Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Jordan F »

Mark Murray continues to roll on, getting a 5th win with an average of over 111 per game. Will he get the 6th? If he does, I believe that will clinch him a place in the finals and make him, in my opinion, a real threat to win it all.

Join James for the recap later.
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Jordan F »

I did not think this was until later on, but today's challenger is Apterite Peter Steggle, known to us as Pete Steg. He also has had a brush with success before, being the captain on the Bakers team on Only Connect who lost to Michael Wallace and the boys on the Board Gamers. We'll see how this clash goes.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13267
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Standard method for round 3 was (100-75-9)×50+8=808.
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Jordan F »

Man, the standard Mark's gone against is unbelievable. Well done pulling it off yet again against another very tough opponent in Peter. And unlucky Peter, you too probably could have been one of the top 5 contestants of this series had you not gone against Mark. Good lord Mark's run and his opponents that he's had to face.
Jojo Apollo
Devotee
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:29 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Jojo Apollo »

Another great game, well done both. :) Mark's nerves must be near shattered with the murderers' row he is facing. ;)
Jack Worsley
Series 66 Champion
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Location: Blackpool

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Jack Worsley »

Wow, these great games keep coming! Mark's nerves must be shredded by now as once again he played superbly but only sealed it with the great conundrum spot. Peter was also excellent and was very unlucky, especially if he was only a fraction of a second behind on the conundrum. It's a shame these two had to come up against each other in the heats in a series lacking in top quality.

I make the maxes count 13-11 to Mark, assuming there were no beaters available. This must surely be a record for heats.
John Garcia
Enthusiast
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:45 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by John Garcia »

Just one thing to say: AMAZEBALLS!
Sad to see Peter Steggle lose, but what a game!
User avatar
Jon Corby
Moral Hero
Posts: 8021
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Jon Corby »

Gavin Chipper wrote:Standard method for round 3 was (100-75-9)×50+8=808.
I had (100+(75*6)/(50*9))*8, using the quantox-avery method of reduction.
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by JimBentley »

Jon Corby wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:Standard method for round 3 was (100-75-9)×50+8=808.
I had (100+(75*6)/(50*9))*8, using the quantox-avery method of reduction.
Yeah, I thought Runge-Kutta might be best at first but you're quite right of course.
Martin Thompson
Acolyte
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 12:40 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Martin Thompson »

I think with the opponents Mark's faced, he'll find the knockout stages easier!
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13267
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Thursday April 17th 2014 (S70 P68)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Jon Corby wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:Standard method for round 3 was (100-75-9)×50+8=808.
I had (100+(75*6)/(50*9))*8, using the quantox-avery method of reduction.
I was just looking at the wiki page for this and got it this way and remembered you had too. It would be great to see someone on the show making two lots of 450 and then dividing them by each other.
Post Reply