Hangman

Cerebral distractions of every kind, mostly but not exclusively Countdown-related.

Moderator: Michael Wallace

Post Reply
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Hangman

Post by Charlie Reams »

Here's a thing.

It plays Hangman perfectly. Here's a paper about it. It's fun.
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Hangman

Post by Howard Somerset »

It took three goes to get my first word correctly. That's because I answered wrongly on the first two occasions. :oops:

Looks good. I might even try reading the article later.
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Hangman

Post by Charlie Reams »

Howard Somerset wrote:It took three goes to get my first word correctly. That's because I answered wrongly on the first two occasions. :oops:
There should probably be some text about how the interface works but I'm lazy, I'm sure people will figure it out after a few goes.

BTW when you get bored of losing, it's quite fun to find words it can guess on the first go. VERISIMILITUDE and TARAMASALATA are two I've found so far.
Howard Somerset
Kiloposter
Posts: 1955
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am
Location: UK

Re: Hangman

Post by Howard Somerset »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Howard Somerset wrote:It took three goes to get my first word correctly. That's because I answered wrongly on the first two occasions. :oops:
There should probably be some text about how the interface works but I'm lazy, I'm sure people will figure it out after a few goes.
Well the second time was entirely my own fault, and no amount of explanation of the interface would have got over that one. I hadn't realised that there were two As in BASTARD. It was the first 7-letter word that came to mind.
Gavin Chipper
Post-apocalypse
Posts: 13250
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Hangman

Post by Gavin Chipper »

Charlie Reams wrote:Here's a thing.

It plays Hangman perfectly. Here's a paper about it. It's fun.
It's good but not perfect. For one thing it's far too arrogant. It tells you what it thinks the answer and thinks that's the game over. Just because it hasn't heard of FLID...

Also, it doesn't know Beth's probability distribution.

But very good anyway. ;)
User avatar
Ian Volante
Postmaster General
Posts: 3962
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:15 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Re: Hangman

Post by Ian Volante »

It failed with ARSEHOLE and one life.
meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles meles
User avatar
Michael Wallace
Racoonteur
Posts: 5458
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Location: London

Re: Hangman

Post by Michael Wallace »

Charlie Reams wrote:Here's a paper about it. It's fun.
tl;dr
Ryan Taylor
Postmaster General
Posts: 3661
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: Hangman

Post by Ryan Taylor »

How easy would it be to replicate this for the Hangman based games on quiz machines? Ultimately, would it be worth it?
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Hangman

Post by Charlie Reams »

Ryan Taylor wrote:How easy would it be to replicate this for the Hangman based games on quiz machines? Ultimately, would it be worth it?
Pretty easy, although most of those games feature weird proper nouns and stuff so you'd need a good dictionary.
User avatar
Thomas Carey
Kiloposter
Posts: 1480
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:17 pm
Location: North-West of Bradford
Contact:

Re: Hangman

Post by Thomas Carey »

Very good. Did it with MURIQUI and it went EAOIF and then got it right although only had one correct letter.
cheers maus
Ryan Taylor
Postmaster General
Posts: 3661
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: Hangman

Post by Ryan Taylor »

Charlie Reams wrote:
Ryan Taylor wrote:How easy would it be to replicate this for the Hangman based games on quiz machines? Ultimately, would it be worth it?
Pretty easy, although most of those games feature weird proper nouns and stuff so you'd need a good dictionary.
And would it be worth it? My guess is probably no. I just wonder if that leangem video that Matt inboxed us was done by using something like this off camera?
User avatar
Steve Balog
Acolyte
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:18 am
Location: neither here nor there

Re: Hangman

Post by Steve Balog »

Beat it with JAZZ. Not very surprising, though, considering the algorithm. Nice find.
There are no such things as methods. Only madness.
Hugh Binnie
Enthusiast
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:46 pm

Re: Hangman

Post by Hugh Binnie »

With ?A?AA?? it went for M instead of S with only one life left. (?)

(Also, it seems to be missing SHITFACE but not SHITFACES.)
Richard Adams
Rookie
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:01 pm

Re: Hangman

Post by Richard Adams »

Olympic seems not to be a legitimate word
User avatar
Charlie Reams
Site Admin
Posts: 9494
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: Cambridge
Contact:

Re: Hangman

Post by Charlie Reams »

Richard Adams wrote:Olympic seems not to be a legitimate word
Capital O.
Post Reply