Page 1 of 1
Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:32 pm
by James Robinson
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:32 pm
by Marc Meakin
Why no BEARDIER for round 2?
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:34 pm
by Marc Meakin
CAMPSITE round 3.
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:38 pm
by Ben Wilson
1st numbers alt (all my own work- and in time too): (75-9+50/25)*(10+3).
Rachel's way was probably better though.
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:48 pm
by Chris Davies
UNLASHED
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:11 pm
by David O'Donnell
SOIGNEURS, missed PRODIGALS though.
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:53 pm
by Charlie Reams
James Robinson wrote:Today's spoilers will be just like yesterday's; rubbish, unimaginative, lacking content and overall, sub-standard.
A bit like me then
You're not that bad mate.
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:09 pm
by JackHurst
There was a nice bloke in the last series who looked like todays challenger. Were they related (I missed the start of the episode if they mentioned anything)
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:50 pm
by Kevin Davis
JackHurst wrote:There was a nice bloke in the last series who looked like todays challenger. Were they related (I missed the start of the episode if they mentioned anything)
No, but his son
Joe was on the show back in Series 58.
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday March 10th 2010
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 6:06 pm
by Alec Rivers
Simpler 2nd numbers:
(75 x 2 + 1) x 2 = 302
