c4countdownA group for contestants and lovers of the Channel 4 game show 'Countdown'.
|
|
|
|
It is currently Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:28 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:42 am |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
|
The much-requested counterpart to the Thread of Brag. Obviously I've never done anything bad so I can't contribute further.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Martin Gardner
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 5:59 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:57 pm Posts: 1436 Location: Leeds, UK
|
|
My brilliant one today was a target of 897 with a 100, 9 and 3 in the selection. I typed in 100*9-3 into the box but declared 900 instead of 897. Unsurprisingly, my opponent got it right...
_________________ If you cut a gandiseeg in half, do you get two gandiseegs or two halves of a gandiseeg?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Paul Howe
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:14 pm |
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm Posts: 1020
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Joseph Bolas
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 2:36 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am Posts: 2446 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Nothing too bad, but in round 13 of this Goatathon game, it was my turn to pick and the selection before picking the last letter was RCSUEINM. I almost ran out of time, before picking A, as I had at the last second remembered the word MANICURES. I quickly clicked on A and entered MANICURES in the box and then clicked on the "end the round early button"... only to find out that I had typed MAINCURES (which ain't allowed) instead 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jimmy Gough
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:53 pm |
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm Posts: 801 Location: Eastbourne
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:21 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
Jimmy wrote: http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=10386 Wow, that has to be the nastiest set of conundrums I've ever seen.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Joseph Bolas
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:41 am |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am Posts: 2446 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Charlie Reams wrote: Jimmy wrote: http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=10386 Wow, that has to be the nastiest set of conundrums I've ever seen. I agree, but there are some unusual words there, so it makes for good learning, just incase these come up again, especially if it's a crucial conundrum too 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lee Simmonds
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:50 pm |
| Acolyte |
 |
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:37 pm Posts: 125
|
Kai Laddiman wrote: I have just looked at my history and I am absolutely gutted that I, exceptin a marathyon game, have never got a century on apterous  Play against Prune, you should be able to get a century then 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:57 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1740 Location: Alsager, UK
|
I've only just noticed this thread. I think that every one of my games could probably feature here.  Even the ones against Prune.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kai Laddiman
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:12 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm Posts: 1995 Location: My bedroom
|
Lee Simmonds wrote: Kai Laddiman wrote: I have just looked at my history and I am absolutely gutted that I, exceptin a marathyon game, have never got a century on apterous  Play against Prune, you should be able to get a century then  I am 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ben Wilson
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:12 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm Posts: 1989 Location: Lincoln
|
Joseph Bolas wrote: Just had a 9-rounder where the conundrum was HORSESHIT, but after 15.6 seconds, I guessed SHORESHIT  Twice in the same week I've missed PACEMAKER, going for CAPEMAKER (!!!!) on one occasion and PEACEMAKER on the other 
_________________ TMBSWOOHSTJTTTTTMCICGNRBTDMWPDMENOTATLKWAOIIW If other people can post cryptic puzzles, so can I... repeatedly.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Joseph Bolas
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:42 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am Posts: 2446 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Ben Wilson wrote: Joseph Bolas wrote: Just had a 9-rounder where the conundrum was HORSESHIT, but after 15.6 seconds, I guessed SHORESHIT  Twice in the same week I've missed PACEMAKER, going for CAPEMAKER (!!!!) on one occasion and PEACEMAKER on the other  The best conundrum has to be COUNTDOWN, I don't know though how many times this has appeared as a conundrum (I think I've come across it twice now).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jimmy Gough
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:19 am |
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm Posts: 801 Location: Eastbourne
|
Ben Wilson wrote: Joseph Bolas wrote: Just had a 9-rounder where the conundrum was HORSESHIT, but after 15.6 seconds, I guessed SHORESHIT  Twice in the same week I've missed PACEMAKER, going for CAPEMAKER (!!!!) on one occasion and PEACEMAKER on the other  Ha ha yeah, you went PEACEMAKER and I still didn't guess it. Stupidly I put that in the brag section....
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jimmy Gough
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:42 pm |
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm Posts: 801 Location: Eastbourne
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:01 am |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
Jimmy wrote: Ok, Plum must have been really pissed at me when I kept beating him on conundrum attack - just check this out http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=10972  Wow, 14 maxes from Plum... This almost belongs more in "weird games" than the thread of scrag, you can't feel too bad about losing when your opponent plays like that.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jimmy Gough
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:19 am |
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm Posts: 801 Location: Eastbourne
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kai Laddiman
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:24 am |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm Posts: 1995 Location: My bedroom
|
Kai Laddiman wrote: I have just looked at my history and I am absolutely gutted that I, except in a marathon game, have never got a century on apterous  I am now super happy, as I have discovered I scored 107 in a 15 round game! Whoopee! http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=5945And BTW how do I hyperlink the 107?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Phil Reynolds
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:38 am |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm Posts: 2502 Location: Leamington Spa, UK
|
I still haven't managed to beat Apterous Plum, but I noticed today that Caesar is now ranked lower than Plum (although still higher than me) so I optimistically had a go. This was the result. http://apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=12501Beaten in each of the first three rounds by words I'd never heard of. By round 8, as you may surmise, desperation was setting in. At least I got the (pathetically easy) conundrum.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ben Hunter
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:02 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:54 pm Posts: 1388 Location: S Yorks
|
Phil Reynolds wrote: I still haven't managed to beat Apterous Plum, but I noticed today that Caesar is now ranked lower than Plum (although still higher than me) so I optimistically had a go. This was the result. http://apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=12501Beaten in each of the first three rounds by words I'd never heard of. By round 8, as you may surmise, desperation was setting in. At least I got the (pathetically easy) conundrum. Caesar and Plum can be freakishly good sometimes. I've noticed their ratings fluctuate between 300 and 600, I also often declare PURDIEST (too much reading John Steinbeck when I was little). If you ever find PURDIEST, it means you've also found STUPIDER
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Joseph Bolas
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:24 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am Posts: 2446 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Two games worthy of scrag... I think. My first game was against Kirk and I had two successive word rounds, where I declared words that could not be made with the selections (in other words I saw letters that wern't there). My second game was against Prune and I couldn't even think of a word for round 3. Luckily though an obscure conundrum ensured me a win and not had to go into a tiebreaker conundrum.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:44 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
Ben Hunter wrote: Caesar and Plum can be freakishly good sometimes. I've noticed their ratings fluctuate between 300 and 600, Yeah, I think I made them a little too random. Need to sort that out some time.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kirk Bevins
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 10:46 am |
| God |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm Posts: 4260 Location: York, UK
|
Ben Wilson wrote: http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=12748 and http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=12752Methinks the settings for the Collins dictionary could use a tweak or two. This reminds me: Can it be put onto those reviews, Charlie, that he was using a different dictionary as I like learning words from other people's reviews and don't want to end up learning non-ODE words. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 12:33 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
Kirk Bevins wrote: This reminds me: Can it be put onto those reviews, Charlie, that he was using a different dictionary as I like learning words from other people's reviews and don't want to end up learning non-ODE words. Thanks. Done.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kirk Bevins
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:02 pm |
| God |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm Posts: 4260 Location: York, UK
|
Charlie Reams wrote: Kirk Bevins wrote: This reminds me: Can it be put onto those reviews, Charlie, that he was using a different dictionary as I like learning words from other people's reviews and don't want to end up learning non-ODE words. Thanks. Done. Top man.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kai Laddiman
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 4:40 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm Posts: 1995 Location: My bedroom
|
Joseph Bolas wrote: Two games worthy of scrag... I think. My first game was against Kirk and I had two successive word rounds, where I declared words that could not be made with the selections (in other words I saw letters that wern't there). PETUNIA... BTW, it was against Plum (your other one).
Last edited by Kai Laddiman on Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Dinos Sfyris
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:43 am |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:07 am Posts: 2440 Location: Sheffield
|
Kai Laddiman wrote: LOL at Plum getting the conundrum in 41.3 seconds
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kai Laddiman
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:45 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm Posts: 1995 Location: My bedroom
|
Dinos Sfyris wrote: Kai Laddiman wrote: LOL at Plum getting the conundrum in 41.3 seconds I got the conundrum wrong because my computer didn't register that I'd pressed the D.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ben Wilson
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:53 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm Posts: 1989 Location: Lincoln
|
http://apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=14101Quite easily the worst I have ever played in recent memory.  Despite the difficulty of the last two spots.
_________________ TMBSWOOHSTJTTTTTMCICGNRBTDMWPDMENOTATLKWAOIIW If other people can post cryptic puzzles, so can I... repeatedly.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jimmy Gough
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:23 pm |
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm Posts: 801 Location: Eastbourne
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jimmy Gough
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 3:51 pm |
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm Posts: 801 Location: Eastbourne
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Phil Reynolds
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:44 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm Posts: 2502 Location: Leamington Spa, UK
|
http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=15275Not really sure whether to post this as Scrag or Brag! Astonishingly, I won the game - but only after five of my first six words were disallowed. (The one that passed muster - OUTFLEW - was the only one of the six I thought might not be legit...)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jimmy Gough
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:03 pm |
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm Posts: 801 Location: Eastbourne
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jacob Sutton
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 11:44 pm |
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:07 pm Posts: 65
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Joseph Bolas
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:03 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:19 am Posts: 2446 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Oliver Garner wrote: It gets harder when you play Waldorf  I am a bit pissed off about round 4  , I should've got the max  ( it probably only applies to me in this forum too anyway  )
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kirk Bevins
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:55 pm |
| God |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm Posts: 4260 Location: York, UK
|
Joseph Bolas wrote: Oliver Garner wrote: It gets harder when you play Waldorf  I am a bit pissed off about round 4  , I should've got the max  ( it probably only applies to me in this forum too anyway  ) I used to be a teetotaller when I was younger and I could never understand why people drank for. Then, at 16, I drank champagne at a wedding and enjoyed the feeling of being under the influence. It made me happy and wanted to dance (never violent). Then coming to university, I drank on nights out to boost confidence to dance etc and the best nights tend to be the ones where you drink as you have no inhibitions. I don't like people that drink and get violent from it - just don't bother. I also don't understand those that don't touch alcohol for non-medical reasons.
Last edited by Kirk Bevins on Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gavin Chipper
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 2:32 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm Posts: 2582
|
Kirk Bevins wrote: I could never understood why people drank for. Quote: I also don't understand those that don't touch alcohol for non-medical reasons. No middle ground then.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 2:36 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
Gavin Chipper wrote: No middle ground then. What would the middle ground between drinking and not drinking be? I'm sure Aristotle would love to know.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kirk Bevins
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:09 pm |
| God |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm Posts: 4260 Location: York, UK
|
Gavin Chipper wrote: Kirk Bevins wrote: I could never understood why people drank for. Quote: I also don't understand those that don't touch alcohol for non-medical reasons. No middle ground then. I'm not with you (again). My post was like a timeline. I didn't understand why people drank but now I've grown up and seen the error of my ways, the story has reversed - why do people stay sober all the time!?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gavin Chipper
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:22 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm Posts: 2582
|
Kirk Bevins wrote: Gavin Chipper wrote: Kirk Bevins wrote: I could never understood why people drank for. Quote: I also don't understand those that don't touch alcohol for non-medical reasons. No middle ground then. I'm not with you (again). My post was like a timeline. I didn't understand why people drank but now I've grown up and seen the error of my ways, the story has reversed - why do people stay sober all the time!? My point is that considering that you were once someone who not only didn't drink, but also couldn't understand why people did, you should at least still be able to understand why some people don't drink, or do you look on your past with complete bafflement?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kirk Bevins
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:49 pm |
| God |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm Posts: 4260 Location: York, UK
|
Gavin Chipper wrote: My point is that considering that you were once someone who not only didn't drink, but also couldn't understand why people did, you should at least still be able to understand why some people don't drink, or do you look on your past with complete bafflement? If you read, it implies I look on my past with complete bafflement. My viewpoint on alcohol was it makes everyone do stupid things and become violent but I was wrong.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kai Laddiman
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:24 pm |
| Kiloposter |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm Posts: 1995 Location: My bedroom
|
Callum Laddiman wrote: You may laugh if you want cause i just lost 137-111 in a numbers attack against Apterous Prune. My rating unfortunately went down by 30! Very embarrassing!  Hahaha, I am laughing. (Of course I'm not - I would never do anything like that to a fellow Laddiman  )
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:26 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7429 Location: Cambridge
|
Callum Laddiman wrote: You may laugh if you want cause i just lost 137-111 in a numbers attack against Apterous Prune. My rating unfortunately went down by 30! Very embarrassing!  In fairness Prune is nowhere near as bad at numbers as he is at letters. But keep practising, you'll get there.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ben Wilson
|
Post subject: Re: Official thread of scrag Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:42 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm Posts: 1989 Location: Lincoln
|
Kai Laddiman wrote: I really shouldn't be posting this, but is John Bradley the only person to have 'lost' to The Duellist? http://www.apterous.org/viewgame.php?game=11959Hell no, not even close. Can't recall specific cases off the top of my head but a few people have blanked entire duels before. In the old days, though, if you blanked an entire duel it would then throw you up a sudden death conundrum, which would of course count for ten points. So when, one day, the duel was a solitary letters round, many people forfeitted in favour of the guaranteed, and likely superior, ten points. Only the ten points weren't superior, as the letters round had a niner available. 
_________________ TMBSWOOHSTJTTTTTMCICGNRBTDMWPDMENOTATLKWAOIIW If other people can post cryptic puzzles, so can I... repeatedly.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|