c4countdownA group for contestants and lovers of the Channel 4 game show 'Countdown'.
|
|
|
|
It is currently Mon Sep 06, 2010 11:14 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:17 am |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
|
The success of previous C4C group projects has demonstrated how well crowdsourcing can work when your crowd consists of smart nerdy people with an unhealthy passion for completionism. Project Hyper, all agreed, was a grand success and opened many new opportunities for apterous games.
Now it's time to make use of this grand resource again, as Mike "Excellent" Brown has finished scanning his paper notes for the entirety of Series 48, all 128 episodes of it. This is the series that played host to Julian Fell, Grace Page and of course Mr Mike Brown himself, amongst numerous other characters, so it's an exciting series to cover. What's needed now is some nice people to take these scans and convert them into full blown recaps, so that this place and the wiki can have a complete record of the second half of 2002. It's pretty straightforward if you've done recaps before and, if you haven't... well, it's still pretty straightforward.
What I propose is this: if you're keen, please reply to this. You'll be given a quick introduction to Mike's notes, I'll allocate you a small block of episodes and send you the relevant files. And it will be a whole lotta fun!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Andy Wilson
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:46 am |
| Devotee |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm Posts: 588
|
|
I'll give some a go. I'm a recap virgin so be gentle. Probably be busy til Monday but I can get some done then.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Matt Bayfield
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes (& Dudettes) Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:53 am |
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am Posts: 319 Location: England
|
|
Bung a couple my way if you like Charlie. Obviously I didn't watch any of the episodes from that series, but I can work from Mike's notes, unless he's got doctor's handwriting or something. I've used the recapper for a couple of my Co: event games, but not done any uploading to any database, other than copy-and-pasting text to these forums.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kirk Bevins
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:03 am |
| God |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm Posts: 4262 Location: York, UK
|
|
I'll do some mate. Just send me the recapping link again as I've forgotten it.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kirk Bevins
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:36 am |
| God |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:18 pm Posts: 4262 Location: York, UK
|
James Robinson wrote: Send me as many as you want.
Aww. It's times like this that I feel proud to be a part of a community.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:25 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1743 Location: Alsager, UK
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:05 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Thanks very much  The first 7 of you should have received your allocations by email. Still plenty more to give out if anyone else is interested.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:35 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1743 Location: Alsager, UK
|
|
One question, Charlie, which I may find is already answered when I get started.
Does recap-writer always use OED2r for maxes? Or does it know which series uses which dictionary?
If it always uses OED2r, are you worried? If it knows which dictionary to use, and has the dictionary to access, then my admiration for you increases even more.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:39 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Howard Somerset wrote: Does recap-writer always use OED2r for maxes? Or does it know which series uses which dictionary?
It uses ODE2r for Series 51+ and NODE before that, so you just need to set the "Series" correctly at the top. It's possible that our version of the NODE is not 100% correct but it's pretty good. Howard Somerset wrote: If it knows which dictionary to use, and has the dictionary to access, then my admiration for you increases even more. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Innis Carson
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:48 pm |
| Enthusiast |
 |
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:24 pm Posts: 423
|
|
Cool, I'll do some as well.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mike Brown
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:08 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm Posts: 456 Location: King's Lynn
|
Excellent initial response, dudes!  And wonderful to see some Countdown greats in there... Just wanted to point out there are actually only 110 episodes in the series, not 128: I think that stat is down to duplicate entries in the CDB, caused by historical recap additions. Mike
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:11 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1743 Location: Alsager, UK
|
Mike Brown wrote: And wonderful to see some Countdown greats in there... Mike And a few others. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ryan Taylor
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:21 pm |
| Devotee |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm Posts: 957 Location: Coniston, East Yorkshire
|
|
I'll do as many as you want to send. Do I just recap them like normal? And do I have to create a wiki entry? (cos I don't know how to)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:26 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Ryan Taylor wrote: Do I just recap them like normal? Yep. Ryan Taylor wrote: And do I have to create a wiki entry? (cos I don't know how to) Nope, we take care of all that. Full details are in the email that should be on its way to you.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
James Robinson
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:28 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm Posts: 2007 Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
|
|
Charlie, are you aware that your original e-mail suggested that me and Chris Philpot were due to do the same recaps.
And the same for Howard and Kirk too.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:35 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
James Robinson wrote: Charlie, are you aware that your original e-mail suggested that me and Chris Philpot were due to do the same recaps.
And the same for Howard and Kirk too. That is... odd. Hold on to your various horses, I will send out a new schedule.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:43 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
|
Here's the current allocation. Please check that your allocated games haven't been recapped already, since I may have made mistakes.
Andy Wilson: Mon 1-Jul-02 Julia Wilkinson 122 - 62 John Baker Fri 12-Jul-02 David Nickeas 93 - 87 David Watson Mon 15-Jul-02 David Nickeas 97 - 77 Alice Walker Wed 17-Jul-02 David Nickeas 106 - 30 Jason Ainsworth Thu 18-Jul-02 David Nickeas 104 - 24 Julie Cocker
Matt Bayfield: Fri 19-Jul-02 David Nickeas 84 - 72 Harry Mullen Mon 22-Jul-02 David Nickeas 90 - 62 David Cooper Tue 23-Jul-02 David Nickeas 105 - 62 Chris Girling Thu 15-Aug-02 John Lomax 52 - 96 Sassoon Messropian Fri 16-Aug-02 Sassoon Messropian 87 - 57 Frank Carmichael
Howard Somerset: Mon 19-Aug-02 Sassoon Messropian 58 - 87 Paul McGeown Tue 20-Aug-02 Paul McGeown 53 - 100 Martin Oliver Wed 21-Aug-02 Martin Oliver 100 - 53 Dave Holcroft Tue 27-Aug-02 Martin Oliver 60 - 88 Dorothy Bailey Wed 28-Aug-02 Dorothy Bailey 103 - 54 Kristian Turner Thu 5-Dec-02 Geoff Mills 82 - 39 Stan Grosvenor Fri 6-Dec-02 Geoff Mills 74 - 82 Carl Moore Mon 9-Dec-02 Carl Moore 111 - 37 Veronica Dalgarno Tue 10-Dec-02 Carl Moore 75 - 49 Rob D'Agostino Wed 11-Dec-02 Carl Moore 73 - 111 Ian Burrows
James Robinson: Thu 29-Aug-02 Dorothy Bailey 69 - 73 Val Raddon Fri 30-Aug-02 Val Raddon 75 - 84 Alex McKenzie Mon 2-Sep-02 Alex McKenzie 52 - 97 Michael Clarke Tue 3-Sep-02 Michael Clarke 108 - 64 Eleanor Gledhill Wed 4-Sep-02 Michael Clarke 87 - 86 David Sykes Thu 12-Dec-02 Julian Fell 125 - 67 Mike Brown Fri 13-Dec-02 Grace Page 92 - 88 David Nickeas Mon 16-Dec-02 George Greenhough 86 - 94 Joe Zubaidi Tue 17-Dec-02 Julia Wilkinson 70 - 105 Danny Hamilton Thu 19-Dec-02 Grace Page 104 - 71 Joe Zubaidi
Ben Wilson: Tue 10-Sep-02 Michael Clarke 86 - 89 Priscilla Munday Wed 11-Sep-02 Priscilla Munday 78 - 82 Bryan Thirkell Thu 12-Sep-02 Bryan Thirkell 72 - 96 Tony Bearn Fri 13-Sep-02 Tony Bearn 76 - 56 Neil Massey Mon 16-Sep-02 Tony Bearn 85 - 61 Karen Tolfrey
Kirk Bevins: Fri 27-Sep-02 Mike Brown 112 - 76 David Cottee Wed 2-Oct-02 Mike Brown 107 - 63 Trish Staples Mon 7-Oct-02 Dave Cross 68 - 79 Bryan Barnett Tue 29-Oct-02 Sheila Furse 93 - 79 Michael Laverton Wed 30-Oct-02 Sheila Furse 90 - 74 Mike Dow Chris Philpot: Thu 31-Oct-02 Sheila Furse 70 - 68 Lucy Guile Wed 13-Nov-02 Mary Sexton 89 - 63 Norman Goodale Thu 14-Nov-02 Mary Sexton 72 - 67 Ronald Goodman Fri 15-Nov-02 Mary Sexton 91 - 97 Campbell Laurie Mon 18-Nov-02 Campbell Laurie 62 - 71 Ian Courcoux
Innis Carson: Tue 19-Nov-02 Ian Courcoux 107 - 42 Mark Tucker Wed 20-Nov-02 Ian Courcoux 83 - 45 Brian Southern Thu 21-Nov-02 Ian Courcoux 66 - 80 Joe Zubaidi Fri 22-Nov-02 Joe Zubaidi 73 - 63 Franki Ayerst Mon 25-Nov-02 Joe Zubaidi 93 - 92 Tony Slade
Ryan Taylor: Tue 17-Sep-02 Tony Bearn 92 - 62 Alec Gaw Wed 18-Sep-02 Tony Bearn 68 - 75 Robert Lee Thu 19-Sep-02 Robert Lee 83 - 57 Tony Poultney Tue 26-Nov-02 Joe Zubaidi 89 - 74 Michael Duhig Wed 27-Nov-02 Joe Zubaidi 74 - 64 Brenda Slade
Andrew Feist: Thu 28-Nov-02 Joe Zubaidi 88 - 72 Damien Byrne Fri 29-Nov-02 Joe Zubaidi 81 - 56 Jan Macdonald Mon 2-Dec-02 Joe Zubaidi 87 - 58 Andrew Walton Tue 3-Dec-02 Geoff Mills 77 - 63 Stephen Holden Wed 4-Dec-02 Geoff Mills 89 - 84 Alison Hilton
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:54 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1743 Location: Alsager, UK
|
|
I've already done the first three of Kirk's. If Kirk hasn't started, maybe it's worth swapping us.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:58 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Howard Somerset wrote: I've already done the first three of Kirk's. If Kirk hasn't started, maybe it's worth swapping us. Done.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Andrew Feist
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:33 pm |
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:43 pm Posts: 379
|
|
I can knock a few out this weekend, provided the e-mail has instructions.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
James Robinson
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:57 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm Posts: 2007 Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
|
Charlie Reams wrote: Kirk Bevins: Fri 27-Sep-02 Mike Brown 112 - 76 David Cottee Wed 2-Oct-02 Mike Brown 107 - 63 Trish Staples Mon 7-Oct-02 Dave Cross 68 - 79 Bryan Barnett Tue 29-Oct-02 Sheila Furse 93 - 79 Michael Laverton Wed 30-Oct-02 Sheila Furse 90 - 74 Mike Dow I did that one a few months ago. So, you don't need to worry about that one. EDIT: As you can see here: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3285
|
|
|
|
 |
|
David O'Donnell
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:51 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:27 pm Posts: 1914 Location: Cardiff
|
Charlie Reams wrote: Howard Somerset wrote: Does recap-writer always use OED2r for maxes? Or does it know which series uses which dictionary?
It uses ODE2r for Series 51+ and NODE before that, so you just need to set the "Series" correctly at the top. It's possible that our version of the NODE is not 100% correct but it's pretty good. Howard Somerset wrote: If it knows which dictionary to use, and has the dictionary to access, then my admiration for you increases even more.  I am with Howard here, awesome. I know I didn't really commit last time but I can commit to doing a few if you have some left over.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:54 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1743 Location: Alsager, UK
|
|
My batch is done. If you're struggling to get volunteers to finish it off tomorrow, Charlie, I could manage a few more.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
James Robinson
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:00 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm Posts: 2007 Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
|
Howard Somerset wrote: My batch is done. If you're struggling to get volunteers to finish it off tomorrow, Charlie, I could manage a few more. That goes for me too. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Andrew Feist
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:41 pm |
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:43 pm Posts: 379
|
James Robinson wrote: Howard Somerset wrote: My batch is done. If you're struggling to get volunteers to finish it off tomorrow, Charlie, I could manage a few more. That goes for me too.  Thirded.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ryan Taylor
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:44 pm |
| Devotee |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm Posts: 957 Location: Coniston, East Yorkshire
|
|
I've not got an email yet. Do you still need me to do some?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:50 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Ryan Taylor wrote: I've not got an email yet. Do you still need me to do some? I sent it to the email address you've got registered on here (@hotmail.co.uk), is that not your current one?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Matt Bayfield
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:04 pm |
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am Posts: 319 Location: England
|
I've recapped the first of my 5 games - this thread. If somebody familiar with recapping could confirm I've got the hang of it, then pls reply, and I'll get on to the other 4. [Edit: I can't seem to be able to submit the link to the recap to the database. I've entered the password and hit "submit", but when I go to the Series 48 index, the game I recapped isn't hyperlinked to its recap.]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:34 pm |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1743 Location: Alsager, UK
|
Matt Bayfield wrote: I've recapped the first of my 5 games - this thread. If somebody familiar with recapping could confirm I've got the hang of it, then pls reply, and I'll get on to the other 4. [Edit: I can't seem to be able to submit the link to the recap to the database. I've entered the password and hit "submit", but when I go to the Series 48 index, the game I recapped isn't hyperlinked to its recap.] The recap itself looks good, though I haven't checked the details. Not sure about the submission to cdb, though. However, that can be done later.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
David Williams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:44 pm |
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm Posts: 461
|
Charlie Reams wrote: It's possible that our version of the NODE is not 100% correct but it's pretty good. Don't know where its failings might be, and whether this is a worthwhile suggestion, but I've got a NODE and if anyone wants to PM me with a doubtful word, please do so. I think the main differences are that a lot less -IER and -IEST words were OK. I'm also not sure exactly when they relaxed the rules about pluralising mass nouns, which of course happened without a change of dictionary. Julian Fell's famous GAMBIERS was in Champion of Champions, and I think that was the first appearance of the new rule, so it wouldn't have applied to this series, but I couldn't be certain.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Matt Bayfield
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:12 pm |
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am Posts: 319 Location: England
|
|
Cheers Howard.
I still don't seem to be able to upload the recap to the cdb, but when I'm more awake, I'll stick my other recaps in the appropriate "Historical recaps" forum on c4c.
Perhaps someone else could then upload to the cdb for me (or tell me what I'm doing wrong with the uploading process, if anything).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Andrew Feist
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:53 pm |
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:43 pm Posts: 379
|
Matt Bayfield wrote: [Edit: I can't seem to be able to submit the link to the recap to the database. I've entered the password and hit "submit", but when I go to the Series 48 index, the game I recapped isn't hyperlinked to its recap.]
Same here (and looking, the same for Innis as well). I don't know if there's just a lag in generating the web pages, or the submissions didn't go through for some reason (there was no indication of any error). (I suppose you could confirm the password we were to use?....)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:12 am |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
|
The password is dolomite.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Andrew Feist
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:13 am |
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:43 pm Posts: 379
|
Charlie Reams wrote: The password is dolomite. Oh is it. EDIT: Alright mine are added (which of course mean they duplicate the stubs that were already in there).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:26 am |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1743 Location: Alsager, UK
|
|
Note to everyone doing these S48 recaps.
When you come to the bottom of the recap-writer, can you make sure that you press both the Make text recap and Make wiki recap buttons. You need do nothing at all with the Wiki formatted recap, but pressing both buttons ensures that such a recap is made available for someone else to put into the Wiki.
No worries with those recaps that have already been done.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:40 am |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Howard Somerset wrote: Note to everyone doing these S48 recaps.
When you come to the bottom of the recap-writer, can you make sure that you press both the Make text recap and Make wiki recap buttons. You need do nothing at all with the Wiki formatted recap, but pressing both buttons ensures that such a recap is made available for someone else to put into the Wiki.
No worries with those recaps that have already been done. Unless I'm misremembering my own system, the wiki version is saved in the background whether you press the "make wiki recap" button or not.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Howard Somerset
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 11:43 am |
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:02 am Posts: 1743 Location: Alsager, UK
|
Charlie Reams wrote: Unless I'm misremembering my own system, the wiki version is saved in the background whether you press the "make wiki recap" button or not. Very true, Charlie. I've just tried a dummy recap, and that came through ok without me pressing the button. I was convinced that some of yesterday's were not available, but I may well have been mistaken.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Matt Bayfield
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:17 pm |
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am Posts: 319 Location: England
|
|
Ok, got my first recap added to cdb. I was using the wrong p/word. If, for some reason, there hasn't been a wiki version generated properly, then let me know. I copied-and-pasted the wiki recap into a text file, which I've got saved on my computer.
Edit: I've accidentally added one recap to cdb with the wrong date, which means it appears twice.
Please could somebody delete from cdb the Lomax v Messropian game dated 25 July 2002. This game is also correctly in the database on the real date when it took place, 15 August 2002.
Sorry 'bout that.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Matt Bayfield
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:09 pm |
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am Posts: 319 Location: England
|
|
OK, my 5 games are recapped. There are a few differences between the calculated max and the max in Mike's notes. In most cases, this is explained by very difficult numbers rounds, which went unsolved, but were possible to solve exactly. Also, in one case, Mike appears to have made a 1 point error in his addition of his running total for max.
These are the discrepancies between Mike's max and calculated max due to countmax identifying longer words than Mike did:
Nickeas v Mullen, 19 July 2002: R7 countmax suggests EUSTATIC (8), which adds +1 to Mike's max
Nickeas v Cooper, 22 July 2002: R3 countmax suggests AUTOSOME (8), which adds +1 to Mike's max R8 countmax suggests VIRGATES (8), which adds +1 to Mike's max R11 countmax suggests STERNWAY (8), which adds +2 to Mike's max
Nickeas v Girling, 23 July 2002: R8 countmax suggests MOPPIER (7) and POMPIER (7), which adds +1 to Mike's max
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Matt Bayfield
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:15 pm |
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:39 am Posts: 319 Location: England
|
|
And to repeat my last but one post [in case it was missed], could somebody please restore the correct recap for 25 July 2002? I accidentally submitted a recap for this date which should have been the recap for 15 August 2002... and now the correct game for 25 July 2002 (don't know if it was just a placeholder, or a full recap) has gone missing from the index page (presumably by Mike or Charlie? or whoever else is tidying it up?)
Ta...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:24 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Lesley Hines wrote: I'm a recap n00bie but a pretty quick typist - give me a shout if I can help  Will do. Everything is allocated for now but hopefully Mike will be back with a bunch of new scans soon.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mike Brown
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:08 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm Posts: 456 Location: King's Lynn
|
Howard Somerset wrote: And a few others.  I'm sure you can be called a Countdown great, Howard, with all of your sterling work on the wiki. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mike Brown
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:12 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm Posts: 456 Location: King's Lynn
|
Charlie Reams wrote: The password is dolomite. Think that pretty much eliminates the point of there being one... 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mike Brown
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:21 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm Posts: 456 Location: King's Lynn
|
Matt Bayfield wrote: There are a few differences between the calculated max and the max in Mike's notes. In most cases, this is explained by very difficult numbers rounds, which went unsolved, but were possible to solve exactly. Also, in one case, Mike appears to have made a 1 point error in his addition of his running total for max. Just to clear this one up, the maxes on my notes (until very recently, like somewhere during Series 61) have historically been based on the best Dictionary Corner, the contestants, me or my Franklin Wordmaster could come up with, or in the case of the numbers, the best that Carol, me (unlikely) or the contestants could do, so for the purposes of recapping, they're best ignored. And just in case anyone hasn't realised, the words above the 'maxes' are DC's offerings, except those in boxes, which are courtesy of my Franklin Wordmaster. If anyone has any other queries about how the notes work that Charlie can't answer (or you can't read my writing), feel free to post them here.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mike Brown
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:22 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm Posts: 456 Location: King's Lynn
|
Charlie Reams wrote: Lesley Hines wrote: I'm a recap n00bie but a pretty quick typist - give me a shout if I can help  Will do. Everything is allocated for now but hopefully Mike will be back with a bunch of new scans soon. Tuesday or Wednesday, hopefully... 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
James Robinson
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:24 pm |
| Fanatic |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm Posts: 2007 Location: Mirfield, West Yorkshire
|
Mike Brown wrote: Charlie Reams wrote: Lesley Hines wrote: I'm a recap n00bie but a pretty quick typist - give me a shout if I can help  Will do. Everything is allocated for now but hopefully Mike will be back with a bunch of new scans soon. Tuesday or Wednesday, hopefully...  GET IN! You are a legend, Mike. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jacob Sutton
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:11 pm |
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:07 pm Posts: 65
|
I'll happily do some too if need be. 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:14 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Mike Brown wrote: Charlie Reams wrote: The password is dolomite. Think that pretty much eliminates the point of there being one...  The password is really just to prevent spambots from submitting random shit, so hopefully no spambots are reading this.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
David Williams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:53 pm |
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:57 pm Posts: 461
|
David Williams wrote: Don't know where its failings might be, and whether this is a worthwhile suggestion, but I've got a NODE and if anyone wants to PM me with a doubtful word, please do so. My NODE and I will be separated for the next couple of weeks, so this service will be suspended. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Peter Mabey
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 5:26 pm |
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:15 pm Posts: 402 Location: Harlow
|
|
I've a NODE (reprinted 2001 with corrections) too, and am willing to help if required.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Andy Wilson
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:35 pm |
| Devotee |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:09 pm Posts: 588
|
|
Just stuck my first one in, which is now appearing on the list of games in the series twice on cdb. Is that just because the record of the score already existed or because i generated the text recap twice? (still not really sure how this all works) I'd missed the beater ECOTYPES in round 6 until i went back and checked, after I had already generated the text recap. So anyway the max is 1pt greater than Mikes scan pending NODE confirmation.
Will wait like Matt to ensure I've done nothing else wrong before ploughing on.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Charlie Reams
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:42 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:33 pm Posts: 7432 Location: Cambridge
|
Andy Wilson wrote: Just stuck my first one in, which is now appearing on the list of games in the series twice on cdb. Is that just because the record of the score already existed or because i generated the text recap twice? (still not really sure how this all works) I'd missed the beater ECOTYPES in round 6 until i went back and checked, after I had already generated the text recap. So anyway the max is 1pt greater than Mikes scan pending NODE confirmation.
Will wait like Matt to ensure I've done nothing else wrong before ploughing on. That's fine, I delete the duplicate entries. And you can always generate the text again if you make a change. So basically, good work 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Chris Philpot
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:17 pm |
| Acolyte |
 |
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:34 pm Posts: 168 Location: West Sussex
|
Peter Mabey wrote: I've a NODE (reprinted 2001 with corrections) too, and am willing to help if required. Would you be able to confirm whether or not CAPEJUT was available in the NODE? (And, if it is, what on earth does it mean?!  ) Many thanks!
_________________ Chris 'Crispy' Philpot A failure from Series 51
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ben Wilson
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 9:42 pm |
| Legend |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:05 pm Posts: 1989 Location: Lincoln
|
Chris Philpot wrote: Peter Mabey wrote: I've a NODE (reprinted 2001 with corrections) too, and am willing to help if required. Would you be able to confirm whether or not CAPEJUT was available in the NODE? (And, if it is, what on earth does it mean?!  ) Many thanks! Couldn't tell you what it means, as it ain't in the NODE. 
_________________ TMBSWOOHSTJTTTTTMCICGNRBTDMWPDMENOTATLKWAOIIW If other people can post cryptic puzzles, so can I... repeatedly.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Ryan Taylor
|
Post subject: Re: Wanted: Awesome Dudes Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:49 pm |
| Devotee |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 6:18 pm Posts: 957 Location: Coniston, East Yorkshire
|
Chris Philpot wrote: Peter Mabey wrote: I've a NODE (reprinted 2001 with corrections) too, and am willing to help if required. Would you be able to confirm whether or not CAPEJUT was available in the NODE? (And, if it is, what on earth does it mean?!  ) Many thanks! CAJEPUT?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|