Page 1 of 1
Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:28 pm
by Mark Kudlowski
2nd numbers alt: ((8 x 10) + 3) x 9
4th numbers alt: ((50 + 3) x (8 + 5)) -2
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:58 pm
by Ryan Lam
Well done Philip once again! The conundrum today was the fastest I have ever buzzed in (One second) playing along and it was certainly not fast enough for me to beat him in that round today, coupled with him beating me with VERSIONAL when I had AILERONS in R5 and the following round with a Boeing target (If you get what I mean...) after I so stupidly veered off by doing (5 x 4) + 3 instead of his method after getting 720 the exact same way!
1st Numbers alternative if you want to use up all six numbers: 25 x (100 ÷ 50) x 4 x (10 ÷ 5)
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:33 pm
by Adam Dexter
Ryan Lam wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:58 pm
Well done Philip once again! The conundrum today was the fastest I have ever buzzed in (One second) playing along and it was certainly not fast enough for me to beat him in that round today, coupled with him beating me with VERSIONAL when I had AILERONS in R5 and the following round with a Boeing target (If you get what I mean...) after I so stupidly veered off by doing (5 x 4) + 3 instead of his method after getting 720 the exact same way!
1st Numbers alternative if you want to use up all six numbers: 25 x (100 ÷ 50) x 4 x (10 ÷ 5)
Of course, the *correct* way to do it is ((10 x 8) + 3) x 9
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:44 pm
by Zarte Siempre
Adam Dexter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:33 pm
Ryan Lam wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:58 pm
Well done Philip once again! The conundrum today was the fastest I have ever buzzed in (One second) playing along and it was certainly not fast enough for me to beat him in that round today, coupled with him beating me with VERSIONAL when I had AILERONS in R5 and the following round with a Boeing target (If you get what I mean...) after I so stupidly veered off by doing (5 x 4) + 3 instead of his method after getting 720 the exact same way!
1st Numbers alternative if you want to use up all six numbers: 25 x (100 ÷ 50) x 4 x (10 ÷ 5)
Of course, the *correct* way to do it is ((10 x 8) + 3) x 9
Which Mark already said, stop robbing.
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:05 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Zarte Siempre wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:44 pm
Adam Dexter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:33 pm
Ryan Lam wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:58 pm
Well done Philip once again! The conundrum today was the fastest I have ever buzzed in (One second) playing along and it was certainly not fast enough for me to beat him in that round today, coupled with him beating me with VERSIONAL when I had AILERONS in R5 and the following round with a Boeing target (If you get what I mean...) after I so stupidly veered off by doing (5 x 4) + 3 instead of his method after getting 720 the exact same way!
1st Numbers alternative if you want to use up all six numbers: 25 x (100 ÷ 50) x 4 x (10 ÷ 5)
Of course, the *correct* way to do it is ((10 x 8) + 3) x 9
Which Mark already said, stop robbing.
Both of them used too many brackets, so I think I can steal this one for myself.
It's (10x8+3)x9.
You're welcome.
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:57 pm
by Zarte Siempre
Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:05 pm
Zarte Siempre wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:44 pm
Adam Dexter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:33 pm
Of course, the *correct* way to do it is ((10 x 8) + 3) x 9
Which Mark already said, stop robbing.
Both of them used too many brackets, so I think I can steal this one for myself.
It's (10x8+3)x9.
You're welcome.
They used superfluous brackets, but not too many. Too many suggests it's functionally incorrect.
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 6:41 am
by Noel Mc
Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:05 pm
Zarte Siempre wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:44 pm
Adam Dexter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:33 pm
Of course, the *correct* way to do it is ((10 x 8) + 3) x 9
Which Mark already said, stop robbing.
Both of them used too many brackets, so I think I can steal this one for myself.
It's (10x8+3)x9.
You're welcome.
9(10x8+3)
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:34 pm
by Toby McDonald
I was pleased with getting SOYBEAN as a R10 equaller.
Re: Spoilers for Tuesday, 27 February 2018
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:56 pm
by Adam Dexter
Gavin Chipper wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 10:05 pm
Zarte Siempre wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:44 pm
Adam Dexter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:33 pm
Of course, the *correct* way to do it is ((10 x 8) + 3) x 9
Which Mark already said, stop robbing.
Both of them used too many brackets, so I think I can steal this one for myself.
It's (10x8+3)x9.
You're welcome.
Not this again #bracketgate