75-9 = 66Tony Atkins wrote:Unfortunately the 2 was a 9. It is possible by two ways - both quite hard - one envolving making a 4 digit number.Bob De Caux wrote:R10: (2*75-6)*(1+1)-25 = 263
(25-1) / 6 = 4
(66 x 4) - 1 = 263
75-9 = 66Tony Atkins wrote:Unfortunately the 2 was a 9. It is possible by two ways - both quite hard - one envolving making a 4 digit number.Bob De Caux wrote:R10: (2*75-6)*(1+1)-25 = 263
Please elaborate! Many thanks!!!Graeme Cole wrote: This is why Charlie's long-term aim for the Countdown Database project is so awesome.
I guess I was a day earlyJames Robinson wrote: DOVETAIL in round 2
6x4=24Gavin Chipper wrote:Anyone get 507? I just checked and it is possible.
What's that apterous phrase about perfectly symmetrical countdown scores ...Tony Atkins wrote:After two 69s George gets 96 from a good performance. Lunch must have agreed with him!
OOps, I meant 1st numbers game then! I thought Rachel made the 106 differently, but wasn't paying attention.James Robinson wrote:I don't think that makes 934, John.John Garcia wrote:Alt 2nd numbers - ((7x3x5)+1)x9
And also Rachel used that method for her 954 in round 5............
It was R7 - also could have had UNSEENMark Deeks wrote:BONNES in whatever round it was.
Yeah that's the way I did it too.James Robinson wrote:2nd Numbers Alt.: ((25 x 5) - 1) x 3 = 372
Yes lol, luckily I got it.Jordan F wrote:....really? They get AMNIOTES yesterday and they miss it today? Also, wasn't it round 1 that had AMNIOTE and round 3 that had AMNIOTES yesterday?
Was that the best numbers solution ever by a host? It's the best I can remember.Jack Worsley wrote:2nd numbers: (75x50+6)/(5-(10/10)) = 939
Or AMATEUR as an alternative.Peter McNamara wrote:r8 MALWARE as a beater
That would explain my poor performance tooTony Atkins wrote:That had the feel, through my own experience, of being a 10:00 am recording
Good point. It's not 100% definitive.Innis Carson wrote:Sounds more like a sustained 't' to me, which sounds similar to an 's'. Only fair to give her the benefit of the doubt either way.
Well heard! She does say CASTIGATES. Still glad she won though!James Robinson wrote: You say that, but if you listen carefully, Gerri looks like she's saying CASTIGATES...............
Nice!Peter Mabey wrote:Alt 1st number 75x50/6
The chuckle was from Rachel believe it or not!Brian Moore wrote: Sounded like there was also a chuckle from one of the contestants at Rachel's 'BJ'.
I didn't realize until Rachel gave a chuckle, and I was wondering what was funny. Took me a while to figure out!Charlie Hastings wrote:Was it round 7 (I think) that started a bit unfortunately? nudge nudge
Print that Daily Mail / The Sun (take your pick if u must)
Doh!James Robinson wrote: Or even ANODYNES for a 8...........
Seconded! I know who I'll be rooting for in the finals.Jojo Apollo wrote:Well done, Peter, on becoming an Octochamp. A splendid run.
Or BARCODE which is what I had.Andy Platt wrote:BROCADE in R3.
I don't think anyone can argue with that!Phil Reynolds wrote:OK. We'll stick with criticising her for being a talentless fat Tory bigot then.Chris Hare wrote:Strictly Come Dancing was mentioned (by her) once yesterday, and then only in passing, so I don't think that there's much to criticise her for there
I'm pretty sure it was 75 rather than 25 (i.e. 75,50,100,4,6,3)David Barnard wrote:I've solved the 2nd numbers that Rachel didn't (50/25)X4X100=800+6+3=809
Before part 3 has started as well
Couldn't agree more!Phil Reynolds wrote:Look on the bright side though, anything that stops Ann Widdecombe talking about politics can't be all bad, although a wad of duct tape over the mouth would do the job even better.