FAQSearch  
   
It is currently Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:31 pm




 Page 1 of 5 [ 283 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:27 pm 
Rookie
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:42 am
Posts: 98
Location: Saudi Arabia
SAMOYED
as in the breed of dog
Listed in ODE
Samoyednoun1a member of a group of mainly nomadic peoples of northern Siberia, who traditionally live as reindeer herders.
2[mass noun] any of several Samoyedic (Uralic) languages of the Samoyeds
3a dog of a white Arctic breed

Now given that saluki just a page away has no capitalization, I would've thought that samoyed would be ok too. Like flowers and plants they are all uncapitalized, yes?
Nope!
It seems that if your dog is named after a place eg Labrador, Alsatian it is a proper noun with a capital if not eg labradoodle, dachsund it's just an ordinary noun and doesn't!

so where does that leave the Dulux Dog?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:51 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: My bedroom
GAUZES should defo be in, as in the gauzes you put on tripods for Bunsen burners, and also I was very surprised to find that the plural of RENEGADO is RENEGADOES, not RENEGADOS.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:14 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Posts: 7457
Location: Cambridge
CLOVERS is the most ridiculous omission, although in the last few days I've noticed the absence of AMPHETAMINES and VOLLEYBALLS, both of which are pretty puzzling.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 8:56 pm 
Chairman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am
Posts: 4641
Charlie Reams wrote:
CLOVERS is the most ridiculous omission, although in the last few days I've noticed the absence of AMPHETAMINES and VOLLEYBALLS, both of which are pretty puzzling.


Yeah, Susie has actually ruled against CLOVERS offered by a contestant on the show, which caused me to spit out my tea at the time.



_________________
Officially the second most postingest c4c forummer.
Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:28 pm 
What a lot of bling
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 344
Location: Shrewsbury
How about DELUXE? I know it's supposed to be two words but is so often used as one that I'm suprised it's not in. Was disallowed it on Apterous a while back and was shocked.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:17 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Posts: 7457
Location: Cambridge
On the theme of X words, INBOX was a surprising exclusion that arose recently. I suspect the new edition (early 2010?) will drop a lot of hyphens so that might well be a new addition.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:22 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Posts: 2502
Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Charlie Reams wrote:
On the theme of X words, INBOX was a surprising exclusion that arose recently. I suspect the new edition (early 2010?) will drop a lot of hyphens so that might well be a new addition.

Yep, the current one already has BRAINBOX, which has no hyphens at all but presumably means a receptacle for incoming mammary support garments.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:01 pm 
Kiloposter
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Posts: 1845
AIRBAG should be in

Also PLAUDIT



_________________
Rubber dinghy rapids.
Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:22 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Posts: 7457
Location: Cambridge
CONMAN/CONMEN surprises a lot of people by its absence. Don't agree with PLAUDIT though, when would you ever use that in the singular? "He picked up the plaudits, actually I guess it was just the one plaudit."


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:40 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Posts: 2502
Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Charlie Reams wrote:
Don't agree with PLAUDIT though, when would you ever use that in the singular? "He picked up the plaudits, actually I guess it was just the one plaudit."

Presumably that's what you get if there's only one audient.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:33 am 
Devotee
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
Posts: 788
Location: Mars Hotel
COALMINE
DELUXE
AIRHOLE / S
BEASTING
GULLIBLE


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:48 am 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: My bedroom
D Eadie wrote:
GULLIBLE


That's strange, I thought that was in.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:48 am 
Acolyte
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:34 pm
Posts: 127
Location: Manchester
Kai Laddiman wrote:
D Eadie wrote:
GULLIBLE


That's strange, I thought that was in.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:54 am 
Acolyte

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 240
Darren Carter wrote:
How about DELUXE? I know it's supposed to be two words but is so often used as one that I'm suprised it's not in. Was disallowed it on Apterous a while back and was shocked.


You're not the only one. ;)


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:01 am 
What a lot of bling
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 344
Location: Shrewsbury
Jeffrey Burgin wrote:
Darren Carter wrote:
How about DELUXE? I know it's supposed to be two words but is so often used as one that I'm suprised it's not in. Was disallowed it on Apterous a while back and was shocked.


You're not the only one. ;)


Shhh I think that's bordering on a spoiler...... ;)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:30 am 
What a lot of bling
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 344
Location: Shrewsbury
I'm suprised MUNTER isn't in yet as well.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:29 pm 
Devotee

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:33 pm
Posts: 886
Location: Norn Iron
The amount of times my name has come up at the start of a selection must be a record, although that's because I pick VVVCCCCC(V OR C). And they are also common letters, couldn't find any relative topic to post this in, so I put it here. :)


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:25 pm 
Rookie

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 51
PLEASER?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 3:31 pm 
Devotee
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
Posts: 788
Location: Mars Hotel
Kai Laddiman wrote:
D Eadie wrote:
GULLIBLE


That's strange, I thought that was in.



Reeled another one in i see.
Good lord above. :o


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:02 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: My bedroom
GLACIATED, GLACIATION... No GLACIATES :(


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:12 pm 
Rookie
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:42 am
Posts: 98
Location: Saudi Arabia
Kai Laddiman wrote:
GLACIATED, GLACIATION... No GLACIATES :(


Maybe it happens too slowly to be present tense!


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:35 pm 
Kiloposter
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Posts: 1845
Charlie Reams wrote:
CONMAN/CONMEN surprises a lot of people by its absence. Don't agree with PLAUDIT though, when would you ever use that in the singular? "He picked up the plaudits, actually I guess it was just the one plaudit."

I wrongly assumed PLAUDITS was a plural



_________________
Rubber dinghy rapids.
Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:40 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Posts: 2502
Location: Leamington Spa, UK
marc meakin wrote:
I wrongly assumed PLAUDITS was a plural

It is a plural. It just happens to be one that isn't used in the singular form, like TWEEZERS/TWEEZER.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:47 pm 
Kiloposter
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Posts: 1845
Phil Reynolds wrote:
marc meakin wrote:
I wrongly assumed PLAUDITS was a plural

It is a plural. It just happens to be one that isn't used in the singular form, like TWEEZERS/TWEEZER.

I thought TWEEZER was an agent noun



_________________
Rubber dinghy rapids.
Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:54 pm 
Kiloposter
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 3:37 pm
Posts: 1845
I tried to play IMBURSE once



_________________
Rubber dinghy rapids.
Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:41 pm 
Fanatic

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Posts: 2589
Kai Laddiman wrote:
D Eadie wrote:
GULLIBLE


That's strange, I thought that was in.


An interesting fact - the joke about GULLIBLE being taken out of the dictionary has been taken out of the joke book.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:41 pm 
Fanatic

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 pm
Posts: 2589
HORSEHEAD
FLID
PINCE


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:50 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Posts: 7457
Location: Cambridge
RESPOTTED


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:31 pm 
Rookie

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:15 pm
Posts: 51
Hitman and hitmen.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:40 pm 
Postmaster General
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Posts: 3135
Location: Exeter
Shaun Hegarty wrote:
PLEASER?

Someone clever will clear this up, but it's probably only ever used in the phrase "crowd pleaser", never on its own, so invalid.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:56 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm
Posts: 4277
Location: York, UK
POTTABLE


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:58 pm 
Postmaster General
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Posts: 3135
Location: Exeter
LAGGY, LAGGIER, LAGGIEST


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:31 pm 
Legend
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm
Posts: 1998
Location: Lincoln
STRIM and all of its derivatives. Even in Scrabble it's no good despite being in common usage.



_________________
TMBSWOOHSTJTTTTTMCICGNRBTDMWPDMENOTATLKWAOIIW
If other people can post cryptic puzzles, so can I... repeatedly.
Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:35 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Posts: 2502
Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Ben Wilson wrote:
STRIM and all of its derivatives. Even in Scrabble it's no good despite being in common usage.

Is it (in common usage)? I've never heard it used as a verb, and the only derivative I've ever encountered is STRIMMER, which is in.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 11:54 pm 
Chairman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am
Posts: 4641
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Ben Wilson wrote:
STRIM and all of its derivatives. Even in Scrabble it's no good despite being in common usage.

Is it (in common usage)? I've never heard it used as a verb, and the only derivative I've ever encountered is STRIMMER, which is in.


Strimming, as well as in the gardening sense, is also a term used by coin-op manufacturers for defrauding such devices. Obviously not that common usage, but if you've been involved in that field you'll have come across it plenty.



_________________
Officially the second most postingest c4c forummer.
Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:56 am 
Ginger Ninja
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:45 am
Posts: 1773
Location: London, UK
STRIM is mine too.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 2:37 pm 
Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Posts: 461
Going back to the first post, SOMEDAY is in, SAMOYED is out.

There is an eight letter word, not a proper noun, in common usage for many years, that you can see in letters two feet high all over the place, that was not in the NODE. What is it?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:42 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:37 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: My bedroom
David Williams wrote:
There is an eight letter word, not a proper noun, in common usage for many years, that you can see in letters two feet high all over the place, that was not in the NODE. What is it?


McDonalds?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:55 pm 
Series 58 Champion

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm
Posts: 1916
Location: Cardiff
I remember ROADSIDE wasn't in the NODE or due to some NODE technicality couldn't be accepted.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:34 pm 
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 10:48 am
Posts: 18
Location: Kidderminster
Is it RINGROAD?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:00 pm 
Racoonteur
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Posts: 3487
Location: London
Kai Laddiman wrote:
David Williams wrote:
There is an eight letter word, not a proper noun, in common usage for many years, that you can see in letters two feet high all over the place, that was not in the NODE. What is it?


McDonalds?


Don't be silly.

(that's 9)


Online
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:14 pm 
Series 57 Champion
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 441
One particularly ridiculous omission is SHITTER. It isn't in CSW either. I'd have expected it to be allowed as a 1-syllable adjective in ODE.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:15 pm 
Postmaster General
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:27 pm
Posts: 3135
Location: Exeter
Craig Beevers wrote:
One particularly ridiculous omission is SHITTER. It isn't in CSW either. I'd have expected it to be allowed as a 1-syllable adjective in ODE.

Good point. When I read that I didn't think of the adjective, was thinking more of the noun, as in "well that's a bit of a shitter isn't it?"


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:18 pm 
Racoonteur
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:01 am
Posts: 3487
Location: London
Oh yeah, and obviously MODDING should be in by now, and LOSSIER (although that has an anagram, so it's less of a big deal from a Countdown perspective).


Online
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:45 pm 
What a lot of bling
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 344
Location: Shrewsbury
SHITFACE is in, but no SHITFACED.....


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:48 pm 
Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Posts: 461
David O'Donnell wrote:
I remember ROADSIDE wasn't in the NODE or due to some NODE technicality couldn't be accepted.


No, that was the earlier dictionary that left out compound words whose meaning was obvious, in order to save space.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 5:51 pm 
Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Posts: 461
Tyron Potts wrote:
Is it RINGROAD?

No.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:15 pm 
Rookie
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:42 am
Posts: 98
Location: Saudi Arabia
I always believed the plural of Quorum to be Quorae, apparently not, Quorums it is.
Is this because the archaic Latin bits are being fazed out or does my 30 year old Latin grammar escape me?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:01 am 
Enthusiast

Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm
Posts: 405
Location: Harlow
Maxine Silkstone wrote:
I always believed the plural of Quorum to be Quorae, apparently not, Quorums it is.
Is this because the archaic Latin bits are being fazed out or does my 30 year old Latin grammar escape me?

Yes (assuming you meant 'phased' - classical Greek's going, too ;) ) and yes: the plural of QUORUM would be ^QUORA, taking it as 2nd Declension, neuter, though as it's not actually a Latin noun, QUORUMS is OK.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:37 pm 
Series 57 Champion
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 441
Summate I think should be in. Came up on Apterous the other day.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:52 pm 
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm
Posts: 7457
Location: Cambridge
Craig Beevers wrote:
Summate I think should be in. Came up on Apterous the other day.

What would it mean that "sum" doesn't? Have you ever used it in a sentence?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:54 pm 
Chairman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:36 am
Posts: 4641
Charlie Reams wrote:
Craig Beevers wrote:
Summate I think should be in. Came up on Apterous the other day.

What would it mean that "sum" doesn't? Have you ever used it in a sentence?


*makes up a sentence hilariously using summate to be "some ate" like the classic 'my coat has 10 buttons but I can only fascinate'*



_________________
Officially the second most postingest c4c forummer.
Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:39 pm 
Enthusiast

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm
Posts: 461
David Williams wrote:
There is an eight letter word, not a proper noun, in common usage for many years, that you can see in letters two feet high all over the place, that was not in the NODE. What is it?


Given the total lack of interest, I can reveal that although there are several meanings for REMOVAL in the NODE, including one about moving house, there is no hint that it is anything other than a mass noun, so REMOVALS is not allowed. One assumes the sides of furniture vans are not included in the British National Corpus.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:42 pm 
Series 57 Champion
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 441
Charlie Reams wrote:
Craig Beevers wrote:
Summate I think should be in. Came up on Apterous the other day.

What would it mean that "sum" doesn't? Have you ever used it in a sentence?


It's in dozens of dictionaries, gets plenty of hits on Google and even I've heard of it.

Or are you just angling for Thesaurus Project so you can take a big black marker pen to a copy of ODE?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:52 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Posts: 2502
Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Craig Beevers wrote:
Charlie Reams wrote:
Craig Beevers wrote:
Summate I think should be in. Came up on Apterous the other day.

What would it mean that "sum" doesn't? Have you ever used it in a sentence?

It's in dozens of dictionaries, gets plenty of hits on Google and even I've heard of it.

I notice you've answered neither of Charlie's questions...

It's in neither Collins nor ODE - could you perhaps name a dozen or so of these dozens of dictionaries that it's apparently in?


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:58 pm 
Acolyte

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 240
Jon Corby wrote:
*makes up a sentence hilariously using summate to be "some ate" like the classic 'my coat has 10 buttons but I can only fascinate'*


Four plus four, summate.

I'm here all week! :)


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:10 pm 
Series 57 Champion
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:37 am
Posts: 441
Phil Reynolds wrote:
Craig Beevers wrote:
It's in dozens of dictionaries, gets plenty of hits on Google and even I've heard of it.

I notice you've answered neither of Charlie's questions...

It's in neither Collins nor ODE - could you perhaps name a dozen or so of these dozens of dictionaries that it's apparently in?


Dozens of the more popular ones online. As for Collins it depends which one you use, regardless it's probably worse than a randomly chosen online source. And yes I've heard it used, probably in a maths lecture where they like to throw in less simple words for the sake of it. Doesn't alter how irrelevant those two questions are.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:17 pm 
Devotee

Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:08 pm
Posts: 801
Location: Eastbourne
Kirk Bevins wrote:
POTTABLE

Yeah, but TABLETOP is so much nicer.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:42 pm 
Kiloposter

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 2:25 pm
Posts: 1021
PALATISE


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Words You Would Have Thought...
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:46 pm 
Fanatic
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:43 pm
Posts: 2502
Location: Leamington Spa, UK
Craig Beevers wrote:
Phil Reynolds wrote:
It's in neither Collins nor ODE - could you perhaps name a dozen or so of these dozens of dictionaries that it's apparently in?

Dozens of the more popular ones online.

So the answer to my question "could you perhaps name" them is no? Just so we're clear.


Offline
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 Page 1 of 5 [ 283 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: