Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Discuss anything that happened in recent games. This is the place to post any words you got that beat Dictionary Corner, or numbers games that evaded Rachel.

Moderator: James Robinson

Post Reply
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by Jordan F »

You thought Countdown was over this year? No no no. We have two more specials this week. This one features two of the more senior lady finalists of recent series. First is Eileen Taylor, who made the series 68 semis before losing to our own Andy Platt. Secondly is Priscilla Munday, who made the series 70 quarters before losing to our own Samir Pilica. Who'll win? Factors point to Eileen as a favorite, but we'll have to see how it goes.

Join Andy for the recap later.
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by James Robinson »

MERGED FROM OTHER SIDE :arrow: :arrow: :arrow: :arrow: 8-) :geek: :ugeek:

Well, Series 71 is done and dusted, so no more Countdown till next year......, right :?: WRONG :!: :!:

Channel 4 producers have decided something that I think they should've done ages ago, getting more episodes on DURING the Christmas break. OK, it may only be 2 specials, but it's a start at least. :D

So, today we have two women of the "older generation" returning to face off against each other.

The 2 women selected are Series 70 quarter-finalist, Priscilla Munday and Series 68 semi-finalist, Eileen Taylor. 8-)

Statistics Corner:

Firstly, Series 70 No.7 Seed Priscilla "The Redhill Ravager" Munday - 6 Wins, 630 Points. (Average: 78.75)
Highest Score: 101 vs. Sam Hodkin (4th Game)
Lowest Score: 44 vs. Samir Pilica (Quarter-Final)
9's Achieved: 0/8
Total Points/Max/%: 630/1055 (60%)
Letters Points/Max/%: 411/669 (61%)
Numbers Points/Max/%: 169/306 (55%)
Conundrum Points/Max/%: 50/80 (63%)

Secondly, Series 68 No.3 Seed Eileen "The Sydenham Superwoman" Taylor - 9 Wins, 905 Points. (Average: 90.5)
Highest Score: 111 vs. Katie Burge (5th Game)
Lowest Score: 65 vs. Andy Platt (Semi-Final)
9's Achieved: 1/5
Total Points/Max/%: 905/1284 (70%)
Letters Points/Max/%: 608/784 (78%)
Numbers Points/Max/%: 247/400 (62%)
Conundrum Points/Max/%: 50/100 (50%)
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by Jordan F »

Merged? Was the topic posted elsewhere and I missed it? Sorry if so.
User avatar
Tony Atkins
Fanatic
Posts: 2232
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Reading
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by Tony Atkins »

DESORBING for 9 in R1
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13258
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by Gavin Chipper »

ROUILLE in round 5 as a beater.
User avatar
Mark Kudlowski
Enthusiast
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:15 pm

Re: Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by Mark Kudlowski »

George Ford-like 2nd numbers: 100 x (9 + 1) x 7 = 7000; 7000 / 8 = 875
Jordan F
Kiloposter
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm

Re: Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by Jordan F »

DOMINANCE for 9?
User avatar
Tony Atkins
Fanatic
Posts: 2232
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:19 pm
Location: Reading
Contact:

Re: Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by Tony Atkins »

Jordan F wrote:DOMINANCE for 9?
Did they deliberately avoid telling the 9s to make the players look better? Nevertheless the players played a good game,
with a close final score.
CO-MSO every August
CO:Rea 20th April 2024
User avatar
James Robinson
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 10580
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm
Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire

Re: Spoilers for Monday December 22nd 2014 (Special)

Post by James Robinson »

OSTRAKA in round 7 and IMPEACH in round 8.
Post Reply