Page 1 of 1

SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:21 am
by George Pryn
wat up fellow c down bromigos an amigos, it time to whip ur breyani into gear an play another rootin tootin game of c down yall hear

8-) :arrow: :arrow: :arrow: antoin "the cigar" ette takes on TH3 CURR3NT CH4MP10N :!: :!:

dat right !!! today the much precipitate ANTOINETTE gonna show us if she got wat it takes 2 be the winnr of seris 71.

join jame "the destroyer" robison later for ur recap fill

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:26 pm
by Tony Atkins
FAINTERS was unlucky for Rachel as Antoinette doesn't seem to know her RETAINS+ stems.
I nearly went for the invalid CURLIES when I spotted the 9.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:27 pm
by Tony Atkins
Well done Antoinette!

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:28 pm
by Tony Atkins
999!

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:54 pm
by James Laverty
Last numbers (50+25-8)*(7+3)-1

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:56 pm
by Phil Collinge
Well done Antionette.

That conundrum should never have been allowed as she didn't declare. 'I was going to say collector but it's wrong isn't it' is a retraction not a declaration.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:58 pm
by Tony Atkins
I think that makes the max score 157. I had a 145 max on my first game and didn't make the 100,
so well done to Antoinette.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 4:18 pm
by Philip Jarvis
Well played Bob

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 6:47 pm
by Chardonnay LeAnn Dawson xx
oo lol xx gorge prin r u ma gurl livi in disguys xx

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 7:29 pm
by James Robinson
Tony Atkins wrote:I think that makes the max score 157. I had a 145 max on my first game and didn't make the 100,
so well done to Antoinette.
I got 147/157, unfortunately my mum beat me to the conundrum....... :P I've been trying to get both my parents on the show, with little to no success, and they both could do reasonably well too.

FASTENER in round 1, EQUATOR in round 8 and HEISTED in round 13.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 7:57 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Phil Collinge wrote:Well done Antionette.

That conundrum should never have been allowed as she didn't declare. 'I was going to say collector but it's wrong isn't it' is a retraction not a declaration.
Well, it was the word she buzzed in with, and she still said it. I don't see a problem with it.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:12 pm
by Richard Priest
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Phil Collinge wrote:Well done Antionette.

That conundrum should never have been allowed as she didn't declare. 'I was going to say collector but it's wrong isn't it' is a retraction not a declaration.
Well, it was the word she buzzed in with, and she still said it. I don't see a problem with it.
I too thought Nick was a bit lenient with that one. Had it been a crucial one, resulting in a win for Rachel, I think there could have been quite a bit of controversy. Then again maybe it's because it wasn't crucial that Nick was a bit more easy-going about it.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:18 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Richard Priest wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:
Phil Collinge wrote:Well done Antionette.

That conundrum should never have been allowed as she didn't declare. 'I was going to say collector but it's wrong isn't it' is a retraction not a declaration.
Well, it was the word she buzzed in with, and she still said it. I don't see a problem with it.
I too thought Nick was a bit lenient with that one. Had it been a crucial one, resulting in a win for Rachel, I think there could have been quite a bit of controversy. Then again maybe it's because it wasn't crucial that Nick was a bit more easy-going about it.
I don't see the problem. You're supposed to buzz in with your declaration. If someone buzzes in without an answer (Hansfords it) or buzzes in with something in mind, but then sees it's actually something else and says that, a lot of people would regard that as cheating. This is just the flipside of that.

What if she'd said "It isn't COLLECTOR, is it?" Should Nick have said "You're right. It isn't"?

Corby?

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:25 pm
by Graeme Cole
Of course it should be taken as a declaration of COLLECTOR. The alternative would be to assume Rachel meant "I was going to say COLLECTOR, but now I think that's wrong, so I'm not giving an answer, and if it turns out to be COLLECTOR then don't give me the points", which is absurd. A contestant can never profit from buzzing in without giving an answer, so why assume that's the contestant's intention if they do give an answer, however doubtfully?

Congratulations on teapotting*, Antoinette.

* must be going into the ODO soon.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:28 pm
by Graeme Cole
Gavin Chipper wrote:What if she'd said "It isn't COLLECTOR, is it?" Should Nick have said "You're right. It isn't"?
"You're wrong, it is. The rest of the time goes to Antoinette." :lol:

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 8:33 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Graeme Cole wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:What if she'd said "It isn't COLLECTOR, is it?" Should Nick have said "You're right. It isn't"?
"You're wrong, it is. The rest of the time goes to Antoinette." :lol:
That's what I meant.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:12 pm
by Michael Wallace
I don't see the need for debate. You have to take the first answer, which in this case was "I".

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 12:08 am
by Jennifer Steadman
Congrats, Antoinette - you came across brilliantly, a rare contestant to whom my reaction is "They'd be good fun on a night out" :D Hoping to see more wins!

(Also, regarding the conundrum - what Gevin/Graeme said.)

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 6:30 pm
by Jon Corby
Gavin Chipper wrote:Corby?
She clearly said COLLECTER, not COLLECTOR. It shouldn't have stood.

Re: SP01L3R5 4 W3DN35D4Y TH3 26TH 0F N0V3MB3R

Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2014 7:34 pm
by Gavin Chipper
Jon Corby wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:Corby?
She clearly said COLLECTER, not COLLECTOR. It shouldn't have stood.
Well I've just watched it back in HD and it's now pretty obvious to me that she said QALEQTA.