Page 1 of 1

Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:19 pm
by Ray Wilding
Unbelievable that Rachel missed 100+75+50-9-6 in the first numbers.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:21 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Beat me to it. I'll delete.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:31 pm
by Ray Wilding
GODISED in R7.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:51 pm
by Gavin Chipper
And Larry David goes out!

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 3:03 pm
by Ryan Lam
Ray Wilding wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:19 pm Unbelievable that Rachel missed 100+75+50-9-6 in the first numbers.
"And I'm sure people are screaming at the TV" -> I was one of them... :roll:

And there goes Ted the Scrrable Player, but hey at least the Anscomb Family has a teapot now and I'm sure Jack will be pleased! Anyone noticed the same person who solved today's conundrum solved SCIENTIST back on 29 January 2018? (Thanks Sam Prouse for pointing this out!)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:20 pm
by Countdown Team
Ray Wilding wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:19 pm Unbelievable that Rachel missed 100+75+50-9-6 in the first numbers.
It's called being human, maybe you should try it ;)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:54 pm
by Marc Meakin
Countdown Team wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:20 pm
Ray Wilding wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:19 pm Unbelievable that Rachel missed 100+75+50-9-6 in the first numbers.
It's called being human, maybe you should try it ;)
Also proves that you don't reedit to rectify human error.
It also gives a lot of viewers pleasure to beat her for once.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:27 pm
by Countdown Team
Marc Meakin wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:54 pm
Countdown Team wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:20 pm
Ray Wilding wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:19 pm Unbelievable that Rachel missed 100+75+50-9-6 in the first numbers.
It's called being human, maybe you should try it ;)
Also proves that you don't reedit to rectify human error.
It also gives a lot of viewers pleasure to beat her for once.
Yeah great - that's what it's all about.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:20 pm
by Elliott Mellor
Countdown Team wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:27 pm
Marc Meakin wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:54 pm
Countdown Team wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 8:20 pm

It's called being human, maybe you should try it ;)
Also proves that you don't reedit to rectify human error.
It also gives a lot of viewers pleasure to beat her for once.
Yeah great - that's what it's all about.
Which is why it's better than the French version which used a machine - beating Rachel and DC is one of the real buzzes (however infrequent) :)

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:28 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Elliott Mellor wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:20 pm
Countdown Team wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:27 pm
Marc Meakin wrote: Thu Mar 15, 2018 9:54 pm

Also proves that you don't reedit to rectify human error.
It also gives a lot of viewers pleasure to beat her for once.
Yeah great - that's what it's all about.
Which is why it's better than the French version which used a machine - beating Rachel and DC is one of the real buzzes (however infrequent) :)
The other buzz being on the conundrum.

Re: Spoilers for Thursday 15th March 2018 (Series 78, Prelim 48)

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 9:12 pm
by Zarte Siempre
Gavin Chipper wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:28 pm
Elliott Mellor wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:20 pm
Countdown Team wrote: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:27 pm

Yeah great - that's what it's all about.
Which is why it's better than the French version which used a machine - beating Rachel and DC is one of the real buzzes (however infrequent) :)
The other buzz being on the conundrum.
Buzz Aldrin sets the conundrums?!