Text

Discuss anything interesting but not remotely Countdown-related here.

Moderator: Jon O'Neill

Post Reply

What are the simple past and the past participle of the verb 'text'?

Poll ended at Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:30 pm

Texted
22
69%
Text
2
6%
Either, according to the context or the dialect
8
25%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Text

Post by Martin Gardner »

Does exactly what it says on the tin.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Matt Morrison »

I voted "text" merely because that is what I say, "texted" sounds a bit 'orrid.
Hmm I guess on that basis I should change my vote to option 3.
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Text

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

I texted him earlier shurely makes a lot more sense than I text him earlier.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Matt Morrison »

Dinos Sfyris wrote:I texted him earlier shurely makes a lot more sense than I text him earlier.
"I hitted the target earlier" surely makes a lot more sense than "I hit the target earlier" ;)
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Charlie Reams »

Matt Morrison wrote:
Dinos Sfyris wrote:I texted him earlier shurely makes a lot more sense than I text him earlier.
"I hitted the target earlier" surely makes a lot more sense than "I hit the target earlier" ;)
Well, it does. Irregular verbs are historical annoyances that make English harder for learners and we should try to avoid introducing new ones.
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by JimBentley »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:
Dinos Sfyris wrote:I texted him earlier shurely makes a lot more sense than I text him earlier.
"I hitted the target earlier" surely makes a lot more sense than "I hit the target earlier" ;)
Well, it does. Irregular verbs are historical annoyances that make English harder for learners and we should try to avoid introducing new ones.
Damnit, I was about to say that, just not quite so eloquently.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Matt Morrison »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:
Dinos Sfyris wrote:I texted him earlier shurely makes a lot more sense than I text him earlier.
"I hitted the target earlier" surely makes a lot more sense than "I hit the target earlier" ;)
Well, it does. Irregular verbs are historical annoyances that make English harder for learners and we should try to avoid introducing new ones.
In a roundabout way, that was exactly my point.
I was suggesting that "what makes sense" and "what is right" is not always the same.

To me, "texted" is the same as "hitted" - makes more sense than "text" or "hit" in terms of its construction, but doesn't sound/feel right to say.
Though clearly I'm in a massive minority.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Text

Post by Gavin Chipper »

I always say "texted" and make a point of taking the piss out of people who say "text" even if I'm in the minority. Bear in mind that quite a few people that say "text" are probably actually saying "texed" given that they say "texes" rather than "texts".
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Text

Post by Jason Larsen »

I voted for either! Either way is acceptable.
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Text

Post by Joseph Bolas »

I'd agree that both TEXT and TEXTED, in the correct context, are acceptable.
User avatar
Daniel O'Dowd
Acolyte
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:40 pm

Re: Text

Post by Daniel O'Dowd »

Dinos Sfyris wrote:I texted him earlier shurely makes a lot more sense than I text him earlier.
IAWTP. Taken out of context, the former cannot be parsed differently for the majority of logical grammarian minds. The latter however does contain a seed of present habituality. (text him earlier/than...)
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Text

Post by Howard Somerset »

I don't see any question as to which is correct. The past tense must be TEXTED. This is confirmed by OED2r which says that any exceptions to the -ED rule are explicitly stated, and TEXT as a verb does not have any exception listed.

I take issue with earlier remarks about HIT and HITTED. I don't think I've ever seen the word HITTED before reading it in this thread. Indeed, countmax agrees with me about the invalidity of HITTED.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Text

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Gavin Chipper wrote:I always say "texted" and make a point of taking the piss out of people who say "text" even if I'm in the minority. Bear in mind that quite a few people that say "text" are probably actually saying "texed" given that they say "texes" rather than "texts".
Further to this, I think the people who use "text" as the past tense are the same people who use "come" as the past tense of "come" as in "I come up here the other day". But because it's quite a new word, it never got the chance to get an established form before the inarticulate got hold of it. But inarticulate they are and "texted" it must be.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Charlie Reams »

Howard Somerset wrote:I take issue with earlier remarks about HIT and HITTED. I don't think I've ever seen the word HITTED before reading it in this thread. Indeed, countmax agrees with me about the invalidity of HITTED.
No one was saying that HITTED is correct (at least, I hope not.) I was just pointing out that the argument "no HITTED therefore no TEXTED" does not add up, because irregularity is not productive in English, e.g. the past tense of a new verb like PING is PINGED not PANG, regardless of SING/SANG.
User avatar
Ian Volante
Postmaster General
Posts: 3963
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Ian Volante »

It has to be TEXTED. Whenever I've heard anyone saying something that sounded like the pp of TEXT, I assumed in their dialect it was difficult to pronounce the second T, similar to me not being able to say the second T in STATISTICIAN without concentrating.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Martin Gardner »

I suppose the real question is, if you send a long text message and your phone company sends it as two texts in order to charge you more money, is that two texts or two halves of a text? I'll be quiet now.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Martin Gardner »

And of course people use came as the past tense of 'cum' as well, because cummed would rhyme with 'comed' which is a grammatical error.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
George Jenkins
Enthusiast
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:55 am

Re: Text

Post by George Jenkins »

Martin Gardner wrote:And of course people use came as the past tense of 'cum' as well, because cummed would rhyme with 'comed' which is a grammatical error.
Text is an original work by an Author. texted is "newspeak" like wicked etc. You SEND a text, and it is not possible to "texted it"
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Charlie Reams »

George Jenkins wrote:
Martin Gardner wrote:And of course people use came as the past tense of 'cum' as well, because cummed would rhyme with 'comed' which is a grammatical error.
Text is an original work by an Author. texted is "newspeak" like wicked etc. You SEND a text, and it is not possible to "texted it"
Luckily, no one agrees with you or we'd all still be speaking Latin.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Text

Post by Gavin Chipper »

George Jenkins wrote:
Martin Gardner wrote:And of course people use came as the past tense of 'cum' as well, because cummed would rhyme with 'comed' which is a grammatical error.
Text is an original work by an Author. texted is "newspeak" like wicked etc. You SEND a text, and it is not possible to "texted it"
I think you send a text message, not a text! ;)
Hannah O
Acolyte
Posts: 216
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:15 pm

Re: Text

Post by Hannah O »

Charlie: What's wrong with Latin?! And despite the irregular verbs, it makes more sense than the English language!

As for the SING/SANG/SUNG thing, is it called an ablaut? I tried to start reading the dictionary a few days ago just to generally help with Countdown ( :P ) and I think I came across that word and definition.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Charlie Reams »

Hannah O wrote:Charlie: What's wrong with Latin?! And despite the irregular verbs, it makes more sense than the English language!
Well, Latin was pretty good when people wanted to talk about agriculture and temples all the time, but its not so great for talking about differential calculus or feminism. Language evolves, rapidly in fact, and saying "it is impossible for 'text' to be a verb" is just silly and is really not the kind of linguistic purism which its authors tend to think they're defending.
As for the SING/SANG/SUNG thing, is it called an ablaut? I tried to start reading the dictionary a few days ago just to generally help with Countdown ( :P ) and I think I came across that word and definition.
Yes :) I look forward to your forthcoming wisdom on such varied topics as adhocracy, Agamemnon and anchovies.
Dinos Sfyris
Series 80 Champion
Posts: 2707
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Sheffield

Re: Text

Post by Dinos Sfyris »

Charlie Reams wrote:Agamemnon
Agamemnon is SEXY. It can be split into no less than 3 palindromes.
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Martin Gardner »

A couple of examples, when asking my mum what the past tense of text was she said 'texted' but a couple of days later said 'I text your brother last night'. Dan, a uni friend thought about it for about thirty seconds before saying "the incredibly awkward texted".
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
Derek Hazell
Kiloposter
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:52 am
Location: Swindon
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Derek Hazell »

On a similar note, is "broadcast" always the correct past tense of "broadcast"? This site seems to think so because it follows the same pattern as "cast", and the OED is even mentioned.

So is it ever truly acceptable to use "broadcasted"?
Living life in a gyratory circus kind of way.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Charlie Reams »

Derek Hazell wrote:On a similar note, is "broadcast" always the correct past tense of "broadcast"? This site seems to think so because it follows the same pattern as "cast", and the OED is even mentioned.

So is it ever truly acceptable to use "broadcasted"?
IIRC ODE says that either is acceptable.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Text

Post by Matt Morrison »

There are some fucking NAMES in this thread. And I am still bewildered that you old OLD people think "texted" sounds ok.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6289
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Text

Post by Marc Meakin »

Yes.
Also Skypeted , WhatsApped and DMed
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Text

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Matt Morrison wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2020 11:21 pm There are some fucking NAMES in this thread. And I am still bewildered that you old OLD people think "texted" sounds ok.
I love how you desperately try to cling onto your illogical losing position by chucking out some last-ditch insults.
Post Reply