Spoilers For Thursday September 10th 2009

James Robinson · Post by **James Robinson** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:18 am

Right, after a couple of days at the studios, I'm back in the chair here.

Bob De Caux is now the champ and Christopher Harris is the challenger. He can do something very well that Bob can't do very well. (All will be explained in the introduction.)

I personally thought it was a good opening by Bob yesterday, but he'll need to score a few more good wins for him to try and get a place in the quarters.

At this rate, since there are already 3 octos, and 2 pentas, Bob will probably need to win at least 6 shows to guarantee a place in the quarters at the end of the series.

James Robinson · Post by **James Robinson** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:43 pm

Is it me or does no seem to be interested in today's show

Derek Hazell · Post by **Derek Hazell** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:51 pm

James Robinson wrote:Is it me or does no seem to be interested in today's show

Someone who can draw graphs could probably draw a graph on here of how C4C's interest troughs and Digital Spy's interest peaks whenever a top Apterite comes to the end of their run.

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:52 pm

It's not started yet, James. Maybe more postings will arrive when the show starts. There's really no need to start the thread at 9:18am!

James Robinson · Post by **James Robinson** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:07 pm

Kirk Bevins wrote:It's not started yet, James. Maybe more postings will arrive when the show starts. There's really no need to start the thread at 9:18am!

People have started threads earlier, Kirk.

On most occasions, there are a few posts before it begins.

On some occasions, there have even been more before than during or after the show!

Phil Reynolds · Post by **Phil Reynolds** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:12 pm

James Robinson wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:It's not started yet, James. Maybe more postings will arrive when the show starts. There's really no need to start the thread at 9:18am!
People have started threads earlier, Kirk.

Yes but the question is why? There's nothing interesting to be said about today's show before it starts.

Marc Meakin · Post by **Marc Meakin** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:22 pm

Hope it is another close contest today

No disrespect to the recent octochamps, but is nice to get to part three with the contest still alive

Darren Carter · Post by **Darren Carter** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:32 pm

Marc Meakin wrote:Hope it is another close contest today

No disrespect to the recent octochamps, but is nice to get to part three with the contest still alive

I sort of agree. Whilst I love watching the likes of Hulme, Carson and Davies coming up with ridiculous words, and can't wait to see them up against each other in the finals, it is good to have some close games with evenly matched players from time to time.

Phil Reynolds · Post by **Phil Reynolds** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:37 pm

Is Bob wearing one of Charlie's collection of olive-green shirts?

Marc Meakin · Post by **Marc Meakin** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:40 pm

Eskimoes not a word. Innuit

Bob De Caux · Post by **Bob De Caux** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:41 pm

Hello everyone. Quite amused to discover this forum. My god, that was an appalling first four letters rounds from me

Phil Reynolds · Post by **Phil Reynolds** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:46 pm

Shame Ovaltine is capitalised...

James Robinson · Post by **James Robinson** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:46 pm

Bob De Caux wrote:Hello everyone. Quite amused to discover this forum. My god, that was an appalling first four letters rounds from me

Hi, Bob.

Yeah, I can remember seeing the shows. There were some dreadful combinations and I think nearly all the audience were finding them hard going too.

Chris Davies · Post by **Chris Davies** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:47 pm

BLOVIATE, round 7.

Phil Reynolds · Post by **Phil Reynolds** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:54 pm

Excellent spot with HAIRLINES - I was stuck on NEARISH.

Marc Meakin · Post by **Marc Meakin** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:57 pm

3 successive impossible numbers rounds?

Bob De Caux · Post by **Bob De Caux** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:58 pm

I usually fancy myself on the numbers, but the selections today were shocking. Terrible miss yesterday though

Allan Harmer · Post by **Allan Harmer** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:07 pm

Marc Meakin · Post by **Marc Meakin** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:11 pm

Allan Harmer wrote:Oops

I was just about to praise that solution aswell

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:11 pm

Marc Meakin wrote:3 successive impossible numbers rounds?

No. Rachel solved 588 in the break.

I also had a shocking 3 out of 4 rounds to start with - very odd.

Bob De Caux · Post by **Bob De Caux** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:31 pm

Watching it back was painful as all the words jump out at you straight away. Nerves are a nightmare

Daniel O'Dowd · Post by **Daniel O'Dowd** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:01 pm

ESOTERIC in the CORSETED round

Ray Folwell · Post by **Ray Folwell** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:32 pm

Marc Meakin wrote:3 successive impossible numbers rounds?

And the last one is possible, but I would never have got it without using a solver.

JimBentley · Post by **JimBentley** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:44 pm

Ray Folwell wrote:
Marc Meakin wrote:3 successive impossible numbers rounds?
And the last one is possible, but I would never have got it without using a solver.

Nor me! It's a spectacular method indeed:

75 x (10 + 6) = 1200
1200 + 5 = 1205
1205 x 8 = 9640
9640 / 10 = 964

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:47 pm

JimBentley wrote:
Ray Folwell wrote:
Marc Meakin wrote:3 successive impossible numbers rounds?
And the last one is possible, but I would never have got it without using a solver.
Nor me! It's a spectacular method indeed:

75 x (10 + 6) = 1200
1200 + 5 = 1205
1205 x 8 = 9640
9640 / 10 = 964

Kieran Child got this in 7 seconds.

Kieran Child · Post by **Kieran Child** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 4:54 pm

^ I didn't get any of the numbers today.

Darren Carter · Post by **Darren Carter** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:50 pm

Phil Reynolds wrote:Excellent spot with HAIRLINES - I was stuck on NEARISH.

I was stuck with INHALERS - nowhere near HAIRLINES.

Well done Bob, good stuff so far.

Joyce Phillips · Post by **Joyce Phillips** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:37 pm

Nice to see you on the Forum Bob? Are you coming back to Apterous?

Ken MacKenzie · Post by **Ken MacKenzie** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:39 pm

Bob De Caux wrote:Hello everyone. Quite amused to discover this forum. My god, that was an appalling first four letters rounds from me

Hey Bob good to "see" you again, even though I still think you're the most evil man I've ever met.

As I said to you on the day, I had you beaten in the next game. I would have been leading 32-0 after 4 rounds.

Really looking forward to seeing your progress as I didn't watch your final game of the day.

Alec Rivers · Post by **Alec Rivers** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:03 pm

Bob De Caux wrote:Hello everyone. Quite amused to discover this forum. My god, that was an appalling first four letters rounds from me

Hi, Bob, and welcome.

Well done with the first two games. And, jeez!, how far is Jeff going to stretch that lame skuba-diving mickey-take? Let's hope you're not up against a marine biologist or something tomorrow.

Will you be playing on Apterous again some time?

Bob De Caux · Post by **Bob De Caux** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:48 pm

Yes, I'll probably be back on Apterous for the odd game - just needed a bit of a break from it! And Ken, I know - I thrashed my TV self from home today and can't believe I couldn't get at least a 7 in the first round. Still, as we both know, it's much tougher when you're there. I'll see you on Apterous sometime for the rematch

James Robinson · Post by **James Robinson** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:21 pm

Daniel O'Dowd wrote:ESOTERIC in the CORSETED round

I'm surprised no-one mentioned ESCORTED in that round, since it's the obvious anagram of CORSETED.

I remember being in the audience that day. After witnessing Chris completing his octochampdom, it was nice to see some "normal" people in some very tight matches. I hope that Ken and Bob don't take the "normal" too seriously.

Of course, everyone who was there that day will remember it for one unbroadcastable bit of magic involving Rachel. I won't divulge what unless you're that desperate.

julie lane · Post by **julie lane** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:13 pm

Bob De Caux wrote:Watching it back was painful as all the words jump out at you straight away. Nerves are a nightmare

Hi Bob - well done today, I know what you mean about nerves being a nightmare! You were lucky! You didn't have Chris to compete against! Do you remember?? How can I forget. Good Luck next round etc. (And well done again Chris!!)

Alec Rivers · Post by **Alec Rivers** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:14 pm

James Robinson wrote:Of course, everyone who was there that day will remember it for one unbroadcastable bit of magic involving Rachel. I won't divulge what unless you're that desperate.

Oh, do tell! (Unless it gives something away about a future show, of course.)

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:22 pm

James Robinson wrote: I'm surprised no-one mentioned ESCORTED in that round, since it's the obvious anagram of CORSETED.

Who says ESCORTED is more obvious?

James Robinson wrote: I remember being in the audience that day.

Do you usually find it hard to remember being in the audience?

Ben Hunter · Post by **Ben Hunter** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:16 am

James Robinson wrote:I like to dangle the carrot in front of people and not give them a nibble unless they beg me and make me feel big.

Just tell us.

Clive Brooker · Post by **Clive Brooker** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 5:04 am

James Robinson wrote: Of course, everyone who was there that day will remember it for one unbroadcastable bit of magic involving Rachel. I won't divulge what unless you're that desperate.

I am that desperate.

James Robinson · Post by **James Robinson** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:29 am

Kirk Bevins wrote:
James Robinson wrote: I'm surprised no-one mentioned ESCORTED in that round, since it's the obvious anagram of CORSETED.
Who says ESCORTED is more obvious?

I seem to think that ESCORTED is more obvious than CORSETED. Maybe I'm the only one. After all, some people might think that CORSETED had 2 T's.

Kirk Bevins wrote:
James Robinson wrote: I remember being in the audience that day.
Do you usually find it hard to remember being in the audience?

Nope. It's pretty simple really.

James Robinson · Post by **James Robinson** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:52 am

Right, since the desperation-o-meter has hit 2 and a half, I'll reveal all.

2 things first:

1. Don't worry, it has nothing to do with a future episode.

2. If you're excepting something mind-blowingly impressive, I think you'll be comfortably disappointed.

During the first numbers game, as we saw, it was proving a bit tricky. Rachel thought she had solved it, but she kept on making mistakes as she was scribbling the answer on the board.

In the end, her answer was wrong. I can't remember what it was exactly, but it ended in a 2, because I noticed that her multiplication involved multiplying something ending in a 4 (I think 74) with an 8, which us maths people will know, would have to end in a 2.

After the applause died down and Jeff and the others noticed that something was wrong, Rachel declared that she had done "a total BOLLOCKS" with the numbers, so obviously the whole bit was redone.

Nothing too spectacular, but you don't expect that lovely smiley face to swear just like that, do you?

To me it was just a small moment to treasure.

If you're disappointed by this, you can pelt a tomato or something harder at me next time you see me, if you ever see me.

Jeffrey Burgin · Post by **Jeffrey Burgin** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:03 am

I'm sure it was a 'you had to be there' moment.

Phil Reynolds · Post by **Phil Reynolds** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:49 am

James Robinson wrote:If you're disappointed by this, you can pelt a tomato or something harder at me next time you see me, if you ever see me.

An accident happened to Robinson, Jim
When somebody threw a tomato at him.
Tomatoes are juicy, and don't break the skin;
But this one was different - it came in a tin.

Boom-boom.

Charlie Reams · Post by **Charlie Reams** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:57 am

Phil Reynolds wrote:
James Robinson wrote:If you're disappointed by this, you can pelt a tomato or something harder at me next time you see me, if you ever see me.
An accident happened to Robinson, Jim
When somebody threw a tomato at him.
Tomatoes are juicy, and don't break the skin;
But this one was different - it came in a tin.

Boom-boom.

Will you be posting the sheet music for this?

Phil Reynolds · Post by **Phil Reynolds** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:35 am

Charlie Reams wrote:Will you be posting the sheet music for this?

Only if you present yourself naked in front of me and beg me to.

Anyway, apart from substituting "Robinson, Jim" for "my brother Jim" it's not an original I'm afraid.

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:40 pm

Phil Reynolds wrote:
Anyway, apart from substituting "Robinson, Jim" for "my brother Jim" it's not an original I'm afraid.

Yeah I've heard it before - loved it then too.

Kirk Bevins · Post by **Kirk Bevins** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:40 pm

James Robinson wrote: If you're disappointed by this, you can pelt a tomato or something harder at me next time you see me, if you ever see me.

I'll hold you to this.

Jon Corby · Post by **Jon Corby** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:07 pm

Kirk Bevins wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Anyway, apart from substituting "Robinson, Jim" for "my brother Jim" it's not an original I'm afraid.
Yeah I've heard it before - loved it then too.

Aye, twas a favourite of my old junior school teacher Mr Golding.

Matt Morrison · Post by **Matt Morrison** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:29 pm

James Robinson wrote:I like to dangle the carrot in front of people and not give them a nibble unless they beg me and make me feel big.

I like to hold it up in the foreground with a tall building or something in the background. That's what makes me feel big.