c4countdown

Gavin Chipper

Jon O'Neill wrote:
Dave Preece wrote:Surely pure and simple points scored / available points x 100 is the best and only way to 'rank' players?
I think you should multiply by 7.12349867123409781293 actually.

Well that's at least two methods already then.

Gavin Chipper

I was thinking about this thread again for some reason. But something else I've just thought about is this: 100+3=103 and 100+2+1=3 Going by what I've said, these two are different. But if you do the 2+1 first and then do 100+3, surely there is no difference in identity between the 3s. So in a sense...

Gavin Chipper

I don't think Facebook is less suited for it, to be honest. You know how some people are idiots who shouldn't be heard from and who actively (or intentionally yet persistently) make discussions worse? Via Facebook, you can control that. Stuff is better archived on a forum and it's more neutral in t...

Gavin Chipper

It's made me realise that no-one wants to discuss anything on here any more. I don't know if it's just this forum or in general, whether it's because people like to do their discussions in the far-less-suitable medium of Facebook, but we don't have good non-Countdown discussions/debates any more.

Gavin Chipper

I've just done some research on something which I'm sure many will have briefly thought about doing (apologies if it already has and I'm an idiot). It's the calculation for what your score would've been if your opponent maxed every single round throughout. So, the way to do this is by taking all th...

Gavin Chipper

Dave Preece wrote:Colin who???

COLIN

Gavin Chipper

Tony Atkins wrote:Off topic I know, but it was odd to see a friend's marriage break up splashed across the Sun newspaper today.
Hope Rachel is happy.....

Are you friends with Jamie Gilbert?

Gavin Chipper

Dave Preece wrote:Come again?

Never mind. Are you coming to COLIN by the way?

Gavin Chipper

Dave Preece wrote:Can I be on the panel???

I'm going to wait for a year when you're the only other one arguing.

Gavin Chipper

If you'd read the thread and weren't such a cunt you'd realise that I stated the above is true if your goal is to win Oscars . If your goal is to win a series of Countdown, then you are indeed better at winning a series of Countdown if you pick a series of Countdown with no good players. Your goal ...

Gavin Chipper

If you'd read the thread and weren't such a cunt you'd realise that I stated the above is true if your goal is to win Oscars . If your goal is to win a series of Countdown, then you are indeed better at winning a series of Countdown if you pick a series of Countdown with no good players. Your goal ...

Gavin Chipper

Sit tight. It will come to us.

And remember, the objective of COLIN might be to get cheap accommodation but failing to do so doesn't make you worse at Countdown.

Gavin Chipper

Well actually, if winning Oscars is the objective of making films, you might argue that releasing your film in a year where there aren't any other good films is part of what makes it good. So in that case I'd say Shawshank and Pulp Fiction are actually shit . (I'm only kidding. About Pulp Fiction. ...

Gavin Chipper

I'm going to have to start watching more films.

Gavin Chipper

Well actually, if winning Oscars is the objective of making films, you might argue that releasing your film in a year where there aren't any other good films is part of what makes it good. So in that case I'd say Shawshank and Pulp Fiction are actually shit . (I'm only kidding. About Pulp Fiction. ...

Gavin Chipper

Jon O'Neill wrote:I recently saw Avatar and it's terrible. Same goes for Inception. These are widely regarded as great films, but apparently not on c4c, so well done us.

Inception was utter shit! Yes!

Gavin Chipper

Ian Volante wrote:You give the people that pick the Oscar winners way too much credit.

This.

Gavin Chipper

I still haven't booked Saturday yet and noticed the "sale" price. I'm going to hold out a bit longer.

Gavin Chipper

And also the answer at some point in the future. I know we can look it up or wait for the recap, but it seems weird to leave it hanging forever. We need Spoiler Spoilers, for spoilers that would spoil the Spoilers. I was thinking that too. And I imagine one day we'll find the need for yet another l...

Gavin Chipper

I'm fairly easy about travel times on the Friday, although I don't want to get there insanely late or anything, and obviously the cheaper the better. I seem to remember that Corby did an excellent job of organising us last year.

Gavin Chipper

Anyone get the scientific 9 in round 1? I got ENTHRONE, but don't remember what the other letter was? Ok answering my own question, turns out the other letter was an I. So ENTHRONE + I = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ p.s. just as a general point, I love the "did you get the 9 in round X ..." type que...

Gavin Chipper

Tony Atkins wrote:Nice solve by Rachel in last numbers - mind you 710 was easy (75-4)x(3+7).

I think she made it look harder than it was. Once you see 79*9, you can just do (75+4)*(7+5-3) rather than (75+4)*(50/5-7)*3. (I didn't get it though.)

Gavin Chipper

Matt Morrison wrote:Graeme is ok by me. Thomas, no.

What about Deeks?

Gavin Chipper

Tony Atkins wrote:Two 9s available in R1!

Since I know you'll never tell us I've looked them up. They were MICROPYLE and POLMERIC. We're allowed spoilers here!

Gavin Chipper

Not disagreeing with you, but ODO getting this right isn't a plus in its corner as much as a minus in the ODE's... it's just a really shit bit of dictionary compiling on behalf of the ODE. I'd be surprised if there weren't errors of this magnitude in the ODO. It's all relative so anything that goes...

Gavin Chipper

Susie disallowed the Apterous-valid INDORSE. Can someone with the relevant dictionary clarify who's correct? Not that I don't trust her!

Edit - the online dictionary says US and Law, which would make it fine. But that might not be the same.

Gavin Chipper

I don't think this has come up (and I can't be bothered to check), but one problem with the change to the online dictionary is in checking older games. Obviously recaps are done there and then, but sometimes people might want to go back and check something. Will there be any sort of archive of previ...

Gavin Chipper

There's various tests statisticians might apply to the data, but like scientific tests in general, they'd really only be testing for whether it fails. You'd never say "yeah, it is random", but you might say "there's no particular reason to suggest it isn't random, so it could be"...

Gavin Chipper

This thread has just been spoiled.

Gavin Chipper

(like LEARNT which you've just used) Seems a bit weird to point out the little joke someone made and then make the same joke if you understood that it was a little joke. I understand that this is getting a bit complicated for some people. Let's go through this step by step. Susie said "Dreamt ...

Gavin Chipper

No he didn't. I'm currently going Gevin 1- Matt 0. You missed Brian's score. If you DID detect his joke then I'm at a loss as to what Brian suggested you were nit-picking. Currently Gevin 1 - Matt 1 - Brian 0 by my score. Maybe I wasn't nitpicking? Did it come across that I was because of the sente...

Gavin Chipper

You mean she should have said something like "one of the few"? That's probably what she MEANT. I think there's quite a few that take a T anyway (like LEARNT which you've just used) Yeah, sorry, just a little humour at Susie's expense. Cheap. I get my phrases mangled on stage sometimes, bu...

Gavin Chipper

Susie said "Dreamt is one of the only past tenses to take a T". A curious way of phrasing it. I wonder where she learnt that. You mean she should have said something like "one of the few"? That's probably what she MEANT. I think there's quite a few that take a T anyway (like LEA...

Gavin Chipper

COOTIES/TACKIES in round 10. Beaters? Try and watch the show, or look at the Wiki. Can't be too hard for you. :) But, if you can't be bothered, it's equallers, as opposed to beaters, mainly as by the time I watch it, all the beaters are already mentioned on here........ I actually knew, but I've no...

Gavin Chipper

James Robinson wrote:COOTIES/TACKIES in round 10.

Beaters?

Gavin Chipper

Graeme Cole wrote:I'm definitely sure I didn't read the question properly.

True, but since the new and old 15s have been mixed, it seems logical to include 9-rounders as well for completeness.

Gavin Chipper

This may sound harsh but I always think it's strange when people always go for stuff like 3 large when they're not very good at it. Or even if it's just the pressure of the studio, accept that and pick something easier. They have been quite hard 3Large ones as I only got 1 away on that one - though...

Gavin Chipper

Tony Atkins wrote:Has anyone ever done 6-3=3 before?

Nice and fitting conundrum there (nicely solved too - I thought it was "proodness").

I remember someone doing something ×1 and then being one out. This was years ago though. May Graeme can find it.

Gavin Chipper

Nice miss in round 14 too.

Gavin Chipper

Andy Platt wrote:Nice miss in round 6.

And not even within 10.

Gavin Chipper

Round 4: B Y L E I O G S H C1: BOGIES (6) C2: BOGIES (6) DC: BOLSHIE (7) OBLIGES (7) Score: 27–12 (max 29) Fancy a round of golf? Well it's all BOGIES in this round. Six a piece. Rachel put BOGIES up, but do we know it wasn't BOGEYS in one or both cases? I don't think they were asked to spell it out.

Gavin Chipper

Martin Sinclair wrote:It's impossible to get 100% max percentage if you lose, though. And no, I'm not, Jon.

For some reason I thought you were talking about numbers rounds.

Gavin Chipper

Martin Sinclair wrote:How, Gavin?

People who lost their first game but had easy numbers.

Gavin Chipper

If they can play any number of games there will be loads of people on 100%.

Gavin Chipper

Tony Atkins wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:WORNER as a beater in round whatever. It's not on Apterous but it's an adjective isn't it?
Depends if you think it is one syllable or two...

WORN is one syllable unless you're an alien.

Gavin Chipper

This may sound harsh but I always think it's strange when people always go for stuff like 3 large when they're not very good at it. Or even if it's just the pressure of the studio, accept that and pick something easier. They have been quite hard 3Large ones as I only got 1 away on that one - though...

Gavin Chipper

WORNER as a beater in round whatever. It's not on Apterous but it's an adjective isn't it?

Gavin Chipper

This may sound harsh but I always think it's strange when people always go for stuff like 3 large when they're not very good at it. Or even if it's just the pressure of the studio, accept that and pick something easier.

Gavin Chipper

I can see now why people blog about absolute shit that nobody else is really interested in, it's actually quite fun just to write stuff down for yourself. Does anyone know how I can get in touch with Clare Sudbery to apologise? Is that why you fell out? What a cunt. I won't be talking to you on the...

Gavin Chipper

Dave Preece wrote:Susie's job is hard, give her a break FFS!

Is it though?

Gavin Chipper

Jon Corby wrote:
Matt Morrison wrote:Have you PM'd him yet?
Yes.

And I've PMed back. None of this "PM'd" rubbish for me

Gavin Chipper

If the machine is purely trying to fuck you then surely it will never give you any of the bonus things if it can give you 0-3 or whatever. And of course it would never spin a red. So surely that's not actually what it's trying to do. It has to be generous enough to keep people's interest in the game...

Gavin Chipper

I like how Susie kept everyone in suspense with ROUNDISH by saying "yes" after she found the entry and then pausing for a bit. (She just as often says "yes, I didn't think it would be in" ). She is probably pausing while Damian talks through her ear piece telling her that their ...

Gavin Chipper

Ian Volante wrote:I have, and the question isn't there! I can't watch video links here.

Scotland has blocked YouTube? Or there is just no internet apart from Edinburgh city centre?

Gavin Chipper

I like how Susie kept everyone in suspense with ROUNDISH by saying "yes" after she found the entry and then pausing for a bit. (She just as often says "yes, I didn't think it would be in" ).

Gavin Chipper

Graeme Cole wrote:
Gavin Chipper wrote:What about declarations under 100?
There haven't been any besides the two I mentioned.

Oh yeah. For some reason I didn't read that bit.

Gavin Chipper

Alistair's GAUZES not allowed on Apterous but the ODO thing likes it (not that that's in use yet).

Gavin Chipper

Multiplying all the small numbers together gives 480 in the 480 round.

Gavin Chipper

Are the written lyrics true to their performance, or is part of the game that you have paraphrased them so as to prevent Googlery? I'm relying on my memory somewhat, but I'm fairly sure they're accurate. I mean, the "headed" might've been "heading" or something like that, but no...

Gavin Chipper

Jon O'Neill wrote:I'd say if the number is below 7 you should go higher, and vica versa. But it all depends really.

Definitely. Also if you wait around until somebody before you loses a load of money and then pounce. I can't believe you haven't thought of any of this???!!!

Search found 13276 matches