Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Moderator: James Robinson
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
The Countdown champions' chair seems to be changing as regular as the challengers' chair at the moment. Mark will become the newest person to sit on it today, after beating Norman yesterday.
I wonder if today's challenger will continue this trend.
So, tune it at 3:25pm to see what will happen, having said that, it can sometimes start at 3:26pm, or even 3:24pm. But, any which way, it will be in roughly 2 hours time.
One final note, on behalf of the Spoiler Community, I wish to congratulate Dinos on his performance in last night's The Krypton Factor. Your performance was very exceptional, and even though you didn't win, I think we all think that you're a winner to us.
I wonder if today's challenger will continue this trend.
So, tune it at 3:25pm to see what will happen, having said that, it can sometimes start at 3:26pm, or even 3:24pm. But, any which way, it will be in roughly 2 hours time.
One final note, on behalf of the Spoiler Community, I wish to congratulate Dinos on his performance in last night's The Krypton Factor. Your performance was very exceptional, and even though you didn't win, I think we all think that you're a winner to us.
-
- Series 80 Champion
- Posts: 2707
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Cheers mate much appreciated
- Michael Wallace
- Racoonteur
- Posts: 5458
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
- Location: London
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Man, I'd be pretty annoyed if I hadn't already watched that - you really should only have spoilers relevant to the spoilers thread in here.James Robinson wrote:<Krypton Factor spoilers>
- Davy Affleck
- Acolyte
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 6:24 am
- Location: Lesmahagow
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Michael Wallace wrote:Man, I'd be pretty annoyed if I hadn't already watched that - you really should only have spoilers relevant to the spoilers thread in here.James Robinson wrote:<Krypton Factor spoilers>
If you didn't want to know last nights results:
Chelsea drew 1-1
Celtic lost 1-0
St Mirren are in the League cup final
- Alec Rivers
- Devotee
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
There is a God.Davy Affleck wrote:Chelsea drew 1-1
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6289
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Gooner?Alec Rivers wrote:There is a God.Davy Affleck wrote:Chelsea drew 1-1
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
-
- Kiloposter
- Posts: 1955
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: UK
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
No. A god would have made it 1 - 0 to Hull.Alec Rivers wrote:There is a God.Davy Affleck wrote:Chelsea drew 1-1
- Matt Morrison
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 7822
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: London
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
As much as I hate to say it, a god would have let Chelsea win so as to help prevent the Scum winning another title this year.
I wouldn't mind at all if Arsenal would win the league, that's far preferable to Chelsea or the Scum, but they're just not good enough to maintain a challenge.
I wouldn't mind at all if Arsenal would win the league, that's far preferable to Chelsea or the Scum, but they're just not good enough to maintain a challenge.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
As long as "the Scum" don't win the title, I don't mind who wins it.Matt Morrison wrote:As much as I hate to say it, a god would have let Chelsea win so as to help prevent the Scum winning another title this year.
I just don't want the mighty Terriers to lose their place in history.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6289
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Another Aptorite today.
Good luck Jay.
Good luck Jay.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6289
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
The Woofits were a family of dogs on childrens telly in the eighties.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Kirk Bevins
- God
- Posts: 4923
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
- Location: York, UK
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
The conundrum scramble should have been IFNOTNICE in relation to the TTT being INOTNICE.
Well done Jay, good to see another apterite owning a teapot.
Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.
Well done Jay, good to see another apterite owning a teapot.
Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.
- Karen Pearson
- Devotee
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:28 am
- Location: Bromsgrove
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
IAWTPJames Robinson wrote:As long as "the Scum" don't win the title, I don't mind who wins it.Matt Morrison wrote:As much as I hate to say it, a god would have let Chelsea win so as to help prevent the Scum winning another title this year.
On the spoilers subjects, my contributions for today are APERIENT, REASON and REMODEL.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 6289
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
As long as the BBC don't object to using the name.Kirk Bevins wrote:The conundrum scramble should have been IFNOTNICE in relation to the TTT being INOTNICE.
Well done Jay, good to see another apterite owning a teapot.
Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
- Mike Brailsford
- Acolyte
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:41 pm
- Location: Blackpool, England
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Written and narrated by Michael Parkinson.Marc Meakin wrote:The Woofits were a family of dogs on childrens telly in the eighties.
Jay had to be a United fan since he has the look of Nemanja Vidic !
- Alec Rivers
- Devotee
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
- Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
- Contact:
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Simpler first numbers: (25 - 7) x 8 = 144
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
I thought mine wasn't too bad.Alec Rivers wrote:Simpler first numbers: (25 - 7) x 8 = 144
((8 + 7) x 10) - 7 + 1 = 144.
2nd Numbers Alternative: (4 x 3 x 10) - 1 = 119.
TRIBUTE in round 8 and EMERALD in round 12.
- Richard Priest
- Devotee
- Posts: 678
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 4:30 pm
- Location: Newcastle-under-Lyme
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
CABILDO, round 6 I think.
-
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 13258
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
I think if anyone complained about Apterous copying Countdown, Charlie could use the "OOW" defence.Marc Meakin wrote:As long as the BBC don't object to using the name.Kirk Bevins wrote:The conundrum scramble should have been IFNOTNICE in relation to the TTT being INOTNICE.
Well done Jay, good to see another apterite owning a teapot.
Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.
- James Robinson
- Post-apocalypse
- Posts: 10580
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
- Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Maybe if it was called Susie's Call My Bluff, then they won't be able to complain. Also, I should think that as long as they don't bring in the music, it'll be OK.Marc Meakin wrote:As long as the BBC don't object to using the name.Kirk Bevins wrote:Keep up the Call my Bluff style OOW segment...I'm loving it.
- Martin Bishop
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:29 pm
- Location: Tadworth, Surrey
Re: Spoilers For Wednesday February 3rd 2010
Having just seen Dinos on Krypton Factor, I've been waiting a few days to say this.
Was I the only one waiting for Susie to use the foodstuff mass noun rule in round one?
Was I the only one waiting for Susie to use the foodstuff mass noun rule in round one?