Christmas is here again

Discuss anything interesting but not remotely Countdown-related here.

Moderator: Jon O'Neill

Post Reply

Do you celebrate Christmas?

Yes, as a Christian festival
6
16%
Yes, as a Pagan festival
1
3%
Yes, mainly as a family get together
24
65%
No, I hate it like a sheep sucking a striped mint
4
11%
No, I'm just going to use the time off to sit around drinking and block it all out
1
3%
Not telling you, polls are b***** f****** s*** - there's my Christmas spirit for you!
1
3%
 
Total votes: 37

User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Christmas is here again

Post by Derek Hazell »

Nobody's saying anything now Countdown's off air, so time for another boring poll.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Matt Morrison »

I fucking love Christmas. I love seeing my family, and the buzz I get out of giving people presents and seeing them smile is like nothing else. I love this time of year.
User avatar
Lesley Hines
Kiloposter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Worcester

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Lesley Hines »

^What he said :D
Lowering the averages since 2009
User avatar
Jon O'Neill
Ginger Ninja
Posts: 4545
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Jon O'Neill »

^ What she said. :)
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by James Robinson »

^ What they both said. ;) :) :D
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6283
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Marc Meakin »

James Robinson wrote:^ What they both said. ;) :) :D
^ What they all said (apart from Derek) :D :) ;)
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Jon Corby »

Matt Morrison wrote:the buzz I get out of giving people presents and seeing them smile is like nothing else.
Have you tried cocaine?
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Derek Hazell »

Jon Corby wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:the buzz I get out of giving people presents and seeing them smile is like nothing else.
Have you tried cocaine?
No, he prefers to get Merry with Joanna.
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Howard Somerset »

Family get together. But we have them about four times a year anyway, so the fact that it's Christmas on this occasion doesn't make that much difference.
User avatar
George Jenkins
Enthusiast
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:55 am

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by George Jenkins »

Howard Somerset wrote:Family get together. But we have them about four times a year anyway, so the fact that it's Christmas on this occasion doesn't make that much difference.
Agreed, why goodwill to all men (not the women?) on one day a year? Whats the matter with the other 364 days? Bah! humbug.
User avatar
Andy Wilson
Kiloposter
Posts: 1181
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Andy Wilson »

Christmas shall be different this year with apterous to buffer the boredom.

Have a happy Christmas everyone.
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

Andy Wilson wrote:Christmas...boredom.
lol wat!?

Emma and I will be celebrating our first Christmas living together by erm... going to our parents' and eating all the food, then when all that food is gone we'll go to the other set of parents and do the same there. Really looking forward to it. Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! :) :D
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Brian Moore »

George Jenkins wrote:why goodwill to all men (not the women?)
There seems to be some debate as to whether this should be "to men of goodwill".

The original Greek, according to this website, is:
Δόξα ἐν ὑψίστοις θεῷ καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς εἰρήνη ἐν ἀνθρώποις εὐδοκίας
and the Latin translation:
et in terra pax hominibus, bonae voluntatis

The debate seems to rest on accusitive/dative, though since my basic Latin studies were 33 years ago, I haven't a clue. Mind you, I didn't have much of a clue 33 years ago. Although, to answer George's question, hominibus can be translated (I think) as "a human being, man, person", so the "men" in the English translation should not be taken as being gender-specific.
User avatar
Andy Wilson
Kiloposter
Posts: 1181
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Andy Wilson »

Dinos Sfyris wrote:
Andy Wilson wrote:Christmas...boredom.
lol wat!?
I assumed it was a common phenomenon. I guess it's just because I live a decent commute to my mother's place (so I'm already here) and will be stuck here til Sunday probably, by which time I'll definitely be ready to get out! Not that I don't enjoy it...
User avatar
Julie T
Kiloposter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: Hertfordshire, England

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Julie T »

Merry Christmas Everyone! :D :D :D

I love Christmas, all the joy and bonhomie, even though it's quite expensive buying stuff for all my kids, and hard work cooking the dinner.
Being an atheist, I resent Christians insisting on bringing Jesus into it, though. ;)
I love all the tacky, cheery decorations too, and we even have snow this year! :)
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
User avatar
George Jenkins
Enthusiast
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:55 am

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by George Jenkins »

Brian Moore wrote:
George Jenkins wrote:why goodwill to all men (not the women?)
There seems to be some debate as to whether this should be "to men of goodwill".

The original Greek, according to this website, is:
Δόξα ἐν ὑψίστοις θεῷ καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς εἰρήνη ἐν ἀνθρώποις εὐδοκίας
and the Latin translation:
et in terra pax hominibus, bonae voluntatis

The debate seems to rest on accusitive/dative, though since my basic Latin studies were 33 years ago, I haven't a clue. Mind you, I didn't have much of a clue 33 years ago. Although, to answer George's question, hominibus can be translated (I think) as "a human being, man, person", so the "men" in the English translation should not be taken as being gender-specific.
I was fascinated by your answer Brian, but my clunky brain can only think of a simpler anwer. We are human animals, different from ovine, bovine animals, etc. A male pig is a boar, and a female is a sow. If we talk about a boar, we don't include a female sow, so goodwill to all boars means exactly that. If we want to include women in our good will wishes, we should say goodwill to all humans. From what I have learnt about attitudes to women in the past, they had no rights at all, right up to the present time, where in most occupations, they are paid less than Human men. Didn't Lott who lived in Soddom, say to the host who ordered him to hand over his male guest, so that they will know him, (I love the polite language), "Nay, Know ye not my guest, Take ye my Wife, and do what ye will with her", or words to that effect, But the Angel, who had been sent down by God to test Lott, smote the host blind, because Lott had passed his test. So considering the status of women, who were owned by their husbands as a commodity I can't imagine Vicars and Priests including women in their good will wishes. I think that the phrase is, goodwill to all MEN. So! all you lads who don't like women and think that they are inferier, as in the bible, send them to me, I love 'em.
Last edited by George Jenkins on Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Derek Hazell »

Yeah, Merry Christmas lovers and haters
Image
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Kai Laddiman
Fanatic
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: My bedroom

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Kai Laddiman »

The one thing that annoys me about Christmas is the hype - about 57,000,000 of my Facebook friends have said "omg xmas 2moz!!!!!1".
16/10/2007 - Episode 4460
Dinos Sfyris 76 - 78 Dorian Lidell
Proof that even idiots can get well and truly mainwheeled.
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Brian Moore »

George Jenkins wrote: Didn't Lott who lived in Soddom,
Say to the host who ordered him to hand over his male guest,
So that they will know him,
"Nay, Know ye not my guest,

Take ye my Wife, and do what ye will with her",
But the Angel, who had been sent down by God to test Lott,
Smote the host blind,
Because Lott had passed his test.
I think these are a couple of verses out of 'Hark the Herald Angels Sing' that have been dropped in recent years, because they didn't fit the tune very well.
David Roe
Enthusiast
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:58 pm

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by David Roe »

George Jenkins wrote:So! all you lads who don't like women and think that they are inferier, as in the bible, send them to me, I love 'em.
But Lot was Jewish, so nothing to do with Christmas. "Goodwill to all men" is from Luke, who was very definitely pro-women. So it's either a mistranslation or it means "men" as in "mankind".
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Charlie Reams »

David Roe wrote:But Lot was Jewish, so nothing to do with Christmas.
Jesus was also Jewish.
User avatar
George Jenkins
Enthusiast
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:55 am

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by George Jenkins »

David Roe wrote:
George Jenkins wrote:So! all you lads who don't like women and think that they are inferier, as in the bible, send them to me, I love 'em.
But Lot was Jewish, so nothing to do with Christmas. "Goodwill to all men" is from Luke, who was very definitely pro-women. So it's either a mistranslation or it means "men" as in "mankind".
That's only another example of pushing the belief in the superiority of men. If the intention was to include women, he would have said humankind, or least "Goodwill to all men and women". Doesn't the fact that Priests are not allowed to marry say something about Religions attitude to women. I have always assumed that women are assumed to be unclean, unworthy, corrupting because of the desires of the flesh or whatever. I'd like to know the real reson. Of course, it's alright to rape little boys, so God must be a tolerant bastard. Also, quoting from the bible is perpetuating fiction.
User avatar
Lesley Hines
Kiloposter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Worcester

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Lesley Hines »

Happy Christmas all. Hope Santa brings you what you want :D xx
Lowering the averages since 2009
User avatar
Rosemary Roberts
Devotee
Posts: 555
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:36 pm

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Rosemary Roberts »

George Jenkins wrote:That's only another example of pushing the belief in the superiority of men. If the intention was to include women, he would have said humankind, or least "Goodwill to all men and women". Doesn't the fact that Priests are not allowed to marry say something about Religions attitude to women. I have always assumed that women are assumed to be unclean, unworthy, corrupting because of the desires of the flesh or whatever. I'd like to know the real reson. Of course, it's alright to rape little boys, so God must be a tolerant bastard. Also, quoting from the bible is perpetuating fiction.
Amen, George!
User avatar
Alec Rivers
Devotee
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
Contact:

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Alec Rivers »

Lesley Hines wrote:Happy Christmas all. Hope Santa brings you what you want :D xx
Thanks, Lesley, you too! x
User avatar
John Bosley
Enthusiast
Posts: 380
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by John Bosley »

As George says, pigs are general and boars are male and sows are female. Trouble is that 'man' means 'a human being' or 'mankind' - and that is the first meaning given in the Chambers Dictionary (which many Countdowners do not use because Susie doesn't).
Yes, it also means 'human male' and I prefer not to use in the general sense, but strictly speaking you can.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Charlie Reams »

John Bosley wrote:As George says, pigs are general and boars are male and sows are female. Trouble is that 'man' means 'a human being' or 'mankind' - and that is the first meaning given in the Chambers Dictionary (which many Countdowners do not use because Susie doesn't).
Yes, it also means 'human male' and I prefer not to use in the general sense, but strictly speaking you can.
All this quibbling about the meaning of "man" is irrelevant because the Bible was not written in English.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13253
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Charlie Reams wrote:
David Roe wrote:But Lot was Jewish, so nothing to do with Christmas.
Jesus was also Jewish.
But was Jewsus Jeish?
User avatar
John Bosley
Enthusiast
Posts: 380
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:52 pm
Location: Huddersfield

Re: Christmas is here again

Post by John Bosley »

Charlie Reams wrote:
John Bosley wrote:As George says, pigs are general and boars are male and sows are female. Trouble is that 'man' means 'a human being' or 'mankind' - and that is the first meaning given in the Chambers Dictionary (which many Countdowners do not use because Susie doesn't).
Yes, it also means 'human male' and I prefer not to use in the general sense, but strictly speaking you can.
All this quibbling about the meaning of "man" is irrelevant because the Bible was not written in English.

Who is talking about the bible? Certainly not me.
Post Reply