One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
Moderator: Jon O'Neill
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:47 pm
One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
Have a look (and a listen) to this - from the brilliant You Bet! in the mid-90s:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYDaLfhq-j4
Let us know how you do??
Jeff
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYDaLfhq-j4
Let us know how you do??
Jeff
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
Awesome. I've never seen a skill like it. Pure magic.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
Give that there were only 24 to choose from, I'd guess anyone could learn to do that in a few weeks if they could be arsed.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
I did wonder that, yeah. Also how did they choose which bit to play? (All I could guess was that it was from a little before to a little after the highest point of the roller coaster, but I've no idea, really.)Charlie Reams wrote:Give that there were only 24 to choose from, I'd guess anyone could learn to do that in a few weeks if they could be arsed.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
It would've been pretty evil if they could play any 5-second clip from a complete recording of the ride, so I would guess they just picked some random snippet ahead of time and he learnt those. The programme generally seems to have been (CoRig)rigged so as to make the tricks look more impressive than they were, which is unfortunate because it devalued the occasional ones that were really cool.Michael Wallace wrote:I did wonder that, yeah. Also how did they choose which bit to play? (All I could guess was that it was from a little before to a little after the highest point of the roller coaster, but I've no idea, really.)Charlie Reams wrote:Give that there were only 24 to choose from, I'd guess anyone could learn to do that in a few weeks if they could be arsed.
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
Also, anyone else think that the process by which the clips were selected by the audience looked distinctly dodgy?Charlie Reams wrote:The programme generally seems to have been (CoRig)rigged so as to make the tricks look more impressive than they were, which is unfortunate because it devalued the occasional ones that were really cool.
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
Yeah - especially the times when the numbers were flashing down in sequence and then jumped to a particular one. Maybe it looks less flashy, but why not just get them to choose a number? Although it would seem odd for them to feel the need to rig it quite so much.Phil Reynolds wrote:Also, anyone else think that the process by which the clips were selected by the audience looked distinctly dodgy?
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
I suspect what happened was that the producers simply chose the 5 clips at random before the show so that they could be edited together in the right sequence for studio playback (bear in mind that this dates from a time when sound clips were not routinely stored and reproduced digitally). The audience participation bit was just a gimmicky way of highlighting the fact that the clips were chosen at random, although that choice had in fact been made in advance.Michael Wallace wrote:Yeah - especially the times when the numbers were flashing down in sequence and then jumped to a particular one. Maybe it looks less flashy, but why not just get them to choose a number? Although it would seem odd for them to feel the need to rig it quite so much.Phil Reynolds wrote:Also, anyone else think that the process by which the clips were selected by the audience looked distinctly dodgy?
Last edited by Phil Reynolds on Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Charlie Reams
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9494
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
- Location: Cambridge
- Contact:
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
I feel like we've just told Kirk that Father Christmas isn't real.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
Wow!
And Matthew Kelly is one of the few bearded game show hosts in the entire world!
And Matthew Kelly is one of the few bearded game show hosts in the entire world!
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
So anyway, this has reminded me of how awesome the theme tune was.
- Jason Larsen
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3902
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: One for Kirk - name that rollercoaster
Did Brucie start dancing to it every show?