Tuesday May 27th 2008

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
Ben Wilson
Legend
Posts: 4539
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
Location: North Hykeham

Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Ben Wilson »

R13 FEROCITY. :)
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Jon Corby »

Where's the disclaimer? :x
User avatar
Richard Brittain
Series Champ
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:11 pm
Location: Belgium

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Richard Brittain »

This guy is really rather good. If I was Jason Cullen, I'd be worried. If I was David O'Donnell, I'd even be slightly worried.
User avatar
Ben Pugh
Enthusiast
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: North London

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Ben Pugh »

DIOPTASE is a useful equaller in round 2.
lelb72
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:44 am

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by lelb72 »

He whopped me, i had no chance!Oh well
Malcolm James
Acolyte
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:59 pm

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Malcolm James »

R5

25 9 9 8 3 2 Target 735

(8 + 2) x 9 x 9 = 810

810 - (25 - 3) = 735
User avatar
Joseph Bolas
Fanatic
Posts: 2446
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Joseph Bolas »

lelb72 wrote:He whopped me, i had no chance!Oh well
Well done though for getting 2 wins :).

Does it get easier the more games you win or does it get harder with each game?

EDIT: Were the letters there in Round 7 to be able to make the 2 words Joseph RULES :P :lol:
Julian Fell
Series 48 Champion
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Julian Fell »

Am surprised no-one's mentioned this: with the help of that last-gasp conundrum, hasn't the challenger achieved the highest-ever score by a debutant? Correct me if I'm wrong... but I make it that the previous record was 123, and that's stood for more than 6 years!

In any case, mightily impressive performance by him - as Richard said, I'd be worried if I were David O (luckily, he won't have got to see today's game...). Hard luck Lee, this guy's a goodie.
lelb72
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:44 am

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by lelb72 »

You have to be careful not to relax too much when you've won a couple of times as you never know who you are going to be up against. I blame a spider that was crawling under the desk when i was playing, i lost concentration (any excuse)
As you say he was just very clever. If you watch him he studies the letters first before deciding a word. I cant and didnt do that. Thanks to those who congratulated me anyway. :)
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Jon Corby »

lelb72 wrote:As you say he was just very clever. If you watch him he studies the letters first before deciding a word. I cant and didnt do that.
You actually scored quite well then, if you didn't pay any attention to the letters when deciding your words :?
lelb72
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:44 am

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by lelb72 »

You make me want to call you something quite rude Corby but i know you're only trying to wind me up now.
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Paul Howe »

Corby wrote:
lelb72 wrote:As you say he was just very clever. If you watch him he studies the letters first before deciding a word. I cant and didnt do that.
You actually scored quite well then, if you didn't pay any attention to the letters when deciding your words :?
Hmm, I really should be revising, but all I can think about now is devising a strategy to play optimally when you don't know what the letters selection is. If I fail I'm holding you directly responsible. :evil:
JasonCullen
Devotee
Posts: 712
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:43 pm
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
Contact:

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by JasonCullen »

Richard Brittain wrote:This guy is really rather good. If I was Jason Cullen, I'd be worried. If I was David O'Donnell, I'd even be slightly worried.
Who's worried? :shock: :roll:
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by JimBentley »

Paul Howe wrote:Hmm, I really should be revising, but all I can think about now is devising a strategy to play optimally when you don't know what the letters selection is. If I fail I'm holding you directly responsible. :evil:
This intrigued me, I have to say. There's not a strategy that you could employ to win the game, but what would be the word that would leave you with the least egg on your face? For a start, most times your word's not even going to be within the selection, and even if it is, it's probably not going to win the round, unless you get lucky and your opponent declares something invalid.

Based on every letter selection from this series - and assuming your opponent always declares nothing, or something that's disallowed - the best bets are:

ATE/EAT/ETA/TEA would score 3 points in 34.09% of selections, average 11.25 points per game
TE would score 2 points in 48.48% of selections, average 10.67 points per game
ARE/EAR/ERA would score 3 points in 32.24% of selections, average 10.64 points per game
ER/RE would score 2 points in 47.90% of selections, average 10.54 points per game
SAE/SEA would score 3 points in 31.65% of selections, average 10.44 points per game
EN/NE would score 2 points in 45.71% of selections, average 10.06 points per game

Everything else is under 10 points on average.

Best eights are DETRAINS/RANDIEST/STRAINED, INHALERS, MINERALS and ROUTINES, each of which appeared in 0.34% of selections, gaining on average 0.3 points per game.

For the sevens, LARNIES/NAILERS, 1.35% of selections, 1.04 points on average
Sixes: ARISEN/ARSINE/SARNIE, 3.79% of selections, 2.5 points on average
Fives: OATER/ORATE, 8.25% of selections, 4.54 points on average
Fours: RATE/TARE/TEAR, 16.92% of selections, 7.44 points on average

So - assuming your opponent is a tub of lard (as is the classic test of these things), your best bet is to declare TEA in every letters round, which should gain you 12 points on average over the course of the game. The numbers and conundrum are an entirely different problem, however ;)

I realise that Paul was probably thinking along more subtle and nuanced lines in terms of an optimal strategy, but it's best to start with a brute force approximation, I reckon.
Paul Howe
Kiloposter
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm

Re: Tuesday May 27th 2008

Post by Paul Howe »

jimbentley wrote:
I realise that Paul was probably thinking along more subtle and
nuanced lines in terms of an optimal strategy, but it's best to start
with a brute force approximation, I reckon.
Hah, not really! I'm not sure you can do better than a slight modification of what you suggested, which is to build a table comparing how each word would score against every other word in the dictionary, on average (so this hypothetical table would have N^2 entries, as opposed to just a list of N words) and then pick the word that scores best against all other words. Assuming you knew the number of vowels and consonants in each round, you'd need three separate tables. My intuition is that five vowels would result in slightly higher scoring, but it doesn't matter as both players would play the same word. Kind of a boring game really.

Ithink TEA might still come out as the best play, but I would probably offer ETA as I wouldn't want to be reminded of the slightly disturbing manner in which some Northern folk refer to their lunch as their dinner.
Post Reply