems to settle the argument: Link
The final numbers game, pity he didn't go for 4 large.
You see Charlie, I told you
Well researched, Martin.
Am surprised though that nobody has yet spotted that Junaid Mubeen has been on before................
Cue the mass protests from Joseph Bolas. Oh how i love life.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
That was 12 years ago! Like I said above, I think it has been changed at some point.Damian E wrote:You see Charlie, I told youMartin Gardner wrote:Ok found it, this seems to settle the argument: Link
The final numbers game, pity he didn't go for 4 large.
It was actually me that found the page.Damian E wrote:Well researched, Martin.
Oh yes. Almost exactly ten years ago. Given that he can't be much over 20 now, he must've been pretty young back then. Seems fair enough to give him another shot, but I'm looking forward to the inevitable voices of dissent.Damian E wrote:Am surprised though that nobody has yet spotted that Junaid Mubeen has been on before.:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I'll find out for definite and let you know.
Its not that crucial anyway is it, but even so its good to put it to rest. How did you research the 100 game if Martin posted it?
Its not that crucial anyway is it, but even so its good to put it to rest. How did you research the 100 game if Martin posted it?
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Not at all, but it would be good to put it to rest. Martin and I were talking about it last night on MSN. He remembered that the large number was 50, although he misremembered the contestant being Tony Vick, but I eventually tracked it down with the awesome power of Google.Damian E wrote:I'll find out for definite and let you know.
Its not that crucial anyway is it, but even so its good to put it to rest. How did you research the 100 game if Martin posted it?
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 8:54 pm
- Location: Farnborough, Hampshire
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I think he may well be the singing love child of host Des. I am sure I can remember "Nothing Compares 2 U" by Junaid O' Connor.............Damian E wrote:
Am surprised though that nobody has yet spotted that Junaid Mubeen has been on before................
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13381
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
100-999 is 900 numbers so if 100 is available then the chances of it not appearing in 2484 consecutive games is (899/900)^2484 = 0.063. So doing 1 minus that and multiplying by 100 you get your 93.7%. Not significant at the 5% level even! However, the way you've worded it seems to be a bit of a misuse of statistics. All we can really say is that in a situation where 100 is possible, then over the course of 2484 games there is a 93.7% chance that it will come up. You wouldn't say after three heads in a row that there is a 7/8 chance (or 3/4 using a two-tailed (as opposed to two headed) test I suppose) that it's a doubled-headed coin.Charlie Reams wrote:Yep, CountGen does 101-999 only, although as you rightly say, it's still potentially worthwhile to declare anything as low as 91.
I have to say I think someone has changed CECIL without informing Damian, because 100 has not come up in any of the last 2484 numbers games, which makes it 93.7% likely that CECIL can't generate it. (Perhaps one of our resident statonerds can confirm my back-of-the-envelope calculation.)
But anyway, it's not that statistically freaky so I see no reason to doubt Damian on this one. Oh, Damian - yes, I see.
Obviously this and the following discussion may have assumed perfect contestants, but 100 could still be offered as a single number "solution" if the contestant simply failed to see how to get 101.Paul Howe wrote:If a target of 101 was unattainable and there was a 100 in the selection the 100 could count as a single number "solution". Whether such a numbers game exists is unclear, I just spent a few minutes trying to make one and was unsuccessful.
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I meant that a solution is any method that gets you as close as possible to the target, not just anything the contestants happen to offer.Gavin Chipper wrote:Obviously this and the following discussion may have assumed perfect contestants, but 100 could still be offered as a single number "solution" if the contestant simply failed to see how to get 101.Paul Howe wrote:If a target of 101 was unattainable and there was a 100 in the selection the 100 could count as a single number "solution". Whether such a numbers game exists is unclear, I just spent a few minutes trying to make one and was unsuccessful.
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Excellent explanation, Gavin.
I wouldn't have put it better myself.
I just wouldn't.
I wouldn't have put it better myself.
I just wouldn't.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:41 pm
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
Slightly unrelated to whether the target is attainable with one number, but yes I have seen a game where 100 has been the target. It was a CoC final (either 7 or 8, I can't remember which), however the large number in the selection was 50.
Is it possible that maybe if 100 was in the selection and was also generated as the target that the sequence would be reshot? Which might explain it so rarely appearing...
Is it possible that maybe if 100 was in the selection and was also generated as the target that the sequence would be reshot? Which might explain it so rarely appearing...
- Ian Volante
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3974
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
- Contact:
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
But Richard always pronounced it Cecil! Is this humour? I never can tell.Damian E wrote:Cecil.........(pronounced SeeSill), is programmed to select ANY 3-figure number, so 100 is legitimate.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
- Johnny Canuck
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:44 pm
- Location: Montréal 😃, Québec 😕, Canada 😃
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
I'm not dead yet. In a rut right now because of stress from work. I'll be back later in S89. I also plan to bring back the Mastergram - if I can find a way to run a timer or clock through pure MediaWiki without having to upload to Vimeo every time.
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
If, for example, the target was 100 and one of the large numbers was 100, could the method just be 100 or would you have to do, say, 9-8=1 and 4-3=1 and 100+1-1=100? If you know what I mean...?
One Direction are my life. <3
"The reason for life is to find out who you are"
"It always seems impossible until it's done"
Love loads of celebs to be honest... Might marry Nicky Maccy
"The reason for life is to find out who you are"
"It always seems impossible until it's done"
Love loads of celebs to be honest... Might marry Nicky Maccy
- Rhys Benjamin
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3108
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Re: Numbers Game Solved With One Number, Is It Possible?
RW:Soph K wrote:If, for example, the target was 100 and one of the large numbers was 100, could the method just be 100 or would you have to do, say, 9-8=1 and 4-3=1 and 100+1-1=100? If you know what I mean...?
I'll give you 10 points anyway, but can you find another way?"