Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 24

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Prelim 24

Post by Jordan F »

Victoria James is still here, in what was arguably her best performance thus far yesterday, but I still think she probably has a ways to go before getting to an octochamp type level. Can she inch closer today. Kate Humble is still in the Corner...and I think I've decided I don't like her. She seems a bit..I don't know if smug is the right word, but there's something about when she talks about words that she obviously didn't find that bothers me. Sorry Corby.

James will recap into the night later.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Jon Corby »

Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
Why?
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Jordan F »

Jon Corby wrote:
Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
Why?
Because you were trying to convince me to like her with that video you were talking about, but I just can't do it.
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Jon Corby »

Jordan F wrote:
Jon Corby wrote:
Jordan F wrote:Sorry Corby.
Why?
Because you were trying to convince me to like her with that video you were talking about, but I just can't do it.
Not really. I just think it's always better to have as much information as possible when making a decision. I often find that annoying people become far less annoying if I like their boobs.
Jack Worsley
Series 66 Champion
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Location: Blackpool

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Jack Worsley »

SIDESMAN in round 7 and TETRODE in round 13.

1st numbers: (75+9)x8+9+6 = 287
2nd numbers: (75/(4-1))x4x2 = 200
3rd numbers: (75-6)x(10-1)=7-1 = 627
User avatar
Phil Reynolds
Postmaster General
Posts: 3329
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Location: Leamington Spa, UK

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Phil Reynolds »

Jon Corby wrote:I often find that annoying people become far less annoying if I like their boobs.
I'll be taking a photo of mine to send you as soon as the tray of ice cubes I've just put in the freezer is ready.
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by John Garcia »

Round 12 - ACTIVES for 7 to match DC's ABUSIVE
User avatar
Karen Pearson
Devotee
Posts: 742
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:28 am
Location: Bromsgrove

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Karen Pearson »

I thought I got two nines today but as no one else has mentioned them, I'm wondering if I am mistaken! (I was busy cooking so I wasn't giving it my full attention)
BAROMETER
MANGINESS
Keith Bennett
Acolyte
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:26 am
Location: Kent

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Keith Bennett »

Karen Pearson wrote:I thought I got two nines today but as no one else has mentioned them, I'm wondering if I am mistaken! (I was busy cooking so I wasn't giving it my full attention)
BAROMETER
MANGINESS
Was looking for 2nd R to come out for BAROMETER but it didn't, second T instead

And I got ASSIGNED somewhere which may be the other round you're thinking of, so D instead of 2nd N (assuming I wrote them down correctly).

Bet the food's good though!
User avatar
Karen Pearson
Devotee
Posts: 742
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:28 am
Location: Bromsgrove

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Karen Pearson »

:-(
Thought it was too good to be true!

Spicy pork and bean casserole. Smells yummy!
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Brian Moore »

Jordan F wrote:Kate Humble is still in the Corner...and I think I've decided I don't like her. She seems a bit..I don't know if smug is the right word, but there's something about when she talks about words that she obviously didn't find that bothers me.
I'm with you on this, Jordan - tries to sound authoritative but doesn't pull the act off, or acknowledge that she's been fed words. Her comment for FIANCES "doesn't look right" was splendid. Nothing interesting to say, basically.

Other than that, she's great.

2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200
User avatar
Graeme Cole
Series 65 Champion
Posts: 2037
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Graeme Cole »

OATIER in the GOATIER^ round.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by James Robinson »

Brian Moore wrote:2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200
Which is what Rachel did, but put in a different way........... :oops: :roll:
Jack Worsley wrote:TETRODE in round 13.
11, surely :?:
Jack Worsley wrote:1st numbers: (75+9)x8+9+6 = 287
25, surely :?: Your sum equals 687 :!:

UNIPED in round 1, ORGEAT in round 2, ABETTOR in round 4, COINAGES in round 6, SOIGNEE & WIGEONS in round 8, DUIKERS in round 9 and LLANERO in round 13.

1st Numbers Alt.: (25 x 8) + (9 x 9) + 6 = 287
David Barnard
Enthusiast
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by David Barnard »

I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by James Robinson »

David Barnard wrote:I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that
Unfortunately, it's BIRETTA, but ABETTER is a valid anagram of beretta.
David Barnard
Enthusiast
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:02 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by David Barnard »

James Robinson wrote:
David Barnard wrote:I think I got BERETTA in round 4, I swear I have heard of it before but haven't verified it, maybe saw it in one of Jack W's games, if I was in the studio I would certainly risk declaring that
Unfortunately, it's BIRETTA, but ABETTER is a valid anagram of beretta.
Ah right, that's why it wasn't mentioned then, I thought I had 116 points but now it's been slashed to 109 but we dont mind :D
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Brian Moore »

James Robinson wrote:
Brian Moore wrote:2nd numbers alt:
(4x5x2) x (4+1) = 200
Which is what Rachel did, but put in a different way........... :oops: :roll:
Sorry, James. I must pay more attention in class. I was probably wiping lasagne off the keyboard at the time. (I won't bother to put that in the Tonight's Dinner thread now.)
User avatar
Andy Platt
Kiloposter
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:00 pm
Location: Wirral

Re: Spoilers for Thursday February 9th 2012 (Series 66 Preli

Post by Andy Platt »

Only just got round to watching this, thought the champ wasn't up to the same standard today - I'd only have beaten her yesterday because of her not being up to scratch with numbers. This time, she was showing a bit less gaminess and was a little lousier.

Round 10 weird alternative, (4+4)*75/(2+1), taking it up to 600 needlessly, everything else posted already. Glad I spotted LLANERO, haven't seen that word for ages
Post Reply