Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by James Robinson »

The weekend is now upon us, so can Craig keep our spirits high by going the whole week undefeated :?:

If today's challenger is anything like Catherine from yesterday, then Craig will surely have his work cut out for him, but they'll definitely have to be up with their numbers just to keep up. Still can't get over how he did that 1st numbers yesterday :?

So, let's hope Craig can do Apterous/C4Countdowners proud, and hopefully won't get any Rawsonitis....
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Wow. Shocked both missed (7+7-5)x100-5. I put 10 points on to the challenger's score before the time was up. Oops.
Last edited by Kirk Bevins on Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Matt Morrison
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 7822
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Matt Morrison »

1st numbers was silly easy.
7+7-5 = 9, x 100 = 900, -5 = 895
User avatar
Mark Kudlowski
Enthusiast
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Mark Kudlowski »

1st numbers (easier)

Three identical posts in less than a minute !

(100 x (7 + 7 - 5) - 5)
User avatar
Ian Dent
Devotee
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:12 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Ian Dent »

I didn't get the first numbers.
Liam Tiernan
Devotee
Posts: 799
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Liam Tiernan »

Thought I had a nice beater there with BOVVERS. Unfortunately it's only listed as a noun, not a verb, so no -s.
BOVVERED likewise would be invalid.
Last edited by Liam Tiernan on Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Liam Tiernan wrote:Thought I had a nice beater there with BOVVERS. Unfortunately it's only listed as a noun, not a verb, so no -s.
You can pluralise nouns, Liam. The problem comes because BOVVER is a mass noun.
Liam Tiernan
Devotee
Posts: 799
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:12 pm
Location: Kildare, Rep. of Ireland

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Liam Tiernan »

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Liam Tiernan wrote:Thought I had a nice beater there with BOVVERS. Unfortunately it's only listed as a noun, not a verb, so no -s.
You can pluralise nouns, Liam. The problem comes because BOVVER is a mass noun.
Sorry, should have been more specific.Just took that for granted.
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Kirk Bevins »

JADEITE for a beater in round 9.
User avatar
Mark Kudlowski
Enthusiast
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Mark Kudlowski »

2nd numbers alt

((75 + 8) x 9) - (3 x 4)
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Kirk Bevins »

They didn't go to DC in round 12 so these aren't really beaters but there were 7s, like STOMPIE, IMPUTES, TIMEOUS.
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Sue Sanders »

They missed MUPPETS, the MUPPETS!!!
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6294
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Marc Meakin »

Sue Sanders wrote:They missed MUPPETS, the MUPPETS!!!
And MOPPETS.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Sue Sanders »

Ha - well, I guess if Jay can get away with OUTSTEER, Craig can get away wiv 'WIVERIN' ;)
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
Helen James
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:19 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Helen James »

IMPUTES for a 7 in Round 9
Helen James
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:19 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Helen James »

I think I meant Round 11 for IMPUTES (Can't count)
Niall Seymour
Rookie
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:10 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Niall Seymour »

Anyone else think the challenger was a dead ringer for comedian Milton Jones from Mock the Week and other stuff?
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Martin Gardner »

Mark Kudlowski wrote:1st numbers (easier)

Three identical posts in less than a minute !

(100 x (7 + 7 - 5) - 5)
It seems like he's so used to factorising to find solutions, that he didn't even see the obvious way. I too saw this in about two or three seconds.
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
D Eadie
Devotee
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
Location: Mars Hotel

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by D Eadie »

Kirk Bevins wrote:JADEITE for a beater in round 9.

Wasn't a beater, we couldn't be arsed mentioning it. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Martin Gardner
Kiloposter
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm
Location: Leeds, UK
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Martin Gardner »

Anyone want to comment on FUNNEST which was disallowed about a year or so because there was 'a note in the dictionary'?
If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
User avatar
D Eadie
Devotee
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
Location: Mars Hotel

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by D Eadie »

Niall Seymour wrote:Anyone else think the challenger was a dead ringer for comedian Milton Jones from Mock the Week and other stuff?
.............wearing a banana skin with the top peeled off?
User avatar
Alec Rivers
Devotee
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
Contact:

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Alec Rivers »

2nd numbers also:

75 x 9 + 6 x 8 + 3 x 4
User avatar
Jason Larsen
Postmaster General
Posts: 3902
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:18 pm
Location: Seattle, Washington

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Jason Larsen »

Was the challenger today any relation to Bamber?
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6294
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Marc Meakin »

Jason Larsen wrote:Was the challenger today any relation to Bamber?
No, but he was 2 bob bit.
Cockney rhyming slang pundetry there.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
User avatar
Brian Moore
Devotee
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:11 pm
Location: Exeter

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Brian Moore »

Marc Meakin wrote:
Sue Sanders wrote:They missed MUPPETS, the MUPPETS!!!
And MOPPETS.
And MOPIEST, which I thought Susie would mention having disallowed MOPPIEST
Jim Treloar
Rookie
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:58 pm

Re: Spoilers For Friday February 12th 2010

Post by Jim Treloar »

The challenger had other things on his mind. His wife who came with him was taken ill, couldn't come into the studio and spent the whole time in the sick room. The start of the prog was held up as he wanted to go in and see her. I saw them next day and she looked terrible, I had a quick word, didn't like to ask but looked like a very bad flu.
Post Reply