+sums+

All discussion relevant to Countdown that is not too spoilerific. New members: come here first to introduce yourself. We don't bite, or at least rarely.
Post Reply
Ralph Gillions
Devotee
Posts: 557
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: South Yorkshire

+sums+

Post by Ralph Gillions »

Do you say "plus" or "add" or "and"?
Do you say "take" or "minus" or "subtract"?
Why does it vary? Is it a generational thing? Or geographical?
Does it matter?
User avatar
Julie T
Kiloposter
Posts: 1130
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: Hertfordshire, England

Re: +sums+

Post by Julie T »

Plus and minus for me. It doesn't matter to me if others use different terms, though, apart from 'by' for 'times': wtf??
Dunno if it's generational, but I was at school in the 1960s and 70s, both in Lancashire and in Essex, if that helps your research!
"My idea of an agreeable person is a person who agrees with me." Benjamin Disraeli
Marc Meakin
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 6299
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: +sums+

Post by Marc Meakin »

Come back Derek and create one of your sadly missed polls.
BTW its plus and minus for me.
GR MSL GNDT MSS NGVWL SRND NNLYC NNCT
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: +sums+

Post by Jimmy Gough »

Interesting
User avatar
JimBentley
Fanatic
Posts: 2820
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:39 pm
Contact:

Re: +sums+

Post by JimBentley »

I use all of them with no consistency or logical method and often change which type I'm using midway through a sum.
User avatar
Clive Brooker
Devotee
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:37 pm
Location: San Toy

Re: +sums+

Post by Clive Brooker »

Julie T wrote:Plus and minus for me. It doesn't matter to me if others use different terms, though, apart from 'by' for 'times': wtf??
Dunno if it's generational, but I was at school in the 1960s and 70s, both in Lancashire and in Essex, if that helps your research!
I'm 100% with you on "by". In 1970s Universify of Warwick speak, "by" meant "divided by", as in 90 degrees equals pi by 2 radians.

I think I'm pretty consistent in keeping the distinction between 4 minus 3, take 3 from 4. Just as I'd always multiply 3 by 4.
User avatar
Lesley Hines
Kiloposter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Worcester

Re: +sums+

Post by Lesley Hines »

My most frequent expression mid-sum is pretty much "um... fuck..."
After that it really can be anything, and with varied results.
Lowering the averages since 2009
User avatar
Alec Rivers
Devotee
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
Contact:

Re: +sums+

Post by Alec Rivers »

Lesley Hines wrote:My most frequent expression mid-sum is pretty much "um... fuck..."
After that it really can be anything, and with varied results.
lol. :D
Julie T wrote:It doesn't matter to me if others use different terms, though, apart from 'by' for 'times': wtf??
I don't say it myself, but when people use 'by' for times I think of areas, e.g. 7 by 12 meaning 7 x 12, so it seems pretty reasonable to me (although it does have a slightly uneducated feel to it).
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: +sums+

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Interestingly, ODE doesn't give MINUS as a verb, so where "I'm adding these two numbers together" is acceptable, "I'm minusing these two numbers" is invalid.
User avatar
Alec Rivers
Devotee
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
Contact:

Re: +sums+

Post by Alec Rivers »

Kirk Bevins wrote:Interestingly, ODE doesn't give MINUS as a verb, so where "I'm adding these two numbers together" is acceptable, "I'm minusing these two numbers" is invalid.
Plussing, the antonym of minusing, isn't in, either. The antonym of adding is subtracting. And the syntax changes for subtracting because you must specify which number is subtracted from which (subtraction is not commutative). ;)
User avatar
Kirk Bevins
God
Posts: 4923
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Location: York, UK

Re: +sums+

Post by Kirk Bevins »

Alec Rivers wrote: Plussing, the antonym of minusing, isn't in, either.
Good point. I think plussing should be in too.
User avatar
Alec Rivers
Devotee
Posts: 918
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:36 pm
Location: Studio 57, Cheriton (Kent)
Contact:

Re: +sums+

Post by Alec Rivers »

Kirk Bevins wrote:Good point. I think plussing should be in too.
Aaaaarghh!
Jimmy Gough
Devotee
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Location: Eastbourne

Re: +sums+

Post by Jimmy Gough »

Alec Rivers wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:Good point. I think plussing should be in too.
Aaaaarghh!
Not in.
User avatar
Sue Sanders
Kiloposter
Posts: 1334
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Whitstable Kent

Re: +sums+

Post by Sue Sanders »

Influenced by the sentence construction surely, rather than geographical or generational influence
'1 plus 1 is 2, and then you need to add that to the 10' - the 'plus' sounds fine replaced with either 'and' or 'add' but only the 'add' works in the second bit.

Along similar lines....
'They won 1 - 0', I'd pronounce the 0 as nil.
'10 - 10' = 0, I'd pronounce it as zero
'Tel no. 01227.....' I'd pronounce that 'oh'
'Add 0 to times it by 10' I'd probably pronounce that one 'nought'
'This one goes up to eleven'
Fool's top.
David Williams
Kiloposter
Posts: 1263
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm

Re: +sums+

Post by David Williams »

Alec Rivers wrote:
Kirk Bevins wrote:Interestingly, ODE doesn't give MINUS as a verb, so where "I'm adding these two numbers together" is acceptable, "I'm minusing these two numbers" is invalid.
Plussing, the antonym of minusing, isn't in, either. The antonym of adding is subtracting. And the syntax changes for subtracting because you must specify which number is subtracted from which (subtraction is not commutative). ;)
I'm nonplussed.
Post Reply