Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 24
Moderator: James Robinson
Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 24
Victoria James is still here, in what was arguably her best performance thus far yesterday, but I still think she probably has a ways to go before getting to an octochamp type level. Can she inch closer today. Kate Humble is still in the Corner...and I think I've decided I don't like her. She seems a bit..I don't know if smug is the right word, but there's something about when she talks about words that she obviously didn't find that bothers me. Sorry Corby.
James will recap into the night later.
James will recap into the night later.
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Why?Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Because you were trying to convince me to like her with that video you were talking about, but I just can't do it.Jon Corby wrote:Why?Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Not really. I just think it's always better to have as much information as possible when making a decision. I often find that annoying people become far less annoying if I like their boobs.Jordan F wrote:Because you were trying to convince me to like her with that video you were talking about, but I just can't do it.Jon Corby wrote:Why?Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
-
- Series 66 Champion
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
- Location: Blackpool
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
SIDESMAN in round 7 and TETRODE in round 13.
1st numbers: (75+9)x8+9+6 = 287
2nd numbers: (75/(4-1))x4x2 = 200
3rd numbers: (75-6)x(10-1)=7-1 = 627
1st numbers: (75+9)x8+9+6 = 287
2nd numbers: (75/(4-1))x4x2 = 200
3rd numbers: (75-6)x(10-1)=7-1 = 627
- Phil Reynolds
- Postmaster General
- Posts: 3329
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
I'll be taking a photo of mine to send you as soon as the tray of ice cubes I've just put in the freezer is ready.Jon Corby wrote:I often find that annoying people become far less annoying if I like their boobs.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Round 12 - ACTIVES for 7 to match DC's ABUSIVE
- Karen Pearson
- Devotee
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:28 am
- Location: Bromsgrove
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
I thought I got two nines today but as no one else has mentioned them, I'm wondering if I am mistaken! (I was busy cooking so I wasn't giving it my full attention)
BAROMETER
MANGINESS
BAROMETER
MANGINESS
-
- Acolyte
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:26 am
- Location: Kent
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Was looking for 2nd R to come out for BAROMETER but it didn't, second T insteadKaren Pearson wrote:I thought I got two nines today but as no one else has mentioned them, I'm wondering if I am mistaken! (I was busy cooking so I wasn't giving it my full attention)
BAROMETER
MANGINESS
And I got ASSIGNED somewhere which may be the other round you're thinking of, so D instead of 2nd N (assuming I wrote them down correctly).
Bet the food's good though!
- Karen Pearson
- Devotee
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:28 am
- Location: Bromsgrove
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Thought it was too good to be true!
Spicy pork and bean casserole. Smells yummy!
- Brian Moore
- Devotee
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
- Location: Exeter
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
I'm with you on this, Jordan - tries to sound authoritative but doesn't pull the act off, or acknowledge that she's been fed words. Her comment for FIANCES "doesn't look right" was splendid. Nothing interesting to say, basically.Jordan F wrote:Kate Humble is still in the Corner...and I think I've decided I don't like her. She seems a bit..I don't know if smug is the right word, but there's something about when she talks about words that she obviously didn't find that bothers me.
Other than that, she's great.
2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200
- Graeme Cole
- Series 65 Champion
- Posts: 2037
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
OATIER in the GOATIER^ round.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Which is what Rachel did, but put in a different way...........Brian Moore wrote:2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200
11, surelyJack Worsley wrote:TETRODE in round 13.
25, surely Your sum equals 687Jack Worsley wrote:1st numbers: (75+9)x8+9+6 = 287
UNIPED in round 1, ORGEAT in round 2, ABETTOR in round 4, COINAGES in round 6, SOIGNEE & WIGEONS in round 8, DUIKERS in round 9 and LLANERO in round 13.
1st Numbers Alt.: (25 x 8) + (9 x 9) + 6 = 287
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Unfortunately, it's BIRETTA, but ABETTER is a valid anagram of beretta.David Barnard wrote:I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Ah right, that's why it wasn't mentioned then, I thought I had 116 points but now it's been slashed to 109 but we dont mindJames Robinson wrote:Unfortunately, it's BIRETTA, but ABETTER is a valid anagram of beretta.David Barnard wrote:I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that
- Brian Moore
- Devotee
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
- Location: Exeter
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Sorry, James. I must pay more attention in class. I was probably wiping lasagne off the keyboard at the time. (I won't bother to put that in the Tonight's Dinner thread now.)James Robinson wrote:Which is what Rachel did, but put in a different way...........Brian Moore wrote:2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200
- Andy Platt
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
- Location: Wirral
Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli
Only just got round to watching this, thought the champ wasn't up to the same standard today - I'd only have beaten her yesterday because of her not being up to scratch with numbers. This time, she was showing a bit less gaminess and was a little lousier.
Round 10 weird alternative, (4+4)*75/(2+1), taking it up to 600 needlessly, everything else posted already. Glad I spotted LLANERO, haven't seen that word for ages
Round 10 weird alternative, (4+4)*75/(2+1), taking it up to 600 needlessly, everything else posted already. Glad I spotted LLANERO, haven't seen that word for ages